Lolcow Melinda Leigh Scott & Marshall Castersen - Sue-happy couple. Flat earth conspiracists. Pretending to be Jewish. Believe Kiwi Farms is protected by the Masonic Order. 0-6 on lawsuits. Marshall is dead.

[Dynamite Ninja]

Practice what your preach because you use this site to be up in everyone else's business and life but your own.

HE DOESN'T NEED TO; BUT YOU HAVE TO, YOU FUCKING WHORE!

 

[Useful_Mistake]

>46 pages

It has nothing on Russel Greer's

what would the likelihood of livestreaming the collection? Id imagine there'd be privacy concerns that would impede such an endeavor.

I imagine he'd be able to do it, and Hardin can certainly give Null better advise about this than I can. Worst comes to worst, he can always make a deal with Mel wherein he would forgive a part of the debt if she allowed him to film her.

 

[MemoriesOfMemphis]

Imagine thinking Null has the patience or the willpower to become a Mason

 

[Anonymus Fluhre]

If Dear Leader is indeed awarded fees and expenses, what would the likelihood of livestreaming the collection? Id imagine there'd be privacy concerns that would impede such an endeavor.

At the very least, I would hope there's a video recording of the process made available. I'd love nothing more than to watch someone take stuff, not to mention any particle shenanigans Mel might pull.

Not really, get the body cam footage from the police officers who have to go with them.

 

[AnOminous]

I like the way that she's threatening us with dogs, with traps, with firearms, but she's completely forgotten that Marshall is a SEALS- and Spetsnaz-trained killing machine.

Even she can tell he's a completely useless inbred hillbilly retard beaner spic faggot.

 

[Rod Dangerous]

Marshall Law vs. Rekieta Law: part 1 (link)

Marshall Law vs. Rekieta Law: part2 (link)

 

[AnOminous]

The Jennfur Jay thread has Jennfur in there frequently and she is actually pretty chill there. And because of that, that threads audience like having her around.

And I remember some cases where threads were approved for dropping due to the subject going quiet, growing up, and asking with awareness and respect

@jenffer a jay is copacetic.

All Smelly Melly had to do not to become a lolcow was nothing. We were already ripping her weird stalker's ass open for him as he is an obviously mentally ill creep. We did nothing to this retarded cunt. But no she had to sperg out. Fuck this bitch and her batch of six retarded hillbilly hobgoblins.

Imagine the distended cunt of this demonic twat, this tard launcher spitting out the vile offspring of defective retards every nine months, who will grow up to be lolcows themselves.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

Marshall Law vs. Rekieta Law: part 1 (link)

View attachment 2642353

Marshall Law vs. Rekieta Law: part2 (link)

View attachment 2642356

If part 2 is anything like part 1, it's gonna be horrid.

Also, I like how they are getting the wrong "color of law" definitions from google, lol. The only good definitions can be found here and here. It's weird how many people are unable to understand something so simple.

 

[PomegranateKing]

Marshall Law vs. Rekieta Law: part 1 (link)

View attachment 2642353

Marshall Law vs. Rekieta Law: part2 (link)

View attachment 2642356

I can't for the life me understand how anyone can watch his videos. The um's, ah's, you see's, and coughs take up 15 out of every 20 minutes

 

[Useful_Mistake]

I can't for the life me understand how anyone can watch his videos. The um's, ah's, you see's, and coughs take up 15 out of every 20 minutes

People shit on Nick at the fact that he can never get to the point he's talking about, but Marshall is way worse. I think in Part 1 it took him over 10 min to even so much as play Nick's video, much less address it. That means he tried putting 2 hours of Nick's commentary in the 9 minutes he had left remaining. Needless to say it was shit

 

[AnOminous]

Also, I like how they are getting the wrong "color of law" definitions from google, lol. The only good definitions can be found here and here. It's weird how many people are unable to understand something so simple.

Why do you think so many nutty lawsuits by absolute morons purport to be under Section 1983? Unfortunately most laws are written by lolyers too dumb actually to practice law but just smart enough to get elected. So they throw around phrases like "color of law" while not grasping that people even dumber than they are (like the idiot whore Melinda) will literally be incapable of understanding what that even means.

 

[Drowningman]

Once again the expression "A little knowledge is a dangerous thing" is fully proven by Melinda and Russell Greer.
Marshal just believes anything Mel tells hm like he can barely put 2 sentences together as we have seen from his videos.
How total idiots can use the legal system to make peoples life hell is a crime itself
I'm sure the founding Fathers never could have foreseen Mountain Jew coming.

 

[DSP's Tax Lawyer]

Once again the expression "A little knowledge is a dangerous thing" is fully proven by Melinda and Russell Greer.
Marshal just believes anything Mel tells hm like he can barely put 2 sentences together as we have seen from his videos.
How total idiots can use the legal system to make peoples life hell is a crime itself
I'm sure the founding Fathers never could have foreseen Mountain Jew coming.

I am convinced their "little knowledge" is just being able to google things. Not understanding what they are googling but just being able to google things

 

[Illuminati Order Official]

Also, I like how they are getting the wrong "color of law" definitions from google, lol

Since KiwiFarmsDotNet is a community centered around friendship, help and learning let's try to define the term in a way that it's understandable even by a person with intellectual deficit and confirm if I understand it correctly...
As I understand it, action taken under the color of law is an unlawful action taken by an individual holding some official legal power and pretending to be exercising that power. So:
- If a police officer fines me for driving a black car it's under the color of law because there is no law that forbids driving black cars.
- If a police officer stops me for speeding and flogs me for it it's under the color of law because such penalty is illegal.
- No matter what Josh or Hardin put in their motions it is not under the color of law because neither of them holds any kind of official legal power.
Am I understanding this correctly?

 

[RodgerDodger]

Since KiwiFarmsDotNet is a community centered around friendship, help and learning let's try to define the term in a way that it's understandable even by a person with intellectual deficit and confirm if I understand it correctly...
As I understand it, action taken under the color of law is an unlawful action taken by an individual holding some official legal power and pretending to be exercising that power. So:
- If a police officer fines me for driving a black car it's under the color of law because there is no law that forbids driving black cars.
- If a police officer stops me for speeding and flogs me for it it's under the color of law because such penalty is illegal.
- No matter what Josh or Hardin put in their motions it is not under the color of law because neither of them holds any kind of official legal power.
Am I understanding this correctly?

A'yup. As was said "Color of Law" 99.9% of the time applies exclusively to the executive branch. And really the way Melinda uses it is not correct. Color of Law is the action of a Law Enforcement Official in which they have presumptive power. It is assumed the Police Officers actions have the power or color of law. The way Melinda uses it is those circumstances where an enforcement action is taken under the assumption of "Color of Law" but for which there is no actual underlying law.

And even when the above hapoens, it is not always improper or "unlawful". For example Police have broad latitude in the moment for maintaining public order and safety. You may have a right to stand in a public street, but if the Cop believes that it pose a hazzard he may order your ass off the street under Color of Law, even if there isn't a specific law against it. Where Melinda's interpretation might come up is if you were issued a fine for standing in the street, where no underlying law against it existed. But you would still have to get the fuck off the street. This is what happened with Melinda's car seat incident. The Officer did not act improperly under color of law. The only thing she actually succesfully fought was the fine.

 

[Hyacinth Bucket (Bouquet)]

At least in Canada, "colour of law" is a phrase used almost exclusively by crazy people. In fact, the only people who seem to use it in the correct fashion are the Industrial Relations Board.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

As I understand it, action taken under the color of law is an unlawful action taken by an individual holding some official legal power and pretending to be exercising that power

"Color of law" pretty much means "empowered by law". That essentially means the Government and its arm (like policemen). Deprivation of rights under the color of law means that someone empowered by law misused it by violating your rights.

Department of Justice gives a pretty good definition of it. That can be found here. Their definition is a bit more complex than mine, but you might find it useful still.

If its unclear, you can ask for some examples, but it should be pretty clear.

Am I understanding this correctly?

More or less.

 

[Anonymus Fluhre]

"Color of law" pretty much means "empowered by law". That essentially means the Government and its arm (like policemen). Deprivation of rights under the color of law means that someone empowered by law misused it by violating your rights.

Department of Justice gives a pretty good definition of it. That can be found here. Their definition is a bit more complex than mine, but you might find it useful still.

If its unclear, you can ask for some examples, but it should be pretty clear.


More or less.

Only "Colour of Law" I know is when Judges or lawyers circle stuff in different colours meaning what can and cannot be enforced in a contract.

 

[RodgerDodger]

At least in Canada, "colour of law" is a phrase used almost exclusively by crazy people. In fact, the only people who seem to use it in the correct fashion are the Industrial Relations Board.

It’s a sign of a crazy person in the US as well. It’s waving a great big Sovereign Citizen flag. If you want a fun time do a YouTube search on Sovereign Citizen Arrests to watch some insane morons getting tazed cuffed and stuffed.

 

[Easy J]

Ron Collins (a fellow litigious Appalachian cow) also likes his "color of law" flourishes in his various tardsuits, mostly when discussing the cops and prosecutors illegally persecuting him.

He was diagnosed with malignant narcissism and is a legal and all around expert on everything like Melinda.

He's sitting in prison for another year for bragging about buying a gun despite having been previously involuntarily committed to a crazy house.

He told the court how the law works and even assaulted one of his attorneys for not following his directives. But alas, the entire Wes Verjinya government was in on the conspiracy and railroaded him anyway. If Marshall doesn't work out, Ron would be a perfect male compliment to Mel.

https://kiwifarms.st/threads/ron-collins-draven-azropht.34120/

Incoherent Ramblings and Rantings. Waiting to get Everything Rolling.

So I am sitting here... Waiting. The Raleigh County Prosecutor Kristen Keller has been served and has until March 5th to make a reply or, I ...

blackdragonninjitsu.blogspot.com