Wuhan Coronavirus: Megathread - Got too big

Status
Not open for further replies.
Sounds like one is causing the other. You know what would be really stupid? If the Great Filter wasn't nukes,climate change, bioleninism, or whatever the issue du jour happens to be in 5 years, but the HR profession becoming so collectively god-awful that it drives the labour force participation rate down to skeleton-crew levels, through a feedback loop of labour shortages driving more intensive work environments, making us extremely vulnerable to the slightest shocks.
The accelerationist in me has just gained a newfound appreciation for the HR profession.

It could be interesting to compare Florida data with the ones from other states like Texas, Ohio, New York and California.
I'm going to make the riskiest gamble in the history off betting the odds and say that in any of those states, the promised viral apocalypse never came.

No bodies in the streets.
No dent in the human population.
Just a mild respiratory virus like has happened thousands of times in human history, and probably tens of millions of times in our evolutionary lineage.
 
@Drain Todger your letter is starting to go places, Zerohedge is now featuring it in all its glory.

God bless your autistic love of reading research papers, it's going to be absolute hilarity once mainstream media finally notices it - and its extensive citations :story:
Oh wow, there it goes. :story:

I just thought it was generally quite disturbing that nobody noticed what the hell was going on with this Spike protein, and they were being so cavalier about making it in-situ in the body.

I know that the HexaPro version of the Spike has a substitution at the furin cleavage site, so it shouldn't be cleaved by furin there, but IIRC, these vaccines don't use HexaPro. They use 2P, with two proline substitutions to lock the heads of the spike. Those substitutions are on the S2, not the S1.


The way the Spike normally works is like this. The S1 trimers, the part with the receptor-binding domains, lock onto ACE2. A human protease comes and cleaves them off and they fall away. That process of cleavage activates the S2, which unfolds, driving into the cell membrane, and then folds back on itself, pulling the two membranes together for fusion and endocytosis of the viral nucleocapsid.

This process of cleavage acts as, essentially, a sensor. To the Spike protein, it means "I'm within range of a cell membrane and ready for fusion". Yes, human proteases participate in the process. It may seem weird that human proteins actually help process a virus's proteins, but what we're talking about are chemicals, here. They have no eyes, nor brain. They can't see that they're helping a great big fucking virus.

The proline substitutions are supposed to stiffen the protein to keep the S1s from moving to the position where they're ready to fuse. However, these proteins are being expressed in human cells, and they have a transmembrane domain. So, basically, rather than the Spike sticking in towards a cell, it is sticking out of the cell membrane, the same way it would if it were sticking out of a virus's membrane. It is already in range of membrane-bound proteases. Because the prolines are on the S2 and not the S1, if, by some chance, the S1 can still be cleaved off from the S2 by some means, that S1 subunit will float away and the S2 will extend. If the S2 extends into another, adjacent cell membrane, congrats. You now have syncytia:


The S1 on its own is nasty, toxic, can penetrate the BBB on its own, and can aggregate amyloid.



This might explain the "brain fog" the vaccinated are complaining about. They may already be in the early stages of premature neurodegeneration from amyloid aggregation.

To put this in everyday terms, if, for some reason, the Spike protein produced by these vaccines is not fully inert (and given the side effects, it is likely that it is not) then we are officially up shit creek.

Some may be skeptical about the BCI stuff, but let's face it. Charles Lieber, Robert Langer, Wuhan, and our own DOD form a neat circle. They're all directly linked. Charles Lieber had funding from ONR, DARPA, AFOSR, NIH, and MITRE. DARPA has been continuously researching non-invasive BCIs.


