Covid/mRNA Vaccine Info General - "Covid Seasonal Flu Vaccines is Society's New Normal" - FDA

[m1ddl3m4rch]

Is Fauci going to go to jail for perjuring himself in front of the senate?

I'm giving you a but I earnestly hope Fauci reaps the whirlwind for his lies. So I'm optimistic

 

[Ponzo]

Great points all around, but don't be too frustrated with the fate of the aging world-eaters in political and economic influence. They and their offspring who carry their mantle will get theirs in due time. It's inevitable. Their descendants might be rich but they won't be safe; a dismantled, chaotic world will bear its fangs against even the elite's descendants, just like it's done in the past. Revolutions, war machinations, etc. There's no escaping comeuppance even for the wealthiest of the wealthy and powerful. If I recall correctly, even the Rothchilds suffered a major blow by the Nazis, and we've already seen how the upper echelon of society in a country like China or Russia can't escape an inflamed government that targets them for their money or opinions. Communist or likewise governments also have a history of bearing a revolving door to the cemetary even for their most staunchly loyal political figures.

Also, the elite are a den of vipers and always will be. The phrase "crabs in a bucket" doesn't just apply to the rest of us. If outside forces don't strike them then it'll be the serpent next to them that does. Epstein didn't kill himself, after all. And as for the old and dead? There's always Hell.

Setting the world aside, how is your loved one? Last I heard they were finally doing better after having been terribly sick for like a month after their second Covid vaccination. Are they more inclined to listen to the vaccine info you find these days? Are they at least healthier and safer?
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Edit: Delta PLUS?
ARE YOU KIDDING?
View attachment 2649541

Gotta catch em all

 

[Shaka Brah]

Edit: Delta PLUS?
ARE YOU KIDDING?

Go figure they talk about how greater circulation causes greater mutation, but don't mention the positive evolutionary impact of leaky vaccination on that evolution.

 

[Vince McMahon]

I'd be pissed at the "unaligned compliant" 1/3rd who just go along with the rules because they just want it to be over

It's kinda funny that you don't mention the Government but the people who comply with restrictions because the government is forcing them to.

 

[Lichen Bark]

They have to take turns renting a brain-share for 15 minutes a day, have mercy on them

Someone should suggest they shell out the extra few dollars, and get access to the entire brain-share, including the prefrontal cortex addon. You may be a gay mouth, but fuck, you make me laugh between my sets.

Spoiler: Mandatory sucking up

I am sorry for contributing nothing of value, but I do love coming in here and reading all the effortposts.
Thread Theme:

 

[Bad Take Crucifier]

Not sure if this was posted already but this article and video is insane. I don't know how to archive the video.

"Don't donate plasma for COVID-19 treatments if you were vaccinated, it's useless to us". https://www.wafb.com/2021/01/22/coronavirus-vaccine-could-affect-how-you-donate-plasma/

 

[EyelessMC]

Not sure if this was posted already but this article and video is insane. I don't know how to archive the video.

"Don't donate plasma for COVID-19 treatments if you were vaccinated, it's useless to us". https://www.wafb.com/2021/01/22/coronavirus-vaccine-could-affect-how-you-donate-plasma/

EDIT:

"When you get the Covid vaccine it wipes out the antibodies that person had developed before, so it helps you but if your intent is to help others by donating your plasma it negates it."
I'm sorry. Clock me if I'm late on this but, what?

"When you get the Covid vaccine it wipes out the antibodies that person had developed before,"
WHAT?

Edit: This is from back in January, which may as well be ten years ago at the rate of things. The full story is that at the time they were looking for people who had natural antibodies to Covid so they could help in plasma donation during the pandemic. Those who had the vaccine could still donate plasma in general but it wouldn't help for the pandemic.
The main point of contention for me is what the guy in the video said (he's not credited as a doctor in the article). Apparently this was a major issue for a blink around that time. I can't find any info on it. Found something. A Washington Informer article linked back to a FactCheck.org article--and before you dismiss it outright as anyone is typically right to do considering the nature of "fact check" sites, this one linked to multiple studies which reportedly argue the opposite of the above claim:
> Distinct antibody and memory B cell responses in SARS-CoV-2 naïve and recovered individuals after mRNA vaccination - https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciimmunol.abi6950
> Antibodies elicited by SARS-CoV-2 infection and boosted by vaccination neutralize an emerging variant and SARS-CoV-1 -

