Lolcow Melinda Leigh Scott & Marshall Castersen - Sue-happy couple. Flat earth conspiracists. Pretending to be Jewish. Believe Kiwi Farms is protected by the Masonic Order. 0-6 on lawsuits. Marshall is dead.

[PyrrhicRustle]

I own legally registered firearms

Why would you register your guns?

 

[Dizzyuntildeath]

@Useful_Mistake May I ask you a question? You seem extremely well versed in law. If Josh is awarded damages, and is allowed to pursue @TamarYaelBatYah regarding them. Could Mel, in a brilliant 4d chess move of spite, purposely liquidate or give away her property until all that is left is protected under the law? She does seem demented and stupid enough to (further) push her family into poverty and chalk that up as a win.

 

[TamarYaelBatYah]

Why would you register your guns?

It's required under Virginia law. Every time you purchase a gun in VA from a legally licensed vendor they have to run a background check and then the VA State Police headquarters gets a notification in their database that you own a gun. I only buy guns through legally licensed dealers.

Comparison/point: 22 of the 31 counties of VA that have declared themselves "gun sanctuary counties" and in those places you can find all sorts of guns for sale. Not much different than the rest of the US. There's black market guns sold illegally everywhere every day.

Long live the Second Amendment!

And long live the NRA!

1. Yes, that happened
2. Yes, Akilah tried that stupid argument
3. The judge beat her over the head with how stupid she is
4. Sadly this was in a completely different court, nowhere in the fourth circuit

View attachment 2631763
View attachment 2631764

Firstly, how come when you highlight stuff it's never a straight line? It's like all over the place.

Second, you said it yourself: THAT'S NOT FROM THE FOURTH CIRCUIT. Therefore, it's not the legal standard for the Circuit I'm in. It's only "persuasive". I can find just as many case law from other Circuits which show that they don't agree with that Circuit.

Thirdly, keyword: FRIVOLOUS. It says "...defend against a frivolous suit". The legal definition of "frivolous" has not been used by any judge in my case, nor has his attorney Hardin been able to demonstrate that my case is "frivolous" within the legal meaning of the word as set by the standards of the US Supreme Court. Learn the meaning of legal words before trying to use them.

So what I said about you earlier holds true: your case law you present is constantly off topic and out of context as a misinformation campaign.

Because sheriffs would never show up to walk through the property to verify her assets, and then take

This isn't ancient Rome, the law doesn't work like that.

What country do you live in that you think America works like that?

Melinda, just because you don't understand something doesn't mean it's wrong. One can crowdfund their legal fees and still be awarded attorneys fees. It doesn't matter how the person paid for their legal fees.

citation needed

Don't you spread misinformation as well? It's been repeatedly proven than your assumptions over what FDCPA covers and your various misunderstandings of self-defense and debt collection are wrong, and yet you still attempt to repeat the same points to where it's clear you believe your own bullshit, wouldn't this be the spread of information even if it's ineffectual?

You haven't disproves anything. You just say something you made up and then think that's proof when it's just your opinion.

Here's some PROOF. Read it and weep:

, I am rather honest.

No actually, you're a liar like Rekeita and Hardin. You're typical Masonic lawyers who try operate under "color of law".

Someone's mad at Nick. And, yet, he was right, wasn't he? You lost

Firstly, the case isn't over. It's in Appeals. You can't say who won or lost yet.

Disgust is more like it, not anger. Rekeita is a narcissistic Christian who is feeding off the situation to look for narcissistic supply. He thinks his narcissistic behavior is socially acceptable. Typical preppy white boy. He's also a racist who defended Chauvin killing George Floyd. Just sick.

He wasn't right about the *reasons* he predicated a dismissal. He said the case would be dismissed because it didn't have the Clerk's seal and because of lack of proper service and it was not dismissed for either of those reasons.

Rekeita is a hot head who runs misinformation campaigns to try to deter people from thinking for themselves. I'm too smart to fall for his nonsense.

I could point out dozens of places where he lies and fibs about case law.

