Gofishy Headpiece
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Aug 28, 2024
Who is Parlo?
Parlo/CammyFemboy/Tobias O'Keefe is a english, roblox commentary sloptuber whos notable achievements include:
Getting into Twitter Slapfights
Ruining every drama he gets involved in.
Sending his Self-Harm photos to 13 year olds
Supporting a Pedophile (Nathorix)
Running a NSFW discord server full of minors
Grooming a minor he believed was 16.
Part 1: Natty Forsyth
Nathan Forsyth/Nathorix/Natty Forsyth/Scrimzox
Parlo, in 2022 used to associate with a pedophile by the name of Nattie Forsyth. Nattie Forsyth had multiple allegations of being a sexual predator. These allegations ranged from sending gore content to minors on a public Discord server, asking a 12 year old for nudes, exchanging nudes with a 16 year old, and even creating a NSFW twitter account and promoting it to her young fanbase.
The evidence confirming Natty as a pedophile can be found on this link.
Parlo, being fully aware of this at the time, would continue to feature in her videos, live streams, and even met her in real life.
It is unknown why Parlo chose to associate with Natty for multiple years
here are some screenshots of parlo defending Natty
Parlo now claims that they were groomed and manipulated for years, but how does being groomed make you ignore evidence proving someone's a pedophile?
PART 2- Doxxing
Nathan Forsyth/Nathorix/Natty Forsyth/Scrimzox
Parlo, in 2022 used to associate with a pedophile by the name of Nattie Forsyth. Nattie Forsyth had multiple allegations of being a sexual predator. These allegations ranged from sending gore content to minors on a public Discord server, asking a 12 year old for nudes, exchanging nudes with a 16 year old, and even creating a NSFW twitter account and promoting it to her young fanbase.
The evidence confirming Natty as a pedophile can be found on this link.
Parlo, being fully aware of this at the time, would continue to feature in her videos, live streams, and even met her in real life.
It is unknown why Parlo chose to associate with Natty for multiple years
here are some screenshots of parlo defending Natty
Parlo now claims that they were groomed and manipulated for years, but how does being groomed make you ignore evidence proving someone's a pedophile?
PART 2- Doxxing
XDgamer420 or Furryblox was a Roblox troll who created similar content to Parlo when he was a Roblox troll from 2019 to 2020. Parlo created an expose video on him in late 2020 alleging XDgamer420 to have sent unsolicited gore content to others and participated in server raiding. Parlo also encouraged his audience to mass report the XDgamer420 YouTube channel, which subsequently led to the channel being deleted.
When Parlo was doxxed in late 2022, the information was uploaded under a throwaway account with the username "xdgamer". Parlo assumed that therefore XDgamer420 must have posted the dox. Parlo then began compiling personal information on XDgamer420 with the help of 2 doxxers, SC99 and Soulless. It is important to note that both SC99 and Soulless were both minors. Parlo went on to command the minors to find the personal information of Sydiced later on, believing that Sydiced was a friend of XDgamer420.
It's important to note that although XDgamer420 and Sydiced are terrible people, Parlo only went out of his way to doxx them because he believed they did something personal to him. I also have to say how irresponsible and reckless it is to use children to do your dirty work, especially when said dirty work is trying to go after a prolific child predator, harasser and doxxer like XDgamer420, while doing nothing yourself.
Part 3: Sending Self-Harm to Minors
This section will primarily focus on the documented case involving Kirb. While Parlo was 16 at the time, Kirb was only 13. That age gap combined with Parlo’s influence and emotional instability created a situation like the one you are about to see.
This cannot be brushed aside as drama, this is serious and should be treated as such.
Twitter post about Parlo cutting himself
During the months leading up to Parlo’s break from the internet and during his steady mental decline, Parlo would send self-harm gore images of himself to multiple minors. Parlo even went into a public Discord call to harm himself while others listened, which included minors. The ages of the victims Parlo exposed this content to were as young as 13 years old. Parlo was well aware that this was unacceptable behavior and he has called others out in the past for doing similar actions.
In late 2022, Parlo would admit to continuing to send his self-harm images throughout his break. He even tried to justify it by claiming that others wanted to see his arm and people were doubting the legitimacy of his claims. These are not valid excuses as he had no need to prove his self-harming was real, especially not to children as young as thirteen years old. Despite this clearly being inexcusable, Parlo has refused to take responsibility and blames everything around him, rather than himself.
