Culture REEEE! Handmaid Tale’s author Margaret Atwood asks why we can’t say ‘woman’ anymore and the Left lose their damn minds - Someone's about to be eaten by the monster they helped to feed.

Article
___

HOOboy … how long before the Left try to cancel their HERO who wrote their favorite book EVER, Handmaid’s Tale? Someone should probably tell her saying woman is a big no-no now or something because a few hundred people in the country want to erase women since their mere existence is oppressing to them.

Or something.

Hey man, we don’t buy this crap.

And neither does Margaret Atwood:


(link to the article)

Guess how this went over?

We know you know people lost their minds but you know, we needed a tie into these ridiculous tweets.

Ok, MAN. Tell a woman she can’t say woman.

That reads.

Or we can just keep saying women instead of trying to erase them from society.

Who are these people?

Boosting women is profoundly disappointing.

Alrighty then.

Oh no!

Whatever will she do with only 2.1 million followers left?!

Huh?

Ok?

Anti-trans dog whistle.

This. Is. Ri-damn-diculous.

Truly recoiled?

REALLY?

How pathetic that this is their reaction. They use her book for YEARS to #Resist Trump … maybe instead of trying to cancel her they should listen to her?

Oh, we know they won’t but still.

***

 

[Getting tard comed]

The only question is will women repent as a group or will they die fighting to the troonery?

 

[elite_club]

 

[Mr. Bung]

The only question is will women repent as a group or will they die fighting to the troonery?

Some feminists were always saying "the future is female," or that men were becoming biologically obsolete and would phase out of existence when technology allowed for reproduction to occur without needing sperm. The great irony being that the way things are going the future will be "biologically male." Troons are already phasing biological women out of their own sports and other circles. What's to say the future won't be just troons and cis men when the technology allows for reproduction without needing eggs or being born with a womb?

 

[elite_club]

Some feminists were always saying "the future is female," or that men were becoming biologically obsolete and would phase out of existence when technology allowed for reproduction to occur without needing sperm. The great irony being that the way things are going the future will be "biologically male." Troons are already phasing biological women out of their own sports and other circles. What's to say the future won't be just troons and cis men when the technology allows for reproduction without needing eggs or being born with a womb?

The future is Femboy

 

[Coleslaw]

Some feminists were always saying "the future is female," or that men were becoming biologically obsolete and would phase out of existence when technology allowed for reproduction to occur without needing sperm. The great irony being that the way things are going the future will be "biologically male." Troons are already phasing biological women out of their own sports and other circles. What's to say the future won't be just troons and cis men when the technology allows for reproduction without needing eggs or being born with a womb?

If trans women have no advantage over cis women, why not just get rid of gendered sports altogether?

 

[Dom Cruise]

You get what you fucking deserve!

 

[MirrorNoir]

I don't know...judging what little I've seen from the Hulu version, there seems to be undertones of a weird, "porn for women" theme going on, almost as if a woman had a BDSM/humiliation fetish going on but not as transparently as 50 Shades of Gray or whatever. Even it was only the TV network, is it that crazy a theory?

The Hulu TV version of Handmaiden Tales rapes the source material and then some. To the point that I have to think that Olsen and the showrunners are EXPLICITLY keeping the early 90s softcore theatrical adaptation buried and unavailable on DVD or airing on TV, because they are wholesale afraid that the skinnimax version of Handmaidens Tale will be deemed the better adaptation than the Hulu version if people could access it and it was aired semi-regularly enough to develop a cult following.

 

[Positron]

Just a little more than a year ago, Atwood was a brave ally of trans rights who trusted SCIENCE! (Archive)

Somehow it makes the smell of her burning flesh sweeter.

 

[Feline Supremacist]

Some feminists were always saying "the future is female," or that men were becoming biologically obsolete and would phase out of existence when technology allowed for reproduction to occur without needing sperm. The great irony being that the way things are going the future will be "biologically male." Troons are already phasing biological women out of their own sports and other circles. What's to say the future won't be just troons and cis men when the technology allows for reproduction without needing eggs or being born with a womb?