Langer's own bibliography looks like this:


2020

Raman, R., Hua, T., Gwynne, D., Collins, J., Tamang, S., Zhou, J., Esfandiary, T., Soares, V., Pajovic, S., Hayward, A., Langer, R., Traverso, G. Light-degradable hydrogels as dynamic triggers for gastrointestinal applications. Science Advances, 6:eaay0065, 2020. PMID32010768; PMC6968934; DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.aay0065

Yu, J., Wang, J., Zhang, Y., Chen, G., Mao, W., Ye, Y., Kahkoska, A., Buse, J., Langer, R., Gu, Z. Glucose-responsive smart insulin patch for blood glucose regulation in mice and pigs, Nature Biomedical Engineering, 499–506, 2020. DOI:10.1038/s41551-019-0508-y

Sarmadi, M., Behrens, A.M., McHugh, K.J., Contreras, H., Tochka, Z., Lu, X., Langer, R., Jaklenec, A. Modeling, design, and machine learning-based framework for optimal injectability of microparticle-based drug formulations. Science Advances, 2020.

Volpatti, L., Matranga, M.A., Cortinas, A.B., Delcassian, D., Daniel, K., Langer, R., Anderson, D., Glucose-responsive nanoparticles for rapid and extended self-regulated insulin delivery, ACS Nano, 14 (1): 488-497, 2020. DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.9b06395. PMID: 31765558

Mirvakili, S., Sim, D., Hunter, I., Langer, R. Magnetically induced thermal pneumatic artificial muscles. Science Robotics, 2020.

Yang, K., O’Cearbhaill, E., Liu S., Zhou, A., Hamilos, A., Chitnis, G., Xu, J., Giraldo, J., Verma, M., Pop, R., Langer, R., Melton, D.,. Greiner, D., Karp, J. SUbA therapeutic convection enhanced macroencapsulation device for enhancing β cell viability and insulin secretion. Science Advances,

Mirvakili, S., Ngo, Q.P., Langer, R. Polymer nanocomposite microactuators for on-demand chemical release via high-frequency magnetic field excitation. Nano Letters, 2020, 4816-4822 DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.0c00648 PMC7349659; PMID: 32479730

Srinivasan, S., Ramadi. K., Vicario, F., Gwynne, D., Hayward, A., Lagier, D., Langer, R., Frassica, J., Baron, R., Traverso, G. A rapidly deployable individualized system for augmenting ventilator capacity. Science Translational Medicine, 2020. PMID32424018; PMC7259824; DOI: 10.1126/scitranslmed.abb9401

Roberts, T., Langer, R., Wood, M. Advances in oligonucleotide drug delivery. Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, 2020. DOI: 10.1038/s41573-020-0075-7

Lu, X., Miao, L., Gao, W., Chen, Z., McHugh, K., Sun, Y., Tochka, Z., Tomasic, S., Sadtler, K., Hyacinthe, A., Huang, Y., Graf, T., Hu, Q., Sarmadi, M., Langer, R., Anderson, D., Jaklenec, A. Engineered PLGA microparticles for long-term, pulsatile release of STING agonist for cancer immunotherapy. Science Translational Medicine, 2020. DOI: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aaz6606

Sadtler, , Collins, J., Byrne, J., Langer, R. Parallel evolution of polymer chemistry and immunology: integrating mechanistic biology with materials design. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, 2020. doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2020.06.021

Patel, A, Kaczmarek, J, Bose, S, Kauffman, K, Mir, F, Heartlein, M, DeRosa, F, Langer, R, and Anderson, D, Inhaled Nanoformulated mRNA Polyplexes for Protein Production in Lung Epithelium, Advanced Materials, PMID: 30609147 DOI: 1002/adma.201805116

Von Erlach, T., Saxton, S., Shi, Y., Minahan, D., Reker, D., Javid. F., Lee, Y.L., Schoellhammer, C., Esfandiary, T., Cleveland, C., Booth, L. Lin, J. Levy, H., Blackburn, S., Hayward, A., Langer, R., Traverso, G. Robotically handled whole-tissue culture system for the screening of oral drug formulations. Nature Biomedical Engineering, 4, 544–559, 2020. DOI:10.1038/s41551-020-0545-6

