US Joe Biden News Megathread - The Other Biden Derangement Syndrome Thread (with a side order of Fauci Derangement Syndrome)

Let's pretend for one moment that he does die before the election, just for the funsies. What happens then? Will the nomination revert to option number 2, aka Bernie Sanders? Or will his running mate automatically replace him just the way Vice-President is supposted to step in after the Big Man in the White House chokes on a piece of matzo? Does he even have a running mate yet?

 

[jspit2.0]

Of course it means something, what it means precisely we'll know for sure on election day. That said, when you check the RCP average for the Virginia election this year, https://www.realclearpolitics.com/e...inia_governor_youngkin_vs_mcauliffe-7373.html and you look down to the previous Fox News poll, what we see is that McAuliffe was ahead by 5 points, and the latest poll from the same source now has Youngkin ahead by 8 points. That shows that the momentum is on Youngkin's side right now.

For a further bit of optimism about this election, check the data for the 2013 Virginia election here, https://www.realclearpolitics.com/e...inia_governor_youngkin_vs_mcauliffe-7373.html see how McAuliffe underperformed by 4.2 points on election day compared to the polling average? There's a reason why the Dems are so fucking scared about this election and why the coping articles about how this doesn't mean much for the mid-terms have already started being written. It shouldn't have even been this close in the first place, let alone the now real possibility of Youngkin winning.

I think Youngkin has a shot.

Of course, I'm also with Nat Silver that whether Republican's win by 51 or lose by 49; the take away is the same.

Virginia was a +10D state in a +4D year. If a Republican is hitting 48-49 percent there than they're winning Georgia, Florida and North Carolina. Allot can change from the VA election to 2022.

Of course, the real action isn't Virginia or New Jersey races.

 

[FAQnews Correspondent]

Of course, the real action isn't Virginia or New Jersey races.

What's the real action?

 

[Linkola's IT Guy]

The only person who maybe on the up and up is Tucker and he's a trust fund baby and married to Hienz or some other rich connected family so you never know when he's gonna turn back to his own.

Tucker is the fakest one of them all. He only picked up the faux-populism to follow the wind with the popularity of Trump. And now he's talking about the Great Replacement on air because immigration is a current talking point. If he were to ever have any actual political power he would drop the act and be right back to Mises-style libertarianism.

I hate neocons, but they fight for what they believe in.

 

[Drag-on Knight 91873]

so the NG are supposed to handle the border problem, staff the hospitals after they fired a ton of people and now the supply chain crisis too?
Let me guess, they'll ask them to help with trash pickup next?
At this rate they might as well look for the $3.5 trillion just for the NG since apparently they can do EVERYTHING

"Oh the Guardsmen can!"

 

[FunPosting101]

I think Youngkin has a shot.

Of course, I'm also with Nat Silver that whether Republican's win by 51 or lose by 49; the take away is the same.

Virginia was a +10D state in a +4D year. If a Republican is hitting 48-49 percent there than they're winning Georgia, Florida and North Carolina. Allot can change from the VA election to 2022.

Of course, the real action isn't Virginia or New Jersey races.

Well, yeah obviously. The fact that the Dems are even having to call Obama to Virginia or New Jersey(New Jersey for fuck's sake!)is really terrible news for them in the coming mid-terms.

 

[Getting tard comed]

Tucker is the fakest one of them all. He only picked up the faux-populism to follow the wind with the popularity of Trump. And now he's talking about the Great Replacement on air because immigration is a current talking point. If he were to ever have any actual political power he would drop the act and be right back to Mises-style libertarianism.

I hate neocons, but they fight for what they believe in.

Counterpoint: he was the first mainstream figure on the right I've seen or heard who straight up said he would outlaw self driving cars and trucks due to how negatively it would impact American drivers. He did this at a convention where Shapiro took the opposite position(cuz of course he did). I don't trust Tucker, but he has earned a little rope with me from that. He did it before it was popular for everyone on the right to support people over technology so maybe he saw where the wind was blowing or maybe he actually believes it. Idk. Trust but verify.

 

[CarlosDanger]

I think if Younkin wins, the Loudoun rape story could be what got him over the line. Before Younkin asked for an investigation, less than 50% of Virginia voters knew what had happened, now it is well over 50%. Fox News is definitely trash when it comes to polling, but this might be why you see a trend towards Younkin in their own poll.

 

[Feline Supremacist]

Don't trust Fox News period. They aren't on your side even if you're on the "right". The only person who maybe on the up and up is Tucker and he's a trust fund baby and married to Hienz or some other rich connected family so you never know when he's gonna turn back to his own.

Fox is not your friend. Never forget they called Arizona before anyone else in 2020.

Tucker's stepmom inherited her money from her family, the frozen dinner Swansons. You're thinking of Teresa Heinz Kerry, a native of Portuguese East Africa who married into the Heinz ketchup family and whose current husband is John Kerry.

Sadly Teresa has been sidelined by her fortune hunting husband after a stroke. She was famous for speaking her mind and making libs head explode when correctly calling herself an African-American because she's a very fair Portuguese lady who was indeed born in Mozambique who became an American citizen.

 

[northstar747]

Weren't they in bed with the Saudis before Trump showed up? I was reminded of hearing that when I looked at Kitty History.

Fox news?

Yep the saudis invested in the murdok empire during the bush years. Which makes sense.

 

[UselessIdiot]

Don't trust the Fox Poll, their polling is run by a liberal and it's trying to set up the "Oh Youngkin's up so much, and I can't believe that icky Trump is endorsing Youngkin so I, the affluent white stay at home wine mom, don't have to vote for Youngkin even though I hate rising prices and chyna virus restrictions and that my child has transitioned because of CRT."

