💰 Grifter "Mad at the Internet" - a/k/a My Psychotherapy Sessions

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
ok. That message he showed to imply he wasn't having weird rape role-play, or normalizing it for her, literally implied the opposite. She said she had never done it before, and didn't know what to call it. As if to imply she did that because he introduced it to her. She definitely seemed into it in his screenshot, but it doesn't really show that as a complete lie.

edit: yeah, the match screenshot thing was an obvious lie. Even in the actual interview it was a noticeable lie.


HE GOOONED!
 
Last edited:
sometimes I think about all the times I sincerely prayed for dumb shit like rare loot drops in video games like OSRS and wonder if maybe I used up all my wishes for the rest of my life.
Never gonna get a bowfa without a prayer
 
Half way through it and there's a few things I think Turkey Tard does that make me question his claims. At one point he says "I'm not hammering that vagina like Steve mining diamonds" that alone is enough to proclaim him guilty but then he shares a text where she describes their first time as rapey and she hasn't experienced something like that before but liked it, that implicates he's violent generally during sex. As for her being a gooner in messages, women adopt things their man likes, they will get into hobbies and shit the guy is into and so on, if he was being violent and rapey she probably played into it to get his attention.

Also, he mentions the blackmail thing but doesn't mention Kai confirmed there was a blackmail folder.
 
Also, he mentions the blackmail thing but doesn't mention Kai confirmed there was a blackmail folder.
Yeah he seemed to completely ignore that entire part of things for the most part. Unless I missed it. He didn't seem to want to go down that road with the accusations.

For these refutation videos, all they have to do is call enough question onto the accuser, to make them seem untrustworthy. If they pull that off, they can pretty much walk away in the free, because their fans want to believe it isn't true from the beginning. So even if there is truth in the accusations, if he can show a different narrative that's all he needs.

At least that's my observation from the many other similar "youtube dramas" I've watched over the years.
 
Last edited:
Yeah he seemed to completely ignore that entire part of things for the most part. Unless I missed it. He didn't seem to want to go down that road with the accusations.

For these refutation videos, all they have to do is call enough question onto the accuser, to make them seem untrustworthy. If they pull that off, they can pretty much walk away in the free, because their fans want to believe it isn't true from the beginning. So even if there are truths in the accusations, if he can show a different narrative that's all he needs.

At least that's my observation from the many other similar "youtube dramas" I've watched over the years.
Finished it now, and I don't really trust him. On the blackmail thing he mentions multiple times they sent him nudes and asks why they'd do that if they were worried about the recordings and the answer is simple, if they already knows he has their nudes what's the difference of him having a few more? He still doesn't mention Kai confirming the blackmail folder.

The other odd thing is both Katie and Sacramento mention violence in relation to sex after their first encounter in the texts he showed. If he's not into some kind of weird BDSM kink shit then why does it seem to be the norm in his first encounters with women? I can easily see him intentionally making it sound like the opposite in texts because that's a written record and he doesn't want to express it there so he says the opposite when they bring it up.

At another point he mentions Sacramento asking if he'd be ok fucking her on her period, and asks why she'd ask about blood if he's fucking her bloody each time. The obvious answer is that period blood and blood from sex is different, one which is caused by her, the other by him which he'd be in consent of.

Finally, if he's not a sexual degenerate, why is he fucking his way across the country with a bunch of BPD esluts?
 
I love the way Pay pay pay knows his whales don't mind being humiliated cause he's so entertaining.

I live in rural western Canada, and just this morning picked up an armload of fucking trash poojets beside our beautiful river. Before I was wise to how robotic they are I caught them in the act, yelled at them and waved their trash at them angrily (I didn't want to go to jail) and they just looked at me like a fly with zero expression on their retarded faces.

It was a chinese meal, so if I catch them again they're getting sweet and sour sauce poured in their back seat.


The Indian info dump from PPP about shit I wasn't even aware of has made me blackpilled even more than I already was. (Clocks)
 
Yeah he seemed to completely ignore that entire part of things for the most part. Unless I missed it. He didn't seem to want to go down that road with the accusations.

For these refutation videos, all they have to do is call enough question onto the accuser, to make them seem untrustworthy. If they pull that off, they can pretty much walk away in the free, because their fans want to believe it isn't true from the beginning. So even if there are truths in the accusations, if he can show a different narrative that's all he needs.

At least that's my observation from the many other similar "youtube dramas" I've watched over the years.
The worse part off this is not the retarded comments on youtube and jokes that 100% where going to happen.
But the fact that half off the Tom thread joined "SHE LIED,SHE IS A BPD WHORE,SHE IS CRAZY" showed that people even here fall into this,as JOsh said he 100% planned the response along with his friends and Herrera even gave Sacramento Linkedin and full name to the world.
Not even Josh who did retarded shit like helping Crhis Chan at all did that kind stuff for a friend.