Reker, D., Shi, Y., Kirtane, A.R.., Hess, K., Zhong, G.J., Crane, E., Lin, C., Langer, R., Traverso, G. Machine learning uncovers food-and-excipient-drug interactions. Cell Reports, 30, 3710–3716, 2020. DOI:1016/j.celrep.2020.02.094 PMID: 32187543 PMCID: PMC7179333

Li, J., Liang, Y.J., Laken, S., Langer, R., Traverso, G. Clinical opportunities for continuous biosensing and closed-loop therapies. Trends in Chemistry, 2 (4): 319-340, 2020. DOI:10.1016/j.trechm.2020.02.009

Rudra, A., Li, J., Shakur, R., Bhagchandani, S., Langer, R. Trends in therapeutic conjugates: bench to clinic, Bioconjugate Chemistry, 31 (3), 462-473, 2020. DOI: 10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.9b00828

Verma, M., Chu, J., Salama, J., Faiz, M., Eweje, F., Gwynne, D., Lopes, A., Hess, K., Soares, V., Steiger, C., McManus, R., Koeppen, R., Hua, T., Hayward, A., Collins, J., Tamang, S.M., Ishida, K., Miller, J., Katz, S., Slocum, A.H., Sulkowski, M.S., Thomas, D.L., Langer, R., Traverso, G. Development of a long-acting direct-acting antiviral system for Hepatitis C virus treatment in swine. Proceedings of the National Academies of Sciences, 117 (22) 11987-11994, 2020. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2004746117

Sarmadi, M., Behrens, A., Kevin J. McHugh, K., Contreras, H., Tochka, Z., Lu, X., Langer, R., Jaklenec, A. Modeling, design, and machine learning-based framework for optimal injectability of microparticle-based drug formulations. Science Advances, 6:8, eabb6594, 2020. DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.abb6594

Haley RM, Gottardi R, Langer R, Mitchell MJ. Cyclodextrins in drug delivery: applications in gene and combination therapy. Drug Delivery Translational Research, 10:661- 677, 2020. PMID32077052 DOI:10.1007/s13346-020-00724-5

Wei, T., Cheng, Q., Farbiak, L., Anderson, D.G., Langer, R., Siegwart, D.J. Delivery of Tissue-Targeted Scalpels: Opportunities and Challenges for In Vivo CRISPR/Cas-Based Genome Editing. ACS Nano, 2020, DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.0c04707

Saunders N.R.M., Paolini M.S., Fenton O.S., Poul L., Devalliere J., Mpambani F., Darmon A., Bergere M., Jibault O., Germain M., Langer R. A Nanoprimer to Improve the Systemic Delivery of siRNA and mRNA. Nano Letters, 20:4264-4269, 2020. PMID32357299; DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.0c00752

Ramadi, K., Dagdeviren, C., Bhagchandani, P.; Nunez-Lopez, C., Kim, M. Langer, R., Graybiel, A., Cima, M. Simultaneous recording and marking of brain microstructures. Journal of Neural Engineering, 17: 044001, 2020. DOI:10.1088/1741-2552/aba161

Bose, S., Volpatti, L., Thiono, D., Yesilyurt, V., McGladrigan, C., Tang, Y., Facklam, A., Wang, A., Jhunjhunwala, S, Veiseh, O., Hollister-Lock, J., Bhattacharya, C., Weir, G., Greiner, D., Langer, R., Anderson, D. A retrievable implant for the long-term encapsulation and survival of therapeutic xenogeneic cells. Nature Biomedical Engineering, 4: 814-826, 2020. DOI:10.1038/s41551-020-0538-5

Schwerdt, H., Amemori, K., Gibson, D., Stanwicks, L., Yoshia, T., Bichot, N., Amemori, S., Desimone, R., Langer, R., Cima, M., Graybiel, A. Dopamine and beta-band oscillations differentially linked to striatal value and motor control, Science Translation Medicine, in press.

