US Joe Biden News Megathread - The Other Biden Derangement Syndrome Thread (with a side order of Fauci Derangement Syndrome)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Let's pretend for one moment that he does die before the election, just for the funsies. What happens then? Will the nomination revert to option number 2, aka Bernie Sanders? Or will his running mate automatically replace him just the way Vice-President is supposted to step in after the Big Man in the White House chokes on a piece of matzo? Does he even have a running mate yet?
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Like
  • Informative
Reactions: Billy Beer, Splinters RCVD, GenderCop and 22 others
Click to expand...
The Last Stand said:
mustard-rub-burgers-7-720x540.jpg


Can we all agree whoever constructed that burger shouldn't be trusted to prepare food?
Click to expand...
The only inherent problem is patty on top rather than bottom. It's fine otherwise.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Dislike
Reactions: Blasterisk, like_shutup_&_drive_scoob, Ronald Crump and 14 others
www.dailywire.com

Biden Boasts ‘Bigger Story’ Isn’t ‘Mass Firings’ But Vaccine Mandates Working | The Daily Wire

www.dailywire.com www.dailywire.com

Archive: https://archive.md/2ioBe

Speaking in Elk Grove Village, Illinois, on Thursday, President Biden made clear what his priorities are, arguing that the “bigger story” isn’t “headlines and reports of mass firings,” but instead that the mandates for large businesses to vaccinate their workers are having some success.

Biden stated:

These requirements work. And as a business round table and others told me when I announced the first requirement that encouraged businesses to feel they could come in and demand the same thing of their employees, more people are getting vaccinated. More lives are being saved. Let’s be clear: When you see headlines and reports of mass firings, and hundreds of people losing their jobs, look at the bigger story. I’ve spoken with Scott Kirby, CEO of United Airlines, who’s here today. United went from 59% of their employees to 99% of their employees in less than two months after implementing the requirement. 99%.
Click to expand...

Meanwhile, on October 4 The Hill reported:

Northwell Health, the largest health care provider in New York state, on Monday fired 1,400 of its employees who did not comply with the state’s COVID-19 vaccine mandate. … These employees represented almost 2 percent of Northwell’s workforce of more than 76,000 who are all immunized against COVID-19.
Click to expand...

The Seattle Police Department may have to fire hundreds of officers if they don’t meet an Oct. 18 vaccination deadline. “As of Oct. 6, 292 sworn personnel had yet to provide proof of a COVID-19 vaccination,” Fox 13 reported in an article titled, “Seattle Police Department braces for mass firing of officers as hundreds have yet to show proof of vaccination.”

Yahoo News reported on September 25, “New York Hospitals Face Possible Mass Firings as Workers Spurn Vaccines,” adding, “In Buffalo, the Erie County Medical Center plans to suspend elective inpatient surgeries and not take intensive-care patients from other hospitals because it may soon fire about 400 employees who have chosen not to get vaccinated against the coronavirus.”

The White House declared in September:
The Department of Labor’s Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) is developing a rule that will require all employers with 100 or more employees to ensure their workforce is fully vaccinated or require any workers who remain unvaccinated to produce a negative test result on at least a weekly basis before coming to work. OSHA will issue an Emergency Temporary Standard (ETS) to implement this requirement. This requirement will impact over 80 million workers in private sector businesses with 100+ employees.
Click to expand...

An opinion piece in The Wall Street Journal noted in late September:
The Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 authorizes OSHA to enact rules that are “reasonably necessary or appropriate to provide safe or healthful employment and places of employment.” But the Biden mandate is unreasonably and unnecessarily broad. As announced, it applies to all employees, even those who work at home, as millions have done during the pandemic. It’s simultaneously too narrow, failing to require vaccination for contractors, customers and other nonemployees who may be present at the work site.
Click to expand...
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Reactions: Francis York Morgan, spiritofamermaid, LurkNoMore and 7 others
Gehenna said:
You misunderstand, fortification isn't a choice. It's not an option.

Had you asked me if widespread cheating was possible before 2020, I'd have said "yes, but it would be suicide. The sheer cost of it all would be astronomical". But they did it, they paid that price.... and burnt all of their capital to do it. They have done nothing that has gained them any since, in fact they managed to go into the red.

Fortification -costs-, it costs a -lot-. They simply -do not have- the capital to afford it. It's not an option. It's not something they even have the ability to choose.

This, by the way, is why one of the three possibilities I laid out is "An actual nazi gets in", because having burnt their capital on Orange man, they have left themselves vulnerable to something far worse than he.
Click to expand...
Here's a question for you. A lot of people here are taking it for granted that the Dems are out of money and have no way to refill their war chest now that their spending bills are mostly dead in the water. What stops them from finding a new backer? There are a lot of powerful people who benefit from the Dems steering the US.

For example, what if they go to Jeff Bezos and ask him to fully fund the party's coming campaigns through back channels? He could afford it, and in return they could give him control over basically all government IT infrastructure, guaranteeing he'll win every contract that comes up for a bid. The woke ideas advertised by the Dems are still mainstream in many areas of American life, making it easier for them to manufacture consent as long as someone will bankroll them.

Of course, if they sell out in this fashion they'll lose a lot of control over the party but they would likely prefer that to being cast into the political wilderness and then losing power anyway. I'm guessing that this is what they're already doing with Soros but I'm sure there are many other rich people closer to home who have an interest in continued Democrat rule.
 
