Cultcow Russell Greer / @ just_some_dude_named_russell29 / A Safer Nevada PAC - Swift-Obsessed Sex Pest, Convicted of E-Stalking, "Eggshell Skull Plaintiff" Pro Se Litigant, Homeless, aspiring brothel owner

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

If you were Taylor Swift, whom would you rather date?

  • Russell Greer

    Votes: 117 4.5%
  • Travis Kelce

    Votes: 138 5.3%
  • Null

    Votes: 1,448 55.8%
  • Kanye West

    Votes: 283 10.9%
  • Ariana Grande

    Votes: 607 23.4%

  • Total voters
    2,593
Agree with most of it, but even telling some guys you're married don't stop them. They want to know if you're happily married, then tell you " well, you don't look happy."
Fuck off with that, asshole.

And sometimes I think little girls have much better intuition than adults; they haven't been taught to cover up their feelings yet.

And if you're a lesbian--or a married lesbian:

* Lol, you're just rOlEpLaYiNg!
* You just haven't met the right man(TM)
* How...married are you?
* So...which one's the guy? You know that's your problem, right? That you need a guy?
* I'll watch. (Not "may I," "can I," just..."I'll watch") Like he just issued a Papal Bull

But as always with Pipsqueak:

* Let me EXPLAIN!
 
I think women with boyfriends being fair game but married women not for Russ simply comes down to the fact that marriage is a legal contract between two people. To Russ, a wife legally belongs to her husband.

As he told Erika word for word “you owe him (Chad) no duty,” because he was just a boyfriend.
 
@GargoyleGorl

That pet theory is something I don't remember ever reading before, but honestly I think there's a lot in it, when I think about it. Trans women weren't externally socialised as women. (I don't care that they don't like this argument. They just fucking weren't, unless they were brought up a trans kid) If you don't get treated as a girl/woman when you are learning how to navigate the world, there is a whole... dance of 'get creeped on, how to respond to it" that you just don't learn in the way a cis woman of comparable age will have by the time you are her age. Also, unless you came out as trans when young, probably the adults around you didn't give you The Endless Safety Talks that girls are given. Rightly or wrongly, cis women can alllll rhyme off all the safety advice drilled in by parents, teachers, cops: all that business about carrying your keys so you can blind the car park rapist, don't go out at night in a ponytail, all that shit. I will bet dollars to donuts that anyone raised as a cis guy doesn't know half that shit because no one bothers to tell boys that stuff.

I also think, in addition to what you say, that since in good lightning most trans women don't pass (this is unfortunate for trans women, but it is also true) after a good look, that since they aren't being read as cis women, guys are probably not hitting on - and certainly creeping on verging to harassing - them in the same way they are cis women. To use our friend from other threads Ripley as an example, you would have to be absolutely fucking mental to try and creep on and intimidate Ripley because he's about six foot three and clearly a fucking basket case. Creepy dudes are always going to target the five foot nothing schoolgirl instead because she's not going to be able to do any damage if you upset her, whereas Ripley looks like he might rip off your head and shit in the hole.

So you end up in a situation where someone who has never really had to learn How To Spot The Actually Dangerous Creep is working a) alone b) in an intimate situation c) in a line of activity that tends to attract way more dangerous creeps than, say, working the perfume counter in the mall. Plus, trans sex workers are, in most places, not working the top end of the market. The young Denise Richards was famously on Heidi Fleiss' books: I doubt the likes of FuckClown Wedge were making up the rest of the agency.

Vulnerable people in a vulnerable situation with limited skills in spotting the guy who really will kill you from the guy who is just going to fuck and leave... that's a fucking toxic mix.

@Cheesegirl78

The worst fucking thing the PUA snake oil merchants ever did for the genuinely shy and awkward that they sucked in was to sell them this bullshit about 'objection handling' and 'pushing past resistance'. Because all it taught these guys (I don't mean the proto rapists, I mean the poor somewhat autistic fuckers who don't actually want to skin anyone but have a normie gf and become a normie) was that when a girl gives you a knockback politely, in a discreet and feelings-sparing sort of way, that the correct response is to keep hammering away at that refusal until she actually tells you to fuck off in a way that ensures you will stay gone. A lot of these PUA acolyte horror stories of the girls who threw drinks over them or showered them in verbal abuse or other horrendous shit begin with what is very clearly a softened refusal that the dude then doesn't accept. A softened no is still a no. It's not a "convince me". I personally have seen some of the most horrific, shaming, public knockbacks given, and they were always given to someone who had been told nicely to quit their pursuit several times before. If you want to make shy and awkward young guys into hurt, angry incels, the absolute best way is to encourage them to continually pursue women who have already told them no multiple times.

