"little_girl" in the New Doom DLC - ID layoffs were a good thing actually

  • 🔎 If you see an alert for analytics.usips.org, this is a self-hosted system I am running as a test. It is GDPR compliant and collects no invasive information.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Neveragain69 said:
OP: "Hey guys, I found CP in a folder labelled " little girl", someone should do something about this."

Steam users: "Why the fuck would you look in a folder labeled 'little girl', you fucking pedophilie? But if you want me to believe you, you have to give me the EXACT steps for me to see this for myself."

I know it's not a folder, but the analogy holds up. It's baffling that there are people in that thread saying in the same post that "OP is a pedo for looking in the first place" and "This is normal for devs to make, it's not CP".

Either it's normal, in which case OP wouldn't be a pedo, or it's not, in which case the issue is that it exists, not that the OP saw it. But this is the doublethink these subhumans have to do in order to blame the guy pointing this out instead of blaming whatever dev took the time to model that.
Click to expand...
This is a very strange reaction of theirs, and it’s instant too.
That Steam thread smells like basement and unwashed Redditor (redundant), but it’s weird it happened here too.
 
DumbDude43 said:
you model naked so the model you make is easier to reuse in different settings (easier to add different clothes/armor later on)
Click to expand...
But why oh why would you create panties, torso and nipples texture files titled "little_girl", if not to create and show an accurate model of a topless little girl? Was this model then meant to be shown in the game? Is this some overlooked sicko on the team not realising he's unmasked himself?
 
TheArtilleryman said:
But why oh why would you create panties, torso and nipples texture files titled "little_girl", if not to create and show an accurate model of a topless little girl? Was this model then meant to be shown in the game? Is this some overlooked sicko on the team not realising he's unmasked himself?
Click to expand...
they model a little girl because they need a little girl model for some flashback dream cutscene (that's what i got from reading the steam thread, i dont have the game myself)

you people seriously need to calm down and get a grip on your pedo hysteria, this is like getting outraged over the movie "the ring" because it had a 12 year old child actress and the makeup artists and costume designers might have seen her topless during production
 
Ly Erg said:
I remember that Outlast 2 was suppose to have an voice acted audio clip of a priest raping a minor in the game which was cut during production for the most obvious reasons but the fact that it even went that far tells me that there are a lot more creeps in the dev team who were perfectly fine with that being a thing. The audio clip was found after people dug into the game too which seems to be the same situation here.
Click to expand...
Things like this happen from time to time with Outlast, it's tasteless, faux-deep shock horror (fun for that reason). I recall a dev on the Outlast Trials talking about how they had to have a boardroom discussion because they were debating whether or not they could get away with having the big naked sadist guys get erections when they murder you. Their MO seems to be "go too far and then trim it down before release".
 
DumbDude43 said:
they model a little girl because they need a little girl model for some flashback dream cutscene (that's what i got from reading the steam thread, i dont have the game myself)

you people seriously need to calm down and get a grip on your pedo hysteria, this is like getting outraged over the movie "the ring" because it had a 12 year old child actress and the makeup artists and costume designers might have seen her topless during production
Click to expand...
Isn't texturing the nipple and crotch area a bit excessive for that purpose, unless those areas were meant for someone's viewing? Following that, were we meant to see a naked little girl in the game? Bold move if so...
 
Last edited:
TheArtilleryman said:
isn't texturing the nipple and crotch area a bit excessive for that purpose unless it was meant to be for someone to view? Following that, were we meant to see a naked little girl in the game? Bold move if so...
Click to expand...
There are no modeled crotch or nipples. The asset appears to be a pair of panties and what looks like part of an armpit.

Outright lying in order to gin up faux anti pedo outrage is shitty and retarded. You know better than that.
 
Jace on ice said:
There are no modeled crotch or nipples. The asset appears to be a pair of panties and what looks like part of an armpit.

Outright lying in order to gin up outrage is shitty and retarded. You know better than that.
Click to expand...
You don't know me, and I'm only commenting on what I'm seeing. It definitely looks more like nipples to me, and I apologise you are correct "crotch" was misleading, panties is more accurate.
 
I think regardless of whether the texture is cp or not, it's generally safe practice to just assume all game devs are pedophiles until proven otherwise.
 
So here's what I can ascertain from going through this thread and the Steam thread's OP:
-Steam OP is an ESL retard. His understanding of English grammar and diction is poor, he fucks up basic words like "girl" as "giel" already makes me suspect of him
Because I haven't played Dark Ages, or its DLCs, at first I thought "Little Giel" was an enemy or monster or something as OP capitalizes it like its a proper noun alongside Insurgents, but from googling around and nothing coming up in search results for "doom dark ages + little giel" I'd imagine this is him being an ESL tard.
-He provides no context for whom this character is other than she's a little girl. No idea what the name of the character is, a screenshot of what they look like in the game, etc.
-Textures that have been ripped into this thread at first blush kinda look like nipples and the outline of panties? But as @Null demonstrated with the Archvile's texture, how texturemaps conform to polygonal models can vary and look quite different compared to how they look as a static 2D bitmap image.
As someone who's been fucking around with modding PC games for over 20 years, I thought this was just common knowledge? But never let a good pedo hunt go to waste I guess.

