US Joe Biden News Megathread - The Other Biden Derangement Syndrome Thread (with a side order of Fauci Derangement Syndrome)

Let's pretend for one moment that he does die before the election, just for the funsies. What happens then? Will the nomination revert to option number 2, aka Bernie Sanders? Or will his running mate automatically replace him just the way Vice-President is supposted to step in after the Big Man in the White House chokes on a piece of matzo? Does he even have a running mate yet?

 

[SeniorFuckFace]

https://twitter.com/JackPosobiec/status/1453053732871184389

Jack Posobiec 🇺🇸 on Twitter: "Bryson Gray's 'Let’s Go Brandon' Anth…

archived 26 Oct 2021 19:30:06 UTC

archive.md

The Little Things...

 

[Gehenna]

https://twitter.com/JackPosobiec/status/1453053732871184389

Jack Posobiec 🇺🇸 on Twitter: "Bryson Gray's 'Let’s Go Brandon' Anth…

archived 26 Oct 2021 19:30:06 UTC

archive.md

The Little Things...

View attachment 2661101​

So a form of media, most listened to by black men, made by a black man, extolling the fact Biden sucks hit #1.

I knew Biden was doing badly with black men in Milwaukee, but I am upgrading that to probably doing badly with them nationwide...

 

[Mr Bunny]

It sorta makes me wonder if certain factions are gaming out potential strategies to pivot against the vaccine as a campaign tool for 2022 & to provide an off-ramp from the pandemic?

They are too far gone with the vax shit to pull out now. You don't pull North Korea-style propaganda with "95% of those in hospital are unvaxx" when I can just look at other countries and see it falls into the 60/40 range, you lie big because it's all you got.

Though to answer the main question, Fauci is basically the only person keeping the actual approval number around 37%. Kill him, and Biden's floor gets even lower into "Anything we do is fine because the Admin is -clearly- dead" territory. While also removing basically the only weapon the admin has.

Well, that would explain to tall lies around covid, they're not lies, they're a marketing campaign.

 

[SeniorFuckFace]

So a form of media, most listened to by black men, made by a black man, extolling the fact Biden sucks hit #1.

I knew Biden was doing badly with black men in Milwaukee, but I am upgrading that to probably doing badly with them nationwide...

Definitely a pattern...

 

[Kuritan Deplorable]

It sorta makes me wonder if certain factions are gaming out potential strategies to pivot against the vaccine as a campaign tool for 2022 & to provide an off-ramp from the pandemic?

I.e. some shocking 'new' discovery that the vaccines are dangerous, and a pause of the vaxx program + a refocusing of anger against Trump and the Republicans. Fauci and the pharma heads would be called to testify, at which point they'd say that Trump "forced them to rush a vaccine". Then we get a coordinated MSM + Whistleblower + Congress attempts to tie jab deaths to the Republicans & resurrecting allegations that the pandemic response was mismanaged from the get-go. You'd get stuff like Operation Death Speed, or Trump Genocide, etc all the way throughout the mid-terms.

This clearly gives up the pandemic plank in the long-term, but it may be enough to get them over the 2022 hump.

This would be suicide - Vindicating the Conspiracy theorist right would likely leave the left rioting in the streets, the last thing you want is the revolutionary communists to get irrefutable proof that the administration is useless - There's no point coopting a hapless entity, so revolution time. Even hardcore leftists would be hard pressed to stick around - They care about harm and lack thereof so much that the revelation that the government forced dangerous shit onto them all would be disastrous. The independents would be given a massive "The conservatives were right, you should really side with them" sign, and the conservatives who survive the great vindication die off would sweep.

Trying to paint it as "Trump made it dangerous" Wouldn't get them very far when Trump has always been adamantly "its available, but I don't want to force it on you, but its a good idea", whereas Biden has been literally "get the vaccine or get fucked". The rationalization of "well they didn't know it was dangerous yet" to give Biden a free pass from it would prevent any blame from sticking to Trump as well - It'd just lead to complete loss of faith in medical science and vaccination programs as a whole.

At this point, the admin has to push hard and win on vaccines regardless of whether it actually stops covid. They have to hit their goals and then quietly move past it, any attempt to backtrack or deviate will leave them wide open to be shredded by their critics.

 

[Clockwork_PurBle]

Definitely a pattern...

View attachment 2661110​

Fancy Like is the worst song I've heard in a decade.

 

[Blackhole]

Definitely a pattern...

View attachment 2661110​

MOST POPULAR PRESIDENT EVER ELECTED EVERYONE.

 

[Spasticus Autisticus]

It sorta makes me wonder if certain factions are gaming out potential strategies to pivot against the vaccine as a campaign tool for 2022 & to provide an off-ramp from the pandemic?