Abramson, A., Della, D., Kong, Y.L., Zhou, J., Gao, Y., Collins, J., Tamang, S., Wainer, J., McManus, R., Hayward, A., Frederiksen, M.R., Water, J.J., Jensen, B., Roxhed, N., Langer, R., Traverso, G. Ingestible transiently anchoring electronics for microstimulation and conductive signaling. Science Advances, in press, 2020.

Tang, Z., Kong, N., Zhang, X., Liu,Y. Ping Hu, P., Mou, S., Liljeström, P., Shi, P.J., Tan, W., Kim, J.S., Cao, Y., Langer, R., Leong, K., O Farokhzad, O., Tao, W. Responding to COVID-19: What can materials scientists do? Nature Review Materials, 2020, in press.

Raman, R., Rousseau, E.B., Wade, M. ,Tong, A., Cotler, M.J., Kuang, J., Aponte Lugo, A., Zhang, E., Graybiel, A.M., White, F.M, Langer, R., Cima, M.J. Platform for micro-invasive membrane-free biochemical sampling of brain interstitial fluid, Science Advances, 2020, in press.

Yin, H., Bogorad, R., Barnes, C., Zhuang, I., Nonaka, H., Ruda, V., Kuchimanchi, S., Nechev, L., Akinc, A., Zerial, M., Langer, R., Anderson, D. and Koteliansky, V., Efficient multiplex knockdown mediated control of organ size and its application for rapid analyses of molecular interactions in vivo, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,

Han, M., Cha, Y., Jeong, H., Zoldan, J., Burkart, A., Kim, C., Kim, H., Cho, S., Kim, B., Langer, R., Kahn, R., Cha, H., Guarente, L. and Kim, K., Metabolic control of human pluripotent stem cell fate and function by deacetylase SIRT2, Science, submitted.

Taylor, L., Arner, K., Kolewe, M., Pritchard, C., Hendy, G., Langer, R. and Ghosh, F., Tissue stabilization in vitro using surface modification of poly(glycerol-co-sebacic acid) membranes in adult porcine retinal explants, Biomaterials, submitted.

Mizrahi, B., Khoo, X., Chiang, H., Sher, K., Feldman, R., Irusta, S., Langer, R. and Kohane, D., Multi-armed prepolymer for antifouling coatings, Journal of the American Chemical Society, submitted.

Fenton, O., Kauffman, K., McClellan, R., Appel, E., Dorkin, J., Tibbitt, M., Heartlein, M., DeRosa, F., Langer, R. and Anderson, D., Bioinspired alkenyl amino alcohol ionizable lipid materials for highly potent in vivo mRNA delivery, Journal of the American Chemical Society, submitted.

Indolfi, L., Ligorio, M., Ting, D., Xega, K., Tzafriri, A., Bersani, F., Aceto, N., Deshpande, V., Ferrone, C., Haber, D., Langer, R., Clark, J. and Edelman, E., A local drug delivery platform to enhance cytotoxic effects of chemotherapy in pancreatic cancer, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, submitted.

Lin, J., Dargazany, R., Zhang, S., Jafari, M., Lee, Y., Hurowitz, H., Langer, R. and Traverso, G., Corona molecular dynamics of poly(ethylene glycol)-coated nanoparticles, Nano Letters, submitted.

Kahn, O., Tsosie, J., Spanoudaki, V., Zaia, E., Chiu, A., Tang, K., Siebert, S., Bader, A., Aresta-Dasilva, S., Langan, E., Langer, R., Anderson, D., Implant surface modifications modulate blood vessel geometry and vascular organization at the material-host interface, Journal of the American Chemical Society, submitted

McAvoy, M., Tsosie, J, Vyas, K, Khan, O, Sadtler, K, Anderson, D, and Langer, R, Stretchable Multielectrode Array for Skeletal Muscle Conditioning, Acetylcholine Receptor Stabilization and Epimysial Recording After Critical Peripheral Nerve Injury, Biomaterials, submitted.

Ferreira, M., Neubert, J., Atala, A., Breuer, C., Collins, S., Keating, A., Langer, R., Rapoza, M., Reeve, B., Russell, A., Roberts, M., Parsons-Wingerter, P., Stoudemire, J., Gobel, D., Harper, L., Hunsberger, J., Naughton, G., Moldovan, N., Solorzano, R., Pereira, T., Roadmap to ending the organ shortage: Research strategies, challenges and opportunities, Nature Biotechnology, submitted.

Hlavaty, K., Booty, M., Stockman, A., Tian, L., How, E., Subramanya, D., Venkitaraman, A., Yee, C., Ozay, E., Pryor, O., Smith, C., Volk, K., Blagovic, K., Vicente-Suarez, I., Yarar, D., Myint, M., Merino, A., Chow, J., Pomerance, L., Abdeljawad, T., An, H., Stokes, B., Liu, S., Mao, S., Heimann, M., von Adrian, U., Jensen, K., Langer, R., Knoetgen, H., Trumpfheller, C., Bernstein, H., Sharei, A., Loughhead, S., Microfluidic squeezing enables antigen presentation by diverse immune cell types to elicit CD8+ T cell responses, Nature Biomedical Engineering, submitted.

Ramadi, K., Bashyam, A., Frangieh, C., Rousseau, E., Cotler, M., Langer, R., Graybiel, A., Cima, M., Computationally guided intracerebral drug delivery via chronically implanted microdevices, Cell Reports, submitted.

Talebian, S., das Neves, J., Sarmento, B., Langer, R., Conde, J. Facts and figures about nanotechnology in the past 20 years. Nature Nanotechnology, submitted.

Volpatti, L., Facklam, A., Cortinas, A., Matranga, M., Hill, M. Langer, R., Anderson, D. Microgel encapsulated nanoparticles for glucose-responsive insulin delivery. Biomaterials, submitted

Kirtane, A.R. , Karavasili, C., Wahane, A. , Dao Le, T.H., Hua, T., Scala, C., Lopes, A., Hess, K., Collins, J., Tamang, S., Ishida, K., Rajesh, N., Phan, N., Li, J., Hayward, A., Langer, R., Traverso, G. Molecular gastronomy-inspired drug delivery systems for paediatric applications. Nature Communications, submitted.

Schwerdt, H., Amemori, K., Gibson, D., Stanwicks, L., Yoshia, T., Bichot, N., Amemori, S., Desimone, R., Langer, R., Cima, M., Graybiel, A. Dopamine and beta-band oscillations differentially linked to striatal value and motor control, Science Translation Medicine,

Li, W., Qiu, J., Li, X., Aday, S., Zhang, J., Conley, G., Xu, J., Langer, R., Mannix, R., Karp, J.M., Joshi, N. BBB pathophysiology independent delivery of siRNA in traumatic brain injury. Science Advances, submitted.

Caffarel-Salvador, E., Kim, S., Soares, V., Tian, R.Y., Stern, S.R., Minahan, D., Yona, R., Lu, X., Zakaria, F.R., Collins, J., Wainer, J., Wong. J., McManus, R., Tamang, S., McDonnell, S., Ishida, K., Hayward, A. Liu, X., Hubàlek, F., Vegge, A., Frederiksen, M., Rahbek U., Yoshitake, T., Fujimoto, J., Roxhed, N., Langer, R., Traverso, G., A microneedle platform for buccal macromolecule delivery. Science Advances, submitted.

McLean, W.J., Hinton, A.S., Herby, J., Yang-Hood, A., Schrader, A.D., Ohlemiller, K.K., Salt, A.N., Hartsock, J.J., Wilson, S., Lucchino, D., King, S., Jackson, L.E., Rosenbloom, J., Atiee, G., Bear, M., Runge, C., Gifford, R., Rauch, S., Lee, D., Langer, R., Karp, J., Loose, C., LeBel, C. Improved speech intelligibility in subjects with stable sensorineural hearing loss following intratympanic dosing of FX-322. Otology & Neurotology, submitted.

