- Joined
- Dec 18, 2018
I don't think you're a rape apologist, but I do think you're autistic for taking anything related to Chantal this seriously.The concept of "believing all people who claim they were raped" is a very dangerous and slippery slope. See, a lot of people these days are extremely afraid of being "canceled" or labeled a "rape apologist," but there is another side of that coin that a lot of people don't seem to understand. Automatically believing someone is a victim of rape, automatically places guilt on the person being accused.
But no wants to talk about that. No one wants to talk about how reputations, families, and lives are destroyed by false allegations. They are too busy being the morality police because rape is an objectively horrible crime. And I agree that it is. But even with the whole "false rape reports only make up for 5-10% of cases," still, those are instances in which someone was lied on and someone had to do work to prove their innocence. Because false accusations make up the minority, people treat it as "collateral damage" on the journey to seeking the truth. Not realizing how damaging it can be to someone completely innocent.
Now there have been arguments about how grossly underreported rape is, but, they were in fact reported to someone in order for you to surmise that they are underreported. It may not have been reported to a person of authority, but it was reported in some medium where action could and should have been taken.
I understand some people are ashamed or embarrassed to tell their stories, and I also understand there is intimidation and fear. Victim-shaming is a real concept in terms of women being asked what they were wearing, how drunk they were, and some are told that they asked for it, especially by law enforcement.
No one wants to defend Nader. No one is defending Nader. He's a fucking washed up drugged out bum who bangs random fat bitches and junkie whores. He's abusive, agressive, manipulative and insensitive. We don't need to force a rape arc because he does well enough on his own being a complete piece of shit who passes out STDs and blames the other person for it.
I know I will get flack for this. And some people may already have it in their minds that I am a rape apologist. I assure you I am not. I think people get too emotionally driven to the point that prevailing heads using logic and rationale to determine whether or not a serious crime like rape occured is victim-shaming.
If you have made it this far, thank you for reading and not noping the fuck out due to an emotional adverse reaction.
ETA: As for Nader wanting to marry Chantal to avoid deportation, wouldn't he or shouldn't he have already been deported for the stabbing incident and the prison time he served?
I mean, not to pick on you, because half the thread seems to be "believe all women even when they're clearly lying" and the other half seems like "my boyfriend's friend's cousin totally got sent to prison on the word of a feeeeemale" and it's just... Guys. Come on. This isn't Twitter.
Like, debate whether she's lying or not -- fine. But Chantal's little coterie of losers isn't a microcosm for the human experience. Let's not pretend it is and let's not derail into whether rape is really underreported or if cancel culture is a thing, or wherever this is heading. Let's laugh at the fat lady and her merry band of misfits.