True Crime Fans / True Crime Influencers / True Crime Community / #TCC / #actually necro / CrowdSolving - Shipping killers, profiting off the dead, necrophiles, and so much more!

[The Skeksis Emperor]

trying to dodge that her cheating had anything to do with his suicide, and more like he was just a junkie fuck.

Eh, if he started doing drugs because she cheated instead of just divorcing then he's a certified retard who deserved everything he got. I think it's more likely that he had a drug poblem and she said fuck it, let me blow up our lives completely. Bad decisions all around.

Regardless, the suicide was his decision, I don't care if she sucked 37 cocks. He had kids but was spending the last few months farming asspats on a snark sub. What a wanker. I'll give Stephanie some credit for keeping her drama off her YouTube channel, until he ended himself and she had to address it. Those poor kids though.

 

[Crex Crex]

I don't need podcasters explaining to me why such and such criminal is basically a poor victim.

There are a lot of true crime fags who clutch their pearls when criminals are sentenced to death. Yeah man, I think my next 40 years of tax money are well spent buying meals and medicine for serial killers and pedophiles who will never get out of prison.

 

[TokiBun]

There are a lot of true crime fags who clutch their pearls when criminals are sentenced to death. Yeah man, I think my next 40 years of tax money are well spent buying meals and medicine for serial killers and pedophiles who will never get out of prison.

I support the death penalty I just wish they did firing squad over lethal injection. Cheaper and less likely to fail.

 

[My cravat doesn't flutter]

There are a lot of true crime fags who clutch their pearls when criminals are sentenced to death. Yeah man, I think my next 40 years of tax money are well spent buying meals and medicine for serial killers and pedophiles who will never get out of prison.

The average time spent on death row is roughly 20 years, so a death sentence isn't exactly a quick fix.

 

[urr13 account]

The average time spent on death row is roughly 20 years, so a death sentence isn't exactly a quick fix.

They need to be carried out immediately after sentencing. Judge bangs hit little hammer thing, one of the guards walks up a puts a few bullets in the criminals skull, everyone is home in time for dinner.

 

[stupid frog]

Stephanie has a weird vibe, but I didn't expect any of that. How old are her kids?

 

[My cravat doesn't flutter]

Stephanie has a weird vibe, but I didn't expect any of that. How old are her kids?

I believe she was a teen mom, but I'm not sure how old she was when she had her first.

 

[TexasRanger]

They need to be carried out immediately after sentencing. Judge bangs hit little hammer thing, one of the guards walks up a puts a few bullets in the criminals skull, everyone is home in time for dinner.

Are you aware of the impressive legal stunt reps (even those pro death penalty) from my state have pulled off to save a man 90 min ahead of his execution they think is actually innocent (after 20 years on death row)? That happened on Thursday of this week. (Personally, I think the guy is quite possible guilty,see his rap sheet. In which case he should spend the, at least, next 15 years on a prison farm)

Sorry but you're not much different from commufags explaining to me why Communism absolutely does work - on paper, as long as you basically ignore reality.

In Texas, a life sentence right now means no parole for 40 years. What more do you need? Euthanasia, wasting an average of 3 mio $ per lethal jab so you can virtue-signal to the "muh tough on crime" crowd? This crap needs to end asap.

Nah. I'm a pro-gun, pro-police, pro-army whole-life conservative.

 

[Sargon's wife's son]

The only woman I've ever met who liked true crime broadcast was a stereotypical housewife she was also half black and the most insufferable anti white racist but simultaneously acted like the most stereotypical middle class liberal white woman so that's the type of people who like true crime in my mind

 

[74164978231]

Pro-Sue video:
https://ghostarchive.org/varchive/EG0PtwYJU0M

Is this a tranny?

 

[Red flag]

Eh, if he started doing drugs because she cheated instead of just divorcing then he's a certified retard who deserved everything he got. I think it's more likely that he had a drug poblem and she said fuck it, let me blow up our lives completely. Bad decisions all around.

Regardless, the suicide was his decision, I don't care if she sucked 37 cocks. He had kids but was spending the last few months farming asspats on a snark sub. What a wanker. I'll give Stephanie some credit for keeping her drama off her YouTube channel, until he ended himself and she had to address it. Those poor kids though.

I read through most of their timeline and my god, I never realised just how much I hate redditors.