Parlo’s mental health may have been poor during the time he sent those images, but that does not excuse his actions. Parlo knew the ages of most minors he sent these images to.
Parlo has since apologized to the minor above, but by once again, sidestepping any form of accountability
this entire "apology" uses EXTREMELY manipulative wording and language to downplay what Parlo did as much as possible, and doesn't show that Parlo has learned from this at all. Overall, Parlo has proven that they are not mentally stable enough to be trusted with a platform around children.
1. Overjustification with Emotional Overload
“I was extremely mentally unwell with a million factors affecting me at once…”
Instead of directly acknowledging the harm done, Parlo instead front loads the apology with a lengthy emotional explanation. What this does is shift the focus away from what he did and place it onto his emotional state, effectively encouraging sympathy and discouraging scrutiny While it’s not accusatory or outwardly aggressive, it is still functionally a manipulation tactic. Remember that manipulation can be subtle, and it’s often masked so that you don’t even realize you are being manipulated.
2. “I didn’t know your age!”
“At the time I didn’t know your age to my knowledge…”
This is a non apology deflection. If Parlo didn’t know the age of someone in his own community, the issue is reckless, not accidental. Trying to use ignorance of age as a buffer is a form of plausible deniability, but it doesn’t negate the impact or responsibility involved.
3. Minimizing the Intent
“I never intended to maliciously do anything to you…”
This tries to center intent over impact, which is commonly observed in manipulative apologies. Whether he meant harm or not is irrelevant to the actual damage caused. This again, is a tactic to neutralize criticism before it’s even voiced.
4. “Catharsis” Framing
“...Sharing those images as a mode of calling for help.”
This reframes graphic, very triggering behavior as a justified act of coping. This can be seen as emotional blackmail, turning self harm into a communication tool. It also subtly burdens the recipient (In this case, the recipient is a 13 year old) with emotional labor that they never consented to.
5. Performative Language
“I appreciate you so much for allowing me to speak with you about this again…”
This may be opinion, but the gratitude sounds excessive and staged, as if it’s something meant to be quoted and screenshotted. Interestingly enough, this is what Parlo sent to me when I asked him about this situation. Based on what we know about Parlo, I am inferring this as image management. It’s too polished, making it appear more strategic than remorseful.
6. Lack of specific accountability
Nowhere does he say “I shouldn’t have sent those images to you.” ,or acknowledge the age gap in power dynamics or influence. This reframes graphic, very triggering behavior as a justified act of coping. This can be seen as emotional blackmail, turning self harm into a communication tool. It also subtly burdens the recipient (In this case, the recipient is a 13 year old) with emotional labor that they never consented to.
“I was extremely mentally unwell with a million factors affecting me at once…”
Instead of directly acknowledging the harm done, Parlo instead front loads the apology with a lengthy emotional explanation. What this does is shift the focus away from what he did and place it onto his emotional state, effectively encouraging sympathy and discouraging scrutiny While it’s not accusatory or outwardly aggressive, it is still functionally a manipulation tactic. Remember that manipulation can be subtle, and it’s often masked so that you don’t even realize you are being manipulated.
2. “I didn’t know your age!”
“At the time I didn’t know your age to my knowledge…”
This is a non apology deflection. If Parlo didn’t know the age of someone in his own community, the issue is reckless, not accidental. Trying to use ignorance of age as a buffer is a form of plausible deniability, but it doesn’t negate the impact or responsibility involved.
3. Minimizing the Intent
“I never intended to maliciously do anything to you…”
This tries to center intent over impact, which is commonly observed in manipulative apologies. Whether he meant harm or not is irrelevant to the actual damage caused. This again, is a tactic to neutralize criticism before it’s even voiced.
4. “Catharsis” Framing
“...Sharing those images as a mode of calling for help.”
This reframes graphic, very triggering behavior as a justified act of coping. This can be seen as emotional blackmail, turning self harm into a communication tool. It also subtly burdens the recipient (In this case, the recipient is a 13 year old) with emotional labor that they never consented to.