You can actually see that Russ follows that pattern around escalating refusals, but it's not because he can't pick up on a softened refusal. It's that he won't accept one. There's an old quote that used to kick around a sexual assault research blog that stuck with me: "When you keep saying no to a drink from a guy, and he keeps insisting anyway, he doesn't actually care about the drink. What he's finding out for the price of that drink is how hard he has to push to turn your no into a yes."
 
Screenshot_20210919-182748_Brave.jpg
 
Meh, I think for a lot of us it's more that we can appreciate lulz and don't give a shit about people's politics. Someone thinking differently than I do doesn't mean I can't appreciate funny shit.

I couldn't give two fucks about people's feelings or choices. Troon? Don't care. Whore? Don't care. Meninist? Don't care. Your good opinions and comments can be good even if other opinions and comments are stupid.

Giving too many fucks about the way people choose to lead their lives when it isn't hilarious is just sad, guys. But that too, I don't care about. You're allowed.
Whores, trannies, mocha men, fatty mcpatties, whatever. The only person we care to discriminate against here is Russell Greer
 
The worst fucking thing the PUA snake oil merchants ever did for the genuinely shy and awkward that they sucked in was to sell them this bullshit about 'objection handling' and 'pushing past resistance'. Because all it taught these guys (I don't mean the proto rapists, I mean the poor somewhat autistic fuckers who don't actually want to skin anyone but have a normie gf and become a normie) was that when a girl gives you a knockback politely, in a discreet and feelings-sparing sort of way, that the correct response is to keep hammering away at that refusal until she actually tells you to fuck off in a way that ensures you will stay gone. A lot of these PUA acolyte horror stories of the girls who threw drinks over them or showered them in verbal abuse or other horrendous shit begin with what is very clearly a softened refusal that the dude then doesn't accept. A softened no is still a no. It's not a "convince me". I personally have seen some of the most horrific, shaming, public knockbacks given, and they were always given to someone who had been told nicely to quit their pursuit several times before. If you want to make shy and awkward young guys into hurt, angry incels, the absolute best way is to encourage them to continually pursue women who have already told them no multiple times.
PUA shit fucked up a lot of socially awkward young men. They're like SovCits. They think if they can just find the right words in the right combination the woman they're pursuing will magically want to fuck them, even if she's been saying no the whole time, like you said. You can see this formulaic thinking in Russ's approach to women he finds attractive: Start with a compliment, move onto offering gifts,
You can actually see that Russ follows that pattern around escalating refusals, but it's not because he can't pick up on a softened refusal. It's that he won't accept one. There's an old quote that used to kick around a sexual assault research blog that stuck with me: "When you keep saying no to a drink from a guy, and he keeps insisting anyway, he doesn't actually care about the drink. What he's finding out for the price of that drink is how hard he has to push to turn your no into a yes."
When Russ was harassing Erika, she tried several soft refusals, he ignored them, and she finally lashed out, and since Russ refuses to understand why she did, he says she blew up for no reason.
Wanna place a bet on how long it is before he rants she should have dated a nice guy(him) instead of that Chad she was only dating for his looks?
 
PUA shit fucked up a lot of socially awkward young men. They're like SovCits. They think if they can just find the right words in the right combination the woman they're pursuing will magically want to fuck them, even if she's been saying no the whole time, like you said. You can see this formulaic thinking in Russ's approach to women he finds attractive: Start with a compliment, move onto offering gifts,
gifts and compliments aren't redpill pua shit, it's the opposite. russ approaching women is like the most over the top caricature of bluepill behavior possible.
like, the dude literally bought a stripper flowers and tried taking hookers out on dinner dates. he's the anti-PUA in almost every way.
 
gifts and compliments aren't redpill pua shit, it's the opposite. russ approaching women is like the most over the top caricature of bluepill behavior possible.
like, the dude literally bought a stripper flowers and tried taking hookers out on dinner dates. he's the anti-PUA in almost every way.
But like PUAs, he has a formulaic view of attracting women. PUAs teach negging and all that shit done in a sequence will cause a woman to fuck you. Russ thinks going through the sequence of suit>flowers>dinner will lead to sex and love. They both believe women aren't thinking feeling people, but robots who can be induced into fucking with the proper steps. But yeah, incels would make fun of Russ for being a simp, even though as soon as he encounters any resistance at all, he drops the mask and the raging asshole comes out. PUAs and the like just jump straight to the asshole part. Since they believe in approaching as many women as possible, eventually they'll get one who's insecure enough to fall for their shit and hello abusive relationship. Since Russ thinks he's owed only attractive women, he won't go for anyone he doesn't see as a 9 or 10, which means his pool of available victims is smaller.

