Pedophilia in the gay community - oh no, homophobia

[NerdShamer]

The first one was responding to a guy above you.
Second of all, giving sources is poor etiquette?

No, this is.

It sounds like you are victim blaiming here. You are also falling for the ought-is fallacy here. I mean how do you determine how a person should act based on their biology? What you propose is very hazardous:

The Masculinity Motivation | Stanford Law Review

The first reports emerged in October 2017 in the New York Times and the New Yorker that dozens of women had accused movie producer Harvey Weinstein of

www.stanfordlawreview.org

How ‘Boys Will Be Boys’ Still Poisons Our Legal System

Defenses like ‘locker-room talk’ aren’t just memorable Trump lines — they’re used to normalize male sexual violence in courtrooms nationwide

melmagazine.com

Really?

The Results of Sweden's Extreme Gender-Neutral Education

Sweden has led the way on extreme gender-neutral preschool education for twenty years; now a study summarizes the results. It turns out gender neutral education can reduce gender stereotypes.

theswaddle.com

Sweden’s gender-neutral preschools produce kids who are more likely to succeed

A new study looks at what the preschoolers do and do not associate with "boys" and "girls."

qz.com

How to Raise a Feminist Son (Published 2017)

We raise our girls to fight stereotypes and pursue their dreams, but we don’t do the same for our boys.

www.nytimes.com

This isn't telling kids that "gender" doesn't exist fyi. It's just to point out they have a choice and don't need to follow steryotypes

What some call "biological sex" depends on alot of factors going in a certain direction which we shouldn't take for granted.

Accordingly, "some people may cross-dress, some may want to socially transition," and others may decide to medically transition with hormone therapies or gender affirmation surgery notes the American Psychiatric Association.

And those who do so are almost always shown to be in good health: https://www.nbcnews.com/feature/nbc...ng-term-mental-health-benefits-study-n1079911

https://www.transadvocate.com/cling...of-transgender-medical-literature_n_13842.htm

https://web.archive.org/web/2018090...image-sexual-functioning-and-quality-of-life/

https://genderanalysis.net/2015/09/...ransitioning-is-effective-gender-analysis-10/

https://genderanalysis.net/2019/12/...-gender-clinics-are-overwhelmingly-satisfied/

https://web.archive.org/web/2018090...eversal-statistics-a-clearer-picture-emerges/

https://www.forbes.com/sites/dawnst...tic-gender-at-early-age-just-like-other-kids/

https://kathrynhgordon.com/2018/05/...ed-statements-from-a-viral-ben-shapiro-video/


See above. You can't just expect everyone to fit inside a narrow field of choices. And the abuse is done to force them in these boxes:

Link Between LGBT, Religion & Homelessness, Suicide

Being gay or in any way sexually different can be a real challenge for people who live in religious communities, and it appears that the higher the

www.patheos.com

Disparities for LGBTQ and Gender Nonconforming Adolescents

By examining experiences of household dysfunction and abuse, disparities in patterns of adversity (such as polyvictimization) for LGBTQ and gender nonconforming adolescents are identified in this study.

pediatrics.aappublications.org

If anything you are promoting genetic determinism.

 

[ryu289]

Again I am just giving sources.

 

[Newman's Own]

Why aren't you trying to do it yourself? That link only explains how it is supposed to work, except it doesn't address my points at all. In short you are being lazy b y not explaining how these exceptions in this particular case prove the "rule" that only chromosomes determine sex

I'm not a five year old Ryu. Don't get your hopes up about manipulating me to do anything for you.

Humanity would measurably improve with your absence.

 

[NerdShamer]

Again I am just giving sources.

Without context.

 

[Niggernerd]

I'm not a five year old

Thats a good thing on many levels when talking to this pedophile faggot.

 

[ryu289]

I'm not a five year old Ryu. Don't get your hopes up about manipulating me to do anything for you.

You mean getting you to admit to using fallicious reasoning?

Without context.

...really?
I say something like this:

It sounds like you are victim blaiming here. You are also falling for the ought-is fallacy here. I mean how do you determine how a person should act based on their biology? What you propose is very hazardous:

And then links as examples...how is that without context?

 

[Newman's Own]

In short you are being lazy b y not explaining how these exceptions in this particular case prove the "rule" that only chromosomes determine sex

I said chromosomes determine sex.

I did not say "only chromosomes". That's the poorly constructed and frankly transparent strawman you passed off to cover for the fact that you have no argument and expect people to believe that anomalis events should be considered pedestrian because 'your feelings' of lust toward gender and hermaphroditical oddities.

No-one is buying here, and few buy your bullshit anywhere.

Isn't it time you considered that it probably isn't everyone else who is the problem but rather you?

Perhaps it's not the pool waters fault but rather the turd floating in it that ruined the party.

 

[ryu289]

I said chromosomes determine sex.

I did not say "only chromosomes".

That's the same thing. There are other factors that determine sex yet you ignore them to focus on chromosomes.

 

[Newman's Own]

That's the same thing. There are other factors that determine sex yet you ignore them to focus on chromosomes.

It really isn't the same. A four year old gets the difference between 'misbehavior means no dessert' and 'only misbehavior can lead to no dessert'. Sometimes there's just no ice cream to be had.

Retards and autists think in absolutes and can't comprehend the nuance.

God couldn't decide between the "R" or the "A" when he made you.

 

[NerdShamer]

You mean getting you to admit to using fallicious reasoning?


...really?
I say something like this:

And then links as examples...how is that without context?

Because you didn't give an summary of what each link is to get our attention and most of us don't have the time for diving through several paragraphs of trans research.

Retards and autists think in absolutes and can't comprehend the nuance.

And this is why we're assuming that you don't read half of the "evidence" that you post.

 

[ryu289]

It really isn't the same

Oh? Then explain how "chromosomes determine sex" doesn't have the same meaning here as "only chromosomes determine sex".

 

[ryu289]

Because you didn't give an summary of what each link is to

Again I say things like:

And those who do so are almost always shown to be in good health

Followed by sources. Is it that hard to understand?

 

[Newman's Own]

Oh? Then explain how "chromosomes determine sex" doesn't have the same meaning here as "only chromosomes determine sex".

I just did.

Everyone else got it.

Why didn't you?

 

[ryu289]

I just did.

No you didn't.
You said:

I said chromosomes determine sex.

I did not say "only chromosomes". That's the poorly constructed and frankly transparent strawman you passed off to cover for the fact that you have no argument and expect people to believe that anomalis events should be considered pedestrian because 'your feelings' of lust toward gender and hermaphroditical oddities.

Off course you don't explain how it is a strawman. Or how they are different...
I think you are trolling now.

 

[Newman's Own]

Off course you don't explain how it is a strawman. Or how they are different...
I think you are trolling now.

You really don't get it?

This differentiation is really base level. As I said, a four year old is capable of recognizing the difference a qualifier like "only" exerts on the meaning of a statement.

Perhaps you should go back to Tumblr and find some cognitive equilibrium.

 

[NerdShamer]

Again I say things like:

Followed by sources. Is it that hard to understand?

But unlike Wikipedia, you didn't explain, in your own words, on how healthy they are or why are they doing so great.



You're just posting a statement, followed by several articles.

Oh, can someone do me an solid and keep updating the archive of this thread?

 

[ryu289]

You're just posting a statement, followed by several articles.

Yeah, I was showing my sources, but I guess that is being lazy.

This differentiation is really base level. As I said, a four year old is capable of recognizing the difference a qualifier like "only" exerts on the meaning of a statement.

...really? So because you didn't use a qualifier you can claim "chromosomes determine sex" doesn't mean that "only chromosomes determine sex"?

What does that mean then? That chromosomes are just one part in sex diffrenation? Because that is what I was pointing out before

 

[NerdShamer]

Yeah, I was showing my sources, but I guess that is being lazy.

...really? So because you didn't use a qualifier you can claim "chromosomes determine sex" doesn't mean that "only chromosomes determine sex"?

Then why do you ignore the "anomalies" and pretend it doesn't prove that "chromosomes determine sex" isn't accurate? Because there is more to sex than chromosomes as I have pointed out several times.

What's the difference between the X and Y chromosomes in humans?

 

[ryu289]

What's the difference between the X and Y chromosomes in humans?

Again that alone doesn't determine sex differnation. So yeah this is a bit of a red herring for my argument.

 

[Newman's Own]

...really? So because you didn't use a qualifier you can claim "chromosomes determine sex" doesn't mean that "only chromosomes determine sex"?

A four year old understands this.

You don't.

Chromosomes are the chief determining factor for biological sex. ONLY under exceptional circumstances is this not the case.

When such exceptions occur their anomalous nature proves the rule. The rule is that XY= male and XX=female.

This is grade school science you're having trouble with.

Edit: Shall I link Wikipedia again for you moron?