It doesn't appear as though anybody's seen it yet, but I was wrong about the Supreme Court throwing out legal forced sterilization in regards to Pennsylvania passing forced sterilization legislation on men over 40 or having their third child. Lemme give you the lo' down.
Forced sterilization was excused away by the theory of eugenics & forced sterilizations started happening in the late 1800s, specifically for the mentally handicapped & criminally incarcerated before there were any laws regarding it which raged on until the 1940s, slowed by the 1960's but continues today. One of the first applications of this behavior occurred at the Kansas State Asylum for Idiotic and Imbecile Youth in 1894 by Dr. Hoyt Pilcher who sterilized both male & female patients at the ward.
1907 was when the first law permitting it passed in Indiana by Governor Frank J. Hanly under the pretense that "criminality, mental problems, and pauperism were hereditary" & "we owe it not only to ourselves, but to the future of our race and nation, to see that the defective and diseased do not multiply". After this legislation passed into law in Indiana, 30 other states followed suit & the Mengele-esque fun began.
Enter Buck Vs. Bell in 1927, the first serious case of forced sterilization to enter into the Supreme Court in which the Supreme Court sided with sterilizing young woman Carrie Buck out of the state of Virginia. Buck was an inmate at the Virginia Colony for the Feebleminded because she had a baby out of wedlock. This ruling meant that states now had the police power to carry out forced sterilizations, a fate which befell Carrie Buck after she had her first baby.
It was stated by Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr. that '‘three generations of imbeciles are enough".
Between the years of 1928 to 1932 it was found that women were sterilized twice as often as men were. Inb4 "based" comments because "it's okay when it happens to the sex I don't like." More than half of the 30,000 known sterilizations occurred in California. I am shocked to hear California would commit such an atrocity⸮
North Carolina would coerce people into undergoing sterilizations by threatening their social service benefits. Basically the same shit as China's Social Credit program where you can't ride the bus if your score is too low; dystopian.
Enter Skinner Vs. Oklahoma 1942 in which ruled against Oklahoma's Sterilization Act of 1935. This law operated on a three strikes rule in which sterilized anyone caught committing three crimes or more which amounted to a felony. It was found that this violated the 14th amendment & the Supreme Court deemed it unconstitutional.
This didn't explicitly outlaw force sterilization however, while although several states began gutting their own legislation making it legal, but it didn't overturn Belle Vs. Buck & remains legal as its own legislation & forced sterilization continues to this day.
Sterilization continues to be incentivized to be used on inmates to this day, most often but not exclusively done to child predators, even giving them lighter sentences if they agree to the sterilization. I have no idea how a dry sneeze is supposed to prevent more sexual assault when it's most prevalent in prison.
One particular case includes Barbara & Ronald Gross who were found to have abused their own children in 1993 who were offered probation instead of conviction if they took the sterilization. I disagree with this because it wouldn't do anything to stop them from being predators & they belong in prison.
Many forced prison sterilizations of women were unlawful in nature, as over a hundred women in California were forcibly sterilized between 2006 & 2010. Targets of such forced sterilizations were those thought to become repeat offenders in the future, so forced sterilization was administered as a punishment for pre-crime.
Even though forced sterilizations on the mentally handicapped ceased since the 1960s, Relf v. Weinberger 1974 found that poor people were being threatened denial of welfare benefits & medical care if they didn't take sterilizations. Black women were victims of force sterilization under the pretext of receiving "appendectomies" which were undertaken by medical students unknowingly performing hysterectomies.
Recent allegations include border hoppers being given sterilization treatments under false pretenses as described by whistleblower Dawn Wooten. Ironic.
So there you have it, sterilization was never explicitly made illegal by the Supreme Court but remains a seldom used treatment for inmates & coerced treatment for illegal immigrants.
So yes, Pennsylvania can absolutely pass this forced vasectomy legislature & enforce it with Supreme Court precedent backing them. Get out of Pennsylvania while you can LMAO.