The endless pearl clutching, moralfagging and complete ass-tier evidence preservation drove me nuts. Fuckloads of posts making assertions about factual events such as arrest, divorce, affair photos, etc, yet refusing to show evidence because MUH PRIVACY and everyone is just supposed to take their word for it? Showing the obituary is DOXXXXING.

And when Stephanie gets her lawyer to nuke your entire little gay community for "coordinating attacks on her with her ex", everything will be completely gone forever and it'll be her receipts against your vague memory of talking about stuff that you hope you'll remember instead of archiving.

Good job, retards.

 

[Dr. Butt]

I read through most of their timeline and my god, I never realised just how much I hate redditors.

Oh, on that Unresolved Mysteries reddit they say some of the most retarded shit. They're on a page dedicated to discussing crime - some of the worst crimes ever committed in the USA - and seem to have zero knowledge of what happens in the day to day life of a drug addict, street hooker, or violent alcoholic.

This post's comments are mostly "wow, what a mystery! who knows what could have happened! how sad for his family. it's just so unsolvable!" The post is about a 14 year old boy who was 6 foot and looked about 20 and quite handsome for the standards of the time, who liked to smoke marijuana and huff paint and glue. He'd had a fight with his father over his annoying but minor/inexperienced drug "teen in the suburbs" behaviour, and took the bus into San Francisco the next day while he was still angry.

Can none of them remember a day when they were 14, pissed off, and took the bus into town in their best goth outfit to "I don't know, hang around record stores, go to a coffee shop, talk to cool people and come home whenever I want because the train runs til 4am"? And what could have happened if they went just a few blocks too far past that park with the heroin addicts and garbage everywhere, or to talk to someone who had cigarettes when he went out behind the shop?

 

[Crex Crex]

Oh, on that Unresolved Mysteries reddit they say some of the most retarded shit. They're on a page dedicated to discussing crime - some of the worst crimes ever committed in the USA - and seem to have zero knowledge of what happens in the day to day life of a drug addict, street hooker, or violent alcoholic.

The writeups and comments in that subreddit are so melodramatic, I think it's actually disrespectful. You can just tell these people (most of them trannies and cat ladies) want to pose as super-duper empathetic and altruistic for asspats.

 

[WalterSullivan]

I fucking hope most of those tcctwt whores are actually poorly disguised feds.

 

[DarkEmoMario64]

Just gonna leave this here

Archived

 

[Ctrl + Z]

"What do you want for Christmas, sweetie?"
"I want a BTK coloring book!"

 

[Zemblan Physics]

I’ve been an aficionado of true crime since the early 90s (I’m old). Back then, just about the only material out there was books by non-fiction authors like Ann Rule and Aphrodite Jones & “based on a true story” fiction like In cold blood (Capote) and The Exectioner’s Song (Mailer), plus some annual publications by police and forensic services. There were some tv shows like Forensic Files but they were hard to catch.

Ann Rule’s book about Ted Bundy is very good. She used to work with him at a suicide prevention call center (yes, really) and what she does in the book is something that you’re just not allowed to do anymore in true crime: she describes Bundy as a complex human being and not as a one dimensional murder machine (which he kind of was, but still…). I recommend that book to anyone interested in TC, but it’s a chilling read. I remember getting up and checking the locks multiple times while reading it.

Now, during the late 90s and aughts the victim’s rights movement really took off, and this is probably an unpopular opinion, but it has ruined true crime. These days every show (don’t have time for non-fiction books anymore) consists of about 40% cliches about the victim - she always lit up the room, lived for her kids (even when she obviously was a coked up street hooker), would give you the shirt off her back and the town she lived in was a great place to raise children. The rest of the show is pearl clutching, police using the Reed technique and stings to bully suspects into confessing and “therapists” calling every suspect a narcissist and interpreting body language like faggots.

I. Don’t. Like. It. I liked true crime because I’m interested in human behavior. Imo, if you’re unlucky enough ANYONE can be the victim of a crime, but not everyone can become a t&h murderer . There are reasons for people’s behavior, even if it’s just a genetic quirk, and I am curious about those reasons. That aspect of true crime is absolutely gone, and I’ve given up on the genre. All that’s left are indignant wine moms and grifters who think “he was a narcissist” is a deep statement.

(Thank you for attending my TED talk. Bring on the top hats.)