Sadtler, K., MacIsaac, C., Zepeda, F., Langer, R., Anderson, D.G. The clotting cascade: a link between scar formation and the foreign body response. Science Translational Medicine, submitted.

Mitchell, M., Billingsley, M., Haley, R., Wechsler, M., Peppas, N.A., Langer, R. Engineering precision nanoparticles for drug discovery. Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, submitted.

That's not just drug delivery. That's augmentation.

If you listen to this video by Dr. James Giordano, you will quickly realize something:


There is no way to know if you are under an enemy attack with this technology. There is no way to test that many people for nanoparticles in their brain without killing them and doing an autopsy. There is no attribution; even if you realize you were attacked, there's no way to know who did it. All it takes is a few enemy agents tainting a water or air supply to cause noticeable behavioral changes in large segments of the population. The existence and nature of the technology basically compels you to defend against it by being the first one to put it in your own citizens' heads.

We're in a Cold War-style arms race right now, and the target is the human brain.

9EmJLh2YA4jSysLZkw28Xv1kMuBLokbhpd1YYfV5TYk.png
 
You know, the only thing that has really prevented me from being able to see this as an intentional release is that it targets fat, sick, black, and old people. While not uniformly drains on society, it doesn’t make sense for an enemy to release a virus that targets those less likely to be productive in the population they’re attacking. Why not target the youngest and healthiest? Why remove the very people who, if you absolutely had to pick some demographics to delete, would definitely be prime candidates?

But a couple of thoughts...a nation with a surfeit of fatties, olds, and highly melanated parasites might play with the idea of creating a virus that would target its own undesirables. If the US was involved, well, that‘s a path of interest. We could certainly play with the idea of removing our own less desirable citizens etc.

Meanwhile, the *vaccine* seems to cause harm primarily to...young, athletic males. And possibly the fertility/ability to carry a child to term of young females.

:thinking:
 
Last edited:
I think some of DrainTodger's posts about the imminent threat of brain manipulation are over the top (oh fuck it, all of his posts are), but there definitely is a potential threat from that. It reminds me of the threat posed by quantum computing which could theoretically crack any secure computer system in the world in seconds and let the user do whatever they wanted to. Key word being "theoretically" (and IIRC some of the danger from that has been overstated in fiction and popular science) since the technology isn't available today and won't be for years.

But it doesn't surprise me some people know the power they'd hold if they had that technology. Jeffrey Epstein was big into transhumanism, and if you can read it/watch it in some popular science thing, so can the elite. The difference is they can fund it, just like Elon Musk funds his dreams of going to Mars (of course, he funds Neurolink too). The public, of course, doesn't realize that this technology isn't quite science fiction.

I'm not convinced that brain manipulation was one of the goals of the scamdemic, although if the technology existed we'd be thoroughly fucked now since they would've injected that shit alongside the vaxx. It's certainly very illustrative though how easy it is to convince people to take an experimental injection assuming you've made up a threat that justifies it. Like I'm sure the elite guessed they were good enough propagandists to convince the brainless NPCs to do whatever they felt like, but they wanted to see if getting injected with garbage that makes you sick was a step too far for anyone but the most dedicated Expert worshippers. Well now we all know that the majority of the population actually is that stupid or can be persuaded into doing it by threat of withholding employment or opportunities.
 
I think some of DrainTodger's posts about the imminent threat of brain manipulation are over the top (oh fuck it, all of his posts are), but there definitely is a potential threat from that. It reminds me of the threat posed by quantum computing which could theoretically crack any secure computer system in the world in seconds and let the user do whatever they wanted to. Key word being "theoretically" (and IIRC some of the danger from that has been overstated in fiction and popular science) since the technology isn't available today and won't be for years.