Russ not understanding that hookers are working and expect to be paid for their time and he's nothing more than a customer (and a bad one at that) is the funniest thing about his hooker obsession.
 
Last edited:
Is that the same Walmart where Russhole cleans toilets? If so, I'm guessing it's a tard cage they had built especially for him, as they can't just fire him because muh plights.
We don't know if he's working at Walmart. He did for a bit back in SLC, but we're not sure what job he's doing in Vegas. And despite his face, he's been fired several times. Any company with an HR department worth a damn will assemble a paper trail of misdeeds before they axe someone who might sue. Since Russ trumpets his lawsuits from the rooftops, we'd know if he'd sued an employer for wrongful termination. He did file a EEOC complaint against that lawyer he hit on and then applied for a job from but I'm sure it was dismissed as meritless since he never spoke of it again.
 
I see where you're coming from but then again I expected Russ will end up arrested for sex crimes long before Chris does. Life is full of surprises.
Russ hasn't suffered over his actions in a way that he views as truly punishing yet. He needs to suffer jail or monetary damages, until then he is just unlikely to cross the line. So long as he isn't suffering a severe hit to his wallet he'll convince himself everyone else needs to just move on because, naturally, he's moved on. Once he's taken the right hit, I will move him from "unlit and currently harmless dynamite" to "ticking rape bomb and danger to women everywhere".

Though if he gets blanket banned from every Brothel in Nevada and every corner worker in the state decided to black list him, that'd also light the fuse and I would expect him to become a real danger. As is, him buying pussy is a tether to being just sane enough to not be a threat. The moment he's cut off, that tether will be cut with it. You often see similar behaviour in the BDSM scene which tends to self police itself more than people think. While you follow the rules and stay within the lines you have access to a network of connections and peers, it is easy to get invited to events and find likeminded folks, but the moment you cross, unless those around you are feeling forgiving and the infraction was incredibly minor and it isn't a habit, you get exiled from that community, and the tethers keeping them from devolving from deviants who can still exist in society, even if it is in a hidden "keep it to yourself" kind of way into absolute degenerate monsters who are completely unwanted in society and a danger to themselves and/or those around them comes hard and fast. Every time I hear about some creep being kicked out of his local kink scene I place my bets on how long he's going to last before he assaults someone, and there are always lines of people going "he's not quite that bad, he just got too mean spirited with the dirty talk, but we can't be too light on that shit" then a few months later you hear they raped a mother and their child and everyone wonders how it devolved so fast.

Russ is going to be the same once he's cut off, it won't just be sex he's cut off from, but an anchor to decency. When it happens though, he'll deserve it, and I hope he's caught for an attempt and not a success. Yet, until that happens, I still maintain, he's not currently a threat. Not yet. And that isn't me being dismissive, that is me being thankful the poor women around him have time to prepare.
Incidentally, that's what has allowed him to harm women in the past and will allow him to harm them very seriously in the future, if he is ever motivated to do so. He doesn't intrinsically view harming a pimp's sex worker as worse than scratching a pimp's car. You just fucked up another man's property. Never underestimate the capability for violence of an individual who is capable of reducing their target(s) to an object.
I think this is another thing currently keeping Russ from being a danger. He's afraid of what a man will do to him for damaging their property. His fear of men is enough to keep him in line until something pushes him over the edge, but it is definitely the thing that will make him far more dangerous when the time comes for him to be pushed too far, it is a double edged sword.
Well, can't say I'm too surprised about all the things happening lately. Like with Chris, there's no good endings for Rusty, because his life was entirely dedicated and wasted into being the most horrible person imaginable. So I guess people like him and Chris will really reap what they sow. Good.
I just hope we don't roll up on the end anytime soon, I still think we got a long time until then, but when it hits it is going to be horrible for everyone involved. I kinda hope a random act of god takes him out before he goes over the edge, but if that never happens I expect Russ will end up where we are with CWC. In the worse timeline.
How can Rusty's victims be at a fault? I'm not really sure of what you're trying to say, I get that you hate whores for some personal reason or whatever, but I fail to see where they're are at fault here? If anything, hookers are more victims than most of their clients.