That's not the procedure. Pursuant to Va. Code §8.01-466 the writ is issued and served with the form for requesting a hearing on the exemption. https://law.lis.virginia.gov/vacode/title8.01/chapter18/section8.01-466/

The exemption claim is not self-executing. You will have to make the claim and defend it and Dear Leader (through counsel) will get to turn your financial life absolutely inside out to shake out any non-exempt Mountain Shekels you may have.

And this will happen every six months for the next couple decades.

ETA: This is referring to the Write Fi. Fa., not wage garnishment. I haven't looked up the VA procedure for wage garnishment.

Nobody said there wasn't a hearing and discovery. Nobody said the Exemptions were self executing.

And the reason there is a hearing is because I can object to any document he requests or sends a subpoena for.

You seem to keep believing both sides don't have equal rights. Newsflash: women have equal rights in the United States in the court of law.

Nice try though.

 

[Dizzyuntildeath]

@TamarYaelBatYah What trauma caused you to retreat into this power fantasy world of yours where the world somehow bends to your will every time, and every time it looks like it might not, you say something like 'Well I didn't want it to THAT time, so....'

 

[Drowningman]

If Fake jew had to pay for all her bullshit filings, she wouldn't file anything.
An accounting of her assets from what she has shown and told us especially in the last 24 hours will be quite interesting but I expect fake jew to run and go somewhere else and file more bs lawsuits.
If she did shoot at anyone in law enforcement, she might be able to pull off the mentally insane defense.

 

[TamarYaelBatYah]

@Useful_Mistake May I ask you a question? You seem extremely well versed in law. If Josh is awarded damages, and is allowed to pursue @TamarYaelBatYah regarding them. Could Mel, in a brilliant 4d chess move of spite, purposely liquidate or give away her property until all that is left is protected under the law? She does seem demented and stupid enough to (further) push her family into poverty and chalk that up as a win.

Yes, someone can transfer all their assets to their children and spouse before they die. Then their Debtor's can sit there and jerk off to a Court Order.

Funny how you think that Joshua Moon can try to manipulation the court system in playing games with the court about where he lives and yet it's somehow acceptable.

OH MY FUCKING GRAVY, I forgot. You're sociopathic narcissistic Stalkers with double standards. Ok whew. For a second I was talking to you like you were sane healthy people. Silly me.

@TamarYaelBatYah What trauma caused you to retreat into this power fantasy world of yours where the world somehow bends to your will every time, and every time it looks like it might not, you say something like 'Well I didn't want it to THAT time, so....'

What in tarnation are you talking about?

If Fake jew had to pay for all her bullshit filings, she wouldn't file anything.
An accounting of her assets from what she has shown and told us especially in the last 24 hours will be quite interesting but I expect fake jew to run and go somewhere else and file more bs lawsuits.
If she did shoot at anyone in law enforcement, she might be able to pull off the mentally insane defense.

You're complaining at me on a website. Go protest Congress for giving poor people who can't hire legal representation rights.
Not my issue to hear your complaints.

That's why you don't pick on the poor. Learn your lesson idiot.

"like a downpour that washes away all the seeds so is a ruler who oppresses the poor" (prov. 28:3)

Example of Prov. 28:3: a rich man comes and physically attacks a homeless man who was a stranger he never met. In revenge the homeless man vandalizes the rich man's house. The rich man then visits a lawyer to sue the homeless man in court for money. The lawyer asks the rich man where does the homeless man live? At that point they can't sue the lawsuit because he doesn't know where he's going to serve the lawsuit.

Picking on the poor is like shooting yourself in the foot.

NEXT

 

[Illuminati Order Official]

Here's some PROOF. Read it and weep:

Sorry, I had to.
But on a serious note, it would be more informative if you quoted what methods are forbidden.

Firstly, the case isn't over. It's in Appeals. You can't say who won or lost yet.

I'd say you lost and you're asking for a rematch. Fair?

He said the case would be dismissed because it didn't have the Clerk's seal and because of lack of proper service and it was not dismissed for either of those reasons.

Isn't the actual outcome worse for you? I mean, if it was dismissed on technicalities it probably wouldn't be dismissed with prejudice.

Rekeita is a hot head who runs misinformation campaigns to try to deter people from thinking for themselves. I'm too smart to fall for his nonsense.

