Wuhan Coronavirus: Megathread - Got too big

Status
Not open for further replies.
Fluoxetine Man said:
View attachment 2627951
Considering they look like this, I am surprised they were only sucking Fauci's dick metaphorically.
Click to expand...
I think gender "experts" use men like this in their studies that "prove" men and women are equal physically.

I bet an 11 year old girl could beat all of them up at the same time.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: The Other Baldwin, Shiny Shroodle, Exterminatus and 13 others
Nique la mere de Macron said:
A rare victory for common sense as the French National Assembly rejects mandatory vaccination:


I'm relieved. This bill would have imposed a 1500-euro fine for EACH FAMILY MEMBER not vaccinated. So for me, 7500 euros.
Click to expand...
Is there any other source for this? I don't doubt it's true, they were supposed to hold the vote that day. But there's no other English speaking article about it, full media blackout.

What I find damming about it if true is that the entire socialist block voted yes, only three center to right wing senators voted yes. It's clear that the socialists are salivating at the idea of mandatory vaccines
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mhallachd, GloJojo and m1ddl3m4rch
  • Like
  • Feels
Reactions: The Other Baldwin, Shiny Shroodle, Fanatical Pragmatist and 4 others
Kanye Omari West said:
Reminder that today is the HAPPENING. It's 10/15, mandate deadline day for a ton of international megacorps, universities, and entire nations. Will be interesting to see what happens.
Click to expand...
Quebec as I mentionned in an earlier post wanted to do the same for medical personnel in their hospitals but they delayed it to November 15.

One big casuality in the American universities, they'll lack a bunch of students in some useless class like gender studies.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mhallachd, SCSI, clusterfuckk and 2 others
Kanye Omari West said:
Reminder that today is the HAPPENING. It's 10/15, mandate deadline day for a ton of international megacorps, universities, and entire nations. Will be interesting to see what happens.
Click to expand...
The one I'm looking forward to is 12/8. I don't know why, probably some stupid shit Pedo Joe said, but a lot of corporations and the like have flagged that as the "jabbed by now or get the fuck out" day.
 
  • Informative
  • Like
Reactions: Zbk3VmLfujjzjxBd43tL, Mhallachd, Kiwi Lime Pie and 3 others
Super-Chevy454 said:
Too bad we don't have a time machine or we aren't Nostradamus to see what'll happen on 12/8.
Click to expand...

The coffee has completely worn off and I've sat here for the past 5 minutes trying to figure out if I said "December 8th" incorrectly somehow.

But, god willing, we'll see a whole lot of companies punt because of overwhelming resistence. No company can afford to lose 40%, not even the big corpos.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mrs. Addams, Shiny Shroodle, Mhallachd and 8 others
Drain Todger said:
Got my hands on a legal doc you guys are going to want to see. Check out the attachment.

The vaccines don’t fucking work.
Click to expand...
The argument he's making, apart from discussing natural immunity and VAERS data, is that vaccination offers no protection against infection or transmission. Given this there can be no argument that an unvaccinated worker increases the risk to the vaccinated.

However I'm noticing a marked change in the narrative from governments and Branch Covidians. They're finding it increasingly difficult to claim that the vaccines prevent transmission and infection so they're pivoting to claiming that the non vaxxed are at higher risk of serious illness from contracting Covid from the vaccinated, who are far more likely to suffer mild to asymptomatic disease. As such an employer cannot guarantee a safe work place for them unless they agree to be vaccinated. It's a heads I win tails you lose scenario. Yes it's galling that the fact the vaccinated are the ones spreading Covid is being used against us purebloods but there it is.

Of course this is only sustainable if we accept that the vaccines are in fact preventing serious illness. The truth is that it's far easier to game the mortality statistics than the case incidence numbers. Simply swab every unvaccinated person who enters a hospital for any reason and claim that they're a 'serious Covid case' should they return a positive PCR. Fell of a ladder? Had a heart attack? Found an odd lump on your balls? You're a hospitalised Covid patient if you return a positive test.

The truth is that being immune is like being pregnant, you either are or you aren't. At best the 'vaccines' are a preventative treatment for Covid-19. As they do not prevent transmission they cannot be classified as vaccines anymore than PreP can be for HIV. Demanding that people accept a prophylaxis as a condition for employment is not legally sustainable and that's what I would be focusing on in arguing against mandates.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
  • Agree
Reactions: Vault Boy, The Other Baldwin, Shiny Shroodle and 23 others
borsabil said:
The argument he's making, apart from discussing natural immunity and VAERS data, is that vaccination offers no protection against infection or transmission. Given this there can be no argument that an unvaccinated worker increases the risk to the vaccinated.

However I'm noticing a marked change in the narrative from governments and Branch Covidians. They're finding it increasingly difficult to claim that the vaccines prevent transmission and infection so they're pivoting to claiming that the non vaxxed are at higher risk of serious illness from contracting Covid from the vaccinated, who are far more likely to suffer mild to asymptomatic disease. As such an employer cannot guarantee a safe work place for them unless they agree to be vaccinated. It's a heads I win tails you lose scenario. Yes it's galling that the fact the vaccinated are the ones spreading Covid is being used against us purebloods but there it is.

Of course this is only sustainable if we accept that the vaccines are in fact preventing serious illness. The truth is that it's far easier to game the mortality statistics than the case incidence numbers. Simply swab every unvaccinated person who enters a hospital for any reason and claim that they're a 'serious Covid case' should they return a positive PCR. Fell of a ladder? Had a heart attack? Found an odd lump on your balls? You're a hospitalised Covid patient if you return a positive test.

