You absolutely do, but at the end of the day what's going wrong with the pandemic, the funding of gain of function research, the media bullshit, everything, it's all within the realm that people can accept. Sticking with the basics is effective. People get corruption, people understand different medicines do different stuff. I was listening to Bret Weinstein talk about it on a JRE podcast and he makes an interesting point about biology, and how it is easy for most people to grasp it. You can still get people to understand things about corona, even if the people don't have a background in the field of cell biology. It's very cause/effect, and people can see what happens. It's causing inflammation, we give things to treat inflammation, people get better faster, we can see that. People can get natural selection, and the workings of it, but self assembling graphene on the microscale, electron spins, voltage differentials......you're losing people.
Just like the microscope videos out there about "weird things in the vaccine." There are just so many ways a sample can get contaminated, was that a lint piece or a 'parasite', was that manufacturing junk, or a 'microchip' it does so much more harm than good, because what's going wrong is not complex. I try to tell somebody I know how equating this whole thing to satan is a bad way to change someone's mind. He just can't get it that he's actually doing the opposite of what he wants. He keeps droning on about biblical happenings, which is fine for me, I get it, some of this shit is evil. If you want to change a mind of someone at the grocery store you need to plant a little seed, a small question, not smash them over the head with a bat. You need to decide if it's worth muddying the rest of the information for something you personally feel strongly about. Personally, I don't think it's worth it.
When you delve into the brain control, that's fine, but I agree, it takes away from all your other stuff. I think what happens, is you might get bored with covid, because there is only so much research out there, and so you have to point your energy at something else, and brain control shit is interesting. This creates another problem like when Alex Jones chimes in on things, even if Alex is saying something truthful, all the mainstream has to do is show people a few over the top rants from the guy and you've just discredited the whole thing in the minds of people. There's this odd thing where people have difficulty accepting that XYZ person made a good point if they believe something else totally unrelated. I think we are being trained to have this reaction. If some guy says a mean thing on twitter, suddenly people no longer think he's a great programmer. Those things are unrelated, but people can't look at each separately. It's that bizarre polarization that just doesn't seem to want to die. I wouldn't underestimate this.
Find your core points, and hammer those home, try to leave out the creative speculation however strongly you feel about it. Or don't, at the end of the day you have the final say, and you live with the choices. I guess I am biased, because some of the stuff you pointed out is really helpful, and I hate knowing it's going to hand-waved away because you find other things fascinating. It's an information war, strategy matters.