Thinking about counter-arguments against statements and position you disagree with is intellectually stimulating therefore he (likely unintentionally) encourages you to think for yourself.

You seem to keep believing both sides don't have equal rights. Newsflash: women have equal rights in the United States in the court of law.

I don't think anybody here stated your rights should be limited because of your gender.

 

[White Baby]

"like a downpour that washes away all the seeds so is a ruler who oppresses the poor" (prov. 28:3)

Oppression has now been redefined as being featured on a gossip website. Thanks, Melinda, you continue to.. uh.. inject diversity into the english language.

 

[ConSluttant]

Gotta keep my eye on you



The pocket of the litigants, not 3rd parties





Joshua Moon goes into a narcissistic rage any time - and I mean, ANYTIME - he doesn't like someone holding him accountable.



Hm, interesting. If I recall, she threw insults at me. Time for "eye for eye"?

Melinda. It is the rule of law in this land in every jurisdiction that it DOES NOT MATTER WHO PAYS THE LAWYER BILLS. The court doesn't care. It could be someone unconnected to the case. It could be crowd funded. It doesn't fucking matter. It doesn't even matter of they were never paid.

All that matters is that they were BILLED. Period. You saying that it matters isn't going to change reality. Others have been far more butt hurt than you about this and still seethe to this day. Sargon crowd funded his fees against Akeela. She STILL HAD TO PAY THE LAWYER FEES SHE WAS SANCTIONED.

And you keep pointing to consumer protection act. Never mind that any possible sanction for lawyer fees against you has absolutely nothing to do with consumer debt. Like they are totally different galaxies. They are both debt but that's about as close as it gets. Again, you seething and gnashing your teeth about it won't change anything.

But do go on. It's so much fun watching you flail around and work yourself up this way. Lots of fun. I just giggle with glee seeing you do this. It's the best entertainment ever. You have surpassed my greatest hopes for you. It's marvelous. I'm rooting for you for lolcow of the year. You can do it! Beat the motherfucker and Greer. I dare you.

 

[Deadpool]

Yes, someone can transfer all their assets to their children and spouse before they die. Then their Debtor's can sit there and jerk off to a Court Order.

Funny how you think that Joshua Moon can try to manipulation the court system in playing games with the court about where he lives and yet it's somehow acceptable.

OH MY FUCKING GRAVY, I forgot. You're sociopathic narcissistic Stalkers with double standards. Ok whew. For a second I was talking to you like you were sane healthy people. Silly me.





What in tarnation are you talking about?




You're complaining at me on a website. Go protest Congress for giving poor people who can't hire legal representation rights.
Not my issue to hear your complaints.

That's why you don't pick on the poor. Learn your lesson idiot.

"like a downpour that washes away all the seeds so is a ruler who oppresses the poor" (prov. 28:3)

Example of Prov. 28:3: a rich man comes and physically attacks a homeless man who was a stranger he never met. In revenge the homeless man vandalizes the rich man's house. The rich man then visits a lawyer to sue the homeless man in court for money. The lawyer asks the rich man where does the homeless man live? At that point they can't sue the lawsuit because he doesn't know where he's going to serve the lawsuit.

Picking on the poor is like shooting yourself in the foot.

NEXT

Kill yourself, whore.

 

[talk talk talk]

Yes, someone can transfer all their assets to their children and spouse before they die. Then their Debtor's can sit there and jerk off to a Court Order.

Smelly here is going to run into the problem that these would likely be fraudulent conveyances. Va. Code § 55.1-40 provides in pertinent part:

Every​

​

(i) gift, conveyance, assignment, or transfer of, or charge upon, any estate, real or personal,​

(ii) action commenced or order, judgment, or execution suffered or obtained, and​

(iii) bond or other writing​

​

given with intent to delay, hinder, or defraud creditors, purchasers, or other persons of or from what they are or may be lawfully entitled to shall, as to such creditors, purchasers, or other persons or their representatives or assigns, be void.​

​

ETA: The lovely screen caps of our favorite Mountain Jew coping and seething will be good evidence of intent.​

 

[Spergetti]

@TamarYaelBatYah You are obviously terrified of facing the consequences of your years-long stint of abusing the legal system. You know that you're fucked, which is why you have shifted from gloating about some imaginary "win" in court to desperately trying to convince everyone (especially Null) that collecting anything from you is simultaneously a legal impossibility due to legal technicalities based on your retarded and entirely self-serving interpretation of the law, a fruitless effort because you claim to be poor while also publically advertising to us that you have money stashed away for your children, and dangerous by threatening to shoot anyone who shows up to collect anything (which is supposed to be legally impossible, remember?).

