Science Scientists Have Found a Connection Between Nose Size and Penis Size


We've all heard the myth that big feet equals a big penis, but new science has emerged which suggests that it's actually the size of your schnozz which indicates the size of your schlong.

A survey published in Basic and Clinical Andrologymeasured the stretched penile length (SPL) of 126 adults aged between 30 and 60 alongside a range of other data including nose size, height, and weight, and found a direct correlation between nose size and penis length. (SPL was used as a benchmark because that tends to be a good average indicator of how big a penis will get when it's erect, so this study may not apply to people who are growers not showers.)

In a short new video on his social channels, surgeon and YouTuber Dr. Anthony Youn breaks down the findings of the study, with the key takeaway being: "Men with larger noses had an average wiener length of 5.3 inches, whereas men with shorter noses had an average length of 4.1 inches."

Youn goes on to joke that the Incredible Hulk, who is depicted in the MCU as having a pretty squat button nose, would have a proportionally very small penis, while a cartoon character like Butt-Head (of Beavis & Butt-Head fame) would be incredibly well-endowed.

In the study, researchers concluded that nose size is likely the most definitive indicator of penis size. "The fact that nose size is related to SPL indicates that penile length may not be determined by age, height or body weight but has already been determined before birth," they wrote.

There goes that "big feet" theory.

 
We call this "p-hacking." Some of the most blatant I've seen in a while. Put simply, if you have a bunch of data sets and look at them alongside each other you'll probably find some "significance" in correlation between at least two sets, even if they're all actually independent.
There's certainly some hacking of Ps going on among people with particularly large noses. Guess they have a talent for it.
If that's true, then why do so many white women say the stubby nosed black people have huge dicks?

Hey wait a minute, something's off here, isn't the average dick length for men 6 inches?
Apparently among the entire world the average size is 5 inches.
I've also seen claims that eating chicken as a child reduces the penis length when they hit puberty and that people with green eyes have bigger dicks, that vegans actually are the most fertile people and that asians actually don't have smaller penises but Indians do. The last one I can bring myself to believe but I wouldn't take any of this shit at face value.
 
I wish scientists would stop worrying about dick size so much and start reporting on pussy size.

I'd love to know if these bitches with train tunnel puss have big or small schnozes so I can filter them out.
This just in. Scientists say that women who have short hair have vaginas that could fit a god damn baseball bat in.
Source
 
If that's true, then why do so many white women say the stubby nosed black people have huge dicks?

Hey wait a minute, something's off here, isn't the average dick length for men 6 inches?
Last time I actually saw hard data, no. This was, I don't know, decade and a half ago, but average by race was Asians at 5.3," Whites 5.5," and Africans were either 5.57" or 5.7" I don't quite remember. I think 6" is roughly average vaginal depth. The differences aren't actually that big overall, but there are outliers, like the micropeens of the subcontinent. If you work in the porn industry, you're usually biasing your search for people on the right end of the normal distribution, but I don't recall the study showing the standard deviations.

Also remember that women tend to be worse at visual-spatial reasoning, so unless she actually measured it, she probably sucks at eyeballing it. Amusingly, the Big Nose Tribe is also note worthy for having shitter visual-spatial reasoning.
 
Misleading title, as always. Not from OP, but from the IFLS Brigade.

The correlation isn't with nose size, it's with nose height. As in, the distance between the top and bottom of your nose. Giant hooknoses don't apply here.

We call this "p-hacking." Some of the most blatant I've seen in a while. Put simply, if you have a bunch of data sets and look at them alongside each other you'll probably find some "significance" in correlation between at least two sets, even if they're all actually independent.
As much as I resent the site for becoming a quick and easy way for post-modernists to claim that nothing means anything and causative links do not and cannot exist, Spurious Correlations does an excellent job illustrating this.
 
The Romans had big noses.

Some of their statues survived too...
 
Back