Wuhan Coronavirus: Megathread - Got too big

Status
Not open for further replies.
So coordinated it's creepy.

signal-2021-10-05-201533.jpg
 
Last edited:
Is anyone aware that the WHO has an adverse effects worldwide database?

What is the WHO programme?​

The WHO Programme for International Drug Monitoring is a group of more than 150 countries that share the vision of safer and more effective use of medicines. They work nationally and collaborate internationally to monitor and identify the harm caused by medicines, to reduce the risks to patients and to establish worldwide pharmacovigilance standards and systems. UMC has been responsible for the technical and operational aspects of the programme since 1978.

The WHO programme was created in 1968 to ensure that evidence about harm to patients was collected from as many sources as possible. This would enable individual countries to be alerted to patterns of harm that were emerging across the world and which might not be evident from their local data alone.

covid-19 vaccine contains the active ingredient(s): Covid-19 vaccine.
Result is presented for the active ingredient(s).
Total number of records retrieved: 2,201,851.

Totally under reported but everything is there all the same.

Just for shits and giggles.

ivermectin contains the active ingredient(s): Ivermectin.
Result is presented for the active ingredient(s).
Total number of records retrieved: 5,695.

There is also a backend database, need access for that though.

VigiLyze is updated weekly with an overview of the latest incoming data, and through VigiLyze you are also able to learn from the experience reported by other countries.
 
Last edited:
I have a question:
Suppose you are in a situation in your new job. You are a member of a new team. Your manager is pro-vaxx and is even talking how he can't wait to vax his 5-year old, alas the vax is not EUAd for the kids his age. How would you respond if he would ask you if you are vaxxed? (and you are not vaxxed, job doesn't require it, you can just test weekly instead). You can't convince the guy of any rational reasons not to take it, because he is clearly brain-washed. To refuse conversation would mean that he knows you are unvaxxed, because why otherwise would you avoid talking about it. How to politely answer a nosy question?
Well.. apparently(according to the farms here so all the salt in the world) Jesus lied when some people wanted to find him, presumably to kill him prior to it being the right time.

IF true, if it's good enough for Jesus, one without sin, it's good enough for you.
 
I wonder if he can somehow obtain my vax status from HR. Then I would be caught on lie. Testing is mandatory only if you go to office, I don't have to go back to office for at least 10 weeks more.
Hm... If the lie is likely to be called out, I'd try to dodge, and sew the assumption that you're pro vaccine and be like "I'm not some crazy conspiracy theorist. Lulz. Did you know they think the vaccines cause autism/mind-control/Republicanism?" (Or whatever variation on a crazy conspiracy theory you prefer.)
 
Last edited:
To refuse conversation would mean that he knows you are unvaxxed, because why otherwise would you avoid talking about it. How to politely answer a nosy question?
I have really lived in fear of this scenario. My workplace is very woke. I think my boss has just assumed that I'm vaxxed. Very probably your boss just assumed the same and will not ask on his own.

For me, if I ever get caught in a lie, I am totally fucked at work. I don't even know what would happen but it would be bad.

I have a plan to file for the title vii exemption if I need to and to also document everything and make it clear I'm no dummy when it comes to the law. That has given me some peace.

Whenever the vax or pandemic comes up I talk about it for a moment and then change the subject to something work related. I figure that way it will never be natural to casually ask me.
 
I know people that will flat out say "that's not good enough" and "we know the vaccines are safe."

Remember the Offspring drummer that didn't get the second shot because his doctor said it could LITERALLY KILL HIM, and people still called him an anti-vaxx asshole?
I feel like the reason for health screening should cover your bases for the vast majority of normies, but yeah, for vaxxmaxxers it won't be enough.

So coordinated it's creepy.

View attachment 2600911
TBH, 15th is the middle of the month, so it seems more like several ongoing movements that are self-informed by & bandwagoning according to media narratives (muh Delta wave, muh unvaccinated pandemic), rather than some secret coordination.
 
There was one guy in 10th grade filmed his teacher who bullied unvaccinated students in her classroom.
If my teacher told me that I could kill literally everyone on the planet just by not getting a shitty vaxx, I'd be dead from laughing. I think most people would feel like an utter badass when told that.
 
If my teacher told me that I could kill literally everyone on the planet just by not getting a shitty vaxx, I'd be dead from laughing. I think most people would feel like an utter badass when told that.
it's a lot less funny when you had to deal with marxist retard teachers in hillary 2016 shirts screeching about trump and institutionalized racism during class throughout high school
 
>biology teacher
>thinks a 0.2% IFR virus which primarily kills the old & infirm is enough to "kill everyone on the planet"
If it reinfects everyone 500 times eventually it'll get the kills, supposedly.

Also, given how a lot of countries are deciding to end restrictions early and slacken their vax push, will the American government be insane enough to start threatening "superspreader countries", and blaming them for the continuing existence of the virus?
 
Last edited:
If it reinfects everyone 500 times eventually it'll get the kills, supposedly.

Also, given how a lot of countries are deciding to end restrictions early, will the American government be insane enough to start threatening "superspreader countries", and blaming them for the continuing existence of the virus?
considering gretchen fucking whitmer banned mask mandates i'm pretty sure all the narrative's focus is on the vaccines now (and the dems reinstating mask mandates are just dems being dems with their newfound powers)
 
I have a question:
Suppose you are in a situation in your new job. You are a member of a new team. Your manager is pro-vaxx and is even talking how he can't wait to vax his 5-year old, alas the vax is not EUAd for the kids his age. How would you respond if he would ask you if you are vaxxed? (and you are not vaxxed, job doesn't require it, you can just test weekly instead). You can't convince the guy of any rational reasons not to take it, because he is clearly brain-washed. To refuse conversation would mean that he knows you are unvaxxed, because why otherwise would you avoid talking about it. How to politely answer a nosy question?

