- Joined
- Apr 27, 2026
Slavery is objectively retarded from an economic standpoint. It's an absolutely dogshit way to run an economy.and all the slopes have to start somewhere, and thats because people tend to agree that certain measures are beneficial even though further down the line they could result in negative consequences.
take niggers for example, things went from gathering cotton to the modern pavement ape - and yet even on the farms i bet some people will say that the abolition of slavery and segregation werent mistakes.
What do you think is better? A system that encourages skill growth, allows for economic returns (via wages, therefore growing the economy), a productive workforce through incentive structures, and allows for free-market adjustments via workplace mobility and labor supply/demand, or a system that requires you keep a ton of costly, low IQ, unskilled workers you have to spend a hell of a lot of money on keeping alive and in line while still only being ~30-60% as productive as paid labor? Why do you think the South barely industrialized while operating under a slave economy? It encourages short-term gains over long-term success, which is the exact mindset that keeps Africa in the stone age.