The lady doth protest too much, and you have tipped your hand HARD here. You are obviously terrified of losing this case and having what little comforts you have stripped from you. Enjoy the reality check, Melinda. I know I will.

 

[Illuminati Order Official]

Funny how you think that Joshua Moon can try to manipulation the court system in playing games with the court about where he lives and yet it's somehow acceptable.

Technical comment: "try to manipulate". "To" means you are using the infinitive form of a verb. You put a noun there which is incorrect.

You're complaining at me on a website. Go protest Congress for giving poor people who can't hire legal representation rights.

Nobody wants to deprive the poor of their rights. We are critical of your legal endeavors because we find it likely that you use the system to exact vengeance on your personal enemy and that your main goal is to cost Josh as much money as possible just for the sake of draining his resources.

"like a downpour that washes away all the seeds so is a ruler who oppresses the poor" (prov. 28:3)

If Null is the ruler you're talking about, he "oppresses" everybody equally. Fucking Madonna has a thread here, don't think she's poor.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

@Useful_Mistake May I ask you a question? You seem extremely well versed in law. If Josh is awarded damages, and is allowed to pursue @TamarYaelBatYah regarding them. Could Mel, in a brilliant 4d chess move of spite, purposely liquidate or give away her property until all that is left is protected under the law? She does seem demented and stupid enough to (further) push her family into poverty and chalk that up as a win.

That's illegal. So, sure, she probably could if she wanted to go to jail for fraud (or some other punishment depending on how far she goes). Courts have dealt with all the smarties for thousands of years. This would be nothing new.

Firstly, how come when you highlight stuff it's never a straight line? It's like all over the place.

Second, you said it yourself: THAT'S NOT FROM THE FOURTH CIRCUIT. Therefore, it's not the legal standard for the Circuit I'm in. It's only "persuasive". I can find just as many case law from other Circuits which show that they don't agree with that Circuit.

Thirdly, keyword: FRIVOLOUS. It says "...defend against a frivolous suit". The legal definition of "frivolous" has not been used by any judge in my case, nor has his attorney Hardin been able to demonstrate that my case is "frivolous" within the legal meaning of the word as set by the standards of the US Supreme Court. Learn the meaning of legal words before trying to use them.

So what I said about you earlier holds true: your case law you present is constantly off topic and out of context as a misinformation campaign.

I wasn't talking to you, you fucking autist.

What country do you live in that you think America works like that?

You haven't disproves anything. You just say something you made up and then think that's proof when it's just your opinion.

Here's some PROOF. Read it and weep:

Learn to read, and learn law. So far you have failed at both.

No actually, you're a liar like Rekeita and Hardin. You're typical Masonic lawyers who try operate under "color of law".

For someone who is quite assured of my alleged dishonesty, you cannot seem to point at it and prove it. I wonder why?

Firstly, the case isn't over. It's in Appeals. You can't say who won or lost yet.

You literally did though. As of now, you are a loser. If appeals courts were to change that, that might change.

Disgust is more like it, not anger. Rekeita is a narcissistic Christian who is feeding off the situation to look for narcissistic supply. He thinks his narcissistic behavior is socially acceptable. Typical preppy white boy. He's also a racist who defended Chauvin killing George Floyd. Just sick.

So black people should be above law? Emotions should determine situations where niggers are involved? Kinda racist Mel. Everyone deserves their rights, be it Chauvin, Floyd, or whomever else.

He wasn't right about the *reasons* he predicated a dismissal. He said the case would be dismissed because it didn't have the Clerk's seal and because of lack of proper service and it was not dismissed for either of those reasons.

