US Joe Biden News Megathread - The Other Biden Derangement Syndrome Thread (with a side order of Fauci Derangement Syndrome)

Let's pretend for one moment that he does die before the election, just for the funsies. What happens then? Will the nomination revert to option number 2, aka Bernie Sanders? Or will his running mate automatically replace him just the way Vice-President is supposted to step in after the Big Man in the White House chokes on a piece of matzo? Does he even have a running mate yet?

 

[murdered meat bag]

Who were they talking about? why force them instead of firing them then?

pilots. you cant train new pilots in a day so you have to force them to work.

I know we use a line of cells descended from old abortions for testing of all sorts of things; half of my family is convinced that Pepsi has actual abortion juice in it.

But even so, they aren't using the same cells. They're replicated cell lines used for testing for decades and the original murdered baby cells have been long dead (just like the jerk baby).

the american orthodox christian jurisdictions okayed the vaccine because theyre replicated cells and the abortions that produced the originals happened in the 60-70s. abortion bad but vaccine good so... dont feel too ashamed about the jab.

 

[CHARizard]

Maybe its finally happening. Even my left leaning inlaws were bitching about him during dinner a few nights ago.

 

[JohnDoe]

Does it matter at this point? That's what I hate about Hanlon's Razor: both malice and gross incompetence are indistinguishable from one another.

The motivation does seem pretty irrelevant when the end result is you rotting in a cell while your kids are raped and brainwashed and everything you've ever owned given to mobs of foreign savages.

 

[CaesarCzech]

Try harder, please.

Come on mousey you are not competent enough to deal with apocalypse.

 

[Die Dunkle Maus]

the american orthodox christian jurisdictions okayed the vaccine because theyre replicated cells and the abortions that produced the originals happened in the 60-70s. abortion bad but vaccine good so... dont feel too ashamed about the jab.

Praise God!

I am hoping to get an op-ed or article in response actually asserting the "baby meat in vaccine" because I love that kind of stuff, some kind of weird kink.

Come on mousey you are not competent enough to deal with apocalypse.

You don't know me.

 

[Slappy McGherkin]

Would LOVE to see this catch on with teachers, garbage men, utilities, mail, etc. Even for one day.

If the mechanics union takes up for the pilots union, they can ground the planes for relatively simple shit to take them out of service. You wouldn't want to fly on an UNSAFE plane, would you, pilot or no pilot vax? Add ground crews into the mix. Sorry, all the airport gates are full or broken and we can't get luggage on or off them. Add customer service and ticket counter types into the mix. I'm sorry sir, I know you wanted to go to Florida, but your ticket says New York.

It wouldn't take much to totally cripple every airline and airport in the country if peeps really wanted to make a statement and take a stand against these mandates. Pilots and airlines are only one industry. Others could easily do the same and cripple the country as a whole.

There ain't enough national guard to fill in all the holes like NY is trying to do with health worker shortages because of Vax shit.

The ensuing chaos would be glorious and the American people could make one hell of a statement without a single shot being fired. And what could Biden and corporate lackeys do about it, fire every American in every industry in the country?

Capitulation. They'd have no choice but to kill this mandated nonsense. While I honestly believe this would work, I'm not stupid enough to think that the general public would go out of their comfort zones long enough to make it happen. Then again, "Let's go Brandon!" sure seems to be gaining popularity, so who knows.

 

[Honka Honka Burning Love]

They're replicated cell lines used for testing for decades and the original murdered baby cells have been long dead

That wasn't a baby that was a cancer patient.

HeLa - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

 

[Die Dunkle Maus]

That wasn't a baby that was a cancer patient.

HeLa - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

The Johnson & Johnson and Pfizer vaccines supposedly used the HEK 293 line for testing, which are descended from a 1970s abortion.

 

[mold]

Here's the thing, we won't know who it will be until it really begins to happen. It'll be someone outside the normal political sphere by necessity, someone who can claim that as an outsider they can right the boat so long as you surrender your freedom to him. It will happen quickly, suddenly, a handful of years at most. All it takes is for the general populace to desire an end to the chaos more than they desire their personal freedom.

Hitler wasn't outside the normal political sphere of Weimar; he was opposed to it and actively working to subvert it but very much part of it. And electoral politics in Weimar were very different from ours anyway.

It's fun to say "and then one day, for no reason at all..." but how do you reconcile this with all your talk of political capital? Hitler is nothing without his party. The real threat is never one man but a group working together for common ideological goals.

 

[Karl der Grosse]

Troll better, seriously. The last bit at the end makes it too obvious.

Learn how to spot a troll, for reals. What you think is "too obvious" is you being wrong in your assumption.