5. Performative Language
“I appreciate you so much for allowing me to speak with you about this again…”
This may be opinion, but the gratitude sounds excessive and staged, as if it’s something meant to be quoted and screenshotted. Interestingly enough, this is what Parlo sent to me when I asked him about this situation. Based on what we know about Parlo, I am inferring this as image management. It’s too polished, making it appear more strategic than remorseful.
6. Lack of specific accountability
Nowhere does he say “I shouldn’t have sent those images to you.” ,or acknowledge the age gap in power dynamics or influence. This reframes graphic, very triggering behavior as a justified act of coping. This can be seen as emotional blackmail, turning self harm into a communication tool. It also subtly burdens the recipient (In this case, the recipient is a 13 year old) with emotional labor that they never consented to.
Part 4: HOMOTOPIA
what a wonderful photo of Parlo!
After Parlo posted his self-harm photos on discord, Parlo's father restricted his internet access and blocked him from accessing his channel, like a father should.
lets all have a cheer for Peter O'keefe!
HomoTopia was a Discord server owned by Parlo under the CammyFemboy account. The server had a clear sexual undertone and most conversations were sexual in nature. This included discussing sexual experiences, sexual kinks, making sexual comments to other members, and sending nude images to other members.
Parlo suspiciously purged all messages sent by him on the server multiple times. This was done before and after the server was discovered. There are no archives of any messages sent by Parlo before the server was discovered.
Pornography and suggestive photos were often posted on this server. No channels were marked as NSFW. This was so that any minors with their Discord account set as underage could still access all channels. There was a channel named “#irl-media' which was dedicated for members to post photos of themselves. This was generally used by members to post revealing or suggestive photos. This included members who were underage. The legality of these images is questionable, and the members under 18 will be censored for sake of removing CSAM.Friend of Parlo and pedophile Nattie Forsyth was a moderator for the server. Nattie has continued to show no improvement and posted suggestive photos on the server full of minors. This comes only a few months after the Roblox YouTuber attempted to launch an OnlyFans account and promote their NSFW Twitter to their underage fans. Parlo still associated with Nattie Forsyth after they were called out for this.
pyro.... if only you knew...
Parlos ONLY line of defense on Homotopia is that he was not active for the 2 weeks the server, and as soon as he heard about it, he deleted the discord. this is still EXTREMELY unacceptable behavior from Parlo, Parlo still endangered minors by allowing them in a discord moderated by a pedophile. Parlo also reiterates multiple times in his response to homotopia that the discord was meant to be SFW. if the discord was meant to be SFW, it is YOUR RESPONSIBILITY TO KEEP IT THAT WAY. Parlo, by forgetting about the discord server, is directly responsible for everything nsfw that happened in it.
Part 5: The Dupe Situation
(Parlo did not know Dupe was 13!)
Dupe was a 13 year old that Parlo, being 19 at the time, had sexual and explicit conversations with from July to October 2024. Its important to note that although dupe was 13, Dupe himself claimed multiple times that he was 16 turning 17, a believed 2 year and 1 month age gap from Parlo. Despite this, Parlo shows near textbook levels of manipulation and grooming behaviors during their discord messages, to the point where Dupes age is the least of actual concern from this situation. Parlo still had a obvious power dynamic over dupe, being a youtuber dupe looked up to and a believed maturity gap of 2 years. This is still highly irresponsible behavior from Parlo, and should be called out as such.Across multiple dates, Parlo engages in the following:
- Sexually charged roleplay and fantasies, often with specific reference to physical traits, fetishes, and domination/submission dynamics
- Normalization of inappropriate behavior, downplaying boundaries and attempting to reframe things as jokes, “kinks” or mutual fantasies.
- Manipulative Framing and pressure: What’s especially disturbing is the language Parlo uses to cover this behavior. He pairs suggestive statements like “if you’re comfortable” and “I wouldn’t do anything you wouldn’t want.” with explicit coercive suggestions and emotional reinforcement like “You’re so cute.”
- Repeated proposals to meet up in person, with mentions of hotels, hugs, and makeout sessions in “femboy outfits.”
- Grooming behavior, by pushing intimacy while claiming “I wouldn’t do anything you didn’t want.” to soften the manipulation.
- Dismissal of constant concerns, saying things like “Like they know after what they can do abt it,” showing intent to override parental boundaries.
