Megathread Trannies posting their L's Online - Heckin valid people posting their funny misfortunes on the internet

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
There was this episode of Maury Povich that aired over 20 years ago that has stayed with me. Two of the guests were a trans widow and her transbian husband. She was begging him to let them divorce because, paraphrase “I am not a lesbian. I am miserable in this relationship and I am sure you are too. You would be much happier with another woman.”

He was offended because he didn’t want to be in a relationship with anyone else but his wife of over 30 years. She had to become a lesbian and stay with him! He even complained that his wife and him hadn’t had sex since he “came out.” He all but told her that she had to take the girldick on stage.

He had trooned out soon after they became empty nesters, and was the sole breadwinner during most of the marriage. It was another form of control over her, with a hint of cross dressing fetish.

I really hate that Maury eventually became a paternity suit show that thrived on humiliating white trash and niggers for most of its lifespan. I mean, hey, I enjoyed those episodes of Maury like anyone else, but MAN those earlier episodes from before…. 2005 were built different, and had a much broader selection of retards and deviants to make fun of.
 
...not to mention sexuality is a spectrum. a ton of "bisexual" guys are actually just straight guys who dealt with their internalized homophobia and realized they don't need to freak out and get defensive and feel threatened by the possibility of gayness...

To correct the troon, I think some much-needed clarity is in order here: bisexual guys are not straight guys. Straight guys do not seek out or want to see or think about men having sex with other men. Straight guys find the whole idea of sex with other men repulsive on a subatomic level. That said, most straight guys nowadays are also live and let live, you do you kind of guys, so if you're into that sort of thing, fine. That's your business. I don't care. Just keep it out of my headspace. Yuck.

Sexuality is not a spectrum, either. Human sexuality is, well, sexual since human beings are mammals and procreate by means of sexual reproduction. There is no spectrum in such a biologically driven and physiologically purposed arrangement. If you're a man who likes having sex with other men, I would bet your sexuality was skewed as the result of childhood trauma. Someone fucked with your head when they violated your body. You're not right.

Do I think you should be societally penalized for it? Of course not. See above. You do you, pal.

EDIT: Changed 'punished' to 'penalized'.
 
I'd like to title this short segment: "MY FUCKING BITCH OF A WIFE".
1740049733997.png

(R)
This is what he looks like btw

RDT_20250220_1531321114327937817957606.webp
Free winner stickers for anyone who posts him in the Troon Dungeons thread! Edit: nevermind, I did it. Something tells me I'm only going to collect barbells and Islamics.

And this appears to be him with the soon-to-be ex-wifey:

RDT_20250220_1531264857356761704029027.webp

3 days ago he posted a pic of his ass in fishnet panties on r/femboy. I shant be posting that here.
 
Last edited:
Sexist Nu-Speak update alert:
Remember when people would say "women and femmes" but people were confused cause they thought it meant "women and French women"? Remember when they came up with AMAB and AFAB but then got tripped up cause AMABs couldn't spy on AFABs in the bathroom? Remember "non-men" and how it sounded kinda like "untermencshen" so it never caught on? Well the language-butchers are back with Mage, for marginalized gender. That's right, it's "women and Mages" now. Add that one to your glossaries and remember: those who don't remember Quiltbag are doomed to repeat it.
 
See, this makes me angry. Angry enough to fedpost. I won't, but I will say any man that does this to a woman deserves to contemplate the sufferings of Christ in the most personal way possible.
Im 25 and never had a gf. Probably never will because of my autism. Meanwhile this niggerfaggot has a whole wife and kids, something I can only dream of and he throws it all away to crossdress. I would get arrested if I said how this makes me feel.
 
Im 25 and never had a gf. Probably never will because of my autism. Meanwhile this niggerfaggot has a whole wife and kids, something I can only dream of and he throws it all away to crossdress. I would get arrested if I said how this makes me feel.
Chin up, bud. I'm autistic as fuck and found a woman who doesn't mind when I sperg about 40K lore. I will never cheat on her.

