❄️ Snowflake shoe0nhead / June Lapine / June La Porta & Armoured Skeptic / Gregory "Greg" Fluhrer - A poor man's Boxxy: rejected by Vaush, disowned by /pol/ for burning coal, sleeps in a dog's bed surrounded by trash, and her ex-boyfriend.

  • Thread starter Thread starter HG 400
  • Start date Start date
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
She still supports a party whose whole ideas can't be sustained without violence. She still doesn't get that's the only way in which Bernie's policies can happen.
 
Anti Lolicon Bomb said:

She has had enough.
I find this very interesting because this is one of the most palatable left wing creators of the last decade.
Click to expand...
Excuse me Show but isn't there someone you forgot to ask before posting that?
Vaush-2185478786.webp
 
She's basically correct that "Nazi" at this point just means "person I dislike." At best, it means "white person who I dislike". Even though she is left wing she's rejected enough mainstream shitlib orthodoxy that by the logic of "it's okay to kill Nazis" shitlibs are justified in killing her. Not that I think that they have any serious plans to do this, but I think she is upset enough that she isn't thinking things through that much.
 
Manly_Brony said:
I posted in the Kirk thread that she saw that they were celebrating the assassination of the right's golden retriever so I believe she's genuinely afraid that she's on a hitlist somewhere.
Click to expand...
I mean it's pretty unlikely, but then Charlie Kirk was the most affable and non-violent Conservative pundit you could hope to find. Plus she's an attractive woman on the Internet which usually attracts weird obsessive guys. I don't think she's in danger but I get why this would spook her. Even aside from any disgust she rightly feels at the people celebrating it. The Left need their own Trump figure to seize control of the Establishment Left the way Trump seized control of the Establishment Right. I'm not sure what that would look like. RFK Jr. probably.

Tasty Tatty said:
Said this before and will say it again: if getting married and having a kid automatically made a shitty person a good person, then abusive parents wouldn't exist.
Click to expand...
It doesn't guarantee that you'll "become a good person" but it very often does give you a better perspective and priorities in life and that's a big instigator to be a better person. Though personally I've never considered Shoe a terrible awful shitty person anyway. This thread has always been about 30% people just angrily declaring that she's not pretty and they wouldn't date her for as long as I remember.
 
TruffleSpark said:
Even though she is left wing she's rejected enough mainstream shitlib orthodoxy that by the logic of "it's okay to kill Nazis" shitlibs are justified in killing her
Click to expand...
You can call yourself a leftist and reject every left wing economic policy without any pushback whatsoever. You cannot, however, call yourself a leftist without worshipping black people, supporting child sexual mutilation, or wanting to immigrate White people out of existence. Ergo, that is what leftist means.
 
Blarmed&Dangerous said:
You can call yourself a leftist and reject every left wing economic policy without any pushback whatsoever. You cannot, however, call yourself a leftist without worshipping black people, supporting child sexual mutilation, or wanting to immigrate White people out of existence. Ergo, that is what leftist means.
Click to expand...
I want to say the main pillars of modern leftism are transgenderism, mass migration, this weird infantilization of black people where we are expected to just let them get away with crimes because it would be cruel and unusual to hold them to the same moral standards as white people, and the right to goon (access to pornography and prostitution, rape games on Steam). You can join a local communist party and get away with saying unions are labor aristocracy, Cuba is state capitalism and US military intervention is justified on human rights grounds, and you won't get kicked out. You cannot say that humans are a sexually dimorphic species. I think Shoe has a pooner best friend so she's very "trans rights" but aside from that she mostly has what would have been considered normie left wing positions (not even far left, just centre left) 10 to 15 years ago. But what passes for left wing politics these days has completely moved on from stuff like universal healthcare and building public transport.
 
She's an egalitarian. That's what being a leftist is. Their resentment comes from being bitter because they don't have what we have, either money or being able to get married.
 
Pew_Pew_Slash said:
What's the stats on men and boys now? Apparently 60-70 percent are alone and not thriving in either of those areas. Clearly an insignificant percentage.
Click to expand...
I know that, but that's not what or how the left sees it.

Also, these men see the situation different. Anyone can be bitter over what they're lacking, but the left specifically wants the government to become the provider of the things they're missing, even partners. That's the logic behind the push for things such as body positivity: "society says I'm beautiful, so you have to like me".
 
Pew_Pew_Slash said:
What's the stats on men and boys now? Apparently 60-70 percent are alone and not thriving in either of those areas. Clearly an insignificant percentage.
Click to expand...
The Gender Inequality Index used by the UN and other global agencies uses male performance on a given metric as the reference value and caps the ratio at 1.

So if women are doing half as well as men, that's 50% gender equality, but if women are doing twice as well as men, that's 100% gender equality.
 
BetterFuckChuck said:


Jack Saint, friend of pedophile Patricia Taxxon, had a melty over Shoe not liking murder. Unironically told her to "be humble", coming from the guy who thinks he fixes leftism by defending capeshitView attachment 7928051View attachment 7928056View attachment 7928049View attachment 7928045
Calls her anti-woman because she doesn't like hr or something. Rest of his tweets are whining about israel as always
Click to expand...
This dude is such a a bitch he has to throw a fit on a platform he knows sh0e won't see. Why is it that a woman he doesn't even know has such an iron grip on his testicles? C'mon Jack do this on X and really speak truth to power.
 
Raven of the Burning God said:
The Gender Inequality Index used by the UN and other global agencies uses male performance on a given metric as the reference value and caps the ratio at 1.

So if women are doing half as well as men, that's 50% gender equality, but if women are doing twice as well as men, that's 100% gender equality.
Click to expand...
For anything profoundly stupid or wrong, I like to double check in case somehow it's not as bad as it sounds. I couldn't find it stated as baldly as you put it on their page so I did a little digging. It is in fact a rigged game as you suggest. One thing I found is this which shows its hand:

1758116022550.webp

Maternal deaths and pregnancies are part of the equation. Meaning that inherently women would have to be over represented in employment and seats in parliament (another metric) in order to offset what the UN regards as an inherent handicap in the fact they give birth. They regard it as the job of employers to compensate women for being the ones to give birth. That's the implication presuming you consider inequality to be a bad thing.

I couldn't see the cap in the general sense, but as part of that health weighting I describe so it is a component of it. That said, I can't follow the logic of what they're doing:

https://hdr.undp.org/data-center/documentation-and-downloads ("Calculating the Indices" link)

1758118018390.webp

So there's the cap you speak of in the reproductive health index. And if accessing the spreadsheet you can see it used as part of the overall indices quite clearly. I don't pretend to be a statistician though I know what a Harmonic Mean is so I'm probably ahead of the layperson. I can't figure out why their numbers of meaningful. I follow the maths, but not the point of it. The greater the "Account of Inequality" is relative to "Treating genders equally", the greater the GII value. But... "Treating the genders equally" doesn't treat them equally and is in fact derived from the same numbers as the "Accounting for inequality" column. I think it's trying to make it a factor of the absolute numbers and the ratio of the sexes. But... I don't see how this actually means anything. Both numbers contain the inherent bias against men based on the ideology that having children is an inherent negative to be offset.
 
The meme of Shoe being a typical woman and conforming to the beliefs of her partner are probably true but I'm just glad she ended up with a conservative Catholic in the end. Nothing she has posted since marrying him has been anywhere close to as cringe as she was when she was with Greg. Some of her newer videos are actually pretty decent. I watched them through Asmongold reacting to them and was pleasantly surprised.
She just needs to ditch the "Guise I'm totally a leftist!!!" thing. She never was. At this point it's either a cope or a grift.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom