You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly. You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Ethan Klein / h3h3Productions - Opportunistic, two-faced e-celeb sperg with a penchant for hypocrisy and an Oedipus complex; sold out to Susan Wojcicki, the incompetent CEO of YouTube
Not trying to be mean but is Hila all there? Hypothetically she killed 200+ kids in Palestine while she was in the army then jumps on Ethans dick and becomes a millonare.
Her job in the IDF was to work in an office. She recounted joining a raid into the West Bank (Ramallah I think) and being in the armored car as they were shot at. But that was the only time she had ever been in a combat zone as a soldier. Not that that makes her clothes better, but the whole "Hila murders poor muzzie babies!" thing is joked about so much some people think it's actually true, when the truth was Hila sat in an office and did secretary work as her military service.
Truthfully I don't even have an issue with billionaires. $4-5 billion? Those are workers, show respect. Instead the issues that I have are reserved for people who are actually wealthy.
Show starts with a huge rant on anti-Semitism then he does his usual full on Mexican stereotype dancing when he finds out they're getting Mexican food in the middle of the show on today's After Dark.
What the fuck is this? It looks like something a exceptional person would wear. I'm not even joking or trying to be insulting when I say that, I mean it's like, if you had a mentally handicapped sister, this is the kind of "gift" you would buy her. Jesus Christ, what adult woman would willingly wear such a thing?
This is regarding Ethan but also from 2019 and not exactly on topic or breaking news, I just thought this was interesting. I was looking at art online made by the artist Petrina Ryan-Kleid. She came to mild notoriety when it was discovered that a painting of hers was displayed prominently in Jeffrey Epstein's $88,000,000 Manhattan townhouse. The painting in question was of Bill Clinton wearing the famous blue dress that Monica Lewinsky wore along with red high heels while posing seductively and looking at the camera (if you ask me it looks like the iconic Uncle Sam “I Want YOU” poster). While it's often misreported that Epstein also owned a painting of hers showing Bush in the White House knocking down 2 Jenga towers with paper airplanes, he didn't actually own it, although it was painted by the same artist.
I did a reverse image search of the Clinton painting and a web page from 2019 talking about it linked to a Tweet from Ethan. It failed to load and the Tweet's link has since been deleted by Ethan. I know this is off topic I just thought it was interesting that out of all the Tweets he should have deleted, this is one he felt strongly about it doing so. It's not up for debate either, she's on the record discussing the sale and there are many photos showing the same painting inside Epstein's home - it's by no means a conspiracy of any kind. We don't know when he deleted it but we do know that in addition to the 20+ flight logs showing Bill flying with Ep on the Lolita Express, additional damning details have since been revealed exposing their close relationship, like testimony that Bill was in fact seen on Little St. James (Epstein's rape island).
So why would Ethan delete his Tweet? Is it that much of a stretch to wonder why he felt the need to go back in time and delete his acknowledgement + photo of Epstein's painting featuring the former President Bill Clinton, a democrat? Feel free to rate autistic I just thought this was rather strange. It's the former president, Killary's husband, as the subject being humiliated in a painting found in the world's most infamous sex trafficker's $90million home. Whose ownership plus display of said painting has brought on all kinds of questions including if it was indicative of his relationship with a compromised former president or just plainly a funny painting of his close friend going back decades. In Ethan's mind, why was deleting this Tweet the better option compared to just letting it stay up? After all he'd already gone through with publishing it to begin with. Not sure why this captured my interest the way it has but I do know any puzzle ratings are warranted.
"War Games” – Petrina Ryan-Kleid
"Parsing Bill" – Petrina Ryan-Kleid, painting at Epstein's Manhattan Townhouse.
This is regarding Ethan but also from 2019 and not exactly on topic or breaking news, I just thought this was interesting. I was looking at art online made by the artist Petrina Ryan-Kleid. She came to mild notoriety when it was discovered that a painting of hers was displayed prominently in Jeffrey Epstein's $88,000,000 Manhattan townhouse. The painting in question was of Bill Clinton wearing the famous blue dress that Monica Lewinsky wore along with red high heels while posing seductively and looking at the camera (if you ask me it looks like the iconic Uncle Sam “I Want YOU” poster). While it's often misreported that Epstein also owned a painting of hers showing Bush in the White House knocking down 2 Jenga towers with paper airplanes, he didn't actually own it, although it was painted by the same artist.
I did a reverse image search of the Clinton painting and a web page from 2019 talking about it linked to a Tweet from Ethan. It failed to load and the Tweet's link has since been deleted by Ethan. I know this is off topic I just thought it was interesting that out of all the Tweets he should have deleted, this is one he felt strongly about it doing so. It's not up for debate either, she's on the record discussing the sale and there are many photos showing the same painting inside Epstein's home - it's by no means a conspiracy of any kind. We don't know when he deleted it but we do know that in addition to the 20+ flight logs showing Bill flying with Ep on the Lolita Express, additional damning details have since been revealed exposing their close relationship, like testimony that Bill was in fact seen on Little St. James (Epstein's rape island).
So why would Ethan delete his Tweet? Is it that much of a stretch to wonder why he felt the need to go back in time and delete his acknowledgement + photo of Epstein's painting featuring the former President Bill Clinton, a democrat? Feel free to rate autistic I just thought this was rather strange. It's the former president, Killary's husband, as the subject being humiliated in a painting found in the world's most infamous sex trafficker's $90million home. Whose ownership plus display of said painting has brought on all kinds of questions including if it was indicative of his relationship with a compromised former president or just plainly a funny painting of his close friend going back decades. In Ethan's mind, why was deleting this Tweet the better option compared to just letting it stay up? After all he'd already gone through with publishing it to begin with. Not sure why this captured my interest the way it has but I do know any puzzle ratings are warranted.
The explanation is simple, Ethan wiped all of his past tweets about a year or two ago to make it harder to cancel him for saying anything raunchy in the past. This tweet was just one of the many that were swept away.
A lot of popular e-celebs and online figures do that these days because there will ALWAYS be someone ready and willing to type "@[username]" + every variation of the n-word in the search bar to try and ruin somebody's career. A recent example of this is the TinaFate1 situation.
for no reason...PKA Links: PKA on Reddit: http://reddit.com/r/PKAPKA on Patreon: https://www.Patreon.com/PKA Merch: http://PainkillerAlready.net PKA on...
www.youtube.com
Oh man time for Ethan to talk about how Kyle is a "dangerous felon" for 6 months.
Being a multibillionaire isn't megawealthy? I mean come the fuck on, I know you're kike but couldn't you at least tone it down a bit? The absolute fucking state of North American "socialism"...
How do you even arrive at that conclusion?
