- Joined
- Mar 24, 2021
Jacob S. Blaustein / ryu238 / ryu289 / 87Blue - Brony, furry, gets banned everywhere, defends pedophiles, transexuals, and pedophile transexuals, to his last breath and needs others to do the arguing for him
- Thread starter Syntaxion
- Start date
-
🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
- Joined
- Aug 31, 2021
Jacob...I'd like you to meet glass house....you don't throw stones in glass houses.
- Joined
- Sep 11, 2019
Last edited:
- Joined
- Jan 20, 2020
This is by far the most interesting thread I've partaken in, in recent memory. But I think the best part is, Blau-hard over here hadn't stopped when he was found. Infact, he kept posting more often, he posted much more reprehensible nonsense, and kept getting called out even by the culture thatd usually protect him. Hes for all intents and purposes the lolcow eldarado. Hes the best of the worst, with every lolcow worthy trait, and he doesnt stop for anything. He is pure comedy gold.
Outwith Quiddany
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jul 9, 2021
- Joined
- Feb 24, 2019
- Joined
- Jan 20, 2020
At the risk of looking retarded, are you reposting the same screenshots or is this happening so much so quickly, with Ryu’s repetitive nature, that they’re starting to all look the same? I feel like I’ve been seeing this thumbnail for the last 6 pages lmfao.
Edit: Different screen caps lmfao.
- Joined
- Feb 24, 2019
Nah he's just necroing old shit to continue his stuff in new reddit threads.
- Joined
- Nov 17, 2017
Can't find it now but that post of him pestering for the next chapter of the transformation porn is one of the funniest things here so far. Bugs for the guy for days, then when he releases it its just coom and ask when the next is coming out lol fucking unreal
Though I'm not sure if he truly understands it is wrong and its a battle between his morality and lust for children, or if he understands it as being wrong only because that's what society has told him but really believes there is nothing wrong with being a diddler, and his online rambles are him trying to slowly (and unsuccessfully) make his child fetish more socially acceptable. It could be a mix of both these things as the cooming keeps rotting away at his brain and morality.
I agree with you and the couple others who think his bizarre behaviour trying to defend these things is a reflection of his guilt for something he has done or desires to do with children. What we are witnessing is the mental gymnastics of him attempting to convince himself he is a good person while also lusting for something he knows deep down is wrong.
Though I'm not sure if he truly understands it is wrong and its a battle between his morality and lust for children, or if he understands it as being wrong only because that's what society has told him but really believes there is nothing wrong with being a diddler, and his online rambles are him trying to slowly (and unsuccessfully) make his child fetish more socially acceptable. It could be a mix of both these things as the cooming keeps rotting away at his brain and morality.
- Joined
- Apr 23, 2014
The troons aren’t gonna let you put your mangled dick inside their open wound @ryu289 no matter how much you beg them. Also yes only biological women can give birth and even if the day come some deranged cross dressers get an implanted womb and by some miracle carry to term they still won’t be a woman.
- Joined
- Jul 31, 2019
Buh-buh-but I'm not a pedophile! I said that gay people aren't pedophiles, so there! I'm automatically immune!
Why does he keep falling back on this whenever people point out that he wants to fuck kids? It's like saying you advocated for gun control once so that makes you immune from being a mass shooter. Hiding behind faggots won't save you, Jacob... unless you're admitting that fucking neovaginas makes you gay?
- Joined
- Mar 8, 2020
Decided to look through some accounts, and I know this is an old post, but man
www.deviantart.com
x
lol, pot meet kettle
On a different note, his extremely early deviantart posts show a very strong insight into how stereotypical of a redditor Jacob has always been. If you go back to early 2010s, none of it is identity politics (outside of the occasional pedo or gay defending)
It's mostly libertarian-ish, anti-war, anti-NSA, even anti-Obama here and there. Some snippets:
potential government overreach under Obama
NSA
Overal extremely similair to how reddit was in the early 2010s. I always assumed the old guard left, and the new, identity politics focussed plebbitors arrived later - I didn't know some of them went from one to the other
Crazy to see how a person goes from anti-government and, atleast I assume, pro-free speech, to pro-government and anti-free speech.