- Escalation into emotional abuse, evident in his guilt tripping, self harm threats, and framing his own mental state as the reason for this behavior.
This pattern is NOT ACCIDENTAL. It shows calculated persistence, emotional dependency, and deliberate testing of boundaries, all hallmarks of GROOMING.
These phrases are not consent respecting when paired with an imbalance of power and repeated pressure. Even if Parlo thought that Dupe was within the 16-17 age range, he was still 19 at the time with a HIGHLY INFLUENTIAL YOUTUBE PLATFORM. It gives the illusion of choice while removing the ability to genuinely say no.
Parlo, after being called out by his victim, made a video called, The Truth.
This response video is DEEPLY troubling, not only for its manipulative framing, but also for its blatant and apparent attempts to minimize, deflect, or redirect serious concerns. I have taken the transcript from this video, and I will be analyzing it here.
Parlo, after being called out by his victim, made a video called, The Truth.
This response video is DEEPLY troubling, not only for its manipulative framing, but also for its blatant and apparent attempts to minimize, deflect, or redirect serious concerns. I have taken the transcript from this video, and I will be analyzing it here.
Claim: “There was no legitimate proof provided whatsoever that I actually knew Dupe was 12 or 13.”
Reality: Even if he didn’t know, again, the way he engaged with Dupe was still inappropriate, manipulative, and at times, borderline abusive, even under the assumption Parlo believed Dupe to be 16-17. Parlo being the older and more influential one, bore the burden of caution and responsibility, something he failed to uphold.
What this tells us: Parlo fixates on legal culpability rather than actual ethical accountability. Knowing the exact age is not a relevant factor; the power imbalance, nature of the interactions, and the failure to set boundaries are equally important or more.
Claim: “Dupe lied about his age to me and everyone else on numerous occasions”
Reality: This is true, but it’s not an excuse. A 19 year old engaging romantically with someone whose age they cannot confirm, ESPECIALLY IN THE CONTEXT OF THE INTERNET, is reckless and irresponsible. If you can’t confirm someone's age, you don't proceed. End of story.
What this tells us: Blame shifting. Parlo redirects attention to Dupe’s dishonesty instead of reflecting on his own decisions besides the glaring red flags.
Claim: “We only dated for a few weeks online… We did not meet up. No [explicit images] were ever shared.”
Reality: While this may be legally relevant, and even if it is true, it does not solve the ethical issue. Emotional manipulation, inappropriate messages, and validation seeking from someone who is barely 13 is still extremely problematic. And this is assuming that this statement is true. Screenshots and archives confirm that Parlo in fact had plans to meet up. They also confirm that he had sent graphic self harm imagery and emotionally charged messages. On top of that, Parlo also purged his DM’s with Dupe, which is not something that someone with nothing to hide would do.
What this tells us: Parlo is minimizing. He’s reducing the harm to a checklist of “what didn’t happen” rather than taking accountability for the serious issues that he caused.
Claim: “I do personally apologize and take accountability for what transpired.”
Reality: This is immediately undercut by the barrage of attacks on Dupe’s character, calling him a “compulsive liar”, “manipulator”, and saying “he did it all for clout”. Accountability isn’t real if it’s followed or preceded by justification and slander.
What this tells us: This is performative accountability. A common tactic to appear responsible while rejecting any actual meaningful ownership.
Claim: “The Google Drive link… literally proves himself [Dupe] to be a liar.”
Reality: Even if Dupe lied about his age, the way Parlo acts afterward remains unaddressed. Furthermore, this fails to counter the documented pattern of emotional instability, controlling behavior, and lack of boundaries that Parlo exhibited in other DM’s.
What this tells us: He weaponizes one correct point to invalidate the entire narrative, while dodging any introspection about his own choices.
Claim: “Even if Dupe is lying, I don’t care. Parlo deserves to be dragged through the mud.” (Referring to someone else's comment)
Reality: Parlo represents this quote as if it invalidates all criticism, but it's an anecdotal straw man. Most critiques don’t rely on bad faith actors, they stem from legitimate concerns, backed by screenshots, DM’s and interviews.
What this tells us: This is a guilt by association fallacy. Discrediting critics by pointing out a single extreme statement is a manipulation tactic meant to derail legitimate scrutiny.