Besides, look at your competition these days. They're all here.
 
Sexist Nu-Speak update alert:
Remember when people would say "women and femmes" but people were confused cause they thought it meant "women and French women"? Remember when they came up with AMAB and AFAB but then got tripped up cause AMABs couldn't spy on AFABs in the bathroom? Remember "non-men" and how it sounded kinda like "untermencshen" so it never caught on? Well the language-butchers are back with Mage, for marginalized gender. That's right, it's "women and Mages" now. Add that one to your glossaries and remember: those who don't remember Quiltbag are doomed to repeat it.
Mages? LMAO. It gives me Harry Potter vibes.
 
Mage? Isn't that already the name of an online male virgin subculture
No, no, those are wizards, from r9k.
I kinda almost miss those guys. They were funny.
Mages? LMAO. It gives me Harry Potter vibes.
Back to the drawing board, we can't let Führer Rowling genocide all the strong brave amazing Maged-out trans-laydees
Screenshot_20250220_172530_Chrome.jpg
"This includes women, men, women, women and men, women and men, and those who are otherwise underrepresented."
This category includes everyone and therefore isn't meaningful. It will fall apart just like Latinx, QUILTBAG, LGBTQAI2+, women and femmes, trans*, BIPOC, and Atheism+.
According to this definition men can be MaGes if they're in a field where men are "otherwise underrepresented" like teaching pre-K. You could MaGe it up for an afternoon if you wonder "huh, what would it be like to be a girl/boy", then revert back to cis-priveledge once you got distracted and started thinking about other stuff. Horrid German serial killer Beate Schmidt and the women he killed were all MaGes, that was just some Mage on Mage violence.
 
Last edited:
1740092455035.png

Yeah, that's for sure the correct takeaway from this...

These people are malicious. So fucking glad that more and more people are coming to their senses (or deciding they don't care if their true feelings are perceived as "wrong" by others anymore) and finally making moves to slow this weird shit down. All they had to do was leave the kids alone and not demand "more than equal" rights... fuckin A.
 
No, no, those are wizards, from r9k.
I kinda almost miss those guys. They were funny.

Back to the drawing board, we can't let Führer Rowling genocide all the strong brave amazing Maged-out trans-laydees
View attachment 7005955
"This includes women, men, women, women and men, women and men, and those who are otherwise underrepresented."
This category includes everyone and therefore isn't meaningful. It will fall apart just like Latinx, QUILTBAG, LGBTQAI2+, women and femmes, trans*, BIPOC, and Atheism+.
According to this definition men can be MaGes if they're in a field where men are "otherwise underrepresented" like teaching pre-K. You could MaGe it up for an afternoon if you wonder "huh, what would it be like to be a girl/boy", then revert back to cis-priveledge once you got distracted and started thinking about other stuff. Horrid German serial killer Beate Schmidt and the women he killed were all MaGes, that was just some Mage on Mage violence.
You don't even need right wing propaganda anymore, this shit does the job itself
 
Probably never will because of my autism.
There are lots of lonely autistic women out there! You're also young, so there's plenty of time.

Mages? LMAO. It gives me Harry Potter vibes.
Already predicting random posts explaining how "mages" is actually terf propaganda from terfy Rowling stans. Or something along these lines. They love to come up with braindead things and then accuse "terfs" for making it up, everything @Law listed has been called "terf rhethoric" over the last 5 or so years.

If you're a man who likes having sex with other men, I would bet your sexuality was skewed as the result of childhood trauma. Someone fucked with your head when they violated your body.
I did mention this somewhere else, but there actually seem to be other biological markers that make one gay or bi, people change sexuality from brain tumors, various diseases, HRT, and just general hormonal fluctuation, like teenagers who honest to God are attracted to same sex, and then literally grow out of it: their endocrine system settles down and along with that, homosexual attraction vanishes too. So it's not necessarily CSA trauma, although, I have been wondering if maybe general childhood trauma/social conditioning plays a role.