Antibodies elicited by SARS-CoV-2 infection and boosted by vaccination neutralize an emerging variant and SARS-CoV-1

The emergence of SARS-CoV-2 variants raises concerns about their resistance to neutralizing antibodies elicited from previous infection, or from vaccination. Here we examined whether sera and monoclonal antibodies from convalescent donors, prior to and following a single immunization with the...

www.medrxiv.org

> Poor antigen-specific responses to the second BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine dose in SARS-CoV-2-experienced individuals - https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.02.07.21251311v1
> Robust spike antibody responses and increased reactogenicity in seropositive individuals after a single dose of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine - https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.01.29.21250653v1
> Do antibody positive healthcare workers have lower SARS-CoV-2 infection rates than antibody negative healthcare workers? Large multi-centre prospective cohort study (the SIREN study), England: June to November 2020 - https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.01.13.21249642v1
> Single Dose Vaccination in Healthcare Workers Previously Infected with SARS-CoV-2 - https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.01.30.21250843v2

I haven't read through these yet, not even the Abstract, but I wanted to put them up here first for consideration and review.
Also here's the article archived a while ago: https://archive.md/G99QN (it's missing an update about the Pfizer vax being FDA approved in August, doesn't matter).
Here's an excerpt from the article as well:

Obviously some of this information is very dated now but the main focus here isn't anything other than the notion of whether or not the vaccines erase or otherwise disrupt the natural antibodies of a Covid-recovered patient. I'll take a look at this all a bit later but this seems to be the best piece against the idea if only for the links.

Edit 2: From six months ago, Moderna started looking into making the vaccine of Bill Gates's dreams (see the first video of the OP where he mentions this twice): HIV Vaccine

Considering how effective the Covid vaccines have proven to be at preventing infection/spread of Covid's variants, as well as the potential adverse effects involved, I have my doubts.

 

[Major Discord]

Can anyone explain to me what the narrative/plan is at this very moment? Is the general idea still that we need to get to 80% and then we can return to normal? Did they move the goalposts? What is the solution according to the current narrative?

 

[SneedEyeMitch]

Can anyone explain to me what the narrative/plan is at this very moment? Is the general idea still that we need to get to 80% and then we can return to normal? Did they move the goalposts? What is the solution according to the current narrative?

Look at Iseral, it's like looking into a crystal ball.

 

[BLEACHED.COM]

Can anyone explain to me what the narrative/plan is at this very moment? Is the general idea still that we need to get to 80% and then we can return to normal? Did they move the goalposts? What is the solution according to the current narrative?

>his country is STILL only targeting 80% vaccination rate
Slowpoke.jpg

 

[NoReturn]

Not sure if this was posted already but this article and video is insane. I don't know how to archive the video.

"Don't donate plasma for COVID-19 treatments if you were vaccinated, it's useless to us". https://www.wafb.com/2021/01/22/coronavirus-vaccine-could-affect-how-you-donate-plasma/

I brought this up to a friend of mine way back when at the beginning of the year, and their reaction was "So what? It's just convalescent plasma, not plasma donation in general. We have better treatments for COVID now so we don't need it."
Excuse me, but what the fuck? How would we even know that? What if there are still people who need it? Do we even know who they would be?

 

[Protistology]

Can anyone explain to me what the narrative/plan is at this very moment? Is the general idea still that we need to get to 80% and then we can return to normal? Did they move the goalposts? What is the solution according to the current narrative?

Hello Major. Thank you for your service. I am a Nigerian prince who is also your long-lost brother. My name is Hasam. What is your good name Major? Please share your banking info so I can transfer thousands of dollars into your account. Send your banking to here: nigerianprince@scam.com

 

[EyelessMC]

Here we go:

So firstly, I can't read the whole article since archiving it just links back to what I assume is a previous iteration (see: Left). This more recent article is paywalled. It's also the one that directly addresses the main concern of every functional human being about vaccinating 5yr olds: heart inflammation?
From the two introductory lines I could copy-paste, it seems like the FDA says, quote: "[the FDA] flagged the risk of heart-inflammation conditions including myocarditis associated with the vaccine, but the overall benefits, in preventing Covid-19 disease and hospitalizations, would outweigh the risk of the heart inflammation."
Basically:

"Yes, we the FDA acknowledge the Covid vaccine has caused and can cause heart-inflammation conditions (ie heart disease) BUT the ends justify the means the benefit of potentially preventing full-on Covid-19 and hospitalization [NOT preventing infection and spread of SARS-CoV-2 or especially the Delta variant or any other variants, since they aren't effective for that] outweighs the risk of your actual FIVE YEAR OLD getting HEART INFLAMMATION."

