🐱 Men with ‘golden penis syndrome’ are ruining sex and dating for women

CatParty


Beware of the college grad cad!

Men with college degrees have become so cocky that they’re ruining romance for their female counterparts, one “leading expert” alleges.

Just 40.5% of college students in the United States are male, according to the National Student Clearinghouse, meaning they’re in short supply and high demand when dating on campus.

A lack of competition has led these men to develop “golden penis syndrome” — an arrogance that stems from the assumption that a steady supply of females will be sexually interested in them.

“Golden penis syndrome” has led these smug males to engage in dastardly dating practices, such as cheating and ghosting, because they’re confident that another woman will always be waiting around the corner.

The term was purportedly coined by frustrated female students at Sarah Lawrence College in upstate New York — where three-quarters of all enrollees are the fairer sex.

Journalist Jon Birger believes many college-educated men in their 20s, 30s and 40s have also developed GPS because they’re similarly in high demand when it comes to dating.


“The sex ratios among college-educated, hetero singles in Manhattan is approximately three women for every two men. I’ve interviewed a lot of men who were continuing to take advantage of that imbalance,” Birger told Mel Magazine.

“[And] 1981 was the last time that four-year colleges in the US graduated more men than women. Ever since, women have been leaving men in the educational dust.”

Birger — who penned the best-selling book “Date-onomics: How Dating Became a Lopsided Numbers Game” — further explained to the Daily Mail: “We’re seeing a generation of young men who think they’re Adam Driver or Michael B. Jordan. Of course, it’s not about them. It’s the ratio.”

He continued: “When men are in undersupply, the dating culture becomes less monogamous — men are more likely to treat women as sex objects and treat relationships as disposable.”

Not only are men with “golden penis syndrome” more likely to treat their dates badly, they may also be less inclined to put effort into their physical appearance and their sexual performances.

Birger previously spoke with The Post, declaring that dating was particularly dire for heterosexual women in New York.

College-educated women are more likely to date among their own milieu of college-educated men, but as their numbers are so skewed, they’re in for a rougher time.

Birger told The Post that the imbalance is also exacerbated by New York’s large population of gay males. Some 9 to 12 percent of men in Manhattan are gay, according to Gary Gates, a demographics expert at UCLA’s Williams Institute.

But Birger had some trusty advice for female singletons seeking to settle down: Be cautious of the college-grad cads.

“I would be wary of guys who have remained never-married into their late 30s and 40s,” he explained to Daily Mail. “Especially the better-looking ones with good jobs. These men are having too much fun playing the field.”

He also advises women to be assertive when pursing romance, stating: “Fact is, men like women who like them. Also, a man is much less likely to take advantage of a woman who puts herself out there.”
 
Is there a version to calculate how deluded I am? I would like a woman 21-35, no kids, no drugs, not obese, no tattoos or facial piercings, politically conservative or moderate. I'm guessing 4/5 (video game enthusiast).
If you find someone like that, she's going to turn out to be an axe murderer.
 
Eh. This probably won't affect you much if you don't date low-quality guys in the first place. By that I mean men who are not the monogamous type, super impulsive guys that don't know what they want, and all the other obvious red flags that would make forming a stable relationship difficult. The guys of good character will still show good character. Focus on being a woman of good character yourself and you'll have no problem attracting good men, even when supply is low--because you'll be in-demand among those men, too.

also don't be fat
 
Eh. This probably won't affect you much if you don't date low-quality guys in the first place. By that I mean men who are not the monogamous type, super impulsive guys that don't know what they want, and all the other obvious red flags that would make forming a stable relationship difficult. The guys of good character will still show good character. Focus on being a woman of good character yourself and you'll have no problem attracting good men, even when supply is low--because you'll be in-demand among those men, too.
Problem is women aren't looking for good character. If they were we wouldn't be having this conversation. They want status and money that's it. Women could give a rats ass about character.
 