But it doesn't surprise me some people know the power they'd hold if they had that technology. Jeffrey Epstein was big into transhumanism, and if you can read it/watch it in some popular science thing, so can the elite. The difference is they can fund it, just like Elon Musk funds his dreams of going to Mars (of course, he funds Neurolink too). The public, of course, doesn't realize that this technology isn't quite science fiction.

I'm not convinced that brain manipulation was one of the goals of the scamdemic, although if the technology existed we'd be thoroughly fucked now since they would've injected that shit alongside the vaxx. It's certainly very illustrative though how easy it is to convince people to take an experimental injection assuming you've made up a threat that justifies it. Like I'm sure the elite guessed they were good enough propagandists to convince the brainless NPCs to do whatever they felt like, but they wanted to see if getting injected with garbage that makes you sick was a step too far for anyone but the most dedicated Expert worshippers. Well now we all know that the majority of the population actually is that stupid or can be persuaded into doing it by threat of withholding employment or opportunities.
I used to be a transhumanist, myself. I thought that Deus Ex shit was cool. I thought that one day, we'd all be hacking off our limbs and putting on super-limbs in their place, greatly enhancing our intelligence, improving our eyesight and other senses, rendering ourselves invulnerable to cancer and infectious disease, extending our lifespans, and so on and so forth. I love cyberpunk shit.


However, I always knew, from the very start, what the main problem with this would be. Augmentation that actually improves people's abilities would not be available equally to all. It would be gatekept from people based on their wealth. Therefore, the wealthiest people in the world would use it to enhance themselves and leave the rest of us far behind. Most people would just get a cheap brain chip or something that makes them docile, obedient workers, like the Nerve Staple from Alpha Centauri.

AC_Nerve_Stapling.png


In other words, transhumanism under the current power structures would inevitably result in a caste system that makes the current relationships of power biologically fixed, and prevents mobility from one class to another. They're torpedoing the middle class and destroying mom and pop stores with these lockdowns, so we can already see some shades of that right now. They don't want a middle class to exist. They want to have serfs and nobility. In other words, they're bringing back feudalism.


See, this is really crazy, because I warned people about this shit on SB over and over like seven or eight years ago (i.e. the Elites are Malthusians/anti-natalists and will implement technocratic-socialist neofeudalism soon with fixed caste systems enforced by human augmentation). Nobody wanted to hear it. They were fully emotionally invested in the prosperity gospel and believed that continuing economic growth would eventually raise everyone to wealth and status, so warnings about degrowth and depopulation never really got through their skulls. One of my longtime rivals was, himself, a Chinese ex-pat who used to be a rice farmer, but graduated to flipping houses in California and made well over a million dollars in the process. His stance was, you know, the typical Ludwig von Mises sort of classical liberalism.

But that's not what the Elites believe in. Oh, no. Hardly.

In an oligarchy, money is political power. The wealthy Elites don't want people attaining upward mobility because that means you can afford to buy PR, pay off politicians, and practically write the legislature. They believe in the zero-sum game. There is a limited-size oligarch pie, and you becoming an oligarch would make their slice thinner. If, all of a sudden, a bunch of right-wing folks were extraordinarily rich, it would undo all of their "progress" towards the Brazilification of the West.

Why do you think they're cracking down so hard on crypto and small retail traders? They want you poor and disenfranchised. They don't want you to ascend the ladder and take a seat at their table. In fact, they don't want you at the table at all. They want you dead in a ditch.
 
Seconded on the HS books and stuff. my sister homeschools, has for a whiles and loves it.
The ability to (kind of) homeschool legally will be the ONLY good thing to come out of any winter lockdowns. The current situation in France is heavy pressure to inject kids younger and younger, combined with a crackdown on homeschooling that will soon make it illegal in virtually all situations (basically, you can't do it unless you have a kid who is so medically fragile that he/she can't go to school).

