This. I can't speak for TAH, but I know
@Marvin pretty well. He got an invite to a bunch of CWC Discords by virtue of being the MitPS, and he kinda accepted them all like "yeah, w/e." Aside from popping in once or twice when people were bugging him, he checked out of Chris shit a while ago.
There's a reason I put
@The American Hedgehog but not
@Marvin in the title. I think the former is actively trying to hide some shit and the latter wound up having some questionable associations he probably didn't know about until it was pretty late in the game. However, it's a game of "who knew what when" and a callback to the earlier controversy involving the Idea Guys.
The overall thing I'd wanted to edit into a page was that there were four people who had been behind a role (before my edit the page had some dated info about there only being two people).
Since it was a leak and not public info, I redacted some usernames in a couple screencaps used as a citation for it - either the usernames weren't relevant to the matter or weren't mentioned in the wiki at that time in connection to the role.
Why redact some usernames or others?
Let's look here:
After I posted this, you wrote to me:
Apart from you sounding like a condescending dick, I had to kind of restrain myself from explaining that there was a method to my madness here, part of which is my being able to make the point I'm about to make now. Not only do your redactions cover only the name and thus it's fairly easy to figure out who is speaking by process of elimination if you know the candidates simply by lining up the text, but the different styles of redaction show two different redactors redacting different names.
Why would I want to do this? Because you felt the need to redact everyone except MKR. I imagine you will say that MKR is well-known enough to have her own article on the CWCki and thus doesn't need to be redacted. Fair enough perhaps, I'm not the MKR Guard, I don't know or give a shit about MKR and have no problem having people know that she said those things, but the fact that you're willing to go to bat for the redaction of Sean's friends and leave his enemies unredacted is suspicious. Why MKR and Naught for the bus and not anyone else?
In fact your whole effort reeks of Sean damage control from the beginning, to the extent that (as I mentioned) I tinfoiled that your first PM to me could literally have been from Sean himself. In fact that's what kicked off my suspicions to begin with. Why you would go to bat for this highly autistic and seriously depraved individual is beyond me, but it's also beyond me how he slithered his way into such a position of "power" to begin with, although that "power" was largely vested in his hours upon hours of autistically manipulating Chris. But Sean apparently has a web of other more interesting associations.
Why carry water for the guy though? The fact that you did (and were in a position to provide allegedly, but not really, exonerating material) is why I began wondering about you in the first place tbh.
I don’t see much post-arrest activity from Marvin to get bent out of shape over anything yet. I had kinda hoped he’d just taken his hands off the wheel like you say after it became obvious that any plans to manage Chris can be easily cucked by a pair of tits and a prone pussy. Regardless of age and relation.
The fuckery, from what I can gather, is in anybody still trying to hide shit/control the narrative post-august 2nd, when it had became pretty clear the last hand has been dealt and it’s time to fold or show your cards.
Yeah, and having peaced out of the Discord server earlier doesn't exonerate. TAH doesn't give a date but I think he's implying he left 7/31-8/1 at the latest, and I'm not sure if I believe him. Either way, he knew stuff. He had a lot of information about Sean to send me after all.
From the facts, I see nothing that says that Marvin and H-Hog were involved with bella shit.
You also, if you read the OP, don't see me accusing of them being "involved with Bella shit" other than by being in the same Discord. The main issue is (a) "H-Hog", carrying water for
Sean and (b) both of them knowing various things and keeping them under wraps including when they were active serious issues such as the attempts to frame Fiona.
@Marvin, again, I didn't mention nearly as prominently for a reason.
@Spooky Bones I've messaged you privately in the past, and I'll reiterate what I said: your internet detective work uncovering the Chess Club and their gayops was top of the line. Much respect.
But I'm no simp, and watching the investigation veer into the weeds, digging into everyone within six degrees of separation, is eye-rolling.
And I appreciate both your earlier compliments and your current criticism. The "investigation" isn't really even a thing, just people leaking a shitload of stuff and talking about one another. And it's not about "digging into everyone within six degrees of separation", either. Sean warranted a thread for obvious reasons. TAH for inscrutable reasons chose to run damage control for Sean. He declined to continue a conversation with me about it and chose instead to post his point of view on his Wiki (but not here, notably.) As response to this (and only as response to this) I posted this thread.
As for the accusation (by a couple people) that I'm flailing out wildly or clout-seeking, this was essentially brought gift-wrapped to me. I decided to rejoin the CWCki way before this stuff started coming out because I wanted to add some information about some other random weens (and this would be Rosa Rey Ramsey, who even Null would class as a ween) pre-Merge and then ILJ and Sean stuff post-merge. In the course of looking into Sean stuff, I found the sockpuppet account and from there, TAH sent me a few damage control PMs on here; had either of those things happened, we'd never have gotten here.
Since when do ethics come into play on imageboards or wikis dedicated to lolcows? Everyone here spends their time "cyberbullying" (posting mean words) about mentally ill and behaviorally deviant people. Your obligation as a member of the community, however senior, is exactly zero.
If this is the defense that we're going with, fine, it's perfectly valid and I don't really have an answer for it. Yet it's not the argument that either of the individuals we're talking about chose to make.
The argument was more "I joined some random Discord and didn't pay it any mind."
But this is more than "some random Discord," it's the Discord of the individual currently in "control" of Chris (which is a term that I really don't like but don't know what else to use), or rather first Naught's Watchmen and then Sean's schismatic Knights. That's the kind of thing that you would naturally, unavoidably even, open up if major Chris news breaks. I don't believe for a second that either of them, TAH especially, didn't do that.