Due to a bad rep of revealing those sort of personal issues to others in the past (make some excuse or story like long ago too many people you thought you fully trusted with really personal info blabbed about it to everyone which made you feel super god-awful, cynical, depressed, etc.) you don't feel comfortable talking about it even to your manager, and the mere thought of it starts to trigger PTSD/bad memories which would inhibit you from being a good team member, so it's best not to bring it up.
 
I have a question:
Suppose you are in a situation in your new job. You are a member of a new team. Your manager is pro-vaxx and is even talking how he can't wait to vax his 5-year old, alas the vax is not EUAd for the kids his age. How would you respond if he would ask you if you are vaxxed? (and you are not vaxxed, job doesn't require it, you can just test weekly instead). You can't convince the guy of any rational reasons not to take it, because he is clearly brain-washed. To refuse conversation would mean that he knows you are unvaxxed, because why otherwise would you avoid talking about it. How to politely answer a nosy question?
Just cite cultural stigma.
 
Spouse started feeling under the weather 3 nights ago, congestion + post-nasal drip. When we woke up the next day, we both had low fevers, extreme lethargy, and headaches (me), with mild congestion. Yesterday we both felt mostly fine all day, although he's still stuffy and my fever seems to have come back slightly at night. We're going for testing later today. Barring any turns for the worst, I actually hope this is the coof because it's been a total nothingburger so far. Been taking antihistamines and upped our vit D dosages. We live in an area where they almost certainly won't prescribe/fill scripts for ivermectin, so that wasn't an easily obtainable option on short notice. Hopefully we'll test positive, make a speedy, uneventful recovery, and that'll be the end of all the vax-shaming from relatives and friends.
 
This really bugged me, so I went to the Vermont Covid numbers page and pulled the exact charts. I figured something fucky was going on, but what really struck me is they will break all these numbers down on the website, yet completely omit how many people died unvaxxed, how old they were, and anything specific about cause of death. There are a few PDFs from the beginning of the month and they still wont say the age of the dead. My state is doing the exact same thing: there is a complete blackout on specific death information on their website until the 31st.

Figured if I can see the % vaxxed by age, why can't I see % of deaths by age broken down by week? According to Vermont, only one person 20-29 has died from Le Coof since it all began, yet that demographic easily makes up the majority of positive tests. Hmm. Borsabil was spot on with their vaxxed numbers, over 65 is 98% jabbed. You have to love their disingenuous math on the last slide: Hey morons, all 446,306 of those people weren't immediately exposed to Covid after they got the jab. Most of them probably haven't been.

I wasn't a conspiracy nut until Covid. That all changed. Drain Todger is a fucking hero-level autist.

I have been lurking here since this shitshow started.
Most states stopped issuing hospital and mortality data in March. It's all been consolidated in the Fed government which makes it a lot harder to prove they're lying.

So what I'm going to do is estimate the at risk non vaxxed population of Vermont- and discuss whether or not it's possible that 80% of all cases can be attributed to them.

Vermont's population is 623,000 of which 151.500 are over 60.

As you said around 98% of all over 60's in the state have been jabbed which leaves around 3000 olds who haven't been vaccinated.


We can all but eliminate the 0-30 demographic from our discussion, severe illness is so rare in that group that they're not even a rounding error.

Vaxxed Boomers 148500 +
Young uns 256900
_________
405400

Of the 217600 people remaining how many have been vaxxed?

1633503898678.png


75% of 50- 59 year olds and 70% of 35-49 year olds are double jabbed but recall that we're talking about UNVACCINATED people accounting for 80% of hospital admissions so we must include the single dose vaccinated as well which gives us 97% and 90% respectively. Can't find the numbers for the 30-34 age group but it's reasonable to assume 90% for them as well.

That gives us approx 17000 unvaxxed 30-60 year olds and 3000 unvaxxed boomers, so 20,000 people in the entire state who are unvaccinated and at real (if varying) risk of hospitalization.

We know that Delta Covid case numbers peak at 500 per week per 100,000 population and as hospital admissions average about 5% of all cases.

So we can estimate that at the absolute most 100 non vaxxed Vermonters are catching Covid every week. 5% of 100 is 5- so 5 hospital admissions per week.

Currently Vermont is averaging 140 cases per day which would mean 7 hospital admissions per day- 49 per week.

This is assuming that none of the unvaxxed in Vermont have natural immunity, which of course can't be the case.

Rough guess would be that 90-95% of all hospital admissions in Vermont are among the vaccinated. The maths never ever lies even though politicians and doctors do.

You can apply this to anywhere that's reporting vaccination and Covid hospital admissions to figure out if they're lying or not. Spoiler- all of them are lying.
 
Most states stopped issuing hospital and mortality data in March. It's all been consolidated in the Fed government which makes it a lot harder to prove they're lying.

So what I'm going to do is estimate the at risk non vaxxed population of Vermont- and discuss whether or not it's possible that 80% of all cases can be attributed to them.

/snip
I was going to do this math tomorrow when I had some free time. I knew it couldn't be that hard to reverse engineer\unfuck their numbers after looking up the demographics of the state and breaking down their health departments overall numbers and doing backwards math.

You beat me to it, and for that, you get a :semperfidelis:sir.

It's all propaganda at this point. Anyone who believes the authorities numbers on the "deadly coof" is a fucking moron of epic proportions.

Speaking of, where is that *nuggetguy*?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back