The truth is that being immune is like being pregnant, you either are or you aren't. At best the 'vaccines' are a preventative treatment for Covid-19. As they do not prevent transmission they cannot be classified as vaccines anymore than PreP can be for HIV. Demanding that people accept a prophylaxis as a condition for employment is not legally sustainable and that's what I would be focusing on in arguing against mandates.
Click to expand...
I love how they are pivoting to this claim. The same people who are on r/hermancainaward (which imo is way more fucked up and horrible than say r/coontown or r/fatpeoplehate) laughing at the deaths of the unvaccinated and acting all smug with their research they do on the people and various screenshots of them before their deaths want to say they care about us unvaccinated people. They want us dead and this is them refusing to acknowledge they made a mistake or be able to move on. For some reason they can’t even just shut the fuck up and move on and instead keep doubling down on stupid. I want to be able to go back to a society where we’re allowed to be happy.

The most evil part of critical theory (including gender, queer, and race studies) is that it does nothing but cause anger, division, and an inability to be happy with one’s life. It’s never enough to fix a perceived injustice, there must be more that has to be fixed. The goal of these people is the complete destruction of our society and way of life, not reformation. If you listen to anything from James Lindsay it becomes quite clear that these people are literal marxists who couldn’t convince the working class to be their cannon fodder and decided that minorities, homeless people, women, and alphabet people will have to be the ones to do their revolution instead. We as a society have let insane gender studies majors take over because we were too nice to fight back until they infested everything.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Vault Boy, Mrs. Addams, The Other Baldwin and 27 others
Fleece Johnson said:

Protective heterologous T cell immunity in COVID-19 induced by the trivalent MMR and Tdap vaccine antigens​


If your MMR and dTAP vaccinations are up to date, you have an extra layer of defense against covid.
Click to expand...
LMAO

So that shot is highly recommended for those who are going to have a child and those who will be around the newborn/infant as whooping cough can take a baby out.

It's amazing how we're constantly finding how much cross immunity there is with respiratory viruses. Almost like we co-evolved with these things or something.
 
  • Like
  • Feels
Reactions: Hubelublub, Return of the Freaker, Fanatical Pragmatist and 8 others
@Drain Todger

Its something you were saying for about couple of months, right?

So they did know how to treat it since 2005, just decided not to? Not even surprised anymore.
hLc.jpeg
 
  • Informative
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Vault Boy, Shiny Shroodle, Exterminatus and 27 others
There's something unorthodox then Pzifer did Down Under in Australia. I don't know if the Daily Telegraph is more reliable than Brian Williams but it might be worth to see that article.

No Cookies | Daily Telegraph

No Cookies
www.dailytelegraph.com.au www.dailytelegraph.com.au
Pfizer wanted Aussie taxpayers to pay for its Covid vaccine even if it didn’t work, and it may explain why the government waited longer to clinch a deal. See explosive document.

Exclusive: Drug company giant Pfizer demanded a massive secret upfront payment from Australia for its experimental Covid vaccine, it can be revealed.
And if the company’s jab failed to get regulatory approval or was never manufactured, the Australian taxpayer would have forfeited the right to recover half the estimated $240 million down payment.

The financial demand — laid bare in bombshell Health Department documents — was so sensitive, the federal government went to extraordinary lengths to hide it from the public.

The original documents, released under Freedom of Information (FOI) in August, show the company’s proposed contract clause for the 10 million doses it offered to deliver Australia in 2021.

“Upfront payment 50% refundable if reg (regulatory) approval not obtained or not manufactured and delivered,” the FOI records says.

But almost eight weeks on, not a trace of evidence of the pharma giant’s outrageous demand can be found on the department’s website.
Click to expand...

Edit: Wait! There's more as they said in informercials. There's a laboratory who was suspended in the UK for incorrect Covid test results.
www.theepochtimes.com

Laboratory Suspended After Producing Tens of Thousands of Incorrect COVID-19 Test Results: UK

UK health officials on Friday said that an estimated 43,000 people may have been incorrectly told they do ...
www.theepochtimes.com www.theepochtimes.com

UK health officials on Friday said that an estimated 43,000 people may have been incorrectly told they do not have COVID-19 due to problems with testing at a private laboratory.

The Immensa Health Clinic Lab in Wolverhampton, England, was suspended from processing test swaps after reports surfaced of false negatives. The faulty test results were among tests that were processed a the facility between sometime in early September and this week, officials with the UK Health Security Agency said.

“Around 400,000 samples have been processed through the lab, the vast majority of which will have been negative results, but an estimated 43,000 people may have been given incorrect negative PCR test results” located primarily in southwest England, according to the agency.

The UK Health Security Agency appeared to downplay speculation that the issue is widespread, saying the faulty results are “an isolated incident attributed to one laboratory.” Individuals who were affected would be contacted and told to get another test, the agency continued.

“The number of tests carried out at the Immensa laboratory are small in the context of the wider network and testing availability is unaffected around the country,” it said, adding that samples that were sent to the facility have been “redirected” to other labs.

One local authority in England, West Berkshire Council, has told people who were tested at the government-run Newbury Showground site between Oct. 3 and Oct. 12 and were told they were negative to get tested again.

Immensa Health Clinic was founded in May 2020—several months after the start of the pandemic—and has reportedly been awarded contracts worth $234 million to process PCR test results.
Click to expand...
 
  • Informative
  • Like
Reactions: Exterminatus, Return of the Freaker, NoSpiceLife and 7 others
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back