Nobody is on a hooker reddit male feminist crusade here, we just respect them as human beings because they're well... human beings.
I think part of it is there is an idea that KF is universally a far right conservative website or something, even among some of the new members, then they get shocked when half the people laughing at troons, faggots, and hookers with them were... troons, faggots, and hookers. Just like when the more lefty threads laughing at Christians, redneck white trash, and racist bastards are made up half way of... Christians, redneck white trash, and racist bastards. Russ is just in a spot right now that we're seeing that if one thing is true about the farms, its that we have a libtard asshole for every altright asshole on this site, for every moderate to the left of center, you got a moderate to the right of center, it's like a fundamental law of the site, we're perpetually in autistic balance.
But like PUAs, he has a formulaic view of attracting women. PUAs teach negging and all that shit done in a sequence will cause a woman to fuck you. Russ thinks going through the sequence of suit>flowers>dinner will lead to sex and love. They both believe women aren't thinking feeling people, but robots who can be induced into fucking with the proper steps.
Humans are fairly predictable creatures, but only when split into large groups, individuals are far harder to manipulate, though if you've ever studied how scams work, you'll know that there are, in fact, specific steps that will almost always reveal a vulnerable victim early and allow you to follow through with them to get what you want, and weed out those who aren't vulnerable immediately. PUA are like your con and scam artists in that sense, they both are working out the series of steps that if input will result in what they want, but many PUA and wannabe PUA don't understand that their methods only work because the earliest steps are supposed to first identify vulnerable victims with a few tests then lead to the inputs to hook the sucker, and if they aren't vulnerable you stop wasting your time and move on to the next potential target.

I think part of why they don't realize there is a bit of a litmus test for vulnerability early on is they don't view women as thinking people, where as a con artist realizes the people around them are thinking and therefore are looking for the stupid ones. PUA and creeps like Russ just play the numbers game raw, running the full routine on every woman because they think the inputs are universal. They aren't. They just work for a specific type of victim most of the time, so when they find success they don't realize they lucked into the right type of victim, but instead believe that it was just that they finally input the steps correctly.

Also, disclaimer, I am not condoning the illegal actions of con artists, and I am absolutely not condoning the amoral actions of PUA, though I have infinitely more respect for your average conman than any PUA or Russ, and therefore infinitely more respect for the average Hooker. I am just pointing out the methods of those like Russ and PUA, as poorly optimized as they are, can and do work on an unfortunate, yet small, portion of the population, and con artists show what a similar thing done with finesse looks like. If anything, by comparing them to conmen, well it just makes the likes of Russ and PUA look even more misogynistic and pathetic.
 
I have to agree with the other women in this thread. Maybe it's just my own personal experience, but cowardly manlets have a tendency to be even more frightening than larger men. Pipsqueaks like Russell have a lot of anger bottled up inside, and, since they're usually not the sporty or physically active type (or the type to leave their house and their vidya games), they have zero healthy outlets to burn off all that negative energy.

So, it builds. They sit at home, all alone, and stew in their own unhappiness. They message women daily and get no replies. So, it builds more, and more, until finally, they snap and take it out on someone weaker than them. When they're an incel obsessed with sex, they're even more dangerous. It means that instead of just beating a woman, they beat and rape her.

And yes, even if they don't appear sinister or menacing at first glance, most women will be able to sense something "off," and it's not a feeling you can just ignore. That's why we'll keep bringing it up to the people with us, as long as the potentially creepy guy is still around. There's a reason it's a trope in media. A couple are out for drinks, and the girl subtly gestures to a man sitting at the other end of the bar by himself. She tells her boyfriend that the guy is giving her the creeps, but he tells her to simply ignore him. Couple finish their drinks, step outside into the night to begin the walk home, girl again mentions how creepy that dude was, and boyfriend again dismisses her concerns. Couple's route takes them through the park, creepy dude leaps out from the shadows, stabs boyfriend to death, then chases down girl, brutally assaults her, and also stabs her to death. Opening credits roll over a scene of police bagging up two bodies. I just made that up, but there has to be a Law & Order SVU episode with an opening like that.

