Megathread Trannies posting their L's Online - Heckin valid people posting their funny misfortunes on the internet

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
It seems like only now are trannies willing to concede that, yes, they are a very small, irrelevant minority, now that they're on the backfoot.
I notice this is especially rampant, not so much among trannies themselves, but among handmaidens and "allies".

Would you feel safe with a weeping troon spraying your kitchen? :lit:
Given how troons keep mentioning how they would deliver petty revenges against normal people, would you feel safe with a troon carrying canisters of poison into your home?
 
Given how troons keep mentioning how they would deliver petty revenges against normal people, would you feel safe with a troon carrying canisters of poison into your home?
Exactly my train of thought. 8)


Troon with Democrat fatigue? :P

1750210225487.webp
Reddit -- Archive
I'm transgender. Tell me exactly which of my rights I should support losing to not "die on this hill."

Should I be banned from playing a sport? Should I be banned from public restrooms? Should I be banned from dressing in a way I'm comfortable with? Should companies be able to fire me or refuse me service because I'm transgender?

My rights being politically unpopular has no weight as an argument, because Martin Luther King Jr. once said, “injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere.”

And when he was assassinated, he had a 75% disapproval rating.

Thanks in advance!

P.S. I'm not saying it's all Democrats. But there is a legitimate powerful caucus within the Democratic Party that believes we should cede some trans rights to appease the fascists. Namely, the powerful and influential Third Way organization.

Here is a source: https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2025/05/29/transgender-politics-democrats-third-way-00372820

Ezra Klein who has connections with the Third Way also wrote an op-ed which you can read here: https://www.nytimes.com/2025/06/17/opinion/ezra-klein-podcast-sarah-mcbride.html

Gavin Newsom, one of the front runners to lead the Democratic Party, also has backtracked on supporting trans rights. https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/cal...party-transgender-athletes/story?id=119559011
Some interesting links in the rant.
I'll forego making a political speech, but I will note he doesn't mention anything about children in his rant.
 
Troon with Democrat fatigue? :P

1750210225487.webp
Reddit -- Archive
I'm transgender. Tell me exactly which of my rights I should support losing to not "die on this hill."

Should I be banned from playing a sport? Should I be banned from public restrooms? Should I be banned from dressing in a way I'm comfortable with? Should companies be able to fire me or refuse me service because I'm transgender?

My rights being politically unpopular has no weight as an argument, because Martin Luther King Jr. once said, “injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere.”

And when he was assassinated, he had a 75% disapproval rating.

Thanks in advance!

P.S. I'm not saying it's all Democrats. But there is a legitimate powerful caucus within the Democratic Party that believes we should cede some trans rights to appease the fascists. Namely, the powerful and influential Third Way organization.

Here is a source: https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2025/05/29/transgender-politics-democrats-third-way-00372820

Ezra Klein who has connections with the Third Way also wrote an op-ed which you can read here: https://www.nytimes.com/2025/06/17/opinion/ezra-klein-podcast-sarah-mcbride.html

Gavin Newsom, one of the front runners to lead the Democratic Party, also has backtracked on supporting trans rights. https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/cal...party-transgender-athletes/story?id=119559011
Some interesting links in the rant.
I'll forego making a political speech, but I will note he doesn't mention anything about children in his rant.
Should I be banned from playing a sport?
>Not at all! NO ONE is saying that you should be banned from playing sports, Lilith…as long as you stick to the men’s leagues. Stay out of the women’s leagues, which are specifically reserved for them, and there’s literally no problem whatsoever, sir.

Should I be banned from public restrooms?
>Absolutely not! That’s a ridiculous suggestion. You have every right to use a public restroom…as long as it’s the men’s room. Since, y’know…you’re a MAN.
IMG_4115.webp


Should I be banned from dressing in a way I’m comfortable with?
>Not in the slightest! You can do whatever you want, and there’s pretty much nothing that anyone can do about that. Be a fashion disaster in public all you want, as long as you’re okay with getting looks of disgust and bewilderment. There’s no legislation being considered that would target this. If you’re referring to dress codes at work/private companies (which I suspect), simply wear some comfy men’s clothes within regulation…since, again…you’re a MAN. Otherwise find another job that’ll give you more leeway. Problem solved!

