Yes. Any continuance by the defendant would extend the restraining order, but that's necessarily true if the plaintiff asks for one unless there's good cause (like Faith being unable to serve him properly the first time because the TRO paperwork got held up for days in Sacramento, and he went to Las Vegas a week early). California apparently allows both the plaintiff and defendant one no-questions-asked request for a continuance. From what I understand (because I'm going off of Vickers' statements here), there was a hearing of sorts in which Ralph kept interrupting the judge, trying to get the judge to say that it was okay for Ralph to keep talking about Faith. The judge's response was, "I can't give you legal advice." Apparently, part of the conversation went:
Ralph: I just want it on the record that I believe I can talk about this case.
Judge: You can say whatever you want on record, that doesn't make it true.
Ralph is also alleged (again, by Vickers) to have said, "There's been a lot of wild accusations of criminal activity, and I'm not going to be answering any of that." The judge told him that he SHOULD seek the advice of an attorney because he might want to exercise his right to plead the fifth, and Ralph's response was, "I mean, I'm just not going to answer those accusations."
EDIT: Just to cover the bases (because I did not ask to share this), Vickers did not give me permission to share this information and this is 100% on me.