- Joined
- Oct 20, 2018
I wish they'd fucking stay in their shit hole. Californians ruin every other state they touch. Including the "conservative" Californians.
BreadTube - The Unofficial ContraPoints Dickriders Club and the culture / drama surrounding the community.
- Thread starter RichardMongler
- Start date
DirtyHegel
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jun 16, 2021
Lobster Cult High Priest
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Feb 11, 2021
Conservative Californians are mostly retards like Mr. Vickers (Ralph’s baby mommas father). Complete and utter tards.
Scarmaiden
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- May 18, 2020
Lobster Cult High Priest
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Feb 11, 2021
This nigga hasn’t heard about living within his means, or he took that saying to the extreme and is living exactly on the line of his means.
- Joined
- Jan 12, 2019
They're bugnats or fudds or rich neocons who really like waging war for Israel. There are very few CA conservatives who have genuinely novel right-wing values. The only ones that fit that bill are the highly religious ones, but that seems to dispel California's curse just like it does with every shithole.
- Joined
- Mar 17, 2020
- Joined
- Jun 27, 2021
Apparently, Xanderhal does not think his financial situation is about his poor spending, but instead his poor earnings.
His fans, as usual, are not very intelligent
Allahu Akbar brothers.
Update:
His fans, as usual, are not very intelligent
Allahu Akbar brothers.
Update:
Last edited:
- Joined
- Jan 29, 2021
At this point, I am convinced cynical history is just trying to paint himself as some "intellectual" contrarian to stand ut.
They all seem to be directionless gen z who try too hard to meme. You got totally owned by that guy telling you to touch grass.
brentkanaris
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Oct 8, 2020
Yet they are the ones helping Texas from becoming blue.
Scarmaiden
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- May 18, 2020
Being adult actually does mean you can't just spend all your money on weed and toys, adults have responsibilities they have to take care of what world are these retards living in?
Having 15$ to your name on the last week of the month doesn't sound like he's being very responsible
- Joined
- Sep 2, 2020
How apropos. Haz began his fifty-minute-long raging at BadEmpanada by saying BadEmpanada’s video on the Uyghur genocide was ‘dogshit’, ‘bullshit’, and ‘debunked’.
He has a nearly two-hour-long argument with some woman over puberty blockers, psychiatry, Vaush’s takes on paedophilia, and propagation of contentious media.
But, if you want funny content, listen to two Marxists spending an hour and a half arguing over whether the US was founded on evil, whether Native Americans should get all the US land, and how the revolution will happen. See the Jason Unruhe thread for more information on the other guy.
Watched a twenty-five-minute-long video from one of the new BreadTubers reassessing the concept of the YouTube radicalisation pipeline. What I got from it was that he ostensibly wishes Ben Shapiro was also banned.
The article ends in quite a snarky way, which makes me suspect the journo also found his story rather silly.
He could have foreseen all of this. Comment sections are tard pens, and there is more of a pull to express disapproval than approval. There are enough morons commenting as if criticising something implies wanting it banned. People usually do think that these days, unfortunately, but it is not necessary.
He is a socdem, and, expectedly, in the comments, he has been dispensing takes that are obvious products of a leftoid outlook. For example, he has been arguing that cruelty makes things unfunny and that people should speak to a crowd with the same care and consideration as they would to a friend.
He has a nearly two-hour-long argument with some woman over puberty blockers, psychiatry, Vaush’s takes on paedophilia, and propagation of contentious media.
But, if you want funny content, listen to two Marxists spending an hour and a half arguing over whether the US was founded on evil, whether Native Americans should get all the US land, and how the revolution will happen. See the Jason Unruhe thread for more information on the other guy.
Watched a twenty-five-minute-long video from one of the new BreadTubers reassessing the concept of the YouTube radicalisation pipeline. What I got from it was that he ostensibly wishes Ben Shapiro was also banned.
His video was posted in March. The article about him was published in June. His video came first. Considering how in vogue articles about YouTube politisperging were back then, it is not at all suspicious that some journo grabbed the opportunity to cover this brave young man opening up about a leftist transvestite teaching him to not pepepost.