Should companies be able to fire me or refuse me service because I’m transgender?
>No way! Firings are (and *should* largely be) based on unsatisfactory performance, disruptively poor behavior, refusal to obey rules, etc. NOT on identity factors. Ditto towards service refusals, for the latter two aforementioned reasons.

In summary, the civil rights of troons aren’t actually at risk. They can absolutely play sports, use a public toilet, dress as they please, hold jobs, and utilize services. They just have to obey the same rules that the rest of us do. This just puts all of their kicking and screaming into a deliciously infuriating perspective. What they’re actually doing is whining about having to follow these social orders along with us, and tantrumming that society isn’t catering or bending over backwards to make exceptions for them to blatantly act out their gross fetish in public/intimate spaces.
 
What they’re actually doing is whining about having to follow these social orders along with us, and tantrumming that society isn’t catering or bending over backwards to make exceptions for them to blatantly act out their gross fetish in public/intimate spaces.
This. They don't want "human rights", they want power so they can force others.
 
Should I be banned from playing a sport? Should I be banned from public restrooms? Should I be banned from dressing in a way I'm comfortable with?
This nigger lol. You're not banned from playing sport, you just have to compete with others that match your biological gender. Same as everyone else. You're not banned from public restrooms, you just have to use the one that matches your biological gender. same as everyone else. You're not banned from dressing however you like, you just might be mocked in public like anyone else that dresses inappropriately.
 
Capture.webp
Link

This troon seems to hail from some sort of parallel universe. Even the tranny Redditors in the replies are fact-checking this as false: Trump's current approval rating apparently isn't even close to the lowest in US history and the bit that implies people hate anything more than trannies is just obviously false at face value.

The last line in particular stands out, though:

Ppl hate trans people because they are ignorant of us.

Quite the opposite, actually. Most people were fairly indifferent to trannies for many years, but it's now quite clear that a normie's hatred of trannies is directly proportional to their level of exposure to them. Trannies were halfway tolerable when they just kept to themselves and spent their days jacking off to loli- it's only when they emerged from their troon dungeons and started causing trouble that the backlash against them started in earnest.

Tranny visibility has only ever been a significant detriment to the tranny cause. As a community, their optics are among the worst in all of recorded history.

Ppl hate you because they know what you are now.

Self-awareness check failed.
 
Last edited:
It seems like only now are trannies willing to concede that, yes, they are a very small, irrelevant minority, now that they're on the backfoot.

That's probably the most obvious example I can think of, but I'd be very interested if anybody can think of any more arguments that they've noticed them suddenly start making.
They use that small numbers thing to amp up their claimed victimhood. 'The quality of a liberal democracy is most evident in how it treats marginalised communities.'

This means replacing words such as mother and women with 'inseminated person' and 'menstruator' to appease small group of attention-seeking, self-hating women (revolting against their femaleness yet revelling in the attention they get for doing what other women routinely do - gestating a child). Or giving precedence to men's self-declared gender identity over women's biological reality, collapsing the very basis of female safeguarding (protection from male predation).

Society is best served when run in accordance with the demands of lecherous, etiolated men who consume porn (drawn, live action, hentai whatever) compulsively.
 
This is one of the more amusing responses to my above post:

Capture2.webp
Link

They could literally send us all to Guantanamo Bay and eradicate is, without issue RIGHT NOW.

Nothing is stopping them.

So why the fuck haven't they then?

According to trannies, the US government has both the desire to enact trans genocide and the means to do so at a moment's notice without repercussion, but they just haven't gotten around to it yet because [?]

It's almost as if anything that comes out of a tranny's mouth is complete nonsense. I suppose if trannies were capable of critical thinking, they wouldn't be trannies in the first place.
 
Last edited:
Screenshot_20250618-065905.Reddit.webp
Not quite an L but I find it interesting how many pooner's date bisexual women compared to their counterparts. Of course some of them claim they're dating straight women but we all know the truth on that one.

I found these two post to be interesting:

Screenshot_20250618-070248.Reddit.webp

Lesbians in "disguise"



Meanwhile some in the trans community aren't fond of their white and gay brethren

Screenshot_20250618-071325.Reddit.webp

Seems like gays are the only ones within their community who are open about tolerance



Found a good post seems like pooner's don't like being seen as a better alternative to men

Screenshot_20250618-072716.Reddit.webp

Many in the comments are saying the same thing but this one stood to me:

Screenshot_20250618-072932.Reddit.webp

 
Last edited:
This is one of the more amusing responses to my above post:

View attachment 7521493
Link



So why the fuck haven't they then?