 

[Not A Bunny]

I. Don’t. Like. It. I liked true crime because I’m interested in human behavior. Imo, if you’re unlucky enough ANYONE can be the victim of a crime, but not everyone can become a t&h murderer . There are reasons for people’s behavior, even if it’s just a genetic quirk, and I am curious about those reasons. That aspect of true crime is absolutely gone, and I’ve given up on the genre. All that’s left are indignant wine moms and grifters who think “he was a narcissist” is a deep statement.

I gave up on True Crime also. Because I also am fascinated by human behavior. But it's hard to listen to people talk about crime if they're not going to talk about it in a clinical, compartmentalized sense because they will eventually use it to make sure YOU know how virtuous they are.

There are reasons to talk about the victims, particularly if they fit a "type", but I don't want to hear editorializing about it from people who use these stories for a giggle. Those are people that are exploiting those victims for their wine-time shenanigans, and they need to act like if they don't pull back and tell you what kind of virtuous person the victim is, then no one will think they aren't virtuous themselves, instead of the kind of sick fetishists that giggle at True Crime.

And then there are the sick fucks that actually care about that. I'm not saying all True Crime followers are abuse victims, but there is a noticeable correlation between them and frequently use it as their own outlet for "justice" and "validation", so if you don't do True Crime by their rules, you're going to get flayed by these nonces for being insensitive and not paying attention to their pain.

 

[Autistic Asparagus]

I gave up on True Crime also. Because I also am fascinated by human behavior. But it's hard to listen to people talk about crime if they're not going to talk about it in a clinical, compartmentalized sense because they will eventually use it to make sure YOU know how virtuous they are.

There are reasons to talk about the victims, particularly if they fit a "type", but I don't want to hear editorializing about it from people who use these stories for a giggle. Those are people that are exploiting those victims for their wine-time shenanigans, and they need to act like if they don't pull back and tell you what kind of virtuous person the victim is, then no one will think they aren't virtuous themselves, instead of the kind of sick fetishists that giggle at True Crime.

And then there are the sick fucks that actually care about that. I'm not saying all True Crime followers are abuse victims, but there is a noticeable correlation between them and frequently use it as their own outlet for "justice" and "validation", so if you don't do True Crime by their rules, you're going to get flayed by these nonces for being insensitive and not paying attention to their pain.

I agree the MUH VICTUMS RITES movement ruined a lot of true crime content. Especially by introducing the term “victim blaming” into the mix. Which means you’re not allowed to mention if the victim was living a high risk lifestyle and if you do, you have come up with excuses for it like their goldfish dying when they were 5 years old sent them on the wrong path.

I do want justice for victims but if we are going analyze crime properly we have to understand what makes a person high risk for being a victim and not excuse that type of behavior at all.

The no victim blaming also applies to their families too now. My favorite example of this is Mitrice Richardson “case.” (Case in quotation marks because no one killed or victimized her) Her family literally claims she was perfectly mentally stable one day and even left the house that day normally with no signs of anything wrong. They 100% push the story that she suddenly went absolutely bonkers for no reason at all as soon as she got into her car. You’re not allowed to mention that her family was probably ignoring signs of mental illness and/or drug use for years until it reached a breaking point. You’re also not allowed to say that literally no one in her family gave enough of a shit about her to go get her out of jail right away and they just want to use her as their cash cow.

Semi-related note: A True Crime podcast that I listen to for comedy reasons is “The Vanished” because the host almost exclusively covers missing drug addicts and/or sex workers now. Her podcast is interview based by taking to family and friends of the missing. The podcast should be called “Making Excuses For Terrible People” because the loved ones go out their way to excuse every wrong doing of the missing person. The loved ones will also be in extreme denial that the missing person likely od’d in an alley somewhere and is a John/Jane Doe in a morgue and come up with hilarious conspiracy therories.

 

[Zemblan Physics]

I do want justice for victims but if we are going analyze crime properly we have to understand what makes a person high risk for being a victim and not excuse that type of behavior at all

It’s the classic denial of how things actually are and instead making judgments from how someone thinks they ought to be. Women ought to be able to be hookers without risking their lives, sure, but in the real world there are sick fuckers out there no matter how you spin it.

The shows and families also always portray victims of domestic abuse as totally blameless, and I guess in a sense they are because nobody deserves getting beat up (well, I can actually think of a couple of cows that deserve it), but often these women have children that have to witness the abuse, or are abused themselves, and that’s where my sympathy ends. In most cases, there actually IS a way out and if you have kids you make sure they’re safe. But no, can’t say that, that’s victim blaming! Which actually robs these women of all agency, but that’s the accepted narrative anyway. Smdh.