For example, something I have been pondering on a lot as of recently. There were multiple studies showing that if a child persists to be gender-non conforming after the age of 3, they're likely to grow up gay. It's true that children are gender non-conforming and only start to catch on (and try to match) patterns later on in life to conform, and that children who refuse to, grow up to be SSA. But what if homophobia actually is what, ironically, leads to SSA? What if these studies are inherently biased simply because we didn't fully understand children's psychology? After all, a lot of these studies that link gender non conformity to homosexuality that I read were relatively old, from 70s-90s. Aka the time when gay rights became a really hot topic. That also came not only with increased visibility and loudness or gay rights activists, but also with massive homophobic backlash. Those combined likely have created a whole new mass craze and definitions based on borderline OCD nitpicking of details, down to the way someone walks or stares.

In short, modern society exists in an extreme gender bubble made up of the most obscure markers of what it means to be a man/woman or straight/gay. A child (which is, again, born non-conforming*) is getting bombarded with ideas that their behavior is wrong, but they can't conceptualize why, all they hear is that boys must be like this, girls must be like that, and if they're not, they are this weird word that a child doesn't really understand yet, but nevertheless still slowly conceptualizes over the years as a boy that likes boys/girl that likes girls.

So... Here's the question that neither side wants to ask: who's to say that children aren't conditioned to be gay? Yeah, the alphabet soup agenda is blatantly grooming kids these days, no matter how much they deny it, but the opposition may not be as protective of children as they claim to be, and arguably play a huge role in gender conformity-sexuality correlation. What do you think a child will think when they're told to stop a behavior for no coherent reason? Some may listen and stop behavior and grow up to further enforce stereotype in future generations, some others may not come up with a decent explanation, keep the behavior (or hide it, but still like it) and instead internalize the idea that they're this other category that isn't a "real" boy/girl and they're actually this strange word that they don't understand yet. Which they're still conditioned into, because the world, both conservatives and libs, says that this weird word means you're "into" same sex. When in reality child's persistent non-conformity didn't mean anything, both of these hypothetical children I made up were "born straight". The second child just got traumatized and conditioned by wicked, obsessive-compulsive society, that they're gay from early childhood.


*I want to note though, just not to muddy the waters, that I don't mean here what TRAs mean when they say a child is born gender non-conforming. They erase sex altogether and insist on the idea that children don't see the difference between men and women. When in reality it's the opposite, newborns are the terfiest people on this planet: they're great at sex pattern recognition and aren't fooled by our performative dress ups, they're too pure and aren't stained by gender yet. Hence the words mama/dada by the way, these are universal words that we took from babies. No matter what you put on or whether you as a mom will chop wood or as a dad paint your nails, toddlers see past these markers and never mix up males and females, they're aware that women are "softer" and men are "bolder", which is reflected in their blabbering. Children who are raised in an actual gender-non conforming environment are much less prone to gender neurosis and dysphoria, and are also much less likely to buy into tranny shit, and, I assume, to extent homosexual behavior, since they grow up normie hetties who start their own families, they just don't look nor act like chads and stacies. I kind of wonder now if gendered socialization is some form gaslighting... And, yes, I wonder if that, along with homophobia, is what conditions some children to grow up gay. Children absorb all sorts of things and process them in a way that likely won't make any sense to a grown up.
 
See, this makes me angry. Angry enough to fedpost. I won't, but I will say any man that does this to a woman deserves to contemplate the sufferings of Christ in the most personal way possible.
My ex trooned out around 15 years ago (after we dated) and told me he was my “first lesbian experience.” I thought he was joking at the time but I’ve seen enough to know they’re dead serious when they say this.