According to trannies, the US government has both the desire and the means to enact the trans genocide that they're all so terrified of without consequence, but they just haven't done so yet because [?]

It's almost as if anything that comes out of a tranny's mouth is complete nonsense. I suppose if trannies were capable of critical thinking, they wouldn't be trannies in the first place.

They were squawking about imminent trans genocide death camps during the Biden administration. Biden was the most trans affirming president, yet his men were about to round them up in vans any moment if you believed the T. Which reveals just how much many of them desperately want to find oppression everywhere, on top of everything. Misery breeding more misery.

Not to mention that the “trans genocide” moves that the Trump administration have put into play so far comprise more or less of:

  • “Boys have a penis, girls have a vagina”
  • “Maybe just giving people medically unnecessary medicine and surgery on demand and on the governments dime is actually a pretty bad idea after all”
  • “Forcing that on children is even worse too, who approved this”

Some genocide. The trannies themselves are doing a better job conducting one themselves between systematically forcing blockers on kids and committing suicide when it turned out chasing the dragon didn’t help them one bit.

There is a lot that can be said about the Trump administration regardless of how you feel about the man himself. But nearly all of that is either making things that should’ve been clear crystal or improving healthcare standards. The T are getting a reality check and are hating it.
 
Last edited:
Society should not allow capital D-Deaf couples to make their children deaf, or to isolate them from hearing people. Troon want the equivalent to happen with children, theirs or other people's.
Exactly. There are social changes that a group of people, even a group of people that experience some sort of systemic disadvantage, will want that are not reasonable. 'Messing with kids' is pretty high on the list. Now, I think that there are probably children that have actual gender dysphoria (though these kids have a high likelihood of having been abused in some way, though anyone conducting a study that continues to verify this is limited to saying 'trans kids are especially molestable' and never even touching the idea that there may be a causal relationship going the other way) who could benefit from getting some sort of medical care before and during puberty - but 80% of kids who have some sort of gender identity issues will simply grow out of them by adulthood.

And this is kinda borne out when you look at how the numbers of trans-identified children have risen over the last ten years - it's increased from ~0.7% to ~3.5%. Or pretty much exactly the numbers you'd expect if those 4/5 kids for whom it truly is 'just a phase' were instead encouraged to embrace their issues.
Funny enough transgenderism is also one thing one the individual doesn't need medical care but (According to TRAs) people just need to affirm and respect a trans person's gender and that's the "civil rights" that they claim to want.
Well...not quite. They want the affirmation, they want people to tell them that they totally are the thing that they like to think that they are. Unsurprisingly they have studies to show that this has a positive effect on the quality of life of trans people (which, duh - when people tell you that you are the thing that you desperately want to be it feels good, when they tell you that you aren't it feels bad).

But they absolutely want the medical treatments, and it's part of the contradictions that the TRAs are advocating for. They absolutely need the hormones and drugs and surgeries because those are all powerful, life-saving medicine for a serious condition - and yet they also want to reduce medical 'gatekeeping'. It's simultaneously serious medical treatment for a serious issue, but it should also be available without barriers.

Meanwhile, there aren't any other treatments that fall under this category. Anything that's 'major' and 'lifesaving' is going to have a lot of hoops and consultations and assessments to jump though because they make serious changes to the body, and have serious side effects. No one says that we need to remove 'gatekeeping' from getting chemotherapy, or joint replacement. Those are obviously major treatments and are treated as such with multiple visits to specialists to best determine the course of action.

There's just a lot of elements to what trans advocates have been pushing for that are either contradictory or special pleading.
A friendly reminder that PLing *doesn't* mean not sharing personal anecdotes - it's sharing personal anecdotes that make you look like a fool. If it's relevant to the topic at hand, go ahead and post if it's not retarded. Sorry for the backseat modding.
Power Leveling doesn't have anything to do with how your story makes you look, it's about keeping personally identifying details out of your posts. If a story has enough distinctive elements that someone could read it and recognize who might be writing it, that's a power level.
 
I view Trump as a necessary president, not a good or bad one. He was such a low bar to get over and yet Democrats have failed to do so twice. We need him in office so that the left will take a good look at their policies and leaders and figure out why they're out of touch, which will give us stronger choices in future elections. All of these left-wing politicians backing off of trans rights is exactly what I was hoping a Trump presidency would lead to and it hopefully continues.
 
