Zoosadist Valerie / Connor Roundy / Hypnotist Sappho / Succubus Sappho / Vin R. Wolf / f1r3fr0st / V3xArray / r00tlulz - Chair Force "mommy dom" pedophile zoophile furry troon, cult leader who grooms children into zoophilia, wannabe hypnotherapist fetishist who exploits his clients, chairman of a fraudulent bestiality non-profit

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

This was posted 7 months ago by Sappho, the amount of brainless fucking mouthbreathers in the comment section that support her wish her luck etc deserve to get swatted.
also is Sappho back fr fr? or is this another autistic fuck roleplaying as a dogfucker online for attention?
probably another autistic playing as a dogfucker again. Although, they have ties to numerous people that may be friends with sappho
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: crackers breakfast
*super long sigh*
look at the account without getting eyecancer. its impossible.

claims sappho is in the dc server, seems sketchy tho
 

Attachments

  • image_2025-01-21_104550452.png
    image_2025-01-21_104550452.png
    876 KB · Views: 134
Last edited:
Archive

View attachment 6865520

According to a comment left in a reply by Dyno, Sappho's new alias is s6. Here's the Dyno TikTok account.


Why not include the account ID for HypnoticDyno?

Archive

View attachment 6865520

According to a comment left in a reply by Dyno, Sappho's new alias is s6. Here's the Dyno TikTok account.


Why not include the account ID for HypnoticDyno?
Do we have any prior history of Dyno? Their Discord account is rather fresh, not to mention the profile picture they use was the same one that Sappho had used on her Telegram account. Not saying that Sappho and Dyno are the same person but that is pretty weird.
 
a manipulator and self acclaimed mastermind in the dyno sappho server. HypnoFloof, a annonymous user we haven't found yet. Pretty sure we can get a 50 page document with all the aliases this kid has .
https://discord.gg/4fbm4NjS - Hypnotist Sappho Gateway.
 
hey i think the whole op was scrapped. They kinda just nuked their server and they stopped posting as well as adding "project has finished" in their bio
1737749412037.png
 
hey i think the whole op was scrapped. They kinda just nuked their server and they stopped posting as well as adding "project has finished" in their bio View attachment 6899363
i really hope that this dogfucker will include commiting suicide in one of his DFE's
ik most of the paraphilia having niggas are stupid but holy shti coming out is zoophile is both horryfing and hilarious
also
>tried to cover up his grooming shit by saying "im not attracted to humans"
>ends up in mastodon circles who are willing to fuck children too (alongside animals)
 
I talked to the Dyno guy questioning why they would support a zoophile and shit like that while trying to stay as "friendly" as you can be with a literal zoophile supporter. Sadly they deleted their messages before I could screenshot them or anything. (I know I will be bashed on for not imidiently backing everything up and saving it, my mistake, sorry.) All that I have got is this screenshot of them having "RIP DYNO" in their bio. Dyno also said they are 15 and were constantly acting stupid like "whos sappho?" "what grooming?" I doubt they are 15(perhaps 15 mentally. the fuck do I know)
 

Attachments

  • image_2025-01-25_191810655.png
    image_2025-01-25_191810655.png
    28.6 KB · Views: 47
I talked to the Dyno guy questioning why they would support a zoophile and shit like that while trying to stay as "friendly" as you can be with a literal zoophile supporter. Sadly they deleted their messages before I could screenshot them or anything. (I know I will be bashed on for not imidiently backing everything up and saving it, my mistake, sorry.) All that I have got is this screenshot of them having "RIP DYNO" in their bio. Dyno also said they are 15 and were constantly acting stupid like "whos sappho?" "what grooming?" I doubt they are 15(perhaps 15 mentally. the fuck do I know)
yo, Their new discord is nikita. And, im trying to get their new discord server rn.
1737927887220.png
1737927980614.png
 
what is it with hypnosis/hypnotists and constantly doing fucked up shit? i need eyebleach after clicking on this thread. ive just noticed that most hypnotists in the furry and pony fandoms have so much drama and constantly fucked up morals.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bezibank
what is it with hypnosis/hypnotists and constantly doing fucked up shit? i need eyebleach after clicking on this thread. ive just noticed that most hypnotists in the furry and pony fandoms have so much drama and constantly fucked up morals.
Anyone at all into furry/mlp shit has a 100% of being a weird freak that you shouldn’t be around. Not exactly shocking that adding hypnotism to it makes it even worse. A zoophilic, most likely autistic pervert that likes to dress up as cartoon animals who also is into trying to control people’s minds… Wouldn’t really expect a morally sound person
 
Sappho In question, though once a prominent figure on the internet, will not be making a return. Their presence, which once shaped communities, has come to an end, and it's clear that no amount of nostalgia or longing will bring them back. Yet, some individuals online choose to impersonate them, not out of genuine intent but as a way to relive and reminsce on old memories of a time when that person's voice and personality brought something special to the online world. These impersonators are not truly reviving the individual but are simply clinging to the past, unable to accept that Sappho's era has passed. In doing so, they can only reinforce how much that figure impacted them, while simultaneously highlighting that no one can truly recreate what was unique to that person's presence.
 
@Galeocerdo Disliking a statement doesn't alter its truth. Just because someone disagrees or dislikes a certain fact doesn't erase its validity or impact. Reality is not subject to personal preference; it is simply what is, and no amount of disapproval can change that. The truth remains steadfast, whether we embrace it or reject it, and our emotional responses to it do not affect ts existence. Ultimately, we must face the truth as it is, regardless of how we feel about it

And @Galeocerdo exposing someone's flaws, mistakes, or secrets doesn't make you morally superior, especially if you were once close to them. If you were friends with the person you're exposing, it means at some point, you accepted them despite their imperfections. Turning around and broadcasting their faults doesn't erase your own involvement or association with them. In fact, it often says more about your character than theirs, showing that you were willing to keep their confidence until it no longer served you.

Standing by while those close to you commit horrible actuojs makes you complicit, even if you didn't personally take part. Turning a blind eye or staying silent allows their actions to continue, and in doing so, you enable their behaviour. If you truly disagreed with their actions, you would of distanced yourself, or held them accountable instead of maintaining your relationship with them. By choosing to stay, whether out of loyalty, convenience or fear, you became part of the problem. At some point, inaction becomes just as damaging as the wrongdong itself. You only made moves once you had been wronged, you're doings were nothing much of revenge. You are a lolcow
Sappho In question, though once a prominent figure on the internet, will not be making a return. Their presence, which once shaped communities, has come to an end, and it's clear that no amount of nostalgia or longing will bring them back. Yet, some individuals online choose to impersonate them, not out of genuine intent but as a way to relive and reminsce on old memories of a time when that person's voice and personality brought something special to the online world. These impersonators are not truly reviving the individual but are simply clinging to the past, unable to accept that Sappho's era has passed. In doing so, they can only reinforce how much that figure impacted them, while simultaneously highlighting that no one can truly recreate what was unique to that person's presence.
 
"Sappho won't return" ~likely Connor Roundy the pedozoo

If it isn't Connor Pedozoo Roundy, it's likely one of the minors in his "Sappho's Drug Chat" adding to the tally of people who come to Connor's defense and if it somehow a Connor Roundy the Pedozoo defender, please leave Connor's sight, he is likely grooming you or trying to groom you by love bombing you.
 
Last edited:
"Sappho won't return" ~likely Connor Roundy the pedozoo

If it isn't Connor Pedozoo Roundy, it's likely one of the minors in his "Sappho's Drug Chat" adding to the tally of people who come to Connor's defense and if it somehow a Connor Roundy the Pedozoo defender, please leave Connor's sight, he is likely grooming you or trying to groom you by love bombing you.
I'm not supporting this person or defending their actions - I'm simply saying they aren't worth the attention they're getting. Giving them constant focus, whether through outrage or discussion, only amplifies their presence and influence. Some people thrive on controversy, snd by engaging with them, even negatively, you're still contributing to their relevance. Ignoring them and redirecting energy toward something more meaningful is often the best way to show they don't matter. Acknowledging their insignificance isn't the same as excusing them - it's just refusing to give them more power than they deserve.

There's no point in giving someone more attention when everything important about them has already been leaked. At this stage, any new discussion is just repeating what's already known, keeping their name relevant without adding anything meaningful. If the truth is out, people can form their own opinions without constant reminders. Continuing to talk about thek only fuels unwanted drama. Instead of dwelling on someone who has already been exposed, it's better to move on and focus on things that actually matter.

While it may seem pointless to continue giving soneone attention after everything important about them has been leaked, an ongoing discussion can still serve purpose, but this thread has now shifted its focus to posting information about others who are only potentially connected. Instead of staying true to its original purpose, it has turned into a space for speculation and guilt by association. While some of these connections might be relevant, many are thin at best. This shift not only dilutes the credibility of the original exposure but also risks harming innocent individuals. When the focus moves from facts to assumptions, the thread becomes less about accountability and more about unrelated drama. If you have something to post here, please make it about Sappho.
 
I'm not supporting this person or defending their actions - I'm simply saying they aren't worth the attention they're getting. Giving them constant focus, whether through outrage or discussion, only amplifies their presence and influence. Some people thrive on controversy, snd by engaging with them, even negatively, you're still contributing to their relevance. Ignoring them and redirecting energy toward something more meaningful is often the best way to show they don't matter. Acknowledging their insignificance isn't the same as excusing them - it's just refusing to give them more power than they deserve.

There's no point in giving someone more attention when everything important about them has already been leaked. At this stage, any new discussion is just repeating what's already known, keeping their name relevant without adding anything meaningful. If the truth is out, people can form their own opinions without constant reminders. Continuing to talk about thek only fuels unwanted drama. Instead of dwelling on someone who has already been exposed, it's better to move on and focus on things that actually matter.

While it may seem pointless to continue giving soneone attention after everything important about them has been leaked, an ongoing discussion can still serve purpose, but this thread has now shifted its focus to posting information about others who are only potentially connected. Instead of staying true to its original purpose, it has turned into a space for speculation and guilt by association. While some of these connections might be relevant, many are thin at best. This shift not only dilutes the credibility of the original exposure but also risks harming innocent individuals. When the focus moves from facts to assumptions, the thread becomes less about accountability and more about unrelated drama. If you have something to post here, please make it about Sappho.
This is the same thing that pedozoo Connor Roundy did when he claimed to be leaving the internet, multiple times. This thread was scarcely bumped prior to you coming to dump this whole spiel about pedozoo Connor Roundy being gone from the internet for real this time when Connor wants this thread to be bumped because he thrives off attention. This thread was barely even getting bumps prior to Axie's discovery of a Discord server praising pedozoo Connor Roundy.
 
some individuals online choose to impersonate them, not out of genuine intent but as a way to relive and reminsce on old memories of a time when that person's voice and personality brought something special to the online world.
“Something special” in this case = creepy pedophile/zoophile. Also….
Lol fat
 
“Something special” in this case = creepy pedophile/zoophile. Also….
Lol fat
I want to make it clear that I don't support this person or their actions in any way. I only started talking about them after watching videos that detailed what they did, which gave me a better understanding of the situation. My intention was never to defend them but to discuss what I learned. However, I've noticed that the thread dedicated to providing updates about Sappho has strayed from its original purpose. Lately, it seems less about holding them accountable and more about dragging in unrelated information or focusing on speculation rather than facts. At this point, it no longer serves its intended use and has become more of a space for unnecessary drama than meaningful discussion.

The thread that was originally created to expose a specific person has now become a space primarily by their past friends and affiliates. Instead of being a hub for accountability or new relevant information, it seems to have turned into a gathering place for people who were once known to Sappho. This raises questions about the forum's true purpose - whether it's still about spreading awareness or if it has just become a space for former insiders to air grievances, shift blame, or distance themselves from their past associations. When the majority of discussion comes from those who were once part of the same circle, it blurs the line between genuine accountability and personal vendettas.

@younevershould I use a fresh account to post on the thread because I don't want to have any affiliation or lasting connection to it. My goal was simply to share my thoughts without tying them to any exisiting accounts or online presence. Using a new account ensures that my involvement remains limited to that specific post, preventing any unnecessary assocations or assumptions about my stance beyond what I actually said. It's a smart and practical approach because it keeps my online presence seperate while allowing me to engage in the discussion without any unwanted ties to the forum or its ongoing discourse.

@Spoonomancer I'm not saying that Sappho is 100% gone forever, but it's clear that the forum dedicated to them is essentially dead. There haven't been any meaningful updates about them, and the only recent discussion revolves around their fans creating a seperate forum to glorify them. Instead of continuing to expose or hold them accountable, the thread has lost its purpose and activity, with no new relevant information being shared. At this point, the focus has shifted away from the person themselves and more towards the actions of their remaining supporters, making the thread a shell of what it once was.

All posts on the thread should focus solely on crucial information about Sappho as it was created to discuss, rather than unrelated topics or speculation. The purpose of the forum should be to provide meaningful updates, evidence, or discussions directly related to Sappho. It dilutes the forum's credibility and makes it harder to find the important information that actually matters. If the goal is to expose or document Sappho's actions, then every post should contribute to that purpose rather than becoming a space for unnecessary information.
 
Back