Reality: Even if he didn’t know, again, the way he engaged with Dupe was still inappropriate, manipulative, and at times, borderline abusive, even under the assumption Parlo believed Dupe to be 16-17. Parlo being the older and more influential one, bore the burden of caution and responsibility, something he failed to uphold.
What this tells us: Parlo fixates on legal culpability rather than actual ethical accountability. Knowing the exact age is not a relevant factor; the power imbalance, nature of the interactions, and the failure to set boundaries are equally important or more.
Claim: “Dupe lied about his age to me and everyone else on numerous occasions”
Reality: This is true, but it’s not an excuse. A 19 year old engaging romantically with someone whose age they cannot confirm, ESPECIALLY IN THE CONTEXT OF THE INTERNET, is reckless and irresponsible. If you can’t confirm someone's age, you don't proceed. End of story.
What this tells us: Blame shifting. Parlo redirects attention to Dupe’s dishonesty instead of reflecting on his own decisions besides the glaring red flags.
Claim: “We only dated for a few weeks online… We did not meet up. No [explicit images] were ever shared.”
Reality: While this may be legally relevant, and even if it is true, it does not solve the ethical issue. Emotional manipulation, inappropriate messages, and validation seeking from someone who is barely 13 is still extremely problematic. And this is assuming that this statement is true. Screenshots and archives confirm that Parlo in fact had plans to meet up. They also confirm that he had sent graphic self harm imagery and emotionally charged messages. On top of that, Parlo also purged his DM’s with Dupe, which is not something that someone with nothing to hide would do.
What this tells us: Parlo is minimizing. He’s reducing the harm to a checklist of “what didn’t happen” rather than taking accountability for the serious issues that he caused.
Claim: “I do personally apologize and take accountability for what transpired.”
Reality: This is immediately undercut by the barrage of attacks on Dupe’s character, calling him a “compulsive liar”, “manipulator”, and saying “he did it all for clout”. Accountability isn’t real if it’s followed or preceded by justification and slander.
What this tells us: This is performative accountability. A common tactic to appear responsible while rejecting any actual meaningful ownership.
Claim: “The Google Drive link… literally proves himself [Dupe] to be a liar.”
Reality: Even if Dupe lied about his age, the way Parlo acts afterward remains unaddressed. Furthermore, this fails to counter the documented pattern of emotional instability, controlling behavior, and lack of boundaries that Parlo exhibited in other DM’s.
What this tells us: He weaponizes one correct point to invalidate the entire narrative, while dodging any introspection about his own choices.
Claim: “Even if Dupe is lying, I don’t care. Parlo deserves to be dragged through the mud.” (Referring to someone else's comment)
Reality: Parlo represents this quote as if it invalidates all criticism, but it's an anecdotal straw man. Most critiques don’t rely on bad faith actors, they stem from legitimate concerns, backed by screenshots, DM’s and interviews.
What this tells us: This is a guilt by association fallacy. Discrediting critics by pointing out a single extreme statement is a manipulation tactic meant to derail legitimate scrutiny.
Overall, Parlo has proven himself with this situation that he values his career over taking actual accountability over his sexual and manipulative language towards who he believed to be a 16 year old. He would much rather pin a 13 year old as some sort of manipulative monster hellbent on ruining his career, rather than take full responsibility for the actions he did.
Conclusion
Parlo is a manipulative, incompetent youtuber who endangers minors just as much as the pedophiles he calls out. Parlo is not a person capable of holding a platform aimed towards children, and constantly abuses that platform for his own self-gratification. The only thing Parlo is worse at then doing his job, is killing himself. Parlo should not be able to have a Youtube platform, and should spend the rest of his life in a medical institution. Thank you.
Credits
This entire post is essentially a summary and reframing of the megadocument by 77, posted to kiwifarms. I claim none of the words written as my own and wish everyone to go check out 77 for further inquiries on Parlo. thank you.
This entire post is essentially a summary and reframing of the megadocument by 77, posted to kiwifarms. I claim none of the words written as my own and wish everyone to go check out 77 for further inquiries on Parlo. thank you.
This private information is unavailable to guests due to policies enforced by third-parties.
Attachments
Last edited:
