Megathread Trannies posting their L's Online - Heckin valid people posting their funny misfortunes on the internet

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
But if is ex did get a restraining order, that means there is a whole lot of unhinged batshittery the troon has left out of this story, and I want to know what really happened. Because getting a restraining order—especially if you're a man—is not something you just do, post-breakup, as a matter of course.
That one is my guess, but -- as always -- any or all details may be lies.
 
A two-parter: a tranny's boyfriend starts to feel some of that gay panic kick in when he's slobbed the corn-cob attached to this knob. I pity this fool, but one cannot have too much pity for fools willing to cram tranny cock down their gullets - I'd rather eat live worms.
Link 1 | Archive 1
Link 2 | Archive 2

I think my boyfriend is ashamed of me.

So today me and my boyfriend (Straight) had sex for the very first time. During this My boyfriend Wound up sucking and playing with my lollipop (To put it in an appropriate way)
When we were finally done having sex and he was taking me home he told me that I couldn't tell anyone about this. People know we're dating each other but he doesn't want anyone knowing that we had sex. Especially the lollipop part I mentioned.
I feel like he's ashamed that he had sex with me. If he likes me and he wanted to do it I don't see why we should have to hide the fact that it happened.
Obviously I'm not gonna go out of my way and say that I had sex with him but he told me that I can never mention it under no circumstances. He said it's completely between us.
I asked him if maybe he didn't like it and he said he did and wanted to do it again sometime but he just didn't want anyone knowing.
He is a really nice And he's very kind. I don't get why he's embarrassed and ashamed.
Am I overreacting or is he right to feel this way?
I am so sorry If this post is TMI or inappropriate just tell me and I'll take it down.
edit: If it matters, this was both of our first times. And this talk wasn't shameful at all. He's a really nice guy I think He might be a bit insecure. I'll have to talk with him.
edit: I have a part two up I had a conversation with him about how he felt and why he felt this way.

How do I help my boyfriend realise intercource with me isn't gay

So last night me and my boyfriend Sex And he told me that I can never tell anyone. He brought up a certain part where He had played and sucked on my lolipop (To make this post more family friendly.) He told me that he felt he was gay because he liked it. I told him he wasn't gay because it belongs to me a girl But he said mostly guys have it.
He also said that he feels like he isn't the man in the relationship because mine is bigger.

He's really upset and insecure about what he did and insecure about his size. He said he doesn't feel like a man anymore because of it.
I just want him to know that he is a man and that what he did didn't doesn't make him any less or how big he is also doesn't make him any less. I also would like him to know that even If he were gay it doesn't make him less of a man.
He's really upset. To the point where he is crying.
I don't want him to feel insecure anymore.
A toad weeps because despite the crown and dress, nobody would mistake him for a princess.
Link | Archive

I've been clocked and feel awful 😭

A few days/weeks ago, I went out with my girlfriend introducing myself as a girl, dressed up and wearing makeup. And everything went well.
Today I hear my girlfriend talking on the phone with one of the people who were with us that day (a person I don't know and who met me for the first time that day). And that person asks my girlfriend, referring to me, "but is that person male or female? I didn't understand and he had a weird voice".
My girlfriend replied that I am a girl, but now I feel like shit because I don't pass. I mean... I was wearing girl's clothes and I was wearing a lot of makeup, and yet that person saw enough male stuff in me to ask that question 😭😭😭
A FTM is upset about people overestimating the power of testosterone on the female hormonal system as her body fights tooth and nail to keep systems operating as standard as possible in spite of the madness beset by the brain.
Link | Archive

Really hate how often people say “T is really powerful” in trans spaces because it just….isn’t for me

First off it really undermines and diminishes all of the damage that estrogen can/has done to trans men, it makes it seem like estrogen is less powerful and incapable of permanently mutilating our bodies. More importantly though it’s really just isn’t that powerful for everyone. 3.5 years in and I still bleed, I still am practically hairless, I have more visibly damage from estrogen than I have changes from testosterone. It simply is not that powerful.
 