I.e. some shocking 'new' discovery that the vaccines are dangerous, and a pause of the vaxx program + a refocusing of anger against Trump and the Republicans. Fauci and the pharma heads would be called to testify, at which point they'd say that Trump "forced them to rush a vaccine". Then we get a coordinated MSM + Whistleblower + Congress attempts to tie jab deaths to the Republicans & resurrecting allegations that the pandemic response was mismanaged from the get-go. You'd get stuff like Operation Death Speed, or Trump Genocide, etc all the way throughout the mid-terms.

This clearly gives up the pandemic plank in the long-term, but it may be enough to get them over the 2022 hump.

It would be a big risk since the Democrats have made themselves the party of COVID fearmongering. The media and Dem establishment has been whipping the base up into a frenzy about vaccines, to the point where many are ready to start pogroms against the unvaccinated. Putting that genie back in the bottle is not going to be easy. Of course, we are dealing with a bunch of NPCs who just "listen to the experts" and do zero critical independent thinking, so it wouldn't faze most of them to have the mainstream narrative flip overnight. If they are somehow able to pull off that kind of whipsaw while minimizing the credibility loss they would take among actual thinking humans, maybe it would be crazy enough to pull off, but that's a big if.

 

[JosephStalin]

Is boar a gendered word meaning MALE (wild) pig as opposed to (wild) pig (singular) in general?

If that is the case, I thank you friend, because I'll have learned something new and it's thanks to you.

If it's not, would you please explain?

Yes, on a farm a boar is a male pig. There weren't any wild pigs in our area, least that I knew of.

 

[SeniorFuckFace]

Pattern:

​

 

[Lorne Armstrong]

Don't trust Sinema (or even Manchin, for that matter). She'll bend the knee sooner or later.

This is absolute fact. Neither Manchin or Sinema are holding out over principles or beliefs or any other such highfalutin nonsense. They both know that the Dems need this passed and they’re in the catbird seat. They’re holding out because they know the longer they do, the more they’ll get paid.

 

[Lorne Armstrong]

Pattern:


View attachment 2661148

View attachment 2661149



​

This is nice, I’d like to see a lot more states following suit

 

[Blackhole]

Neither Manchin or Sinema are holding out over principles or beliefs or any other such highfalutin nonsense. They both know that the Dems need this passed and they’re in the catbird seat. They’re holding out because they know the longer they do, the more they’ll get paid.

let me be goddamnit. i want the prog seething to continue

 

[Mr Bunny]

maybe it would be crazy enough to pull off, but that's a big if.

Well I mean we've seen this with masks, so maybe it is possible that the memory data of the past year would get deleted with a new narrative installed. Actually, we did see them go from the vaccine is rushed to the vaccine is safe the moment a different asshole sat in the big chair.

 

[Gehenna]

This is absolute fact. Neither Manchin or Sinema are holding out over principles or beliefs or any other such highfalutin nonsense. They both know that the Dems need this passed and they’re in the catbird seat. They’re holding out because they know the longer they do, the more they’ll get paid.

One problem, Manchin's 'payout' is a governor seat he really wants, in a red state.

 

[SeniorFuckFace]

REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

 

[Lorne Armstrong]

REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

View attachment 2661157​

“Everything I don’t like SUCKS!”

 

[Lorne Armstrong]

One problem, Manchin's 'payout' is a governor seat he really wants, in a red state.

Well, surely that’s not the ONLY thing he wants.

 

[Gehenna]

Well, surely that’s not the ONLY thing he wants.

It kinda is. He's already wealthy, has strong family ties, evidently isn't into anything fucked up or they'd have used it against him already.

 

[Sithis]

So as I just inhaled some more fine cannabis vapors to help allay the sense of boiling rage I feel day by day in currentyear, I was struck by a ponderance.
And no I'm not going to go stonerbro and start making a case for it. But with all this REEEEing and screeching about needing to find money to pay for his bullshit plan, why have all the "legalize it, bro!" factions among the Dems all shut up suddenly?
Obviously legalizing pot sales and taxing it nationwide wouldn't generate anything close to 3.5t, but on a state by state level it could generate enough billions for those states to help offset some of the costs of getting the "infrastructure" up and running, and is a topic that even the most hardline conservatives don't put too much fight into anymore given all the other shit in context. It would be such an easy fucking win for them, and would provide them with a source of at least some revenue that was just a straight up tax rather than punitive robbery via taxation.

The only thing that makes sense to me is confirmation of what has been suspected for a while, that they're not even concerned about money in terms of funding the infrastructure, they are concerned with the control it will allow them to take over every facet of people's daily lives, from the news they get in the morning to the food they eat to the things they spend their money on.

This is all being done much the same way FDR did his new deal shit. He robbed private gold owners by outlawing private ownership of certain quantities of gold and requiring them to sell it to the government, then suddenly the price doubled the next year while the government conveniently had taken possession of so much of the citizenrys gold.