Come on, better effort.

Try harder, please.

Now rub the tip

 

[mold]

If they are gone i have no fucking reason to behave as a civilized person or give a fuck . Simple as it is. If i fucking leave this planet better slam that fucking door loud. And i can bet ya there are lot of people in my boat . A lot more than you want admit or many normies want to admit. The nazies got barely 20 per cent of the vote and support and steamrolled the whole society.

You do the math

Where is the NSDAP for you to vote for though? You don't need a guy, you need a party.

 

[Snekposter]

Where is the NSDAP for you to vote for though? You don't need a guy, you need a party.

Haven't you been keeping up? The Republicans are going to be goose-stepping transwomen of color into the gas chambers any minute now.

 

[Gehenna]

Hitler wasn't outside the normal political sphere of Weimar; he was opposed to it and actively working to subvert it but very much part of it. And electoral politics in Weimar were very different from ours anyway.

It's fun to say "and then one day, for no reason at all..." but how do you reconcile this with all your talk of political capital? Hitler is nothing without his party. The real threat is never one man but a group working together for common ideological goals.

The phrase belies a truth of perception, not reality. It seems to come from nowhere because events often precede realization of them. It is very easy to map Hitler's rise to power in hindsight, easy to connect the dots, realize the importance of seemingly minor or disconnected elements, and put together a cohesive picture. It is and was much less easy to see that picture as the events were occurring. To the Weimer Republic, Hitler was a firebrand with weird ideas but not a serious political threat. Until very suddenly he was.

This effect has only been exacerbated in modern times. Hitler had to rely entirely on word of mouth and the printed page. Radio was in its infancy and well outside the affordability of a ravaged Weimer Republic. He had very little way to truly actively spread his message. That is far from the case in the modern era, making such a rise to power even easier for anyone who would do so.

 

[JosephStalin]

That's where I stand. My liberal friends are just naive/stupid, even the ones that think I'm racist, the irony of which is that they are white and I am black.

The Dems in charge or the MSM are just pure evil or at best completely exceptional.

Indeed. The thought comes to me that evil, however you call it, is making a lot of ground these days in trying to destroy our country.

 

[Puff]

You don't know me.

Please stop double posting like a faggot.

 

[mold]

The phrase belies a truth of perception, not reality. It seems to come from nowhere because events often precede realization of them. It is very easy to map Hitler's rise to power in hindsight, easy to connect the dots, realize the importance of seemingly minor or disconnected elements, and put together a cohesive picture. It is and was much less easy to see that picture as the events were occurring. To the Weimer Republic, Hitler was a firebrand with weird ideas but not a serious political threat. Until very suddenly he was.

This effect has only been exacerbated in modern times. Hitler had to rely entirely on word of mouth and the printed page. Radio was in its infancy and well outside the affordability of a ravaged Weimer Republic. He had very little way to truly actively spread his message. That is far from the case in the modern era, making such a rise to power even easier for anyone who would do so.

what are you talking about? Hitler's association with party politics is massively well documented. This didn't happen in some banana republic, it happened in Germany, with Germans (ok also Austrians but they're also austists). if the authorities didn't think he and his people were a threat, it's a little hard to explain how he got involved in the first place. As everyone knows, he was assigned to infiltrate the German Worker's Party - why would you infilitrate a group you don't think is a threat? Then you can just pile on the responses clearly demonstrating that the authorities took their shit seriously, ending up with his prison term.

and the absence of mass communications cuts both ways. if there's no radio and no TV you have to go outside and touch beerhall grass; that means you meet real people and form real, and real dangerous, connections. he and his party very much did *not* rely on the printed word, they put on events. and "word of mouth" is kind of a lame way to refer to someone with his oratory skills.

I don't really like Hitler I should probably make that clear but come on man

and to history sperg a little more: Hitler isn't really that unique or the first one, there's Mussolini and Szalasi.

 

[Gehenna]

what are you talking about? Hitler's association with party politics is massively well documented. This didn't happen in some banana republic, it happened in Germany, with Germans (ok also Austrians but they're also austists). if the authorities didn't think he and his people were a threat, it's a little hard to explain how he got involved in the first place. As everyone knows, he was assigned to infiltrate the German Worker's Party - why would you infilitrate a group you don't think is a threat? Then you can just pile on the responses clearly demonstrating that the authorities took their shit seriously, ending up with his prison term.

and the absence of mass communications cuts both ways. if there's no radio and no TV you have to go outside and touch beerhall grass; that means you meet real people and form real, and real dangerous, connections. he and his party very much did *not* rely on the printed word, they put on events. and "word of mouth" is kind of a lame way to refer to someone with his oratory skills.