View attachment 7062988

>Lesbian awareness
How’s that #girlpower working out for you, fellow lesbians?
That is Montana Representative Zooey Zach Zephyr and his "wife" Erin Tony Reed, the shitty wannabe journoscum. We have a thread on them.
I was going to comment on it being posted somewhere called "life on a council estate". I could be wrong, but isn't that English public housing? Why would American faggots be posting there?
 
Both of those guys sound like retards. The gay one for going with a tranny for his first experience. And the tranny for being all "what's the issue, this is straight sex uwu". It doesn't sound like he's being forceful in the usual way but he's essentially trying to gaslighting this poor gay/bi dude who is already having complicated feelings about the situation apparently. Just...fucking Jesus Christ.
 
I was going to comment on it being posted somewhere called "life on a council estate". I could be wrong, but isn't that English public housing? Why would American faggots be posting there?

Correct, but it sounds like a sarcastic humour page. They’ve probably posted these two lovely “lesbians” as a mockery of them.

It’s a way of saying “lesbians are so rough on council estates they look like men” or alternatively implying “weird defective people like trannies can be found on council estates”.
 
You’d think someone having a fucking existential crisis after having “sex” with you would be proof that you aren’t, in fact, a real honest true woman. I’ve never had a breakdown because pussy is pussy not cock and women don’t have dicks, people know inherently that it’s wrong, it’s instinct and built into our DNA to know that you’re freaks regardless of any mass trans-propaganda being levied at humanity
 
[ingenius modern english prose]
You guys are all so sweet and kind. This guy's older than Christopher Lee was when he finished his tour of actual black ops duty yet you're still so supportive and patient like a bunch of fathers to a child. Maybe the cure to male loneliness is "Kiwi Farms".
 
It's nice to know it isn't just Republicans getting sick of their shit.
View attachment 7062877
Reddit -- Archive

Huge amount of response agreeing. :christine:
The interesting pickle that the Democrats find themselves in, is that their best move is to abandon trannies entirely. And to even try to memoryhole (am-memoryhole?) any support they had for them. However, in doing so, they will alienate the woke sector of their base so they will likely end up losing the next presidential election. And these weird trannies particularly the millennial/or gen z ones will be around a few more decades, they are terminally online too so they’ll be a PR nightmare for Democrats for the foreseeable future.

I do wonder how the party will attempt to restructure. They are going to have to have their own “Tea Party” moment sooner or later. It’ll be interesting to watch.
 
There are born that way homos. Homosexuality in males is generally thought to exist to decrease competition for females. The degeneracy is a result of their maleness, not their gayness. A sexual market of only males, free from women's watchful eyes, who also don't need to hold back physically during sex, is going to turn into a boys' locker room that also has fucking. Lesbianism occurs because humans are a species with two sexes, so the marker/whatever that causes gay males is going to happen to some females, so lesbianism is also real, it's just a complete accident.
There is no gay gene; GWAS has been done and it puts the rate at 12% of it being heritable in twin studies. You do have the Fraternal Birth Order effect which suggests that more older brothers increases the likelihood that the younger is gay due to maternal hormones attacking the fetus.

Lesbianism, as in no sexual attraction to men, is around 0.8% IIRC, while pure homosexuals are 1.1%. Bisexuals are the rest.

"We're all dudes here"

View attachment 7062990

Pure diamond-grade trans joy, this.
Can she not poop because it's too tight, or can she not shit because she can't take it off? Inception.
My guess is the pooner in question is extremely fat and deconditioned and needs to take deep breaths while shitting. Horrifying.
42% are morbidly obese so this tracks.
FTM is upset about people overestimating the power of testosterone on the female hormonal system as her body fights tooth and nail to keep systems operating as standard as possible in spite of the madness beset by the brain.
My guess is she wanted to become a hairy man like her Bara porn and ended up as the uwu smol yaoi boy. Better up the dosage and rot your vag quicker.
 
