US New York Times Pens Major Correction After Overstating Child COVID-19 Hospitalizations - "The New York Times issued a correction Thursday saying it severely misreported the number of child COVID-19 hospitalizations in the United States by over 800,000 cases."

The New York Times issued a correction Thursday saying it severely misreported the number of child COVID-19 hospitalizations in the United States by over 800,000 cases.

The NY Times report, “A New Vaccine Strategy for Children: Just One Dose, for Now,” first reported that about “900,000 children have been hospitalized” with the virus since the start of the pandemic in early 2020. However, the article has since been corrected to say that “more than 63,000 children were hospitalized with COVID-19 from August 2020 to October 2021.”

A note from the editor was added to the article.

“An earlier version of this article incorrectly described actions taken by regulators in Sweden and Denmark,” the correction also said. “They have halted use of the Moderna vaccine in children; they have not begun offering single doses.”

The article, the editor added, “also misstated the number of COVID hospitalizations in U.S. children. It is more than 63,000 from August 2020 to October 2021, not 900,000 since the beginning of the pandemic. In addition, the article misstated the timing of an [Food and Drug Administration] meeting on authorization of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine for children. It is later this month, not next week.”

The correction drew significant criticism on Twitter, where journalist and media critic Glenn Greenwald noted that the NY Times recently fired several senior staff members, including COVID-19 reporter Donald McNeil Jr.

“Now we have an incompetent in his place constantly doing this, or saying it’s racist to investigate COVID origins,” Greenwald wrote.

The correction comes after a recent poll from Gallup found that Americans, by in large, significantly overstate the COVID-19 hospitalization rate.

The survey, published late last month, found that 41 percent of registered Democrats believe that there’s a 50 percent chance that an unvaccinated individual will go the hospital for COVID-19, while 21 percent of Republicans and 26 percent of independents believe the same.

Gallup, citing federal health data, said that under different circumstances, the COVID-19 hospitalization rate for both unvaccinated and vaccinated individuals is fewer than 1 percent.

“Democrats are more likely to overstate hospitalization risks for unvaccinated people, which may fuel efforts, often led by Democratic Party leaders, to enforce both mask and vaccine mandates,” the pollster wrote in a writeup on the survey’s findings.

Meanwhile, data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) released Friday that the seven-day average for new COVID-19 cases has dipped below 100,000 this week.

COVID-19 is the illness caused by the CCP (Chinese Communist Party) virus.

The Epoch Times has contacted the NY Times for comment.

Article

Original NYT article

Corrected version
 
Journalism is fucking dead, man. Ever since the "opinion piece" started coming into fruition in these major news outlets, people just stopped caring. They can make these types of errors/lies and pay no price for them.

Yuri Bezmenov was right. Back in the day, only exceptional journalists worked in the journalism field. Now, you can be mediocre and make a living doing it. And it leads to stuff like this.
 
It is amazing how many errors the NYT, WAPO, CNN, MSNBC, etc have been making that seem to skew beneficial for one side.
Fauci wasn't wrong! The science changed!

Journalism is fucking dead, man. Ever since the "opinion piece" started coming into fruition in these major news outlets, people just stopped caring. They can make these types of errors/lies and pay no price for them.

Yuri Bezmenov was right. Back in the day, only exceptional journalists worked in the journalism field. Now, you can be mediocre and make a living doing it. And it leads to stuff like this.
Remember that the New York Times legal argument in the Project Veritas defamation case is that it's not defamation because their news articles are opinions based on facts and expressing opinions is not defamatory.. I'm not even joking.


Early arguments in the case included remarkable exchanges between New York Times lawyers, Project Veritas lawyers, and Judge Wood. But from the standpoint of readers interested in the state of journalism today, perhaps the most remarkable was the outlet's defense that Astor and Hsu, both news reporters, freely injected opinion into their reports. Even though the stories were published in the news section of the paper, the New York Times argued, Project Veritas was not entitled to sue for libel because the opinions expressed were "unverifiable." "Unverifiable expressions of opinion are not actionable and cannot be defamatory," the paper argued in its motion to dismiss the case. "A defamation action must be based on statements of objective fact, not on an expression of opinion, which by definition cannot be true or false ... In this politically-charged context, the term 'deceptive' is not susceptible to an objective meaning and is therefore a non-actionable opinion."
 
just a 800,000 mistake. I mean thats a lot of zeroes but hey it happens right? our bad guys.
"The far right is saying the NYTs 'error zeroes' somehow represent a few hundred thousand. Fact Check: Mathematicians confirm that zeroes have no value, emphasizing that they are a mark signifying a value of nothing."
 
It is amazing how many errors the NYT, WAPO, CNN, MSNBC, etc have been making that seem to skew beneficial for one side.
Meanwhile, right-wing pundits and centrist fags are walking on eggshells to avoid getting banned on social media platforms and fact-check themselves ad nauseam.
Fucking tired of this shit.
 
Headline: NYT is instructed by their handlers to cool it with the alarmist rhetoric because the data is showing the Moderna vaccine is more harmful to kids than Covid
 
  • Like
Reactions: Elim Garak
Back in the time of the dinosaurs aka the early 21st century, news outlets would fire journalists who made "mistakes" of this magnitude and importance. At the least, the paper's ombudsman would be expected to discuss what had occurred and what steps had been taken to prevent such an egregious error from entering their pages again.
 
Back