I don't really like Hitler I should probably make that clear but come on man

I think you and I are talking past each other or more specifically using slightly different definitions or understandings of terms. Hitler's rise to power occurred over a decade-long stretch of campaigning starting in the early 1920s. So yes, in terms of time he was well established, but some context and consideration must be made. First, he was considered as non-viable by basically every pundit of the time, and the ease with which he was jailed reaffirmed that view. Secondly, the actual shoot from him being released from prison to obtaining power was much shorter.

Where I think you and I are talking past each other is with the term "normal political sphere". I take it from your posts that you are reading that as "Outside of politics in its entirety", yes?

If I understand that correctly, then let me say that's not how the phrase is being used. Rather, the normal political sphere is the mainline, mainstream political beings. Your Pelosis, your McConnells, your Cruzs and your Harris'. People with long-entrenched natures in the system. This is your normal political sphere, the sphere in which people generally feel safe and secure with their candidate. Examples of being outside this are your AOCs, your Trumps, etc. People who appeared on the scene and gained a personal following. Who were known even before then, as Trump himself has spoken on political topics and even ran before.

I am not saying the person would be a total political outsider unknown to anybody, but that he'd come outside the normal channels of politics. They are an outsider to D.C. This is also why we won't know until it happens. While they won't be a totally unknown player, their status outside the normal political sphere means they haven't really be considered, they haven't been analyzed. Their message hasn't been considered.

 

[jje100010001]

The phrase belies a truth of perception, not reality. It seems to come from nowhere because events often precede realization of them. It is very easy to map Hitler's rise to power in hindsight, easy to connect the dots, realize the importance of seemingly minor or disconnected elements, and put together a cohesive picture. It is and was much less easy to see that picture as the events were occurring. To the Weimer Republic, Hitler was a firebrand with weird ideas but not a serious political threat. Until very suddenly he was.

This effect has only been exacerbated in modern times. Hitler had to rely entirely on word of mouth and the printed page. Radio was in its infancy and well outside the affordability of a ravaged Weimer Republic. He had very little way to truly actively spread his message. That is far from the case in the modern era, making such a rise to power even easier for anyone who would do so.

The other issue though is that because of the rise of other forms of communications (television, internet, social media), it's also far too easy to now for the average public be distracted or misinformed.

I might compare it to a situation where a tree is trying to grow, but is being choked out by the weeds around it.

 

[mold]

I think you and I are talking past each other or more specifically using slightly different definitions or understandings of terms. Hitler's rise to power occurred over a decade-long stretch of campaigning starting in the early 1920s. So yes, in terms of time he was well established, but some context and consideration must be made. First, he was considered as non-viable by basically every pundit of the time, and the ease with which he was jailed reaffirmed that view. Secondly, the actual shoot from him being released from prison to obtaining power was much shorter.

Where I think you and I are talking past each other is with the term "normal political sphere". I take it from your posts that you are reading that as "Outside of politics in its entirety", yes?

If I understand that correctly, then let me say that's not how the phrase is being used. Rather, the normal political sphere is the mainline, mainstream political beings. Your Pelosis, your McConnells, your Cruzs and your Harris'. People with long-entrenched natures in the system. This is your normal political sphere, the sphere in which people generally feel safe and secure with their candidate. Examples of being outside this are your AOCs, your Trumps, etc. People who appeared on the scene and gained a personal following. Who were known even before then, as Trump himself has spoken on political topics and even ran before.

I am not saying the person would be a total political outsider unknown to anybody, but that he'd come outside the normal channels of politics. They are an outsider to D.C. This is also why we won't know until it happens. While they won't be a totally unknown player, their status outside the normal political sphere means they haven't really be considered, they haven't been analyzed. Their message hasn't been considered.

yeah and I'm saying that isn't remotely possible in the US in the 21st century for someone on the right coming in to restore order. The kind of organizing that the NSDAP was able to do even under duress is impossible now, just like the kind of organizing that the american revolutionaries did in the time leading up to the actual shooting at Brits is impossible now. And not just for surveillance reasons - anyone like AOC is immediately co-opted. She's not hanging around in the Bronx creating a new party. She was an outsider for like 5 minutes.

You're kind of saying a bunch of things here that don't make sense. Like "they haven't really been considered, their message hasn't been analyzed - " how does that apply to Hitler and fascist ideology? All the European security apparatuses of the time were analyzing the fuck out of any and all potential threats to the state and had been since the lead up to WWI with all the anarchist assassinations. It's ok to admit you don't actually know very much about the era.

who it applies to imo is Mexicans

 

[Cpl. Long Dong Silver]

I think we're missing the more important fact of Hitler lore: there's no way it was six million