Seemingly within a year or 2
Then again, redditors defended pedos when they were mostly libertarians, and they still do to this day, so I guess Jacob hasn't changed that much
Middle Eastern hypocracy by ryu238 on DeviantArt
www.deviantart.com
lol, pot meet kettle
On a different note, his extremely early deviantart posts show a very strong insight into how stereotypical of a redditor Jacob has always been. If you go back to early 2010s, none of it is identity politics (outside of the occasional pedo or gay defending)
It's mostly libertarian-ish, anti-war, anti-NSA, even anti-Obama here and there. Some snippets:
potential government overreach under Obama
NSA
Overal extremely similair to how reddit was in the early 2010s. I always assumed the old guard left, and the new, identity politics focussed plebbitors arrived later - I didn't know some of them went from one to the other
Crazy to see how a person goes from anti-government and, atleast I assume, pro-free speech, to pro-government and anti-free speech.
Seemingly within a year or 2
Then again, redditors defended pedos when they were mostly libertarians, and they still do to this day, so I guess Jacob hasn't changed that much
Last edited:
- Joined
- Jul 29, 2021
I love how some people use the same alias for everything.
I have a different alias and email for things.
Accounts like here, I like choosing vulgar names since no one can google it well.
never use anything tied to legit stuff and places like here. This is a cesspit and you only touch poo with gloves.
if you ever wonder if you should, take a deep breath and realize you shouldnt
I have a different alias and email for things.
Accounts like here, I like choosing vulgar names since no one can google it well.
never use anything tied to legit stuff and places like here. This is a cesspit and you only touch poo with gloves.
if you ever wonder if you should, take a deep breath and realize you shouldnt
- Joined
- Feb 24, 2019
This thread has the reddit seal of approval:
Final link is of course to his post on nudity.
The article he is linking to is:
West, K. Naked and Unashamed: Investigations and Applications of the Effects of Naturist Activities on Body Image, Self-Esteem, and Life Satisfaction. Journal of Happiness Studies. Volume 19, 677–697 (2018 ).
It of course has nothing to do with his argument.
There are no words for his latest posts:
Dudes definitely aMAP Pedophile:
Final link is of course to his post on nudity.
The article he is linking to is:
West, K. Naked and Unashamed: Investigations and Applications of the Effects of Naturist Activities on Body Image, Self-Esteem, and Life Satisfaction. Journal of Happiness Studies. Volume 19, 677–697 (2018 ).
It of course has nothing to do with his argument.
So it was mainly older men which makes this study not very generalizable:
"Eight hundred and forty-nine members of the British public were recruited via word-of-mouth and advertisements posted on various Internet forms to take part in this research. Of these participants, 739 (87%) were male, 94 (11%) were female and 16 (.02%) did not identify their gender or reported a non-binary gender. The mean age was 57.19, with a standard deviation of 12.00. Ethnically, 831 (98%) identified as White, 3 (.4%) as East Asian, 2 (.2%) as South Asian, 0 as Black, and 13 (2%) as “other”; 405 (54%) identified themselves as having no religion, 366 (43%) identified as Christian, 0 identified as Muslim, 74 (9%) identified themselves as “other” and 4 (.5%) declined to identify a religion; 702 (83%) identified as heterosexual, 39 (5%) as gay, 94 (11%) as bi-sexual, and 14 (2%) as “other”."
The incentive was not appropriate for the study. That amount of money is considered excessive:
"All those who completed the survey were offered the chance to win £150 in a prize draw."
Questioned were purposefully vague (partially undressed COULD be seen as meaning swimsuit or boxers):
"To assess participation naturist activities, participants were asked to indicate (yes vs. no) whether they had ever taken part in “in clothes-free activities (i.e., activities in which you have been fully or partially undressed outdoors and/or in the company of other people (other than your close family or romantic partner).” The language of this question deliberately focused on participants’ behaviour and avoided the labels “nudist” and “naturist”."
"To distract participants from the true purpose of the study, a number of filler items were included concerning relationships between males and females, gender norms and sexual activity in general."
They further go on to admit that the latter question was misleading and far too inclusive for the study they were attempting. They state that they know this lead to misleadingly high amounts of positive responses yet decide to include these responses.
This means even if they got results they are meaningless because they fully admit that they are probably innaccurate.
"A final limitation that must be acknowledged is the weak relationship between naturist activity and positive body image in Study 1 (b = .08 ). This suggests the potential criticism that the effects of naturism are not practically meaningful, even if they are statistically significant. Also, further analyses in Study 1 revealed that the relationship between naturism and body image was weakest (or absent) for participants who engaged in the most naturist activities"
"Eight hundred and forty-nine members of the British public were recruited via word-of-mouth and advertisements posted on various Internet forms to take part in this research. Of these participants, 739 (87%) were male, 94 (11%) were female and 16 (.02%) did not identify their gender or reported a non-binary gender. The mean age was 57.19, with a standard deviation of 12.00. Ethnically, 831 (98%) identified as White, 3 (.4%) as East Asian, 2 (.2%) as South Asian, 0 as Black, and 13 (2%) as “other”; 405 (54%) identified themselves as having no religion, 366 (43%) identified as Christian, 0 identified as Muslim, 74 (9%) identified themselves as “other” and 4 (.5%) declined to identify a religion; 702 (83%) identified as heterosexual, 39 (5%) as gay, 94 (11%) as bi-sexual, and 14 (2%) as “other”."
The incentive was not appropriate for the study. That amount of money is considered excessive:
"All those who completed the survey were offered the chance to win £150 in a prize draw."
Questioned were purposefully vague (partially undressed COULD be seen as meaning swimsuit or boxers):
"To assess participation naturist activities, participants were asked to indicate (yes vs. no) whether they had ever taken part in “in clothes-free activities (i.e., activities in which you have been fully or partially undressed outdoors and/or in the company of other people (other than your close family or romantic partner).” The language of this question deliberately focused on participants’ behaviour and avoided the labels “nudist” and “naturist”."
"To distract participants from the true purpose of the study, a number of filler items were included concerning relationships between males and females, gender norms and sexual activity in general."
They further go on to admit that the latter question was misleading and far too inclusive for the study they were attempting. They state that they know this lead to misleadingly high amounts of positive responses yet decide to include these responses.
This means even if they got results they are meaningless because they fully admit that they are probably innaccurate.
"A final limitation that must be acknowledged is the weak relationship between naturist activity and positive body image in Study 1 (b = .08 ). This suggests the potential criticism that the effects of naturism are not practically meaningful, even if they are statistically significant. Also, further analyses in Study 1 revealed that the relationship between naturism and body image was weakest (or absent) for participants who engaged in the most naturist activities"
There are no words for his latest posts:
Dudes definitely a
Last edited:
- Joined
- Aug 9, 2019
Don't call him a "MAP". Don't sugarcoat it, and call him what he is, a pedophile.
- Joined
- Feb 24, 2019
- Joined
- Sep 11, 2019
I feel now is a good a time as any to point out that this man lives a 9 minute walk away from an elementary school (Meadowbrook school, 65 wyckoff road, eatontown, NJ)
Sort of hoping his driving was so bad that they took his license away.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Feb 24, 2019
With the amount of shit hes posted hopefully at least one mandated reporter on reddit has notified someone.
He is still going...
- Joined
- Nov 17, 2017
I think Coffey25 might actually like this site if they gave it a chance. The key is to just scroll past the troll posts, which I think is a lot more difficult for a redditor than a k farmer.
I got news for you @ryu289. I'm sure you've seen To Catch A Predator. Guess what, they arrest the guys for attempting to get with the kids. Some of those arrested on there are non-offending MAPs (aka still pedos) that didn't engage in any acts with children, but definitely wanted to and definitely tried to. They don't set a kid as bait and wait for the guy to fuck them to confirm he's a pedophile lol. It wouldn't surprise me at all if you were one of these guys who doesn't consider himself a pedophile solely because you haven't been caught in the act yet.
This has always been one of the craziest things to me, how far and fast the transition was for the ~2010 liberal to 180 on pretty much everything they believed previously. Been a fascinating ride watching how power (not even really power, more like only the perception of power or perception of being morally correct) can change up somebody's beliefs.
It's posts like this and the others above that basically confirm the belief that Blaustein is at least desiring to molest children, if not actively attempting. Because he is also attracted to adult trannies as well as kids, he can't be a pedophile because pedophiles are exclusively attracted to children. Additionally to be labelled a pedophile (according to him) you have successfully engage in CSA.
I got news for you @ryu289. I'm sure you've seen To Catch A Predator. Guess what, they arrest the guys for attempting to get with the kids. Some of those arrested on there are non-offending MAPs (aka still pedos) that didn't engage in any acts with children, but definitely wanted to and definitely tried to. They don't set a kid as bait and wait for the guy to fuck them to confirm he's a pedophile lol. It wouldn't surprise me at all if you were one of these guys who doesn't consider himself a pedophile solely because you haven't been caught in the act yet.
- Joined
- Apr 23, 2014
Coffey25 and ApprehensiveSnake759 aka the dynamic duo. Since they’re both reading the thread they should join up and have fun with the rest of us. I don’t know what is fuelling @ryu289 at this point. It’s either sheer spite or he can’t face not having the last word and really wanting the win.