I don't think showing a Republican candidate with a sizable lead will depress Republican turnout. I think it's far more likely to depress Democrat turnout, because they seem much more prone to getting easily discouraged. It's not like the Democratic Party has great standing right now to motivate voters to vote for them either.

That being said, it still wouldn't surprise me if somehow McAuliffe won. Virginia isn't California though, so he could easily get voted out in a couple weeks.

 

[jspit2.0]

What's the real action?

Redistricting.

Currently six states have signed maps.

Per Cook.

The only reason Republicans didn't take back the house in '20 was Democratic Courts redrawing maps in Pennsylvania, North Carolina, Virginia, and Florida mid decade.

Over the next six months, the House maps will be redrawn, this time by legislatures.

Republican's screwed up in Indiana, Got cockblocked in Nebraska by a RHINO, and had Oregon Democrats break an agreement to gerrymander the new district there. They managed to net at least two seats in Texas and keep Main Two red.

If Dems lose the House, I can't not see Biden being impeached after Democrats abused the process and impeached Trump twice.

Well, yeah obviously. The fact that the Dems are even having to call Obama to Virginia or New Jersey(New Jersey for fuck's sake!)is really terrible news for them in the coming mid-terms.

Well, given how unpredictable things have been election wise, until the ballots are banked, I try to keep my eyes open.

I don't think showing a Republican candidate with a sizable lead will depress Republican turnout. I think it's far more likely to depress Democrat turnout, because they seem much more prone to getting easily discouraged. It's not like the Democratic Party has great standing right now to motivate voters to vote for them either.

That being said, it still wouldn't surprise me if somehow McAuliffe won. Virginia isn't California though, so he could easily get voted out in a couple weeks.

All I can say there is Californians deserve Gavin. They had the perfect opportunity and they blew it. Fuck that state.

 

[Honka Honka Burning Love]

but they fight for what they believe in.

Lining their pockets?

 

[Celebrate Nite]

Glenn Greenwald: Debut Live and Q&A

Q&A starts 8pm ET Join my Locals community here: https://greenwald.locals.com

rumble.com

Glenn Greenwald doing some good work talking with viewers on Rumble. Reject big tech. Support alternatives!

I agree, you should support alternatives... but not Rumble

In order to upload videos on their site you need to verify your account first by giving them a mobile number.

It's the complete opposite of Bitchute in which you can just start uploading videos immediately. Only way they would have your personal info is if you donate to them on subscribestar, and even then they take bitcoin.

 

[Kane Lives]

Lining their pockets?

Don't forget bombing brown people for their oil and overthrowing foreign governments to install their own puppets.

 

[Gehenna]

And today brought the final proof of the Democrat Civil War. The delay on the vote after announcing it was going through shows that the Progs actually have sheered off and are holding up the bill. Not just Manchin. What is worse, these two groups are irreconcilable.

 

[Linkola's IT Guy]

Lining their pockets?

Yes. Their goal is to empower Zionism, the military, and the 0.1%, and they publicly support policies to accomplish this (although they don't admit that's their goal). Tucker also wants to enrich himself and these interests but publicly claims to support populist policies that would not accomplish that. That's why I think he's less honest than the neocons.

 

[Getting tard comed]

And today brought the final proof of the Democrat Civil War. The delay on the vote after announcing it was going through shows that the Progs actually have sheered off and are holding up the bill. Not just Manchin. What is worse, these two groups are irreconcilable.

Thanks for posting this. I got a notification that the infrastructure bill was a go, that they were going to vote on Thursday(today) and then nothing. Wasn't sure if that meant next Thursday or if they failed to pass it today.

 

[Honka Honka Burning Love]

Yes. Their goal is to empower Zionism, the military, and the 0.1%, and they publicly support policies to accomplish this (although they don't admit that's their goal). Tucker also wants to enrich himself and these interests but publicly claims to support populist policies that would not accomplish that. That's why I think he's less honest than the neocons.

That is the dumbest shit.

Their goal is to make themselves rich, if they could get an extra penny in their bank account they would kill all the Jews, the Military and any other .1%

 

[Gehenna]

By the way, while considering the importance of this I have a few things to add.

1: It was -not- AOC that they went to, to confirm the progressive caucus vote. Proof of what I said earlier that the forced vote on the Iron Dome was the death blow to her as controlled opposition.
2: The new leader appears to be an interim one, but that they could agree on one is bad for the Establishment. She reported back to her caucus rather than deciding on the spot, but in the end they did nix it.
3: This was -really bad- for Pelosi. It's more or less the final blow to her being Speaker. Push came to shove, and when she tried to force the votes she failed. What she wants from now on is irrelevant, no matter the lip service paid.
4: There is no way to reconcile Manchin and the Progs. There was some worthy debate as to if the Progs would actually block the bill, many said that they were doing it for show. Well, they weren't. The bill would not have been 'delayed' if they weren't set to vote against it, Pelosi tried to call their bluff and it turned out to not be a bluff.

 

[Least Concern]

If Dems lose the House, I can't not see Biden being impeached after Democrats abused the process and impeached Trump twice.

I hope they don't bother unless they have the votes to actually convict. The two Trump impeachments without convictions allowed them to claim Trump was the MOST IMPEACHED PRESIDENT IN HISTORY!!!! but without convictions it didn't actually achieve anything and they knew it wouldn't going into it. The whole thing was a theatrical waste of time.