OT but gayness being as evolutionary thing to be extra hands to help with kids or for when there are too many people doesn't make sense. Extra hands is what young women that haven't gotten pregnant themselves are around "for" and also part of the reason we live far beyond our peak fertile years. (I'd also imagine women able to breastfeed could also share duties if they wanted.) That isn't even getting into the fact for the vast majority of human existence we didn't inhabit places or periods where humans were so overpopulated that this would be a selection pressure. It's incredibly costly to be pregnant, give birth, and raise children and before modern medicine about half died and many mothers died in childbirth, there was hardly any extras! If there is competition for resources mammals will compete for those resources with violence, thus culling excess population through killing them or them just being starved. Further, in more primitive societies babies are swaddled and carried around with their mothers and otherwise able to goo goo ga ga while she weaves baskets, forages, etc. and then follow around the womenfolk taking after them or the menfolk depending on sex. The idea you need extra people around because you need to go to your 9-5 is a modern, tech society heavy conception, and therefor again wouldn't be an evolutionary selection pressure (in primitive societies the social group is together looking after everyone all the time so groups of mothers can fair just fine by themselves, i.e. childrearing was parallel to day to day goings on and not something you had to "fit in" the way a lot of people do now). And then on top of that why the fuck would such a thing select for males to be the extra hands??? You could argue far better women with low libidos who prefer not pairing with a man would fill this role. It makes far more sense.

People are gay because of rape/abuse or erotic target misfiring. It's not any more complicated than that. There is no evolutionary or biological advantage to it. It's just a thing that happens. I think people want to create theories for such things just because they're insecure about how "legit" it is. I really don't know. But their reasoning has never made sense to me. It really isn't until relatively recently that males have had such a close role in "nurturing" of infants and toddlers as opposed to taking their older children along to learn, for a variety of reasons, nature doesn't select for males of most species to be infant nurturers.
 
The left has somehow, even though it sounds insane and shouldn't be possible, ideologically captured the state of being homosexual so they're forced to come to the fringes of society, just like in the olden days when they were forced to drink at illegal gangster pubs.
I mean that ones easy. The whole thing is identity as politics. Which is more accurate to say identity as ideology.
The left as a group has branded themselves very successfully as the group for "victimhood" identities, which is to say "not white or straight".

The more your identity as a person is wrapped up in what you are, and what you are as a victim, the more you're just going to default to a My Team mentality. Then you add into that the feeling of being a part of a group of people like yourself. You're suddenly participation trophy special and all you had to do was be who you were in the first place. Oh and then you get to save the world by just not liking white people, and oppressive straight people.

It's an inclusive religion where the loudest are celebrated the most. It's kind of the opposite on the right where your identity is mostly being ignored or set aside for other interests/beliefs. Plus let's not ignore that the left and it's ideologies promote homosexuality (and degeneracy) in general. I mean we just kind of assume that homosexuality is a genetic ingrained thing, but we ignore how children can be groomed and taken advantage of. How different is a 4th grade teacher telling you about this stuff compared to some weirdo online? I think the left is creating way more gay people than it's just picking up by happenstance.

The right might be accepting of it when it happens, but it's not promoting its growth. You might accept your gay son but you're going to view that as a subpar outcome. It's like abstinence and being flippant about sex. The more you normalize this stuff the more people are going to do it because there's no social reason not to.

The biggest problem is that Conservative Republicans don't like dealing with racial identity or weaponizing it. They are still very vulnerable to it as a tactic because mainstream Conservativism doesn't build a strong "white" cultural identity. It tries to work around this by using an inclusive "American" identity, but functionally it's treated like a religion. The biggest advantage the left has in this regard is that it's ideology is very easy to understand.
 
Most likely, this troon's ex did not get a restraining order, and he's just lying for pity (as troons do).

But if is ex did get a restraining order, that means there is a whole lot of unhinged batshittery the troon has left out of this story, and I want to know what really happened. Because getting a restraining order—especially if you're a man—is not something you just do, post-breakup, as a matter of course.
The other thread has the boyfriend's side of the story. Not only did the pooner talked about killing conservatives all the time, she actually carries "a large dagger" wherever she goes. Not sure if these are sufficient for a restraining order, but the boyfriend should indeed stay the fuck away.

And the boyfriend calls her "she".
 
OT but gayness being as evolutionary thing to be extra hands to help with kids or for when there are too many people doesn't make sense.
I've never heard this one, just that gay men reduce competition for mates. "Extra hands to help with kids" makes no sense as an explanation for anything.
 
Back