The article ends in quite a snarky way, which makes me suspect the journo also found his story rather silly.
Alright.
‘Minimises’, rather, which is usually considered to be a kind of denial when it comes to genocide, but considering which political camp he is from, might as well be an acknowledgement. As mentioned above, he catches flak from his fellow leftists over his position.
The changes were not incited by the response to the Chappelle video. After the Vaush video, I checked his channel to see if there were any new ones, and there was one discussing the future of his content in which he talked about wanting to do media critique and asking for channel name suggestions. I do not have an archive or a screenshot of it, so the only proof I have is my word, though.
He could have foreseen all of this. Comment sections are tard pens, and there is more of a pull to express disapproval than approval. There are enough morons commenting as if criticising something implies wanting it banned. People usually do think that these days, unfortunately, but it is not necessary.
He is a socdem, and, expectedly, in the comments, he has been dispensing takes that are obvious products of a leftoid outlook. For example, he has been arguing that cruelty makes things unfunny and that people should speak to a crowd with the same care and consideration as they would to a friend.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Oct 20, 2018
This is interesting because me and my friends are very open with each other and know when we're joking about things. We shit talk each other pretty hard but in the end we all know it's just jokes.
Thing is when you go to a Dave Chappelle stand up show you should expect him to talk about things that might be considered offensive or taboo. He didn't spring the jokes out of thin air.
- Joined
- Oct 23, 2021
A heavily updated response to Vaush’s Ultimate Document and Rose Wrist’s.
From the article:
“In late 2020, a couple of friends and I were commissioned by the political commentator Vincent James to make a response to Vaush’s “Ultimate Research Document.” Originally, I thought that it would be released to the public but that turned to not be the case. Because of this, I decided to make my version which would be more comprehensive and go over much more stuff. Since then, there have been about 2 versions — with the 2nd version gaining much more traction than I expected. Since then, I’ve come across new studies and have decided to make an updated version which includes responses to criticisms, new studies, and fixing some stuff here and there.
Much like the original version, I will respond to criticisms and update the article accordingly to reflect this. Of course, though, I am a single person and can not keep track of the responses I get. To see if there are any responses, I check the statistics section offered to me by WordPress to see where people have been finding this article. I ask the reader to send any criticisms in the comment section, either by typing it out or sending a link to where I can find the criticisms. This makes things a lot easier for me and helps improve this article.
Again, I’m very surprised that my response, which was not even supposed to be public when it was made, picked up steam. Since then, it’s been featured on Russian forums, Kiwifarms, Reddit, and even a Youtube video, with someone calling me and my doc “very stupid” and saying that “It tries to refute the points on the documents while also being very racist so you can familiarize yourself with some of these arguments because more capable weirdos will try to throw these at you.” Interesting that he couldn’t point out the stupid claims made in here. Anyway, this is the 3rd version and maybe the last unless anything new pops-up.”
vinumdiaboli.wordpress.com
Keep in mind, This is the 3rd time Bryan (Francis Black) has made a response to Vaush’s ultimate research document. Vaush also ripped much of the material for his document from Rose Wrist, so criticism can carry over even when Wrist’s document isn’t being addressed and vice versa.
Bryan has found many of the studies (especially in Vaush’s document) have issues with ovvereliance on p-values, non-random samples, lack of controls, mislabeling (For example, calling a literature review a meta-meta analysis) and a host of other problems.
I am interested in seeing how the breadtube community will react to this refutation.
From the article:
“In late 2020, a couple of friends and I were commissioned by the political commentator Vincent James to make a response to Vaush’s “Ultimate Research Document.” Originally, I thought that it would be released to the public but that turned to not be the case. Because of this, I decided to make my version which would be more comprehensive and go over much more stuff. Since then, there have been about 2 versions — with the 2nd version gaining much more traction than I expected. Since then, I’ve come across new studies and have decided to make an updated version which includes responses to criticisms, new studies, and fixing some stuff here and there.
