- Joined
- Jan 19, 2020
I'm from Myanmar the only thing I know how to count is kilos of riceShe left on Monday.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I'm from Myanmar the only thing I know how to count is kilos of riceShe left on Monday.
And how many cups of water to give to Buddha?I'm from Myanmar the only thing I know how to count is kilos of rice
You obviously didn't watch my video. I gave a good number of specifics and citations.Mel, your video faces the same problem Marshall's did. You are trying to squeeze in 3 hours worth of arguments Nick did into 5 minutes (a bit more in Marshall's case). Do you even have a single citation to anything in that vid? Did you have time to play Nick's clips for context?
That's exactly what he said, quit trying to gaslight.A very disconnected video from Mel.
"Since when did I have to sell my house to get a righteous ruling?"
That's not what he said. He said if you believe with certainty that you'll win, then there're no issue. Put up or shut up. If you know you're going to win, then what's the problem?
Why are you so unwilling to commit to this course of action, Melinda? You won, right? You're going to get all that kiwi money, right?
Then sell your shit. Put your belief on the line. For a woman with a supposedly strong belief in her cause of action, you're certainly not willing to show it. Maybe you're not so sure. Maybe, despite your posturing, you're a weak ass bitch with nothing to show for it. Too bad. I guess all that hot talk wasn't worth a single penny in your book.
I don't care about your critique. As far as my video: you can take it or leave it.mean, I can watch and critique it, if you want, I just don't think there's gonna be much sustenance in there.
I have no acne. I also have no man and no kids, which leaves me with no "raccoon eyes" from stress and sleep deprivation.Ah, the single girl with acne is hating because that's me with a man and flawless skin.
Why does it matter if it says that in the Torah or not? You're staring down sanctions and possible fees in a secular court, not a Torah court.You missed the point: WHERE IN THE TORAH DOES IT SAY THAT someone should sell their stuff to obtain righteous rulings?
Sniffing cocaine is bougie as fuck no matter how you do it, common god-fearing salt of the earth folks either rock it up and smoke it, or sprinkle a little into some melted down endone or bupe strips and inject it.Melinda, do you and Marshall use broken Bic pens to snort your coke or do you just go even more ghetto and just lean right over it and take a big ol'wif of it?
Please don't remind her that her fight is in reality. It just angers her, she can't win there.I have no acne. I also have no man and no kids, which leaves me with no "raccoon eyes" from stress and sleep deprivation.
Why does it matter if it says that in the Torah or not? You're staring down sanctions and possible fees in a secular court, not a Torah court.
Sure. Nice cope. Hopefully child protective services doesn't notice Marshall's handiwork when they make their next visit.I have dark inlets because of my Eastern European ancestry (Hungarian). Hungarians have Turkish blood. I don't bother wearing make up to cover it up all the time because I'm not vain. And also, I don't think there's anything wrong with darker inlets. No need to whiten up.
Marshall has never given me a black eye.
No. Tamar is a name taken from The Hebrew Bible. (I don't pronounce my name the same exact way as the Biblical Hebrew though). In 2013 I adopted a Hebrew name for myself.
Naming butts? Good idea!
Yeah, you can't handle the truth
the thumbnail on that one is different than mine and has major resting bitch face. Hahahaha
She left roughly 46 kg of rice ago. I used KG because that's how World Bank measures rice in Myanmar.I'm from Myanmar the only thing I know how to count is kilos of rice
You have to pay for your lawsuits, win or lose, since 1789. Then in 1948 the Congress had a stroke and passed a law that they knew had a big hole in it. Namely that "a litigant whose filing fees and court costs are assumed by the public, unlike a paying litigant, lacks an economic incentive to refrain from filing frivolous, malicious, or repetitive lawsuits". In the middle of said stroke they attempted to solve the problem by allowing to punish poor people who abuse the system. See Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319."Since when did I have to sell my house to get a righteous ruling?"
I mean, obviously. I only stated in very clear terms that I didn't.You obviously didn't watch my video
Very well, I'll give it a watch in a half an hour or so. I'll publish my rebuttal (in text form) here.I gave a good number of specifics and citations
Torah is irrelevant to the realities of the court. Whine about immorality of courts as you please, yet still you are bound by their rules as is any other person.You missed the point: WHERE IN THE TORAH DOES IT SAY THAT someone should sell their stuff to obtain righteous rulings?
