Western Animation - Discuss American, Canadian, and European cartoons here (or just bitch about wokeshit, I guess)

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
16 is also not legal in most states. Its covered under Romeo and Juliet laws in most states that protects the older party from statutory rape prosecution when there is a CLOSE age gap (typically 2-4 years) with underaged minors. For example, it protects an 18 year old who is dating a 16 year old.

IT DOES NOT protect a 30 year old who is dating a 16 year old. Trying to defend John K. just because you like his work is just being a parasocial weirdo. Just separate the art from the artist and enjoy the fucking art you freaks.
The people on the Scott Pilgrim threads on 4chan also use similar arguments to justify dating Knives
 
The people on the Scott Pilgrim threads on 4chan also use similar arguments to justify dating Knives
I recall the actual comic framing it as something pretty fucked up.
...and then the game had multiple jokey(?) endings where Knives ended up with people who were too old for her.
Note that I stopped reading SP by Chapter 4 because everyone was so fucking annoying and I couldn't take it anymore.
 
Those are an urban legend. There is nothing in the books officially which does this it is up to the judge and traditionally it isn't held up.
No, they are a categorization of laws to protect close aged relations between legal adults and minors should an arrest be made that vary state by state.

For example, California has no such categorization and it is always statutory rape. Texas has a scaled set of this categorization that protects legal adults at age gaps that vary as the minor is closer to legal adult age. There are codified laws on the books where such categorization exists though, saying its an urban legend is just flat out wrong.
 
Your average defender of John K on 4chan:
View attachment 9051400
>most states
Notice how it's always "most states" and not "his state" and they never elaborate on those laws they cling to so much. In fact, let's disregard this for a moment; John K was accused of sexually harrassing children as young as 14, well outside that range. Anon's excuse is completely ineffective.
>not a crime
In California, it is counted as discrimination, which is illegal. But also, you don't need to be told that sexually harassing children is wrong because you innately know that it is wrong unless you come from some third world shithole where 40 year olds marry 10 year olds and nobody cares.
>No proof
It's not that there's no proof, it's that the statute had passed by the time it was reported vs the time the claims were said to have occurred, so he wasn't investigated. You can't say there is or isn't proof if there was never an investigation.

Diagnosis: Anon is retarded and/or brown. Doctor reccomends immediate, complete, and total euthanization
 
>most states
Notice how it's always "most states" and not "his state" and they never elaborate on those laws they cling to so much. In fact, let's disregard this for a moment; John K was accused of sexually harrassing children as young as 14, well outside that range. Anon's excuse is completely ineffective.
>not a crime
In California, it is counted as discrimination, which is illegal. But also, you don't need to be told that sexually harassing children is wrong because you innately know that it is wrong unless you come from some third world shithole where 40 year olds marry 10 year olds and nobody cares.
>No proof
It's not that there's no proof, it's that the statute had passed by the time it was reported vs the time the claims were said to have occurred, so he wasn't investigated. You can't say there is or isn't proof if there was never an investigation.

Diagnosis: Anon is retarded and/or brown. Doctor reccomends immediate, complete, and total euthanization
Then there's this shit
Screenshot_20260524-185030_Chrome.jpg
 
Back
Top Bottom