So anyway, here’s this 38-year-old father of two and one on the way, L for everyone involved: IMG_9115.jpeg

Yes, glorious!
IMG_9114.jpeg

Most women who work from home are thrilled about not having to dress up anymore, but not this guy! Totally not a fetish though!
IMG_9109.jpeg

Again, totes not a fetish, haters!
IMG_9111.jpeg

So, how’s the wife handling it? Very accepting and mature!
IMG_9104.jpeg

Glad he’s finally focusing on himself now.
Hope his mental health gets better soon!IMG_9106.jpeg

His son’s gonna have to change his full government name, damn.
IMG_9113.jpeg
 
Not sure how many in household.
Not sure if polyamory or merely communal living.
There exist sensitivity issues that defy the usual tropes.
But one thing is 100% certain. It is an L. 8)
1740103444081.png
Reddit -- Archive
Background: I live in a house with 5+ other housemates. All trans and or nonbinary. We've been living together for over half a year and everyone is very familiar with my pronouns(it-its), my name, and my preferences when it comes to referring to me(bro, dog, dude, folks, ect). I haven't changed any of my preferences during my time living here, there's no new information to learn or memorize for my housemates.

Issue: Starting around a month ago I noticed 2 of my housemates began to use "that person" to refer to me. At first it was used interchangeable with my name or my pronouns, now it's the only thing they use for me. And all my housemates do it now, not just 2 of them.

Technically no one is misgendering me or using terms I've stated I'm uncomfortable with. It feels like a blanket avoidance of using my name or pronouns. I'm the only person who uses it-its pronouns, and identifies as more genderless than anything else. It feels weird to be the only person referred to in this way, like my pronouns are too inconvenient now even though my housemates were using them just fine for months before.

I wish my housemates checked in with me before changing the way they refer to me. Is that nuts, since they aren't misgendering me? I plan on speaking up about it but I wanted to be aware if I was being oversensitive or not.
Key concept:
... Issue: Starting around a month ago I noticed 2 of my housemates began to use "that person" to refer to me. At first it was used interchangeable with my name or my pronouns, now it's the only thing they use for me. And all my housemates do it now, not just 2 of them.

Technically no one is misgendering me or using terms I've stated I'm uncomfortable with. It feels like a blanket avoidance of using my name or pronouns. I'm the only person who uses it-its pronouns, and identifies as more genderless than anything else. It feels weird to be the only person referred to in this way ...
Sample comment (of eight so far)
Your housemates are being really disrespectful, contemptuous, and dehumanizing. It feels like they’ve turned you into an inside joke, which is incredibly unfair. Your discomfort is completely valid, and you’re not being oversensitive. You’re picking up on something real, and you’re right to question why they suddenly changed how they refer to you. Something is definitely up, and you deserve an answer.
More dehumanizing than "it"? :lit:
 
Last edited:
Screenshot_20250220-212511.Reddit.png

This ftm is close to having a mental breakdown over learning about biology.

I will start off by saying I know this is a stupid thing. It is education on a basic level and not that deep. But, in biology (also chemistry) the topic of male and female parts seem like a constant topic. In every single chapter it is mentioned. I absolutely understand that, it is part of the curriculum and just the way things are.
However, it makes me extremely uncomfortable and dysphoric. And at the same really stupid because I have to take a bathroom break to calm down, just because my teacher talked about xy and xx chromosomes for 3 minutes. It is not even done in a condescending or stereotypical manner, very objective and my teacher respects me. I feel so incredibly dumb for getting so upset about it and it’s not getting any better. Every week it is mentioned, every week it feels like a slap to my face to remind me of what I am and always will be. I find this worse than getting misgendered to be honest, I know I will be stealth one day but I will always be a trans person. It also feels stupid because it is exactly what conservatives like to point out, and it feels as if by being bothered I am proving their point (to them). I know this level of biology does not apply to trans people, and I know conservatives are not correct in their arguments but it is not as if they would care for that. A point is a point.
I also have never seen any trans person talk about it. I have 2 other trans people in my class and neither of them seem to be bothered by it. Am I the only one bothered by this? How do I cope and not fail biology??

