- Joined
- Mar 25, 2022
If I'd still been following the show at that point I would feel embarrassed for having watched it until then. What a stupid, caricatured, childlike portrayal of intellect. I've seen reviewers mention that this motivation felt poorly introduced or contrived, but people have yet to acknowledge just how... monumentally stupid this is. A fucking elementary schooler would come up with this. Really? And if you loathe humanity so goddamn much, what excites you about the prospect of reading its literature or history? Like it genuinely fascinates me that this explanation passed through the myriad filters between the writer's room and film set. What. The. Fuck.Just realized Sage had the same character arc as that monkey from Futurama who deliberately nerfed his own intelligence because he hated being smart. It would be good writing if it had actually been on purpose and that was her actual goal. It's a less stupid plan than "I am going to kill everyone so I can sit in a bunker and read books."
It would have been better off if Starr had full control over the writing, period. Unironically. There's no way someone that invested in the believable portrayal of his character's inner life would be indifferent to the rest of the script if it became his responsibility. And while the man isn't a professional writer, I highly doubt he would come up with anything worse than the abysmal rendering of Sister Sage.It would've been better off if Starr had full control of his character.
Casting Trump as an inept side character like Musk or, better yet, the comics' Vic the veep, would likely have irritated him far more than the grandeur of an overwrought parallel with genZ's most beloved villain anyway. And if it was satire they were going for, portraying him as an empty-headed avatar of corporate power would be more poignant (and accurate) than this trite cult motif they resorted to instead.if they wanted a Teump parody, they should've done what they did with Elon Musk.
I wouldn't say they don't believe in the very concept of good. I think The Boys was going for a nihilistic fun house reflection of the modern west's most grotesque cultural vices, a la the GTA series; the podcast, the tiktoks, etc. The key difference that makes The Boys tonally inconsistent, however, is that its group of characters do not succumb to the world they inhabit in the same way GTA's protagonists do, and instead try - successfully - to effect change. As a result the show also vacillates very awkwardly between detached irony and mawkish sentimentalism, going from typical "hopeless clown world" commentary to played-out revenge narrative to a "the power of love conquers all!" scene in the finale.Here I respectfully disagree because I don't think it's about them having a different view on Good, but disliking the notion of Good all together. For someone to be good, someone must have agency, must have will and that opposes their blank slate philosophy, opposes their war on people you can look up to. Everything must be about the group and the system.
Last edited: