Cultcow Russell Greer / Mr. Green / @ just_some_dude_named_russell29 / A Safer Nevada PAC - Swift-Obsessed Sex Pest, Convicted of E-Stalking, "Eggshell Skull Plaintiff" Pro Se Litigant, Homeless, aspiring brothel owner

If you were Taylor Swift, whom would you rather date?

  • Russell Greer

    Votes: 117 4.5%
  • Travis Kelce

    Votes: 138 5.3%
  • Null

    Votes: 1,449 55.9%
  • Kanye West

    Votes: 283 10.9%
  • Ariana Grande

    Votes: 607 23.4%

  • Total voters
    2,594
I am not a lawyer, except on the internet where anyone who can speed read the opening paragraph of a Wikipedia article automatically passes the bar and is qualified to act as legal counsel:

That being said, these are the legal options that are left for Greer:

(1) Follow through on his claim that "truth is like a lion: release it and it will defend itself" ('Why I Sued Taylor Swift: and How I Became Falsely Known as Frivolous, Litigious and Crazy') by somehow acquiring a lion from a Vegas stage magician, or a drug lord, and then releasing it into the court room.

(2) Start a new PAC that aims to introduce a legal precedent, wherein the loser of a court case, no matter how minor, is granted an opportunity to explain their side of things.

(3)Wander out into the desert. Take peyote. Wait for the black owl with the voice of Morgan Freeman, who once told him "Taylor doesn't care about leagues or classes -- she cares about effort," to offer him wise counsel.

Note: It is my opinion, as a man who intermittently dwells upon matters of the law, that Russell should be wary of taking advice from this owl, as it has, wilfully or otherwise, provided him with inaccurate information in the past. I am not just saying that because the owl is black. If it was a white owl with the voice of Henry Cavill my advice would be exactly the same. The owl is either a malevolent troll, in the vein of Isabella Janke, or it is a Walter Mitty-esque fantasist, with no genuine insight into the mind of Taylor Swift.

(4) Begin opening random books on page 6, in the hope that something written there will provide him with guidance.

(5) Attempt to tie Scordas to the gang of masked Taylor Swift fans who once set Russell's lawyer friend, Ken, on fire, using Molotov cocktails. This conspiracy goes all the way to the top. Everybody is out to cock-block Russell: The Bilderberg Group, The illuminati, The Crips, Bill fucking Gates. None of them want him to get laid, but why? Somebody needs to start following the money.

(6) Having failed to sue Joshua Moon, sue the actual moon.
 
Last edited:
sorry for bringing this stuff up yet again 70 pages later, but i just read through it again and there's something i can't figure out about it.
russ says "i have changed, i have moved on with my life" but i don't understand what he means by that? he's still trying to bang hookers just like he was 5 years ago, he's still filing nonsense lawsuits just like he was 5 years ago, and still creeping on random thots social media profiles like he was 5 years ago. so what exactly has changed about him, what has he 'moved on' from?
"That was like 4 or 5 days ago, c'mon man!"
 
Wow, that came out fast. Just started reading and had to stop to mention footnote on Page 1:

"Perplexingly, the Defendants do not raise the issue that Kiwi Farms, as a website, is not a legal entity capable of being sued."

I mentioned that way back a few minutes after I stumbled across the lawsuit and brought it to the Farms' attention. How do you sue a website?? He needed to name the "corporate" entity behind the website. I am glad that was pointed out as I thought I was going nuts that they were entertaining his improper naming of a defendant and didn't turf at least the action against KF immediately. At least that has now been addressed.

Now, back to reading what I expect will be another great smackdown on Russ.
Maybe I'm misremembering, but I remember Nick talking about how it seemed like Skordas was purposefully avoiding the most obvious and quick dismissal points (like lack of jurisdiction) and instead focusing on the 12(b)(6) motion because it would have a greater chance of getting Russ's case dismissed with prejudice.
 
(1) Follow through on his claim that "truth is like a lion: release it and it will defend itself" ('Why I Sued Taylor Swift: and How I Became Falsely Known as Frivolous, Litigious and Crazy') by somehow acquiring a lion from a Vegas stage magician, or a drug lord, and then releasing it into the court room.
I have a better one: Law is like a fence: a lion will jump over it, a snake will slip through it but a cow will never pass it.
So, more bad news for Russ...
 
You can never predict cows, but I'm gonna try to summarize the possibilities for the next chapter for ol' Rusty here.

1. The Battle Against Section 230 to take down Skordas and Moon
2. Return his focus to his White Whale, Taylor Swift with a new (fourth?) lawsuit
3. Having to return to his parents after losing all his money this summer on his useless pursuits
4. Once his 1-year lease is up, moving to LA to search for his twin sister and chase the hollywood dream
5. A new song, for a new instathot
6. A hooker bender with what little money he has left, targetting cheap street whores who might not know who he is
7. Edit: marching to the Bunny Ranch and demanding some sex

Really I think 5 or 1 are most likely, though 4 would be my preferred outcome
I could foresee some sort of stalking or sexual assault charges in the neer future.

But with lolcows like Russ the sky's the limit. Hope to see him argue against section 230 to the supreme court.
 
greg-skordas-russell-greer-smiths.jpg

1632317949870.png
 
I'd love to be a fly on the wall of Russhole's shitty little apartment right now to see how he's taking his most recent failure. I'm sure I'm not alone there. Is he raging and breaking things in his apartment? Is he collapsed on his bed in a heap, sobbing uncontrollably? I'm very curious as to how he's handling the news.

I'm also anxious to see what his next hairbrained, crazy-ass scheme will be. Will he try to woo another celebrity with his wooing music? Will he continue on with his PAC, even though it's dead in the water and no sex worker will have anything to do with him? Will he try yet another frivolous lolsuit? How will Dildo Saggins fail again? Or has he finally reached his breaking point after so many recent knocks to his fragile narcissistic image and now he's going to start lashing out in violence?

And you'd think that after a long career of nothing but failures that Russ would cut his losses and just hide himself away. That's what any REASONABLE person would do. Literally none of his schemes have ever reached success. It's just one failure after another for years on end.
 
A brief primer for Judge Campbell:

"Russell Greer fucks dead goats" is a vile, untrue (probably) statement intended to nudge his life toward the miserable (he doesn't need our help for that).

"Russell Greer thinks women should be legally required to have sex with any disabled man who wants to fuck them" is a vile statement but it's his, not ours.
 
I love how the judge said "Look, I feel bad for you and all. But it's not my job to pat you on the ass and tell you everything's going to be wonderful. Now get fucked you gimpy faced retard... Oh wait, you can't."
He's 100% going to interpret that closing paragraph as being "we really wish we could give you a billion dollars for hurt feelings, but that dang-darn Section 230 ...."
 
i mean there would be some truth to that if he had actually changed, but he obviously hasn't. does he really not realize that his continued public creeping on hookers completely contradicts his "i've changed!" narrative?
If anything he's gotten worse. He's escalating.

I can't wait to see how he handles this latest series of crushing blows. Having some European ho blow his PAC out, and having some bias judge throw his lawsuit out?
I realized why I have never seen them dismissed with prejudice. Every time I was sued by my personal lolcow it was dismissed because of subject matter or diversity jurisdiction, which is usually resolved by filling in the correct court. Nevermind that there was nothing the suit could actually remedy. Why some judges don't just cut the lawsuit off by the head instead of just smacking their hand and telling them to file somewhere else I don't understand. Guess they are just fucking lazy.
Even for failure to state a claim, the judge is typically going to dismiss with leave to amend. Dismissing with prejudice is reserved for cases where the court has considered the merits and finds nothing to justify allowing the plaintiff to amend and re-file it.
 
Back