Lolcow Melinda Leigh Scott & Marshall Castersen - Sue-happy couple. Flat earth conspiracists. Pretending to be Jewish. Believe Kiwi Farms is protected by the Masonic Order. 0-6 on lawsuits. Marshall is dead.

A very disconnected video from Mel.

"Since when did I have to sell my house to get a righteous ruling?"

That's not what he said. He said if you believe with certainty that you'll win, then there're no issue. Put up or shut up. If you know you're going to win, then what's the problem?

Why are you so unwilling to commit to this course of action, Melinda? You won, right? You're going to get all that kiwi money, right?

Then sell your shit. Put your belief on the line. For a woman with a supposedly strong belief in her cause of action, you're certainly not willing to show it. Maybe you're not so sure. Maybe, despite your posturing, you're a weak ass bitch with nothing to show for it. Too bad. I guess all that hot talk wasn't worth a single penny in your book.
 
Mel, your video faces the same problem Marshall's did. You are trying to squeeze in 3 hours worth of arguments Nick did into 5 minutes (a bit more in Marshall's case). Do you even have a single citation to anything in that vid? Did you have time to play Nick's clips for context?
You obviously didn't watch my video. I gave a good number of specifics and citations.



A very disconnected video from Mel.

"Since when did I have to sell my house to get a righteous ruling?"

That's not what he said. He said if you believe with certainty that you'll win, then there're no issue. Put up or shut up. If you know you're going to win, then what's the problem?

Why are you so unwilling to commit to this course of action, Melinda? You won, right? You're going to get all that kiwi money, right?

Then sell your shit. Put your belief on the line. For a woman with a supposedly strong belief in her cause of action, you're certainly not willing to show it. Maybe you're not so sure. Maybe, despite your posturing, you're a weak ass bitch with nothing to show for it. Too bad. I guess all that hot talk wasn't worth a single penny in your book.
That's exactly what he said, quit trying to gaslight.

You missed the point: WHERE IN THE TORAH DOES IT SAY THAT someone should sell their stuff to obtain righteous rulings?


mean, I can watch and critique it, if you want, I just don't think there's gonna be much sustenance in there.
I don't care about your critique. As far as my video: you can take it or leave it.
 
Ah, the single girl with acne is hating because that's me with a man and flawless skin.
I have no acne. I also have no man and no kids, which leaves me with no "raccoon eyes" from stress and sleep deprivation.
You missed the point: WHERE IN THE TORAH DOES IT SAY THAT someone should sell their stuff to obtain righteous rulings?
Why does it matter if it says that in the Torah or not? You're staring down sanctions and possible fees in a secular court, not a Torah court.
 
Melinda, do you and Marshall use broken Bic pens to snort your coke or do you just go even more ghetto and just lean right over it and take a big ol'wif of it?
Sniffing cocaine is bougie as fuck no matter how you do it, common god-fearing salt of the earth folks either rock it up and smoke it, or sprinkle a little into some melted down endone or bupe strips and inject it.
 
Well looky who came crawling back. I was going to ask when Hardin was going to respond to her nonsense or when the court was just going to laugh at her and grant Null's motion but seeing her back means its happening soon. She is getting ready to cope, seethe, and dilate real soon by posting on here again. At least she was smarter than Marshall with her upload (not much of a hurdle) by disabling the dislike bar and the comments.

So a question for people with knowledge on actual legal matters (Sorry Melinda this doesn't include you), when the cops raid the place to collect for Josh, if they find the meth that Marshall and Melinda keep making, do they arrest her and/or is Josh allowed to seize and sell the Meth to make up some of that money?
 
I have no acne. I also have no man and no kids, which leaves me with no "raccoon eyes" from stress and sleep deprivation.

Why does it matter if it says that in the Torah or not? You're staring down sanctions and possible fees in a secular court, not a Torah court.
Please don't remind her that her fight is in reality. It just angers her, she can't win there.
 
I have dark inlets because of my Eastern European ancestry (Hungarian). Hungarians have Turkish blood. I don't bother wearing make up to cover it up all the time because I'm not vain. And also, I don't think there's anything wrong with darker inlets. No need to whiten up.

Marshall has never given me a black eye.






No. Tamar is a name taken from The Hebrew Bible. (I don't pronounce my name the same exact way as the Biblical Hebrew though). In 2013 I adopted a Hebrew name for myself.




Naming butts? Good idea!





Yeah, you can't handle the truth




the thumbnail on that one is different than mine and has major resting bitch face. Hahahaha
Sure. Nice cope. Hopefully child protective services doesn't notice Marshall's handiwork when they make their next visit.
 
I'm from Myanmar the only thing I know how to count is kilos of rice
She left roughly 46 kg of rice ago. I used KG because that's how World Bank measures rice in Myanmar.
"Since when did I have to sell my house to get a righteous ruling?"
You have to pay for your lawsuits, win or lose, since 1789. Then in 1948 the Congress had a stroke and passed a law that they knew had a big hole in it. Namely that "a litigant whose filing fees and court costs are assumed by the public, unlike a paying litigant, lacks an economic incentive to refrain from filing frivolous, malicious, or repetitive lawsuits". In the middle of said stroke they attempted to solve the problem by allowing to punish poor people who abuse the system. See Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319.
You obviously didn't watch my video
I mean, obviously. I only stated in very clear terms that I didn't.
I gave a good number of specifics and citations
Very well, I'll give it a watch in a half an hour or so. I'll publish my rebuttal (in text form) here.
You missed the point: WHERE IN THE TORAH DOES IT SAY THAT someone should sell their stuff to obtain righteous rulings?
Torah is irrelevant to the realities of the court. Whine about immorality of courts as you please, yet still you are bound by their rules as is any other person.
I don't care about your critique. As far as my video: you can take it or leave it.
But you are an academic, correct? A scholar? True scholar delights in discussion, in battles of ideas. Or are you just larping?
So a question for people with knowledge on actual legal matters (Sorry Melinda this doesn't include you), when the cops raid the place to collect for Josh, if they find the meth that Marshall and Melinda keep making, do they arrest her and/or is Josh allowed to seize and sell the Meth to make up some of that money?
Arrest.
 
You obviously didn't watch my video. I gave a good number of specifics and citations.
I watched the video. You cited a single section of a rule throughout the video. Half of the video wasn't even arguments, it was you just rambling and trying to use your phone as a camera, and the other half was just incoherent arguments about stupid Torah shit, how Rackets is a bile-spewing demon, and claiming that he was spreading misinformation without ever actually stating any misinfo or correcting anything that was ever stated. As always, it was just you saying shit that clicks in your brain and nobody else's because you're a rétard.
 
Well looky who came crawling back. I was going to ask when Hardin was going to respond to her nonsense or when the court was just going to laugh at her and grant Null's motion but seeing her back means its happening soon. She is getting ready to cope, seethe, and dilate real soon by posting on here again. At least she was smarter than Marshall with her upload (not much of a hurdle) by disabling the dislike bar and the comments.

So a question for people with knowledge on actual legal matters (Sorry Melinda this doesn't include you), when the cops raid the place to collect for Josh, if they find the meth that Marshall and Melinda keep making, do they arrest her and/or is Josh allowed to seize and sell the Meth to make up some of that money?
Even if it were legal they would have to find a reseller first to be able to sell it for him.
Or are you just larping?
Just larping, she's basically stated that before.
 
I wonder just how deformed and braindead the Marshall baby is. You combine the insanity of its living situation, extreme poverty and stress, fetal alcohol syndrome with Marshall's caveman genes and you have the potential for a truly hilarious breed of kid.
 
I have no acne. I also have no man and no kids, which leaves me with no "raccoon eyes" from stress and sleep deprivation.
Ok, pimple face. Continue on in your sexless life.

Why does it matter if it says that in the Torah or not? You're staring down sanctions and possible fees in a secular court, not a Torah court.
Attorney's fees aren't "sanctions". Get your terms straight

Second, Nick Rekeita-flaw was discussing moral law when he made that comment. Not secular law.


Namely that "a litigant whose filing fees and court costs are assumed by the public, unlike a paying litigant, lacks an economic incentive to refrain from filing frivolous, malicious, or repetitive lawsuits". In the middle of said stroke they attempted to solve the problem by allowing to punish poor people who abuse the system. See Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319.
Don't try to tell me to "See" Neitzke, I'm the one who put that in my pleadings firstly.

Second, KEYWORDS DUMMY: "frivolous, malicious, or repetitive lawsuits". Under the legal definitions of those words, non of my cases apply. You're trying to pull a Hardin on me again.
You can't just slap words on a paper and not define them properly according to legal definitions and case law.

Nice try at the disinformation, yet again. I'm not duped.


Torah is irrelevant to the realities of the court. Whine about immorality of courts as you please, yet still you are bound by their rules as is any other person.
Rekeita made an appeal to moral law, not secular law, and that is what I addressed.



But you are an academic, correct? A scholar? True scholar delights in discussion, in battles of ideas. Or are you just larping?
I don't debate with people who are intellectually dishonest. You and Rekeita are that exactly: spreaders of misinformation.
 
I don't debate with people who are intellectually dishonest. You and Rekeita are that exactly: spreaders of misinformation.
Do you ever consider having sex with a black man to troll Marshall? I think that sucking big fat nigger cock will show Marshall a lesson about being lazy and unpure, as well as earn you lots of money on the side you can use to move to another country so you can sue Null again, so it's ideally the most moral and financially conscious decision you can make
 
Second, KEYWORDS DUMMY: "frivolous, malicious, or repetitive lawsuits". Under the legal definitions of those words, non of my cases apply
you literally admitted to maliciously filing these lawsuits in the hopes to bankrupt Null into getting a judgment. You repetitively filed the same lawsuit over and over again just to have it dismissed. You have frivolously filed these lawsuits to the point that they are dismissed *with prejudice*.

For fuck sake, now I am cheering for Marshall to beat some sense into you
 
Do you ever consider having sex with a black man to troll Marshall? I think that sucking big fat nigger cock will show Marshall a lesson about being lazy and unpure, as well as earn you lots of money on the side you can use to move to another country so you can sue Null again, so it's ideally the most moral and financially conscious decision you can make
That would only make Marshall jealous. Black men belong to him.
 
Back