  • Like
  • Feels
  • Agree
Reactions: spiritofamermaid, LurkNoMore, MarvinTheParanoidAndroid and 4 others
Given the loss in support since November last year, they would certainly need even *more* fraud to win in 2024. Can they up the fraud? Yes, but if enough states either pass election integrity or are ran by MAGA patriots at the local level to a decent enough extent, then Joe n the Heaux don't stand any chance at winning the electoral college in 2024. At the very least you will see Republicans win in the less fraudulent states in 2022 by massive margins. Ohio and Iowa will be double digits for sure, and FL will see DeSantis/Rubio win by at least high single digits. MI-WI-PA have Dem governors and attorney generals and secretaries of state but hypothetically if enough Trump supporters take control at the local level it's possible that 2022 will also see MAGA victories in those states.
 
Vaclav said:
Here's a question for you. A lot of people here are taking it for granted that the Dems are out of money and have no way to refill their war chest now that their spending bills are mostly dead in the water. What stops them from finding a new backer? There are a lot of powerful people who benefit from the Dems steering the US.
Click to expand...

They're already in debt for both cash and favors to multiple people, and have spent the last 9 months showing that they can't deliver on anything they are owed. Why would you want to risk throwing more money their way when they haven't even started to pay off their old creditors and look like they never will be able to do so?

What the shit said:
That’s acceptable.
Click to expand...

Especially if you've got some grilled or smothered onions on there. I think you have a lot of options, but we all have to agree the foundation from the bottom up is bun, sauce, patty. After that you have more flexibility.
 
  • Like
Reactions: spiritofamermaid, LurkNoMore, Luck Skeleton and 5 others
Vaclav said:
Here's a question for you. A lot of people here are taking it for granted that the Dems are out of money and have no way to refill their war chest now that their spending bills are mostly dead in the water. What stops them from finding a new backer? There are a lot of powerful people who benefit from the Dems steering the US.

For example, what if they go to Jeff Bezos and ask him to fully fund the party's coming campaigns through back channels? He could afford it, and in return they could give him control over basically all government IT infrastructure, guaranteeing he'll win every contract that comes up for a bid. The woke ideas advertised by the Dems are still mainstream in many areas of American life, making it easier for them to manufacture consent as long as someone will bankroll them.

Of course, if they sell out in this fashion they'll lose a lot of control over the party but they would likely prefer that to being cast into the political wilderness and then losing power anyway. I'm guessing that this is what they're already doing with Soros but I'm sure there are many other rich people closer to home who have an interest in continued Democrat rule.
Click to expand...
Let's start off with dispelling a massive error in this. No, Bezos couldn't. Some's net worth is deceptive. That worth is largely wrapped up in things like buildings, and ongoing concerns, and otherwise tangible assets which cannot simply be sold and actually maintain their exact value. Actual liquid assets tend to be very, very finite.

Now, that is out of the way. You are also misunderstanding. The actual monetary amount is secondary to the -political- cost. Political Capital isn't actual money. That's what they are in the red for. Mind, they are also pretty badly fucked up to the monetary front, so to address that... Bezos himself is dubiously non-partisan and has an emphatic lack of interest in bankrolling the DNC, as to the other billionaires who might aid... put simply, they already did. Hell, Bloomberg blew a ton on trying to get Florida Blue. They all invested -heavily- in the 2020 election, and not only got nothing out of it, in many cases they are bleeding money. The only way they could fund them again is to start converting non-liquid assets into cash, and at that point they aren't just losing money, they are hemorrhaging their ability to -make- money.
 
  • Informative
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Francis York Morgan, Corette, spiritofamermaid and 15 others
Vyse Inglebard said:
lol this guy watches modern capeshit what a faggot hahahahahahaha

Real talk though, you do bring up some salient points. Still, I will repeat one of the mantras we have here: never underestimate Clown World. Because if you do, it will come back to bite you in the ass when you least expect it. Although, this could also apply the other way around.
Click to expand...
The guy has a point though.

The Democrats basically went scorched earth to depose Trump and were left with nothing. EVERYONE knows that they stole the election, half don't care because their side won and the other half are furious as fuck and won't forget or forgive.

And the half that don't care? A decent number of them basically are now QUICKLY having massive buyers remorse and the other half want to double down on cheating going forward because they wholesale believe that the masses are too fucking "stupid" to "vote the way we tell them to vote", effectively showing that they are the true Nazis and want to make it IMPOSSIBLE to vote the Demorats out of power ever again.

Rigging the election against Trump basically was a short term "victory" that fell apart IMMEDIATELY. ESPECIALLY since Trump is still alive and well and barring the DNC and the (((elites))) having him killed in the next three years, is going to be running for re-election in 2024. Not to mention that 2022 is going to be a potential bloodbath for the Democrats, who historically sleep late and don't bother with non-Presidential year elections; made worse by the fact that Biden's most likely NOT going to get anything "big" done legislation-wise and God fucking help him if another Supreme Court Justice drops dead on his watch.

And even if they DO murder Trump, they'll just be making him a martyr and bring about someone who WON'T play nice like Trump did (to his detriment).

Because right now, the nation is held together with duct tape and superglue because deep down, EVERYONE knows that when Civil War finally gets called to begin, our collective way of life is over. And the fear of the loss of the ability to chill and Netflix, let alone internet in general and especially basic things like electricity and food keep us from just fighting it out last man standing to settle the disintegration of America once and for all. And the Democrats keep pushing shit, because in some macabre way, they'd rather actually HAVE a civil war and risk everything for a chance to MAYBE win it, because with every passing day, they know that the moment the GOP takes power again, there will be a reckoning of epic proportions and they'd rather bait the right to start a civil war so they can claim afterwards, justification to wipe out the right in the event they win (presumably with outside foreign help).
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Informative
Reactions: Francis York Morgan, Leslie Nielsen, spiritofamermaid and 25 others
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back