Opinion How to protect our democracy from the next Trump - Turning the DOJ into a weapon against any future President

For four years, millions of Americans asked, “How can the President get away with that?” as President Trump abused his power in unprecedented ways, from undermining our elections to profiting from the presidency and tipping the scales of justice in favor of himself and his political allies. Where were the checks and balances that we had been assured were built into our political system? The answer quickly became clear that existing checks, including impeachment, are insufficient, and significant reforms are needed to safeguard our democracy from presidential corruption.

But nine months since Trump left the White House, Congress has not passed a single bill to prevent future abuses of executive power, even as Trump mulls another presidential run. While President Biden has enacted tougher ethics guidelines for his team, nothing has been done that would stop a future president from repealing them and repeating Trump’s abuses — or worse.

To be clear, Americans did not take Trump’s assault on our democracy sitting down. Voters and organizations committed to the rule of law—including my own, Stand Up America—fought back. Our members drove hundreds of thousands of calls to Congress demanding accountability, mobilized for nationwide protests, and called out Trump’s corruption on a daily basis. What was missing was bold congressional action to stop presidential abuses.

After Watergate, Congress passed a series of reforms that strengthened campaign finance laws, increased transparency, and placed urgently-needed restrictions on the executive branch. The time has come again for Congress to reassert its role as a check on the executive and go further to protect us from future lawlessness.

Fortunately, legislation introduced in the House of Representatives this week—the Protecting Our Democracy Act, led by Rep. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) and co-sponsored by more than 100 additional members—takes bold steps to stop future abuses of presidential power and restore balance across our government.

At its core, the Protecting Our Democracy Act would ensure that no president is above the law. It would enable presidents to be prosecuted for criminal wrongdoing by suspending the statute of limitations for any federal offense committed by a sitting president, whether before or during their term. It would prohibit self-pardons and prevent political interference at the Department of Justice by requiring transparency of communications between the department and the White House. To strengthen other critical checks on the president, the bill would expedite enforcement of congressional subpoenas and enhance protections for whistleblowers.

The Protecting Our Democracy Act would also crack down on blatant corruption and stop presidents from profiting from public office. It would enable Congress to enforce the Emoluments Clause of the Constitution that prohibits a president from accepting bribes, or payments of any kind, from foreign and domestic governments, which Trump did with startling frequency to the tune of millions of dollars.

If nothing else, we learned from the Trump presidency that tradition and democratic norms are insufficient safeguards on their own. For instance, every elected president since Nixon released tax returns to the American people, until Trump ended that streak. The Protecting Our Democracy Act would codify that tradition and ensure transparency by requiring tax disclosure for all major party presidential and vice presidential candidates in a general election. (But not Congressmen, Senators, Staffers, Agency heads, and judges?)

Finally, the Protecting Our Democracy Act would help protect our elections from foreign interference and interference by a sitting president. It would make it a crime to accept information from foreign actors for political advantage, as Trump’s team was eager to do in the infamous Trump Tower meeting. To stop interference after Election Day and depoliticize presidential transitions, the bill would require the General Service Administration to begin the transition process within five days of the presidential election.

None of us know if future abuses of power will come from a Democrat or a Republican president, but we do know that Trump’s tenure exposed enormous gaps in existing safeguards. Trump himself could return to office, or a future president could build on his efforts to corrupt the highest office in our land. If we don’t act, the abuses we’ve already seen could look like child’s play.

For all of these reasons, the Protecting Our Democracy Act should receive bipartisan support and be passed into law this year. After all, if enacted now, these measures would not relitigate the Trump era, they would immediately put limits on President Biden and future presidents of any party. This is bigger than any single president. It’s about whether the checks and balances built into our system endure. That’s why more than 150 organizations from across the political spectrum have endorsed the bill.

If Republicans refuse to support this commonsense legislation, as they have opposed other pro-democracy measures, then Senate Democrats should reform the filibuster to ensure the Protecting Our Democracy Act passes in this Congress. President Biden and a Democratic-controlled Congress cannot squander the window they have right now to act. History would harshly judge inaction in the face of such glaring threats to our democracy.

Sean Eldridge is founder and president of Stand Up America, a group which seeks to increase voter participation and fight corruption.

 
How about you do a competent job to where populists won't win in a landslide?

giphy.gif
 
Sean Eldridge is founder and president of Stand Up America, a group which seeks to increase voter participation and fight corruption.

How much did they pay in the way of lobbyists?
 
Am I the only one that shivers internally when they see "our Democracy" ?

I dont know, there is just this "cult-ish" tone to it, especially the way you see them repeating it over and over like a chant. There is also this political aspect of the "if I repeat a lie enough, it will become true" quote...

Tho I dont know why they worry so much, they clearly just proved to the world that they can and will get away with cheating elections and the mid terms will probably be no different. They CAN be caught but what difference will that make? There wont be any investigation and they will just punish sacrificial lambs to get the bad press away from them. They know we know that they are a bunch of corrupt lying power hungry monsters and they also know we know that they dont need votes anymore (probably never did but still).
 
Another mistake in progress from a tyrannical regime that believes their side will always be in power.
Tyranny is rather insistent. Im not even talking about anyone specific, Im talking about tyranny as a whole. Tyrants learn from the failures of other tyrants while take advantage of current advancements in comparison to the past. Tyranny is a constant attempt just with different cast. Each time failing, sure, but getting better and more destructive at it. I fear the day might come they wont fail, the day tyranny will be "perfected".
 
"Opinion contributor".

journalists are such shameless hacks, they have to create job titles for themselves. Fucking adorable. They gushed that "democracy prevailed" with Biden. It prevailed in 2016, too. It just didn't go their way.
 
Last edited:
Just keep importing more brown people and republitards can never win again. It worked in California and it can work at a national level. Founding stock Americans were too smart so they need to be replaced with more subservient brown goblins.
it works until the enlighted hordes refuse to support satanic practices.

which is why now elections last weeks with 230k ballots pumped at 4am
 
Am I the only one that shivers internally when they see "our Democracy" ?

I dont know, there is just this "cult-ish" tone to it, especially the way you see them repeating it over and over like a chant. There is also this political aspect of the "if I repeat a lie enough, it will become true" quote...

Tho I dont know why they worry so much, they clearly just proved to the world that they can and will get away with cheating elections and the mid terms will probably be no different. They CAN be caught but what difference will that make? There wont be any investigation and they will just punish sacrificial lambs to get the bad press away from them. They know we know that they are a bunch of corrupt lying power hungry monsters and they also know we know that they dont need votes anymore (probably never did but still).
No you're right, it's not democracy or America, it's THEIR democracy and you're ruining everything with your free will and choices.
 
The most unconstitutional travesty in the land for decades has been the Department of Justice being made less and less subordinate to the chief executive, in contravention of the plain letter and spirit of the constitution.
 
The most unconstitutional travesty in the land for decades has been the Department of Justice being made less and less subordinate to the chief executive, in contravention of the plain letter and spirit of the constitution.
Real banana republic hours who up
 
Which oh-so-conveniently will not apply to Dems' benefactors in Beijing, or their hordes of imported voters.
The Russian President drunk-dialing a Republican with "Hey, Comrade, I just got off the potski with the mother of all vodka hangovers, but will be fine tomorrow" will be spun as somehow "politically advantageous" while the Premire of China calling the effin' White House and saying "We're going to cut you off from our trade deals if you don't move another 30 factories over here" will NOT be, that's how it will be interpreted and only a fool doesn't think that.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: LilShotaBoy
Back