- Note: The FDA is NOT saying children as young as 5yrs old cannot get heart-inflammatory conditions from the Covid vaccines. They are saying that such a guaranteed risk (I say "guaranteed" because they already admitted to the causal link and the science proved it multiple times over, and in this article they say it is factually a risk) is "worth it".

Hey, pop quiz! What's one of the main scientific findings which has been kept consistent from the very dawn of the pandemic to this exact moment you are reading these words? Hint: It's regarding the risk of disease, let alone hospitalization, of children due to Covid.

Spoiler: THE ANSWER

So let me get this straight: The Covid vaccines do not prevent infection or spread of Covid variants. They do not last longer than a few months in a vaccinated patient's system either. These same vaccines also have caused and can cause heart-inflammation "conditions" (even in 16yr olds). However, using them broadly on infants and children is worth the risk of heart-inflammation because they supposedly can prevent Covid-19 disease and hospitalization--not because they can prevent infection and spread, because they don't, but because they can prevent Covid-19 disease and hospitalization, the two things which children are the absolute least likely to experience.

I don't even have it in me to discuss the fact that Pfizer reportedly even used six month old babies in their scientific trials. Just this issue here, what the FDA openly admits to and says is worth it despite their statement flying in the face of science established for over a year already, snaps me in half. I'll update the OP right now. You'll find this in the MEGA link, too.

 

[Bad Take Crucifier]

Exposing already immune kids to potential side-effects, by injecting them with a "vaccine" that still allows them to spread the virus.

Truly we are living in the most retarted of times.

 

[Car Won't Crank]

Exposing already immune kids to potential side-effects, by injecting them with a "vaccine" that still allows them to spread the virus.

Truly we are living in the most retarted of times.

When dogma takes precedence over rational thought when presented with evidence. If there's any reason to think there's no vaccine cult surrounding the covid vaccines, this should convince otherwise.

 

[Fanatical Pragmatist]

but 99% of scientists agree with these journalists and bureaucrats.

[citation needed]

You tinfoil hat wearers still haven't answered what the end-game of this vast conspiracy is yet.

I don't believe there is any "conspiracy" to it and I never said that there was.
Our government is run by incompetent selfish boomers who think forcing as many people as possible to take a faulty vaccine is the key to saving their own post-expiration-dated asses from Mother Nature & Daddy Darwin's newest lovechild.
Sure, big pharma is probably using the situation to make a some extra $$$, but at the end of the day that's all there is to it, and I have never once suggested there is any deeper plot at work.

It's kinda funny that you don't mention the Government but the people who comply with restrictions because the government is forcing them to.

Ahhh you didn't read my post, I see.

 

[Hollywood Hulk Hogan]

[citation needed]

We've already showed you that. I think it was 96%, but that's pretty damn close. What do you know that they don't?

I don't believe there is any "conspiracy" to it and I never said that there was.
Our government is run by incompetent selfish boomers who think forcing as many people as possible to take a faulty vaccine is the key to saving their own post-expiration-dated asses from Mother Nature & Daddy Darwin's newest lovechild.
Sure, big pharma is probably using the situation to make a some extra $$$, but at the end of the day that's all there is to it, and I have never once suggested there is any deeper plot at work.

Bullshit. Why are you so terrified of the vaccine that you're willing to lose your job at Petco over it?

 

[EyelessMC]

Updated to the OP. Also when he says "Trusted News Initiative" this seems to be what he's talking about: https://www.bbc.com/beyondfakenews/trusted-news-initiative/

 

[Jonah Hill poster]

You can be vaccinated and still think CNN and the vaccine worshippers are exceptional. Likewise you can not be vaccinated and still think the hard anti vax nuts are exceptional.

Just like I'm pro kiwi farms yet think many of us are exceptional.

 

[GloryHole Stalker]

I don't think this has been addressed in this thread (if it has, my apologies for missing it). In theory, if someone were to suffer adverse effects from the Covid vaccines, particularly Pfizer and Moderna, would it not stand to reason that those same people would suffer the same, or worse, with actual Covid?