If you're fine with sticking into a hatchet wound or butt fucking, sure. I think we're just wired to want to bone each other, troons are an aberration and defective. I would throw your observation into the radfems faces though, just to watch them get spicy.

 

[PS1gamenwatch]

The future is Femboy

The future is Chinese because they want to rid all of the femboys

 

[CatParty]

Surprise the woman who wrote the defining feminist piece of literature has opinions on men taking over feminist causes lmao

 

[ClownBrew]

leftist ideology is modern example of ouroboros in action.

More like Wile-E Coyote dropping anvils on his own head, over and over again.

 

[frozenrunner]

this is your audience, cunt. Nice ignoring islam with your crybaby christ nazi series too btw

Atwood said in a forward to an earlier edition of The Handmaid's Tale that she had based the story on Iran before and after the Shaw was deposed in the late 70s.

In later editions, she started lying about that, probably to avoid retarded internet feminists shitting down her throat.

 

[WhoIsSutterKane]

I fucking love to see it!

 

[Tasty Tatty]

I don't know...judging what little I've seen from the Hulu version, there seems to be undertones of a weird, "porn for women" theme going on, almost as if a woman had a BDSM/humiliation fetish going on but not as transparently as 50 Shades of Gray or whatever. Even it was only the TV network, is it that crazy a theory?

The Hulu TV version of Handmaiden Tales rapes the source material and then some. To the point that I have to think that Olsen and the showrunners are EXPLICITLY keeping the early 90s softcore theatrical adaptation buried and unavailable on DVD or airing on TV, because they are wholesale afraid that the skinnimax version of Handmaidens Tale will be deemed the better adaptation than the Hulu version if people could access it and it was aired semi-regularly enough to develop a cult following.

The 90s version is superior in every aspect. If anything, it sticks to the original story as much as possible. It even ends in a somehow positive note: the protagonist has an uncertain future, but at least she's free and will try to keep herself alive and safe on her own. Considering how's the life for her before, she got a good ending. I think she's also pregnant at the end, so she keeps her baby.

And, I wouldn't call it softcore as much as it's "erotica" (which are basically the same, tbh), but the Hulu version is just humiliation porn despite it's not sexually explicit (I've only seen a few episodes, so I could be wrong about this)

I have no problem with the story having sex in it because they are showing there is a difference between how she is forced to sex with her owner and how she willingly sleeps with the guard. But I can assure you 100% that feminists watching this consider the former more sexually arousing than the other, and not because they enjoy forced sex (although they probably do), but because they enjoy the idea of having all their beliefs about women validated. Better said, they get off by thinking that, indeed, women are raped and have it as bad as Offred does.

 

[Flexo]

I have no problem with the story having sex in it because they are showing there is a difference between how she is forced to sex with her owner and how she willingly sleeps with the guard. But I can assure you 100% that feminists watching this consider the former more sexually arousing than the other, and not because they enjoy forced sex (although they probably do), but because they enjoy the idea of having all their beliefs about women validated. Better said, they get off by thinking that, indeed, women are raped and have it as bad as Offred does.

I can't find the quote now but I'm pretty sure it was judgybitch who said something like, "Ugly women love feminism because it tells them that men all around them are on the verge of losing control and raping them at any moment because they are so hot and desirable."

 

[hasbinot]

I never say woman and I’m doing great

 

[ロボ﹏§¤r﹏h¶rœ]

This is the new face of Progressivism - erasing women like the Taliban do. This disease has to be contained or else the affected countries will eventually turn into Pakistan and Afghanistan.

 

[Pork Packer]

You get what you fucking deserve!

To that I would also like to add...

 

[thismanlies]

Since we’re at the point where we have to identify women by their organs, I would like to make the following statement:

Women are nothing more than mammary glands and Fallopian tubes.

I have just said the most progressive thing anyone has said on this site.