- Joined
- Jun 23, 2021
So?If they are living the good life now,doesnt mean it will go on that same route when shes gone.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So?If they are living the good life now,doesnt mean it will go on that same route when shes gone.
So that's fucking irresponsible of her.
Sez you? What do you base that on?So that's fucking irresponsible of her.
I base that on adopting bunch of helpless children when you yourself are on a verge of death lolSez you? What do you base that on?
They hardly look on the verge of death. Even if it's only another 15-20 years they live, those children will be adults and will have 15-20 years for theise parents to get them in better places to either take care of themselves or find places that can take care of them without them going back into the system. There are blind people who live independently, or in almost so. You do realize people can live well into their 90's these days, right? There's no saying that they're going to die early.I base that on adopting bunch of helpless children when you yourself are on a verge of death lol
I dont think theres any independency for the hardcore autism half these kids have.Ofcourse the adoptive parents could live well in the 90S but that doesnt mean they will have energy nor willpower to be caregivers,when they could very likely need the help themselves by that time.They hardly look on the verge of death. Even if it's only another 15-20 years they live, those children will be adults and will have 15-20 years for theise parents to get them in better places to either take care of themselves or find places that can take care of them without them going back into the system. There are blind people who live independently, or in almost so. You do realize people can live well into their 90's these days, right? There's no saying that they're going to die early.
First of all, this is Tard Baby General. Perhaps you should read the thread before posting, because blind kids with autism don’t exactly count.I dont think theres any independency for the hardcore autism half these kids have.Ofcourse the adoptive parents could live well in the 90S but that doesnt mean they will have energy nor willpower to be caregivers,when they could very likely need the help themselves by that time.
and i have news for youFirst of all, this is Tard Baby General. Perhaps you should read the thread before posting, because blind kids with autism don’t exactly count.
Secondly, do you think their bio parents would live forever? Because obviously they wouldn’t, and we’re back in the same situation. Or do you just think they should of stayed in the system? I have news for you. No one else wanted these kids. If you want to be angry about a nice couple who decided to give these children a home and stability, that’s your problem. And it’s pretty fucked up, might I add.
Inb4 Spergatory
Again, so what? You keep saying it's "cruel" and "irresponsible" to give these kids a good life now because someday their guardians will die, uh duh, like what kind of drooling pinhead "logic" is that?as soon as the momma ascends to our lord and savior Jazzu most of these kids will be ripped out from ''home and stability'' and placed in a care home
and they will will be back to the system and treated just as bad before they adopted them..Whats the point?Two years ago they discussed all the plans they have been putting in place for their children in the event of their death:
Most of these children were adopted from orphanages because they were abandoned and they have videos showing how they children were when she got them and not all of them were being treated well.
If you watch the video you will see they are putting the supports in place before their deaths so that the children will have living situations and services set up and in place already that they have been able to look into, etc.and they will will be back to the system and treated just as bad before they adopted them..Whats the point?
You have no point. You are angry for some reason over an older woman adopting special needs children. That’s it. Even when others have tried to calmly explain to you that the couple has a plan in place.Thats the whole point i was trying to put across
It’s not. Go back and read about Tinslee, the Hartley Hooligans, Luna, etc., and then try to tell me this is somehow the same..and i think this is pretty relevant to this thread
Again, so what? You keep saying it's "cruel" and "irresponsible" to give these kids a good life now because someday their guardians will die, uh duh, like what kind of drooling pinhead "logic" is that?
and what plan is that? assigning them an attorney? i dont think he will be bothered enough to do anything more than put them in a government care.You have no point. You are angry for some reason over an older woman adopting special needs children. That’s it. Even when others have tried to calmly explain to you that the couple has a plan in place.
It’s not. Go back and read about Tinslee, the Hartley Hooligans, Luna, etc., and then try to tell me this is somehow the same.
Yes, but as others have stated, why risk infection in a medically fragile child.... unless you're trying to move things along.It’s a cultural thing down there
Sick/disabled kid + jesusfreak + MLM = social media trash trifecta. The ultimate manipulator.PrayersforPaisley is doubling down on her Monat stuff and is trying to fight the fact there are multiple lawsuits about hair loss, etc.
View attachment 2671316
So what would YOU recommend? Leaving those children in the orphanages?and what plan is that? assigning them an attorney? i dont think he will be bothered enough to do anything more than put them in a government care.
Even if true, sing it with me if you know the words, so what? What's your reasoning for thinking they shouldn't have as good a life as possible now, just because their current guardians will inevitably die?i dont think he will be bothered enough to do anything more than put them in a government care.
Well some "visits" care would have worked for them.Like they come visit every so often,but dont get too attached,and therefore dont have to be taken from their usual environment and once again having to adapt all over to the life without help..You know like son coming back for Christmas to visit famSo what would YOU recommend? Leaving those children in the orphanages?
I shouldnt refuse myself some steak.I can live without steak because I have tasted other foods and have my way around But shes the only only food they ever tasted.Shes the steak that's keeping them alive.They dont have capabilities nor skills to cook anything else if we are going by your exampleEven if true, sing it with me if you know the words, so what? What's your reasoning for thinking they shouldn't have as good a life as possible now, just because their current guardians will inevitably die?
Someday, if you're lucky, you'll get old and all your teeth will fall out and you won't be able to enjoy a juicy steak anymore. So you shouldn't have any steak now, or ever. Because what's the point, according to you.