They definitely are and are making aggressive moves to access as many possible victims as possible. I know this beyond a shadow of a doubt but cannot share how or why without powerleveling.
I believe you. Here in the uk we have had ‘grooming gangs’ (rape gangs, euphemistically names to not make people feel icky.) they prey on young girls mainly.
I used to know a woman who was sort of a social worker sort of not, but her niche was working with children in homes that were set up for very intensive help. Great staff:kid ratios, cost tens of thousands a year per kid, the stuff that should help them be safe etc.
Imagine her shock when she realised that these gangs were picking girls up from outside the home. Of course she tried to stop it. Got stonewalled at every stage.
Her view, after years trying to help, trying to make police and higher reports, was that the foster and care systems in the UK are by design a source if children ‘no one cares about’ to abuse and worse. She told me some quite specific things I won’t PL about, but it turned my stomach.
That was 20 -25 years ago, before all this. I have no trouble thinking that those same predators wouldn’t be licking their lips at these kids as a source of new meat.
When children are away from parents and family they are vulnerable. Now consider how many pushes there are by lobby groups and the state to remove children from parents. Named person legislation. ‘We will jail you if you object to trooning’ in Austria. States who can take custody if you object. Surrogacy that allows ‘ownership’ to just be changed. So many things that let you remove that protective layer.
I’d be amazed if the foster and care systems WERENT being used like this
 
Should I be banned from playing a sport? Should I be banned from public restrooms? Should I be banned from dressing in a way I'm comfortable with? Should companies be able to fire me or refuse me service because I'm transgender?
They are so consistently full of shit.

- Should I be banned from playing a sport?
Literally no one is trying to ban you from "playing a sport" - they want you play in the appropriate league.

- Should I be banned from public restrooms?
Literally no one wants you "banned from public restrooms" - they want you to use the restroom intended for the sex that you pass as. You know full-well whether you pass or not. If you don't pass, then you can't go into the women's restroom. You're making them feel fear. If you do pass, then go right in.

- Should I be banned from dressing in a way I'm comfortable with?
Literally no one wants to stop you from wearing a dress. You have never in your life been told "you are banned from wearing a wig and a dress"

- Should companies be able to fire me or refuse me service because I'm transgender?
Literally no company has ever even wanted to ban or refuse service "because you're transgender" - companies only refuse you service when the service is not appropriate. Women's spas don't want you in the sauna because you are clearly a man, and your presence in an enclosed space makes women feel uncomfortable.
 
Many in the comments are saying the same thing but this one stood to me:

Screenshot_20250618-072932.Reddit.webp
Why is that retard even going on dates with men if she's asexual? She wants to LARP as a gay man, but is then surprised that her date is talking about sex? Bonafide gays talk about dicks and asses 24/7 so why is a bisexual guy talking about pussy such a shocker (no pun intended)?

The second commenter is also dumb. First of all, there is no such thing as "sex* assigned at birth" because you cannot change your sex*. Secondly, every single person is boiled down to their sex* in the dating game. That's the whole point of being gay/bi/straight. And thirdly, you aren't being treated like a separate category. If anybody treats trannies like an "other category" it's them themselves when they deny their actual sex*.

*sex as in biological sex, not sexual activity
 
Last edited:
Why is that retard even going on dates with men if she's asexual? She wants to LARP as a gay man, but is then surprised that her date is talking about sex? Bonafide gays talk about dicks and asses 24/7 so why is a bisexual guy talking about pussy such a shocker (no pun intended)?

The second commenter is also dumb. First of all, there is no such thing as "sex assigned at birth" because you cannot change your sex. Secondly, every single person is boiled down to their sex in the dating game. That's the whole point of being gay/bi/straight. And thirdly, you aren't being treated like a separate category. If anybody treats trannies like an "other category" it's them themselves when they deny their actual sex.
Friendly reminder: Sex is a tool of oppression, always has been, always will be. Everyone knows dating is for the sole purpose of finding someone to cater to your emotional, physical, and financial needs. The bare minimum is meeting your laundry-list of unrealistic standard. What's so hard to understand? Now you have to venmo me $50 for the emotional labor it cost me to type that comment.
 
Back