But you are an academic, correct? A scholar? True scholar delights in discussion, in battles of ideas. Or are you just larping?I don't care about your critique. As far as my video: you can take it or leave it.
Arrest.So a question for people with knowledge on actual legal matters (Sorry Melinda this doesn't include you), when the cops raid the place to collect for Josh, if they find the meth that Marshall and Melinda keep making, do they arrest her and/or is Josh allowed to seize and sell the Meth to make up some of that money?
I watched the video. You cited a single section of a rule throughout the video. Half of the video wasn't even arguments, it was you just rambling and trying to use your phone as a camera, and the other half was just incoherent arguments about stupid Torah shit, how Rackets is a bile-spewing demon, and claiming that he was spreading misinformation without ever actually stating any misinfo or correcting anything that was ever stated. As always, it was just you saying shit that clicks in your brain and nobody else's because you're a rétard.You obviously didn't watch my video. I gave a good number of specifics and citations.
Even if it were legal they would have to find a reseller first to be able to sell it for him.Well looky who came crawling back. I was going to ask when Hardin was going to respond to her nonsense or when the court was just going to laugh at her and grant Null's motion but seeing her back means its happening soon. She is getting ready to cope, seethe, and dilate real soon by posting on here again. At least she was smarter than Marshall with her upload (not much of a hurdle) by disabling the dislike bar and the comments.
So a question for people with knowledge on actual legal matters (Sorry Melinda this doesn't include you), when the cops raid the place to collect for Josh, if they find the meth that Marshall and Melinda keep making, do they arrest her and/or is Josh allowed to seize and sell the Meth to make up some of that money?
Just larping, she's basically stated that before.Or are you just larping?
Ok, pimple face. Continue on in your sexless life.I have no acne. I also have no man and no kids, which leaves me with no "raccoon eyes" from stress and sleep deprivation.
Attorney's fees aren't "sanctions". Get your terms straightWhy does it matter if it says that in the Torah or not? You're staring down sanctions and possible fees in a secular court, not a Torah court.
Don't try to tell me to "See" Neitzke, I'm the one who put that in my pleadings firstly.Namely that "a litigant whose filing fees and court costs are assumed by the public, unlike a paying litigant, lacks an economic incentive to refrain from filing frivolous, malicious, or repetitive lawsuits". In the middle of said stroke they attempted to solve the problem by allowing to punish poor people who abuse the system. See Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319.
Rekeita made an appeal to moral law, not secular law, and that is what I addressed.Torah is irrelevant to the realities of the court. Whine about immorality of courts as you please, yet still you are bound by their rules as is any other person.
I don't debate with people who are intellectually dishonest. You and Rekeita are that exactly: spreaders of misinformation.But you are an academic, correct? A scholar? True scholar delights in discussion, in battles of ideas. Or are you just larping?
You're literally intellectually dishonest all of the time. Not to mention how often you spread misinformation.I don't debate with people who are intellectually dishonest. You and Rekeita are that exactly: spreaders of misinformation.
Do you ever consider having sex with a black man to troll Marshall? I think that sucking big fat nigger cock will show Marshall a lesson about being lazy and unpure, as well as earn you lots of money on the side you can use to move to another country so you can sue Null again, so it's ideally the most moral and financially conscious decision you can makeI don't debate with people who are intellectually dishonest. You and Rekeita are that exactly: spreaders of misinformation.
you literally admitted to maliciously filing these lawsuits in the hopes to bankrupt Null into getting a judgment. You repetitively filed the same lawsuit over and over again just to have it dismissed. You have frivolously filed these lawsuits to the point that they are dismissed *with prejudice*.Second, KEYWORDS DUMMY: "frivolous, malicious, or repetitive lawsuits". Under the legal definitions of those words, non of my cases apply
That would only make Marshall jealous. Black men belong to him.Do you ever consider having sex with a black man to troll Marshall? I think that sucking big fat nigger cock will show Marshall a lesson about being lazy and unpure, as well as earn you lots of money on the side you can use to move to another country so you can sue Null again, so it's ideally the most moral and financially conscious decision you can make