On another note, I wouldn't be surprised if WhoreBitter is already a user here but not revealing herself. She seems smart enough to follow the rules and not powerlevel. But come on, bitch, join us. I promise we're not the evil, alt-right, Nazi bigots that social media likes to paint us as. We're just shitposters who like to laugh and gossip about idiots online, without being banned for saying the naughty gamer words or hurting feelings.

And what the fuck are you doing being a prostitute? You're hilarious. Please try stand-up comedy. I'm dead serious. Sit down, write out some jokes, find yourself an open mic night, and give it your best. A hooker can't not have crazy stories that would make for great bits. Hell, you could probably get some material just from the shots you've already taken at Russ. Honestly, what have you got to lose?

OT comedy sperging for WhoreBitter:
For some reason, I get the impression you'd enjoy a comedian named Ms. Pat. She's absolutely fucking hysterical, and I think you'd appreciate how she took her fucked up tales from the street and turned them into stand-up gold. Difference being, she sold drugs in front of her daughter's school instead of turning tricks. Here's an interview she did called "Comedian Ms. Pat Shares Her Life Story, Selling Crack, Getting Shot & More" if you want something to put on in the background.
 
Men don't do it in the same way (that is, developing a very sensitive creep-dar) because they've never learned to do it. It was never critical to their survival.
It is if you ever lived in a really sketchy neighborhood.
PUA shit fucked up a lot of socially awkward young men. They're like SovCits. They think if they can just find the right words in the right combination the woman they're pursuing will magically want to fuck them, even if she's been saying no the whole time, like you said.
I'd say it fucked them up, but in the opposite way. PUA shit "blackpilled" these incels and convinced them absolutely nothing would work. Elliott Rodger came from a site called puahate.com after all.
 
Last edited:
I'm guessing it's a tard cage they had built especially for him,
That is a PLIGHTS containment facility and A WOO HOO HOO hugbox (in a way that helps his disability)
He did file a EEOC complaint against that lawyer he hit on and then applied for a job from but I'm sure it was dismissed as meritless since he never spoke of it again.
Pretty sure someone who mattered with that incident reminded the greasy turd about those flowers he sent with whatever creepy ass notes or DMs that absolutely would've been on display in his greatest hits parade for the stalking charge he narrowly avoided that time.
And LDSBC/EC is only regionally accredited via the NWCCU:
Regional is what you should look for as opposed to national. Everest, Westwood, ITT Tech, DeVry, et al. are nationally accredited. The one for profit shit-tier chain Rasmussen is regional to my knowledge unless that's changed.
 
Regional is the "good" accreditation. There are 7 regional accreditors in the United States: the Higher Learning Commission, the Middle States Commission on Higher Education, the New England Commission of Higher Education, the New York State Board of Regents, the Northwest Commission on Colleges and Universities, the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools, and the WASC Senior College and University Commission.

That doesn't necessarily mean that a regionally accredited school is good, nor does it necessarily mean that a nationally accredited one is bad; that being said, it's a useful guideline. (The only national accreditor I'd personally be comfortable with is the DEAC, or the ABHE for bible colleges.) Still, one should look at schools on a case-by-case basis. I can definitely say that Ensign College, the new name of Russell's alma mater, is the Church Education System's equivalent of a highly mediocre community college.

Regional is what you should look for as opposed to national. Everest, Westwood, ITT Tech, DeVry, et al. are nationally accredited. The one for profit shit-tier chain Rasmussen is regional to my knowledge unless that's changed.
Lots of for-profit (and barely nonprofit) schools are regionally accredited. American Public University System, the University of Phoenix, Herzing University, Strayer University, Capella University, Colorado Tech, American InterContinental University, Walden University, Post University, South University, Grand Canyon University, and plenty of others.

DeVry has been regionally accredited by the HLC for awhile, not that that makes it a good school. Everest College is closed, but its Phoenix, AZ campus (and that campus only) was regionally accredited. ITT Tech is also closed, but it was national; same with Westwood.
 
all that business about carrying your keys so you can blind the car park rapist, don't go out at night in a ponytail, all that shit.
(Tried to spoiler this for being OT but the page keeps refreshing instead inserting the spoiler)
I thought the key thing wasn't all that effective since, if you get disengaged, you basically just gave them to the attacker? Maybe it's the grip I'm thinking of, I remember something about the keys-through-fingers grip potentially causing more harm for yourself since you might cut/break your own hand after striking. As for the ponytail, wouldn't your hair get yanked anyway if it's long?
 
Back