X vows to 'robustly challenge' Australia order to remove stabbing posts - Court order demanded the company remove some posts related to the stabbing of a bishop in Sydney.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
X vows to 'robustly challenge' Australia order to remove stabbing posts
Reuters (archive.ph)
By Reuters Staff
2024-04-20 21:19:30GMT

SYDNEY, April 20 (Reuters) - Social media platform X said on Saturday it would challenge in court an order from an Australian regulator demanding the company remove some posts related to the stabbing of a bishop in Sydney.

Police charged a boy, 16, with a terrorism offence on Thursday for the alleged stabbing of Bishop Mar Mari Emmanuel at a church in the New South Wales capital on Monday. Footage from the scene showed the boy restrained by the congregation and shouting accusations that Emmanuel had insulted Islam.

X's Global Government Affairs posted on Saturday that the Australian eSafety Commissioner had ordered it "to remove certain posts in Australia that publicly commented on the recent attack against a Christian Bishop".

The regulator demanded that X "withhold" the posts or face a daily fine of A$785,000 ($500,000), the company said, without giving details of the posts at issue.

It said, "X believes that eSafety’s order was not within the scope of Australian law and we complied with the directive pending a legal challenge.

"The eSafety Commissioner does not have the authority to dictate what content X’s users can see globally," X said. "We will robustly challenge this unlawful and dangerous approach in court."

Asked about X's comments, an agency spokesperson cited an eSafety Commissioner statement that it was working to ensure X's compliance with Australian law.

"We are considering whether further regulatory action is warranted," the regulator said.

The regulator, a government body that works to remove harmful online content, sent legal letters in March to social media platforms including X, demanding information about their efforts to stamp out terrorism content.

The bearded Emmanuel, bishop at the Assyrian Christ The Good Shepherd Church, is a social media star with followers around the world but also a divisive preacher. He has made fiery criticisms of homosexuality, COVID vaccinations, Islam and U.S. President Joe Biden's election.

($1 = 1.5584 Australian dollars)

Reporting by Sam McKeith in Sydney; Editing by William Mallard
 
The bearded Emmanuel, bishop at the Assyrian Christ The Good Shepherd Church, is a social media star with followers around the world but also a divisive preacher. He has made fiery criticisms of homosexuality, COVID vaccinations, Islam and U.S. President Joe Biden's election.
Reuters found a way to "shame" the victim of the stabbing.
 
Weren't these the niggas demanding Josh to also take down the Christchurch shooting? I know the kiwi police went a step further and wanted the NZ IP's that saw the video.

It was the New Zealand government that wanted the video removed from the Farms since the shooting happened in their country, not Australia. Glad Elon is telling tyrannical governments to go fuck themselves when they overreach just like Null did.
 
Weren't these the niggas demanding Josh to also take down the Christchurch shooting? I know the kiwi police went a step further and wanted the NZ IP's that saw the video.
E-safety didn't exist then, ISP's voluntarily blocked access to KF, 4chan and 8chan, as well as several other sites. In one of the Christchurch threads you can find a photograph of someone holding a list of the sites known to be blocked.

What E-safety did do relating to KF is investigate some complaint from an Australian troon. Unfortunately any documents pertaining to that are deleted from their website since last december - they have a 1-year availability period for FOIA disclosures but are available if you email them for it.

It's time for Elon to pull up any roots Twitter has in Australia and tell them to fuck off whenever they order anything.

DARE them to block all of twitter and see how well that goes over with their voters.
The voters will agree with it. The niggercattle willingly want their own government to muzzle them into submission because they can't understand how it could backfire on them. Polling indicates Australians 'want toughter hate-speech laws' - clearly unaware of what a feelgood question like that will entail as Scotland has seen.

The same Sydney Morning Herald that's moralising over Xitter hosting the videos uses stills from videos of the attack in their articles about it - they even credit the specific account. The ABC? They use footage of the attack and just cut out the actual stabbing when broadcasting it; it's a not-so-veiled attempt from the Fourth Estate to brow-beat social media into supporting their failing businesses and ability to control narratives.

Already there's rumblings that the parliament will bipartisanly vote in favour of legislation forcing social media companies to hand over a portion of their profits to prop-up news companies that were over-reliant on social media for audience retention.
 
I think the Court haven't heard of the Streisand effect , trying to remove any posts related to that stabbing might have the opposite effect of what they wished.
The Kikes that own the west really don't want the goyim waking up right now. Meanwhile the imported White-replacements that hate desert ethno-states are starting to look a bit like Frankenstein's golem to the Juden. They will do anything and everything to win this generation.
 
Polling indicates Australians 'want toughter hate-speech laws' - clearly unaware of what a feelgood question like that will entail as Scotland has seen.
It’s going to be interesting to see if the aussies willingly get invaded by the chinks in the coming decades after they pass all sorts of anti-racism laws.

“At least I’m not a -*gargle* “ they’ll say as they get pushed into the sea by the new residents of glorious Chinkstralia.
 
Article says he complied and took the content down.
Pretty sure the journos are lying like they did last time this happened. Musk doesn't take down content, he geoblocks it and goes to court.

Why does Twitter care what a third world country has to say. Just ignore it lol?
They'll get a judgment against him and have the US enforce it.

I mean, Russia is at war, and we've recently banned a teenage figure skater and are trying to imprison a grandpa Playstation hacker on our enemies' say-so. Even if the current US government didn't hate Musk, globalist governments are inherently cucked.
 
Hey, this story sounds familiar! Twitter (now known as X) really is the Kiwifarms of social media.
 
It’s going to be interesting to see if the aussies willingly get invaded by the chinks in the coming decades after they pass all sorts of anti-racism laws.

“At least I’m not a -*gargle* “ they’ll say as they get pushed into the sea by the new residents of glorious Chinkstralia.
Nah. They kicked out Huawei and cancelled 4 belt and road projects. China is not happy.
 
Back