UN Swedish Feminists in a quandry - Rape is bad, unless statistics used to demonize migrants.

Even as Germany has grappled with a scandal over alleged sexual assaults involving migrants, Sweden has been embroiled in its own sexual assault controversy.

It erupted on Jan. 11 after the liberal newspaper Dagens Nyheter reported leaked police memos indicating that Swedish police had covered up reports of groping and the sexual harassment of young girls at a Swedish music festival last summer by refugee youths. The story implied that the police covered-up the reports in order to avoid anti-immigrant sentiment.

The attention on these particular assaults has put many Swedish feminists in an uncomfortable place. They don’t want to play down the very real threat of sexual violence that all men potentially pose, but they don’t want that threat used as a political weapons against refugees. “It is very dangerous to racialize sexual harassment,” says Tiina Rosenberg, a founding member of Sweden’s feminist party, the Feminist Initiative, and a gender scholar and professor at Stockholm University.

“There is a long post-colonial history of the white patriarchy trying to rescue the brown women from the brown men… There is a lot of [similar] racialized talk in the making today that is anti-migration, and we should be very careful about that. We should talk about all the harrassment against women. We should object and protest, but we should not make the distinction about people from another ethnic background that they are more violent than we are… because otherwise we find ourselves in a place of saying: ‘I’m not a racist, but…'”

Other Swedish feminists agreed, saying that, while it may be good that it the national refugee crisis brought attention to the violence all women face, it is wrong to describe the problem as specific to refugees. “This kind of harassment and violence has been going on for a long time in every country,” says Gudrun Schyman, a Swedish politician and spokeswoman for the Feminist Initiative, “What is common is men.”

Yet, Ebba Witt-Brattström, a Swedish feminist who now teaches at the University of Helsinki still saw a silver lining: “It is a good thing for women that at last the sexual harassment of young women that has been going on in schools and on the net, everywhere and at every time has surfaced where it can be debated by everybody.”

http://time.com/4182186/sweden-feminists-sexual-assault-refugees/
 
The only good thing that ever came out of Sweden was
60242289-24B3-44EA-9F63-19D675C1BA5F.jpeg
And I don’t think they’re even made in Sweden.
 
Last edited:
Why the fuck should feminists give a flying fuck about being pro migration? How is it a feminist issue?
It would be if they gave a shit about refugee women but they very, very obviously do not. So what else does immigration have to with women's issues? why do feminists need to take a position on it?
Intersectional feminism is dumb. Random refugee men and troons should have fuck all to do with women's rights. At least some people in the article get that.

Feminist has become an all-purpose purr word for anything that even remotely resembles left-wing social policy. It also makes an excellent motte, since if you oppose any left-wing social policy, then you oppose everything else within the feminist brand label; i.e., you’re also racist/misogynist/transphobic/etc. Of course, as evidenced in the original post, it does make for some really absurd short circuits in logic.
 
Just FYI, this is how the polls look right now


In Sweden you need 4% to actually matter whatsoever, notice how the feminist initiative (F!) cannot even manage that... The election later this year will sure be interesting, but whatever happens these people will never matter.

Sad thing is that it won't be very interesting. You see, only party in Sweden that's against immigration is Sweden Democrats with 20 % popularity, which would in other circumstances be quite good number. However, in Sweden all the other parties have made a deal with each other that none of them will ever co-operate with Sweden Democrats to form a coalition government, which in essence means that unless SD gets 51% of all votes, it will NEVER be in a position to govern. Could SD get 51% of all votes, even in theory? Perhaps, if something totally fucking weird on a massive scale happens, like ISIS suddenly resurfacing in Malmo and starting a total civil war in Sweden. But otherwise, no.
 
Just FYI, this is how the polls look right now
yougovin-LARGE.jpg


In Sweden you need 4% to actually matter whatsoever, notice how the feminist initiative (F!) cannot even manage that... The election later this year will sure be interesting, but whatever happens these people will never matter.
dick_n_balls.png

Is this one the dick n balls party?
 
Just FYI, this is how the polls look right now
yougovin-LARGE.jpg


In Sweden you need 4% to actually matter whatsoever, notice how the feminist initiative (F!) cannot even manage that... The election later this year will sure be interesting, but whatever happens these people will never matter.

Why do Swedish party logos look like things you'd see on energy drinks, nutrient bars, and start up software companies?
 
the progressive stack in action

I want to see it finally topple like a Jenga tower.:evil:

Statistics that are properly compiled do not lie. If most of your rapes are coming from migrants that paints a pretty clear picture of what the problem actually is. No amount of trying to twist it or tiptoe away from the rapefugee angle is going to change that. Stop protecting rapists because you are more concerned about being accused of islamophobia then you are the safety of women and children.
 
Statistics that are properly compiled do not lie. If most of your rapes are coming from migrants that paints a pretty clear picture of what the problem actually is.
Yeah, that's the thing, the properly compiled statistics (accounting for income and poverty and things like that) show that migrants commit only marginally more rapes than the natives.
 
Back