Finished it now, and I don't really trust him. On the blackmail thing he mentions multiple times they sent him nudes and asks why they'd do that if they were worried about the recordings and the answer is simple, if they already knows he has their nudes what's the difference of him having a few more? He still doesn't mention Kai confirming the blackmail folder.

The other odd thing is both Katie and Sacramento mention violence in relation to sex after their first encounter in the texts he showed. If he's not into some kind of weird BDSM kink shit then why does it seem to be the norm in his first encounters with women? I can easily see him intentionally making it sound like the opposite in texts because that's a written record and he doesn't want to express it there so he says the opposite when they bring it up.

At another point he mentions Sacramento asking if he'd be ok fucking her on her period, and asks why she'd ask about blood if he's fucking her bloody each time. The obvious answer is that period blood and blood from sex is different, one which is caused by her, the other by him which he'd be in consent of.

Finally, if he's not a sexual degenerate, why is he fucking his way across the country with a bunch of BPD esluts?
The fact that this thread does an actual discernation off Tom video/response but the Tom thread collapsed to the point of no return seems to confirm that a lot people who still watch Tom and like him have accounts all over here as well.
To be fair i also used to be subscribed to him and watched his videos but started getting SUS with shit like the cheating defense,¨her prostate¨ and finally unsubscribed when i found about sacramento, in fact while watching his last video before the response i saw people commenting about it LOL.
 
Idk why but people in the bigbunjeeeeee thread in multimedia section think that this guy called tharries (who made a video talking about bunje's review on rtd2's doctor who season 1) looks like null but crippled
ElUDA1Mq_400x400.jpg

I barely see a resemblance
 
It's just the eyes, brown hair, and big forehead.
Your right, there is something semblance, maybe its because tharries has no facial hair, he looks more like jersh with a clean shave
Screenshot_20260202_174044_YouCut - Video Editor.jpg

Also in the bunjeee thread we've been dogpiling on tharries (because he's an autistic cripple whose super deep into doctor who, as in he's met a bunch of the actors, including the nigger doctor and his companions, russell t davies, he has been featured in the damn show and the magazine, as per said: hes deep into this show)
 
Idk why but people in the bigbunjeeeeee thread in multimedia section think that this guy called tharries (who made a video talking about bunje's review on rtd2's doctor who season 1) looks like null but crippled
When I saw the picture I thought you stumbled into the wrong thread for a second.

a lot people who still watch Tom and like him have accounts all over here as well.
I've said this before somewhere. But I learned about the forum during the Chris Chan mom fiasco, but never joined or anything. It was later during drop kiwifarms, and Turkey toms, and some of the other commentary youtubers that got me to start paying attention to it, and join the forum after watching mati for a while.

However Turkey Thomas said it at the end of his video. THIS NIGGA GOONED!

"You're right I did goon"
- Turkey Tom 2026

Tom time to rope. Its over little bro. No sweeping it up now.
 
#believeallwomen
as far as im concerned turkish tom is a violent sexual predator.
nothing he says or does will change that.
of course he will deny it and make excuses, why would he admit it?
his jewtube bucks are hanging in the balance, he knows that more than anyone else.
 
ok. That message he showed to imply he wasn't having weird rape role-play, or normalizing it for her, literally implied the opposite. She said she had never done it before, and didn't know what to call it. As if to imply she did that because he introduced it to her. She definitely seemed into it in his screenshot, but it doesn't really show that as a complete lie.

edit: yeah, the match screenshot thing was an obvious lie. Even in the actual interview it was a noticeable lie.
Yeah that's what sort of does it for me; lying about that is so nefarious. Especially knowing he could disprove you. The only reason you'd do that is to tactically try to damage his perception as quickly as possible. Their whole thrust was that he basically flashbanged a normal girl with his goonerism.
 

Attachments

  • Rodeo Clown.png
    Rodeo Clown.png
    226.4 KB · Views: 4
The fact that this thread does an actual discernation off Tom video/response but the Tom thread collapsed to the point of no return seems to confirm that a lot people who still watch Tom and like him have accounts all over here as well.
To be fair i also used to be subscribed to him and watched his videos but started getting SUS with shit like the cheating defense,¨her prostate¨ and finally unsubscribed when i found about sacramento, in fact while watching his last video before the response i saw people commenting about it LOL.
Checked the thread and it's a dumpster fire.

One thing I saw in there and that Turkey Tard really hammered on was the Lolita poster, and the synopsis he read about the movie/book. For those who haven't read it or haven't heard a breakdown about it, the book doesn't endorse pedophilia, it's written as a confession by a pedophile who ruins everyone's life around him and ends up in prison or dead. The guy in the story essentially murders the girls mother after she learns about what he's thinking about her daughter, then runs off with her, only to find out she's being abused by a different famous pedophile which leads to him showing up and killing the other pedophile before getting in his car and going on a rampage. In between that the girl runs away and when he finds her she tells him she basically hates him and wants to live a normal life with a guy her own age and doesn't want to see him again.
 
Back
Top Bottom