At first blush, I can admit that having a texturemap named "little_girl" is pretty sus but if that's literally what the model is for, a young girl character giving it a generic name like that makes sense to me? Especially considering how fucking huge and bloated dev teams for games are now, whomever the artists who creates these textures handing it off to the team of modelers might not know the name of the character, so naming it generically "little_girl" makes it in theory retard proof so they know the "little_girl" texture goes onto the "little_girl" model. And now that I think about it like that, this literally sounds like the definition of a nothingburger lmao. Maybe I'll look stupid later on and this is unconvering some Pizzagate-tier operation at id, but I wouldn't bet the farm on that at this point.
 
Black Snake said:
Maverick leaves instructions on how to view the model, halfway down page 1 of the Steam thread. ID use their own md6 file format, and I couldn't get the model viewer he mentioned to work.

I'll dump the files here though, and someone might be able to figure it out.
Click to expand...
You can just import the FBX into Blender, extract the folder and drag the FBX in, its scaled tiny so scale it up and rotate it on x 90 degrees.

1785983875033.png
Clothes are a separate mesh presumably for physics and material reasons

Don't ban me Null I am just reporting. Body is fully modeled, there are no nipples in the diffuse map but a normal map exists for them. Logically they could have just deleted the body parts beyond the arms and legs since that would never be seen, or blacked out the textures. It is just a base human mesh though, so its more laziness than anything.
1785983929866.png
 
Dan of Steel said:
he fucks up basic words like "girl" as "giel" already makes me suspect of him
Because I haven't played Dark Ages, or its DLCs, at first I thought "Little Giel" was an enemy or monster
Click to expand...
Little Girl is in the title. It is capitalised as it is a proper noun in context.
Giel is a simple typo but it is also a name so wouldn't show as a typo.
Dan of Steel said:
Maybe I'll look stupid later on and this is unconvering some Pizzagate-tier operation at id, but I wouldn't bet the farm on that at this point.
Click to expand...
It's probably just one the new character artists being a bit of a weirdo. Either a nonce or some super autist who doesn't understand that creating images of little girls in just their knickers, is creepy.

Only the lead character artist, Denzil O'Neill, has worked on any Doom games in the past. My money is on Chase Jordan. Looks like it matches their style, using the nude with clothing on top technique, and heavily freckled skin textures:
Yes, he really did paint that old man in a thong.

None of the main human characters in the game use the nude under clothing style, and were likely made by the more experienced staff.
Dan of Steel said:
can admit that having a texturemap named "little_girl" is pretty sus but if that's literally what the model is for, a young girl character giving it a generic name like that makes sense to me?
Click to expand...
The controversy is that an adult man painted nipples and butt creases on a model of a child, instead of an undershirt and shorts. I don't think anyone cares that the little girl is named, Little Girl.
 
Soggy Floppa said:
You can just import the FBX into Blender, extract the folder and drag the FBX in, its scaled tiny so scale it up and rotate it on x 90 degrees.

View attachment 9373542
Clothes are a separate mesh presumably for physics and material reasons

Don't ban me Null I am just reporting. Body is fully modeled, there are no nipples in the diffuse map but a normal map exists for them. Logically they could have just deleted the body parts beyond the arms and legs since that would never be seen, or blacked out the textures. It is just a base human mesh though, so its more laziness than anything.
View attachment 9373545
Click to expand...
inb4 sickos do some unspeakable things to that model(like they did with Sherry in RE2R).
I do have to wonder, at which point was she supposed to be naked? Yeah, it might have just been something players were never able to see, but usually you don't see that much detail going into a part of the model that is supposed to only be viewable with devtools.
I'm split, it might be a nothingburger or it might be the next FULLY MODELED situation. Either way, Doom Dark Ages sucks and I am surprised they even bothered releasing a DLC for this mess.
 
Soggy Floppa said:
You can just import the FBX into Blender, extract the folder and drag the FBX in, its scaled tiny so scale it up and rotate it on x 90 degrees.

View attachment 9373542
Clothes are a separate mesh presumably for physics and material reasons

Don't ban me Null I am just reporting. Body is fully modeled, there are no nipples in the diffuse map but a normal map exists for them. Logically they could have just deleted the body parts beyond the arms and legs since that would never be seen, or blacked out the textures. It is just a base human mesh though, so its more laziness than anything.
View attachment 9373545
Click to expand...

That's what people are all worked up about?? That's so lame I was barely able to jack off to it. smh
 
MIU said:
Also man, Bubonicduck talking to these people reminds me of the fucking scene with Man-Ray and Patrick
Click to expand...
Sadly, Steam Users in general are that fucking stupid. That Joker guy is a great example "its not in the news so I don't believe it!"

Nigger, how do you think something becomes news? Same with those absolute fucking mongs "hurr durr, you must be a pedo for going out of your way to stumble upon this". How the fuck do you "go out of your way to look for" "CP" you didn't even know about until you stumbled upon it? These "people" need to be put in camps, I swear.

A lot of people try to say "they're just trolls", but its literally half the fucking users of the platform, if not more, that act and talk just like these bonafide failed abortions. I fucking hate the community section of that platform so fucking much, words fail to describe it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom