This comes up every ten pages in this thread when a new group of people periodically don't realize that the central powerhouse of the trans movement (the AGPs) specifically target and harass women and groups of women who reject them while constantly giving men a pass.
I was listening to that BBC podcast series and they had an episode with a long interview with a British psychiatrist named David Bell who was consistently telling the interviewer that trans people don't exist. The interviewer was clearly a bit taken aback and kept kind of prompting him to soften up what he was saying, but Bell didn't budge and kept saying that no, it's not real. Bell is something of a public figure in Britain, but I had never heard his name before. There is no constant rage against him on Twitter, he is not under police protection and dealing with rioting troons, like Kathleen Stock, no one is holding signs saying FUCK DAVID BELL at troon protests. All that hate is reserved for
women who don't obey the AGPs, even if they do it in a much milder way. Men get a bit of scorn (and even then, it's usually reserved for non-powerful men, like customer service workers), but not the absolute deranged rush of narc rage is for the women who dare to not accept them.
Being smaller, significantly physically weaker, and more physically vulnerable throughout most of the lifespan because of pregnancy and childbirth is the basis of it; the adaptive traits like learning to placate potentially violent males all grow out from that. The two are not separate. Women who are taught from childbirth to please men and not make them mad get taught that by mothers who learned to act that way by getting it physically beaten into them, or else their mother learned that from her grandmother, etc. The first laws banning wife-beating in the US only appeared in the late nineteenth century (and even then they weren't very well enforced until the 1970s). Here is a ruling from North Carolina's High Court in 1864, for example (State v. Jesse Black):
View attachment 2652266
Another one from 1874 (State v. Richard Oliver):
View attachment 2652267
In other words, for hundreds and hundreds of years throughout our history, adult women had to develop a culture of not pissing men off, and had to pass it down to their daughters, because if they did not do that and the men in their lives got angry and beat them or raped them, no one was coming to help them. Even up until the 1970s or so police were specifically trained to do anything they could to avoid arresting a husband when they were called out to a 'domestic dispute' and to encourage the couple to calm down and reconcile instead; breaking up a family was seen as worse than a bit of beating here and there. What do you think happened to those wives after the police left, and did their daughters witness it?
I am usually a bit of a softie and don't believe this about even the most exceptional lolcows, but when it comes to people like this it would just be better for everyone if they 41%'ed. He is deeply broken and if he stays alive he is clearly going to hurt someone.
This is what you get when you take someone who is already mentally unwell and probably with Cluster B traits and tell them "blaming others for your unhappiness is good actually. The world owes it to you to see you as a beautiful young woman, and if that doesn't happen it is the fault of something out of your control, so let's keep building up that rage and pushing it out into the world!"
