I too feel this pain. I stopped going to movies in the theaters in part because the, let's call them normies aka the cishets of reality, oppressed me with shushes for laughing at garbage "dramatic" moments too many times that I figured I probably should save everyone the trouble and my money. This was back before I was enlightened by my intelligence into euphoria, now I know I should have stood up and screamed at them about how I have the right to exist and set the fash's cars on fire in self-defense.
Its this kind of thinking they have which makes me wonder if what they really want is a feudal society or something like ancient Athens, with "Queer" people firmly at the top, gaming, indulging in orgies and fetishes, philosophizing in hugboxes.
While cis or "Chud" slaves toil firmly underneath them, not being allowed into anywhere where their mere presence would offend "Queer" people.
They claim they want equality and inclusion, but only for them.
I mean, yes, they do. The entire way they outline "queer" status is that of a caste. One with mandatory beliefs and rituals. (And one the caste can shove you out of.)
Think about their central idea: that you can choose to identify into your gender identity and this becomes reality. Combine it with how they speak about the dangers of not doing this properly. Underlying it all is an unsaid argument that the cishets are
choosing and
identifying into cishetism for personal pleasure or out of ignorance. The gender euphoria you automatically feel when you
choose correctly. Because we don't care about this shit we don't really think about what they're really saying, it's like when they say "how would you like to be misgendered?" Who gives a shit? Right? But to them it's super important, it's the most important thing you can do, it's literally an existential question that you have complete control over and promises Heaven.
And what do all us cis people do? Just "accept" it. We don't "challenge" our idea of gender or what ever other shit they talk about it as this spiritually fulfilling endeavor just to think about it. No rituals. No contemplation. Basically denial of the importance of this. Especially not ordering our entire life around it. No day-to-day obsession about the task of it all.
When you speak to a religious person and you aren't their religion, or perhaps worse atheist, non-monotheistic, etc. we all understand that there's a component of a moral condemnation involved in not being their religion. For most of us in the West this is so meaningless and irrelevant that even the strong religious don't really mean it and we never think about this too much. (Online atheists generally think about it too much but I digress.) But think about the truly fervently religious perhaps in a small town, the fundamentalists everywhere, Muslims in the Middle East, etc. They may not act on anything but the moral condemnation is right there in your face and obvious. You aren't in the ingroup and that's
wrong down to your very being.
Troons do this exact same thing in all their language about the "blessings" of being trans/queer/etc. They exacerbate it in their demands that you affirm them, support their "right to exist", use their pronouns even when not present, etc. They cannot abide a rejection of their beliefs. But it's clear from their language and their rhetoric that they view cishet existence as inherently inferior. You see how they constantly want to hatch eggs. They're missionaries trying to spread the Good Word to as many as possible. Children are so important and need to be protected from cishet life because of how degraded and horrible being a cishet is. They're literally saving souls here.
But all religious societies recognize that not everyone is equally spiritually engaged. And it's definitely blasphemy to suggest this is the case. Those who are more pious
are superior, it's inherent in the logic. Their superiorority demands society not only recognize it but assist, affirm and defend it or else society suffers. The inherent logic also works so that the most pious must be the most knowledgeable, sure there are exceptions but generally we understand that priests or monks are the most pious of a religious society. These are your troon elders and popular social media/YouTube "thought" leaders. They are essential to the reproduction of the religious culture and society because they are "thanklessly" and "selflessly" tasked with the curation of it through their higher spiritual connection to the Gods of Gender.
Socially, and politically/etc., these naturally gravitate to the top of the hierarchy in all things. When it becomes rigid and institutionalized then disagreeing with doctrine becomes both blasphemous
and criminal, so does not showing proper respect, obedience, formality, etc. Lese-majeste is basically blasphemy against the head of state. Human history is full of defied leaders (down to today, even and maybe especially in popular democracy) because these two things intertwine so effortlessly. The sanctity of the Church and royalty of a monarchy are a difference in kind, but both establish that there is a natural superior caste that only The Elect can inhabit. The superiority is in their souls and revealed through Earthly means. The ultimate fusion is when a king can write his own metaphysics. That's ultimately what troons want. That and the ability to compel everyone else to see them as true.
If you have no theory of mind or belief in others having any agency, if others existence is about you and your "deserved" destiny, all the evidence you need to justify a literal caste is right there. It seems pretty obviously absurd to see wretched impious cishets as our
equals.