Much like the original version, I will respond to criticisms and update the article accordingly to reflect this. Of course, though, I am a single person and can not keep track of the responses I get. To see if there are any responses, I check the statistics section offered to me by WordPress to see where people have been finding this article. I ask the reader to send any criticisms in the comment section, either by typing it out or sending a link to where I can find the criticisms. This makes things a lot easier for me and helps improve this article.
Again, I’m very surprised that my response, which was not even supposed to be public when it was made, picked up steam. Since then, it’s been featured on Russian forums, Kiwifarms, Reddit, and even a Youtube video, with someone calling me and my doc “very stupid” and saying that “It tries to refute the points on the documents while also being very racist so you can familiarize yourself with some of these arguments because more capable weirdos will try to throw these at you.” Interesting that he couldn’t point out the stupid claims made in here. Anyway, this is the 3rd version and maybe the last unless anything new pops-up.”
Vaush’s Ultimate Research Document and Rose Wrist Response
A heavily updated response to Vaush’s Ultimate Document and Rose Wrist’s.
Keep in mind, This is the 3rd time Bryan (Francis Black) has made a response to Vaush’s ultimate research document. Vaush also ripped much of the material for his document from Rose Wrist, so criticism can carry over even when Wrist’s document isn’t being addressed and vice versa.
Bryan has found many of the studies (especially in Vaush’s document) have issues with ovvereliance on p-values, non-random samples, lack of controls, mislabeling (For example, calling a literature review a meta-meta analysis) and a host of other problems.
I am interested in seeing how the breadtube community will react to this refutation.
- Joined
- Aug 21, 2019
How come nobody’s posted this cringe yet ( https://twitter.com/kingbullyo/status/1452427474063790085 / https://archive.md/lXzRV )?:
The artist, btw, is here: https://twitter.com/JennaferNyx / https://archive.md/DwzMZ (and her NSFW ALT too: https://twitter.com/nyxxxart / https://archive.md/eacYT )
- Pedovosh
- Smashed-In-Trannyface
- Hasan the Hypocrite Homo
- Anal Assparian
- Some liberal spic I couldn’t care less about
- (((Sam Seder)))
Lobster Cult High Priest
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Feb 11, 2021
Wait San sedar is important enough in these circles? His videos are boring they are impossible to sit though (even when he has Michael brooks on as cohost instead of the women cohost he has who used to work with sex pest (((Jordan Charitan))).How come nobody’s posted this cringe yet ( https://twitter.com/kingbullyo/status/1452427474063790085 / https://archive.md/lXzRV )?:
The artist, btw, is here: https://twitter.com/JennaferNyx / https://archive.md/DwzMZ (and her NSFW ALT too: https://twitter.com/nyxxxart / https://archive.md/eacYT )
- Pedovosh
- Smashed-In-Trannyface
- Hasan the Hypocrite Homo
- Anal Assparian
- Some liberal spic I couldn’t care less about
- (((Sam Seder)))
- Joined
- Oct 20, 2018
Sam Seder is only popular because he makes Steven crowder seethe. But otherwise, people don't watch him because he is boring and is just your run of the mill liberal.
- Joined
- Mar 17, 2020
- Joined
- Jun 10, 2018
I have to confess that I did Vote for McCain in '08. In my defense I was painfully aware at the time that he was the worst Republican I ever did, or ever will, vote for.
BootlegPopeye
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jan 18, 2021
He's like the worst of all worlds - the absolute most unhinged warmonger in American politics, violent temper, backstabbing of 'allies', but also corporatist/social liberally domestically. There is no question in mind that he would have gotten us into new major wars. He called Justice Alito 'too conservative' making me think that we wouldn't even have gotten 'good judges' out of him and may have gotten Souter clones.
He was the Republican analog to Hillary Clinton really, of whom he differed little in actual policy.
But the worst part about that man was how he used his POW status as a political weapon and shield from criticism. Bash McCain's corporate liberalism and you'd get accused of hating Vietnam veterans.
I'm glad that evil fucker is dead.