My understanding is that Macron's idea was to stick it to the Muslims (which doesn't make much sense, because that isn't much of a homeschooling demographic, so okay then), but he ended up pissing off the Catholics (the kind who have 12 kids, not the nominally Catholic majority who are really mostly atheist), who are the only people here who really do homeschool, but there aren't enough of them to make a difference and they all vote right-wing anyway so fuck them, I guess.
 
Last edited:
Having at least a vague understanding of the concepts of BCIs, substrate-independent minds, bionic prosthetic limbs and the like really did help when it came time for me to realize what the hell they might be doing with this. However, if it weren't for Charles Lieber's arrest, I probably wouldn't have been able to connect the dots. That one single event changed everything.

In 2013, under the Obama administration, DARPA started the BRAIN Initiative to make cyborg soldiers.


People thought it was hocus-pocus. Sci-fi tech with no practical applications. It's not hocus-pocus. It's real. They already have the technology to make prosthetic limbs with touch sensitivity, and, quite possibly, to do things like increase a soldier's threat awareness rather directly by piping various sensations directly into their brains, linking it to sensors, etc.

I used to be one of those Land Warrior spergs who played ARMA and Ghost Recon and shit, so I always thought future warfare would involve unattended ground sensors being launched like mortars, drones everywhere, augmented-reality goggles on every soldier and ballistic computers in every scope, and so forth. I also like writing Mil-SF as a hobby, so there's that.

The thing is, one of the main problems with modern warfare is keeping soldiers together mentally. The rates of depression and PTSD are really, really high. They try countering it with Xanax and Zoloft and shit, but it's not enough.

One of the functions of a BCI could be to "smooth out the wrinkles", so to speak. Elevate mood, keep people focused on the mission, keep them from getting stressed and breaking down. Maybe, to some extent, they could do brain-to-brain. Brains are the best at decoding brain signals, that's for sure. Future soldiers may be "hive-minded" to an extent that they could act almost as a single organism.

Well, I'll be damned. Looks like the Prophet Hideo Kojima was right again.


 
Meanwhile, the *vaccine* seems to cause harm primarily to...young, athletic males.
I'm about as fit as non-athletic college kid could get, but that "second jab to stay in school" had me shivering in bed at midnight, with my body in aches. Took 2 Ibuprofen tablets and a swig of water before sleeping.

I blew it off though on the same day, with the same 2 tablets + water consumption in the morning. However, I went outside at noon — on a bright, beautiful, sunny day, no less — to complete an assignment last minute. I can't tell if it's my youth, the drugs, the Sun, or hell, my willpower that helped brush off the side-effects in less than 24 hours.

Aside from that, stay pure-blooded gents.
 
Last edited:
Approaching one week, and I think I got away with the fake vax info for work.
They needed dates of injections, and the batch numbers. I was able to get those by checking with a family member and using their stuff.
These numbers can be verified by 'approved' companies by ensuring the batch numbers line up with when they were out for injection.
However as far as I can tell these batches are actually a case of 2-3 dozen doses, which means it is relatively impossible to link the names directly to people.
Just rough geolocational areas and the rough time frame.

My HR had last contacted me to know where to send my badge which identifies me as vaccinated.
So barring some sudden surprise this next week....
I think we is gucci.
I love this. Really sticks it to the retards with the "Just don't comply! Faking it is worse" argument.

I'm in the same boat as you. Got sign off from HR this morning.
 
@Drain Todger
I just thought it was generally quite disturbing that nobody noticed what the hell was going on with this Spike protein, and they were being so cavalier about making it in-situ in the body.
Minor nit-pick but that would be ex-situ.
In-situ is "in the wild", and even some purists would argue it means "in the wild and undisturbed".
Ex-situ is in captivity or in a sterile lab setting.

Muh 99% of all doctors & scientists tho
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back