Jacob S. Blaustein / ryu238 / ryu289 / 87Blue - Brony, furry, gets banned everywhere, defends pedophiles, transexuals, and pedophile transexuals, to his last breath and needs others to do the arguing for him

[Doppio Vinegar]

The source he linked is just a presentation slideshow. Unless I missed something, there's no sources for anything on the slideshow anywhere within it.

Some screenshots from the slideshow:



If that wasn't enough, here are some snippets from the website of this slideshow's creator.

Spoiler: Snippet 1

"The trunk of rights holds up many branches: child protection (the right to body integrity), sex worker rights, digital rights, due process rights, and so on."

Basically they don't exclusively focus on putting a stop to pedophilia. They just use child protection as an excuse to support sex workers and kink gear in public.

Spoiler: Snippet 2

"We believe that children deserve to be protected by laws and policies that are effective, fair, and constitutionally sound. We promote an evidence-based, scientific approach that is informed by dialogue, outreach, and scholarly research. This results in us taking different positions than other groups on a number of key issues such as Internet freedom and the rights of sex workers."

"Yeah, kids deserve to be protected, but I read a research article once that said sex workers are more important than children!!"

Spoiler: Snippet 3

"Sex-positivity means that every human being has the right to express and enjoy their own sexuality, provided that they do so consensually. Sex-positivity underpins our opposition to child sexual abuse, since it is a consent violation by definition (children can’t consent to sex with adults). This contrasts with other organizations whose work is underpinned by society’s moral standards, which can be mutable and subjective."

What the fuck does this even mean? I'm genuinely struggling to figure it out. It reads like they're trying to take a moral high ground and claim other child protection organizations actually support pedophilia since they don't explicitly mention consent. It also reads like being sex-positive is when the child consents when they have sex with an adult.

Spoiler: Snippet 4

"By over-concentrating resources on harassing artists, prosecuting sex workers, shaming kinksters, and making life difficult for registered citizens, we may think we are combatting child sexual abuse—but evidence says otherwise, and bringing that evidence to light is the first step towards redirecting those resources to more effective avenues for prevention."

Basically an admission from the website itself that they don't give a shit about the children, they just give a shit about sex workers and "kinksters." Awesome.

Spoiler: Snippet 5

"Changing the current liability model to make Internet platforms responsible for the actions of child sexual abusers will not help children, but will result in the censorship of constitutionally protected speech."

Admitting you want to rape kids is free speech. Don't be a bigot.

I gave up halfway through because I was beginning to get thoroughly nauseated. Here's the link I was taking these snippets from if anyone wants to do a deeper dive than I did.

Not at all surprised Jacob would use this source to defend showing his dick to children. What a horrible thing to investigate before going to bed.

 

[Sprate Header]

View attachment 2547722

The source he linked is just a presentation slideshow. Unless I missed something, there's no sources for anything on the slideshow anywhere within it.

Some screenshots from the slideshow:
View attachment 2547730
View attachment 2547729

If that wasn't enough, here are some snippets from the website of this slideshow's creator.

Spoiler: Snippet 1

"The trunk of rights holds up many branches: child protection (the right to body integrity), sex worker rights, digital rights, due process rights, and so on."

Basically they don't exclusively focus on putting a stop to pedophilia. They just use child protection as an excuse to support sex workers and kink gear in public.

Spoiler: Snippet 2

"We believe that children deserve to be protected by laws and policies that are effective, fair, and constitutionally sound. We promote an evidence-based, scientific approach that is informed by dialogue, outreach, and scholarly research. This results in us taking different positions than other groups on a number of key issues such as Internet freedom and the rights of sex workers."

"Yeah, kids deserve to be protected, but I read a research article once that said sex workers are more important than children!!"

Spoiler: Snippet 3

"Sex-positivity means that every human being has the right to express and enjoy their own sexuality, provided that they do so consensually. Sex-positivity underpins our opposition to child sexual abuse, since it is a consent violation by definition (children can’t consent to sex with adults). This contrasts with other organizations whose work is underpinned by society’s moral standards, which can be mutable and subjective."

What the fuck does this even mean? I'm genuinely struggling to figure it out. It reads like they're trying to take a moral high ground and claim other child protection organizations actually support pedophilia since they don't explicitly mention consent. It also reads like being sex-positive is when the child consents when they have sex with an adult.

Spoiler: Snippet 4

"By over-concentrating resources on harassing artists, prosecuting sex workers, shaming kinksters, and making life difficult for registered citizens, we may think we are combatting child sexual abuse—but evidence says otherwise, and bringing that evidence to light is the first step towards redirecting those resources to more effective avenues for prevention."

Basically an admission from the website itself that they don't give a shit about the children, they just give a shit about sex workers and "kinksters." Awesome.

Spoiler: Snippet 5

"Changing the current liability model to make Internet platforms responsible for the actions of child sexual abusers will not help children, but will result in the censorship of constitutionally protected speech."

Admitting you want to rape kids is free speech. Don't be a bigot.

I gave up halfway through because I was beginning to get thoroughly nauseated. Here's the link I was taking these snippets from if anyone wants to do a deeper dive than I did.

Not at all surprised Jacob would use this source to defend showing his dick to children. What a horrible thing to investigate before going to bed.

Literally the front page of their site:

Home - Prostasia Foundation

archived 18 Sep 2021 06:10:53 UTC

archive.md

Here's an archive of that FAQ btw: https://archive.md/jR6Mw

EDIT: From the archives of the frontpage:

And what's this?

What I learned as a MAP's partner - Prostasia Foundation

archived 7 Mar 2021 22:43:15 UTC

archive.md

I wonder what @ryu289's thoughts on MAPs are?

 

[Much Ado About Nothing]

So Jacob, @ryu289 , how is your relationship with the law?

 

[Inquisitor_BadAss]

So Jacob, @ryu289 , how is your relationship with the law?
View attachment 2548005

So in little over a year he’s arrested twice for unsafe driving. So not only are children not safe around him but he’s also a danger to motorists as well. This man is just full of surprises and I bet my bottom dollar he’s banned from a host of irl establishments.

 

[Much Ado About Nothing]

So in little over a year he’s arrested twice for unsafe driving. So not only are children not safe around him but he’s also a danger to motorists as well. This man is just full of surprises and I bet my bottom dollar he’s banned from a host of irl establishments.

Wonder if there are more from out of state. He did use to live in New York after all.

 

[Spunt]

So in little over a year he’s arrested twice for unsafe driving. So not only are children not safe around him but he’s also a danger to motorists as well. This man is just full of surprises and I bet my bottom dollar he’s banned from a host of irl establishments.

Do you think he sent the judge some links to irrelevant PubMed articles he hadn't read or understood and a blog run by someone who says that driving on the sidewalk is OK, actually, and when the Judge refused to read them he complained to Reddit about the Judge committing logical fallacies and also said it's OK to get his wang out in front of kids because he can't write a single paragraph anywhere about any subject without bringing it up which is perfectly normal behaviour and you're not allowed to insinuate otherwise unless you have disproven every point made in the massive pile of articles he's linking to even though he hasn't read any of them himself and wouldn't understand them even if he did because he's a moronic pseudo-intellectual who tries to make the internet do his homework for him?

I do.

 

[Thorgrim Grudgebearer]

His is face looks like what an AI would generate if you gave it "Subversive degenerate childish pedophile jew" as an input.

 

[Hongourable Madisha]

Oh my fucking god he's actually citing Prostasia as a source. That's like quoting NAMBLA. The good terves of Mumsnet have dug up a lot of stuff on them, good parents being the natural enemy of paedos after all.

Prostasia Foundation - Child protection or dismantling Safeguarding? | Mumsnet

Credit to Agilelass for flagging these people in the Dr Em Unicorns thread, I thought they warranted a thread of their own. prostasia.orgThey claim t

www.mumsnet.com

 

[Lemmingwise]

If I was a pedo, why am I not banned?

People prefer you sitting here and spouting your nonsense over what you might otherwise do with your time.

 

[GenociderSyo]

More from last nights reddit:

His links are to that Protasia place that has been brought up as a M.A.P. organization.

 

[Much Ado About Nothing]

Anyhow;
empty tumblr blog ryu239: https://archive.md/HHPk6
This is also just following two tumblr accounts; staff, and someone named Jadagul.

Untitled

archived 18 Sep 2021 13:26:14 UTC

archive.md

Math nerd, likes to discuss odd philosophies online: https://archive.ph/uhHZI

 

[Spoonomancer]

More from last nights reddit:
View attachment 2548240

His links are to that Protasia place that has been brought up as a M.A.P. organization.

been looking at these screencaps as they've been getting posted and oh my fucking god how does Ryu keep giving non-answers

 

[Hongourable Madisha]

This is one time when I hope he doesn't read the links he posts.

 

[Lemmingwise]

His is face looks like what an AI would generate if you gave it "Subversive degenerate childish pedophile jew" as an input.

Let's find out ..

 

[Inquisitor_BadAss]

Do you think he sent the judge some links to irrelevant PubMed articles he hadn't read or understood and a blog run by someone who says that driving on the sidewalk is OK, actually, and when the Judge refused to read them he complained to Reddit about the Judge committing logical fallacies and also said it's OK to get his wang out in front of kids because he can't write a single paragraph anywhere about any subject without bringing it up which is perfectly normal behaviour and you're not allowed to insinuate otherwise unless you have disproven every point made in the massive pile of articles he's linking to even though he hasn't read any of them himself and wouldn't understand them even if he did because he's a moronic pseudo-intellectual who tries to make the internet do his homework for him?

I do.

I’ll have you know your honour that driving on the sidewalk is much safer for drivers as there’s less traffic and this link to a child drag show proves it.

 

[Much Ado About Nothing]

I’ll have you know your honour that driving on the sidewalk is much safer for drivers as there’s less traffic and this link to a child drag show proves it.

You know what he reminds me of? Chris-chan, Russell Greer, and Yaniv mixed together. All to create that creature.

 

[Kaido117]

I wonder what mental disorder he has. Genuinely seems like autism spectrum disorder. This entire thread is proof that some people should not reproduce for the good of society. Eugenics is actually not that bad of an idea.

 

[GenociderSyo]

He certainly lacks the insight to understand that his way of approaching this is incorrect. He also lacks the insight to understand he is the cause of his bannings and posts being removed from sites. None of this though supports his beliefs being due to his insight and no mental disorder even autism would be the cause of his deviant interests.

Here he is stating a MAP website has nothing to do with pedophila:

 

[Inquisitor_BadAss]

You know what he reminds me of? Chris-chan, Russell Greer, and Yaniv mixed together. All to create that creature.

Frankenstein’s lolcow.

 

[GenociderSyo]

He is now actively fighting that MAPs are not pedophiles and that sexually abusing a child does not make you a pedophile (He edited the post when called out on it but you can see in the 3rd pic what it originally said):