I'm not supporting this person or defending their actions - I'm simply saying they aren't worth the attention they're getting. Giving them constant focus, whether through outrage or discussion, only amplifies their presence and influence. Some people thrive on controversy, snd by engaging with them, even negatively, you're still contributing to their relevance. Ignoring them and redirecting energy toward something more meaningful is often the best way to show they don't matter. Acknowledging their insignificance isn't the same as excusing them - it's just refusing to give them more power than they deserve.
There's no point in giving someone more attention when everything important about them has already been leaked. At this stage, any new discussion is just repeating what's already known, keeping their name relevant without adding anything meaningful. If the truth is out, people can form their own opinions without constant reminders. Continuing to talk about thek only fuels unwanted drama. Instead of dwelling on someone who has already been exposed, it's better to move on and focus on things that actually matter.
While it may seem pointless to continue giving soneone attention after everything important about them has been leaked, an ongoing discussion can still serve purpose, but this thread has now shifted its focus to posting information about others who are only potentially connected. Instead of staying true to its original purpose, it has turned into a space for speculation and guilt by association. While some of these connections might be relevant, many are thin at best. This shift not only dilutes the credibility of the original exposure but also risks harming innocent individuals. When the focus moves from facts to assumptions, the thread becomes less about accountability and more about unrelated drama. If you have something to post here, please make it about Sappho.