I'm curious about the numbers here in the U.S.I'd hope that its a similar pattern much like the U.K.I'm also curious to know if there's any other group of people that have drastically lost support for their "rights" other than trans people?The only ones i can think of is the LGB, but i'll be honest and say that's mostly the TQ+ force teaming with them.If gays really want to save themselves they'll have to try and quickly not associate themselves with the TQ crazies.
There's an "LGB—drop the T" movement already afoot. There's also Gays against Groomers, which opposes transing kids, in part because a lot of kids who likely would have grown up to be gay or lesbian are being trooned out (see: Jazz Jennings). So it's happening, and slowly gaining traction, especially among older LGB people who are less likely to be indoctrinated into the current gender dogma.
Where are these weirdos going that they get " sir"'d all the time? I think I've gotten "ma'am" d once in my entire life, by some teenaged grocery bagger.
It's pretty rare, but I do get people (mostly retail and customer service employees) who call me "ma'am" on occasion when they don't know my name but are trying to get my attention. I'm a crusty old GenXer, so maybe my age has something to do with it. In the winter, when I'm wearing a hat and shapeless coat, I also get called "sir" if my back is turned. I'm tall, broad-shouldered, and narrow-hipped for a woman, and generally dress in "masculine"-coded clothes, so it's understandable. But the second I turn around the apologies spring forth, because it's obvious I'm a woman—and I laugh it off because it's not an issue. I'm just an old tomboy, a mannish sort of woman, and it's okay.
But for troons and pooners? I suspect they get sir-ed and ma'am-ed more frequently than the rest of us do, both by people who want to perform as good allies—and by people who enjoy passive-aggressively reminding them that reality still exists.
Why do so many trannies dress like this. I used to live with a tranny who dresses exactly like this. The rainbow/trans flag colours don't flatter ANYONE and it just screams "I'm mentally ill" more than "I'm a cUwUte female bean".
You're not 14-18, you're not goth or emo, you don't even try to wear fashion a la Goth Loli clothing where you go all the way on an aesthetic. You just look even more like a man when you think you're hiding your "male assets".
They all seem to have really weak core identities (and a lot of them are straight up Cluster Bs). There's just not much to them as people, so they aggressively signal who they are (or at least who they want you to think they are) through conspicuous consumption.
On top of that, they currently have a lot of privilege to gain by making sure everybody knows they are a member of a vulnerable, marginalized group. The kinds of troons/gendergoblins who are the most ardent signallers via flag-display are also the ones most likely to hurl accusations of transphobia as a weapon in order to get their way. So they wear the flags, and pronoun pins, and other troonwear, in order to make it clear to everyone they encounter that they aren't just another tomboy in a hoodie, or man in a dress, but a stunning and brave trans person.
Lol, yeah right. Just normal girl conversation.
View attachment 5363403
The only way a woman is going to talk periods with a troon like this is if she's a totally ruthless Mean Girl, looking to inflict the most distress and humiliation on him possible, while pretending to accept him as "one of the girls." If this actually happened, it's a thing of beauty.
Because you romanticise girlhood. Only someone who’s never had a period would think they’re fun. And if you think it was bad being sexually assaulted as a boy, being a girl probably increases your risk. Idiot.
Ask a group of women how old they were when a grown man first made inappropriate sexual comments to them, or even overt sexual overtures, and most will tell you it happened between the ages of 8-11. A pretty horrifying number got it even younger.
A lot of those women—including ones who were sexually assaulted—will tell you they were so young, they didn't even comprehend what the man was saying or trying to do until they were well into adulthood, looking back at it. But most knew just enough to know that what the man in question was doing was wrong. And most of those men were family members, friends of the family, or in positions of trust (i.e., clergy, coaches, teachers, camp counselors).
Part of girlhood, for most women, is the shock and unease of being inappropriately sexualized by adult men who you should have been able to feel safe around. As a sexual abuse survivor himself, who has apparently spent a lot of time in some form of therapy, and as clergy who has more than likely had to counsel other sexual abuse survivors, you think he'd understand that young girls get preyed upon, and more frequently than boys do, and that girlhood has a really perilous, scary dark side to it. Yet that just doesn't seem to be on his radar.
Like, at all.
He likes to go on about how sensitive and empathetic he is, yet his own account of his wife's pregnancy emphasizes his envy of her, with her discomfort glossed over. Nor does he show empathy for women afflicted with bladder infections when he talks about having one himself; it's just another way for him to latch on to a female identity.
I always spot red flags whenever a man talks about how sensitive, emotional, and empathetic he is, because inevitably that guy is going to prove himself to be manipulative, entitled, and with a vast reservoir of suppressed rage beneath that nice-guy exterior (see: male feminists; Nice Guys; Sensitive New Age Guys). And usually, all it takes for his real self to be revealed is a woman saying, "No."
The genuinely sensitive, emotional, and empathetic guys I've known never had to tell me they were that way, because it comes out naturally in their kind, considerate behavior. They also wrestle with self-doubt, and their natural male aggression, and tend to be humbled by their imperfection—so they know how prideful and arrogant it would sound to go on about how good and empathetic they are. But this wannabe troon? He's none of that, and frankly, I hope he troons out, blows up his entire life, and ends up alone, because he's a deeply shitty human and I suspect his family and congregation would be a lot better off without him.