And others also have similar stories

I also found that very uncomfortable. I was very annoyed about sex Ed also only teaching contraception for straight sex and tech classes using male and female terms to describe plugs. There are other words, so I exclusively used them as a small rebellion.
Idk if you can do much more than talking to your teacher. If you get along with the other trans students or there's a diversity committee at your school, maybe you could bring it up with them.


I had such a hard time during any class that talked about chromosomes! I remember being surprised by just how much it affected me, and all I could think about was how I would never have a Y chromosome. I could barely pay attention to anything said during the class, and I cried in class a few times.
I don't know that I have any advice, but I just wanted to say that you are definitely not alone in how you feel, and while not every trans person may be affected the same way, your discomfort is completely understandable!


This one is special:
I'm a researcher in the biological sciences, and more specifically, part of my research focused on sex-specific outcomes. I've also taken a lot of endocrinology courses and genetics courses as part of my training. In other words, I've been confronted with a lot of information about how sexes differ, and I've had to come to terms with it. And oddly enough, over time, I've come to be really fascinated by it!
Here is my advice; try to remember that the biological reality of sex that you read about in a textbook is FAR removed from human manhood or womanhood.
All sex differences exist because they were selected for by natural selection. Sex only exists in nature because it perpetuates genetic material. And how sex differences occur vary between species and reproductive strategies. That's why not all species have XY and XX chromosomes. Not all species reproduce sexually, either. It depends!
But the point is, sex differences developed for the same reason that bats evolved to have wings and fly.
There's no deeper meaning to the existence of sex or sex differences beyond increased reproductive success.
Now, what does that mean for us as humans? Well, as you might've noticed, humans have moved beyond nature in many ways. We are able to give meaning to who and what we are. We are not baby-making machines, nor are we consciously aware of the fact that our alleles are optimized for spreading our genetic code.
This is for better or worse. Humans are the ones that made social "rules" that associate with our sex characteristics. Even ones that we wouldn't even know exist without education (like sex chromosomes!). But this also means we can choose to dismantle these social rules or educational imprint.
What you need to remember is that some sex differences are malleable (like those caused by sex hormones), and others are something that we can't change, but do not have a direct effect on our daily lives (chromosomes).
Another thing that has been comforting to me is just taking a step back and removing myself from the situation as I learn about these topics. Let yourself just learn! A lot of it is actually interesting. And there's tidbits about my sex differences that I actually appreciate. For example, as you learn about XX chromosomes and their role in evolution, you will find that the XX chromosomes are actually the most "complete" version of the human genome and create a strong, robust system that is pretty admirable. In other words, XX chromosomes are just cooler, for reasons that are hard to summarize in one reddit post... :)
But anyways, I hope that you'll be able to get through this class okay. I realize how uncomfortable it can be and wish you the best of luck!

It's just so amazing at how retarded they are, but man it shows we need to constantly remind them of what they truly are.

Archive Link
 
Look this is what I mean
It’s not just wide shoulders or gap - I have both. My whole hand width fits in easily, but nobody mistakes me for a man or my breasts for fake breasts. Trannies take note.
The only thing that distinguishes the cows and the farmers is a fence.
 
Not to be too “Old man yells at cloud” here but these kids have a computer in their pocket at all times. They can listen to any music they want for free or nearly free without recording it off of the radio, watch an endless amount of tv shows instead of 4 clear channels and 3 staticky ones, and play an infinite number of video games for fairly cheap too (shit, you could just buy RDR2 and spend all of your spare time playing that and still never find everything.)

And they’re… spending their time trying to cosplay as the opposite sex? Crying in class several times over having XX chromosomes? Girl, why? You’re not being forced to dress head-to-toe in a desert.

I know every generation complains about the ones that come after them but goddamn, surely they can find better ways to waste their time. Almost anything would be better than this.
 
Back