Rekeita is a hot head who runs misinformation campaigns to try to deter people from thinking for themselves. I'm too smart to fall for his nonsense.

Prove it. You can't.

I could point out dozens of places where he lies and fibs about case law.

I call your bluff.

 

[Ralph Barnhardt]

I so badly want the fake Jew lawyer to be sued by the actual mountain Jew lawyer. @TamarYaelBatYah do you have the ovaries to defend your honor? You're not scared are you? God hates a coward you know.

 

[The Un-Clit]

Don't you spread misinformation as well? It's been repeatedly proven than your assumptions over what FDCPA covers and your various misunderstandings of self-defense and debt collection are wrong, and yet you still attempt to repeat the same points to where it's clear you believe your own bullshit, wouldn't this be the spread of information even if it's ineffectual?

I don't even bother correcting the incredibly flawed takes she has on various aspects of the FDCPA, especially regarding contact from not debt collectors but empowered agents of the court of the state of (virginia in this case).

It's too funny to watch her jabber and spin about what is currently hypothetical anyway but when Josh wins damages, she's going to learn the hard way what the reality of the situation is, and she can complain and try to sue long after the fact that everything she owns beyond basic survival is taken to satisfy the claim.

It will be even sweeter if she threatens said agents of the court with violence or GodBear forbid actually shoots someone. She'll be lucky to be taken alive to prison if she does.

 

[Dizzyuntildeath]

That's illegal. So, sure, she probably could if she wanted to go to jail for fraud (or some other punishment depending on how far she goes). Courts have dealt with all the smarties for thousands of years. This would be nothing new.




I wasn't talking to you, you fucking autist.




Learn to read, and learn law. So far you have failed at both.


For someone who is quite assured of my alleged dishonesty, you cannot seem to point at it and prove it. I wonder why?


You literally did though. As of now, you are a loser. If appeals courts were to change that, that might change.


So black people should be above law? Emotions should determine situations where niggers are involved? Kinda racist Mel. Everyone deserves their rights, be it Chauvin, Floyd, or whomever else.

View attachment 2632244

Prove it. You can't.


I call your bluff.

Thanks for the reply. I didn't think it was an above board option, but look at who we're talking about here.

 

[Baby Yoda]

@TamarYaelBatYah When you were in a relationship could you taste your partner's cum based on what he had eaten? This one time I was fucking a whore and she asked me to cum in her mouth so I did. She wanted me to eat pineapple because apparently that makes your sperm taste good. Thoughts?
Also, could you answer me on what you think Burmese Rice Farmer's butthole tastes like. Thanks.

 

[AnOminous]

It is unprotected. It counts as "fighting words" which is unprotected by the First. Even insulting a cop could be "fighting words" (which imo is stupid). I base this claim on Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire, 315 U.S. 568 (1942) where a person insulting a marshal was arrested. If that is enough, I figure threatening to shoot a police officer would be enough to be unprotected too.

There is no way any law currently on the books would be applied as it was in Chaplinsky, in which the defendant (a Jehovah's Witness by the way) was convicted of calling a police officer a "God-damned racketeer" and a "damned fascist."

The "threat" would have to be legally a "true threat," not just hyperbole, and the governing case law would be Watts. Again, much as with Brandenburg, the issue is not whether the speech constitutes a threat, but whether it is likely to cause imminent unlawful behavior.

For a threat to be actionable, that is, a "true threat," it must be "statements where the speaker means
to communicate a serious expression of an intent to commit an act of unlawful violence to a particular individual or group of individuals.” Virginia v. Black, 538 U.S. 343, 359 (2003). While "it was just a joke" is not a defense if the threat is otherwise actionable, it can't be something a reasonable person wouldn't view as a threat.

So while what Smelly Melly said here may or may not be actionable, it doesn't appear to be a direct threat against any specifically identifiable person or group of people, based on speculation about something that may or may not happen in the unspecified future.

It probably isn't actionable on its own, although it is definitely the kind of thing that will cause any law enforcement who does plan on encountering you to come prepared, which makes such idiotic statements sometimes fatally stupid.

 

[Drowningman]

I get the feeling Mel will have her one woman Waco Branch Davidian shoot out one day.