Problem is women aren't looking for good character. If they were we wouldn't be having this conversation. They want status and money that's it. Women could give a rats ass about character.
Then they get fat/stop taking care of themselves, let their sex-drive die, stop putting anything into the relationship, spend all the money, and wonder why the guy cheats on them.

They wonder why they feel empty even though they have money and status.

They wonder what that fat Latina girl that their husband is fucking the shit out of has that they don't.

So they just ramp up the bitchiness and cattiness and write shitty articles for feminist rags about how it's all the men's fault.
 
Eh. This probably won't affect you much if you don't date low-quality guys in the first place. By that I mean men who are not the monogamous type, super impulsive guys that don't know what they want, and all the other obvious red flags that would make forming a stable relationship difficult. The guys of good character will still show good character. Focus on being a woman of good character yourself and you'll have no problem attracting good men, even when supply is low--because you'll be in-demand among those men, too.

also don't be fat
They want a man with good character while also have a Cluster-B Personality Disorder bad boy attitude. These two things are mutually contradictory.
 
Then they get fat/stop taking care of themselves, let their sex-drive die, stop putting anything into the relationship, spend all the money, and wonder why the guy cheats on them.

They wonder why they feel empty even though they have money and status.

They wonder what that fat Latina girl that their husband is fucking the shit out of has that they don't.

So they just ramp up the bitchiness and cattiness and write shitty articles for feminist rags about how it's all the men's fault.
It's those rich housewife cancertoks.

"Being provided for is boring! I want my own business but my rich partner keeps saying I don't understand business. He's scared I'll leave him. He never wants to spend money."

Maybe marrying for happiness and pleasure was a mistake
They want a man with good character while also have a Cluster-B Personality Disorder bad boy attitude. These two things are mutually contradictory.
This too. Every female fantasy. He's a bad boy that is secretly sensitive and caring. He rapes because he loves. The inverse is simp boi joe of (you) loved because he stalks tinder whores and kills the situationships she feels use them

I once read a fanfic with the 1st type of character as the MC but it distinguished itself in displaying how fucked up and broken a person like that would actually be. The anti-social personality being a coping mechanism as well as his usual behavior to protect himself from his experiences and growing realization that he's an unnatural, maladjusted, petty asshole who never got to be a kid.

It was written by a man of course.
 
Yeah based on my dating experience it'd be easier to find a unicorn. Hell my standards are not morbidly obese, doesn't have kids, not a drug addict/alcoholic, kinda cute and i can't find a date.
In a different perspective, it'd be easier to acquire an exotic car like a Gallaro or V12 Vanquish than to find a decent date.
 
If you find someone like that, she's going to turn out to be an axe murderer.
Neah, it'd be chainsaws and cement. It's $CURRENT_YEAR, we've got access to power tools to do the job faster and substances to... Let's call it assistance with preservation and creative positioning...

E: 2/5 here, but I assume it'll jump to 5/5 if I throw in shit like personality, politics, and... Non-cowishness.
 
Last edited:
Yeah based on my dating experience it'd be easier to find a unicorn. Hell my standards are not morbidly obese, doesn't have kids, not a drug addict/alcoholic, kinda cute and i can't find a date.
I actually overstated my standards because I'd be ashamed to admit how low they really are, and even my real standards are evidently too much. And based on that female delusion calculator, I'm apparently in the top 3% of men. I don't feel like I am, though. I think it's missing a few factors ... looks, obviously, and "income" should be replaced with spending. Income doesn't matter if it's diverted to (or generated in) retirement accounts as it doesn't fund one's current lifestyle. I guess I can look forward to buying a hacienda and a bunch of Latin American hookers when I turn 59 1/2, so that's nice.

In a different perspective, it'd be easier to acquire an exotic car like a Gallaro or V12 Vanquish than to find a decent date.
Last time I looked, the market was saturated with Gallardos. You can find one of those or a Ferrari with deferred maintenance relatively cheap. And you can work on that Ferrari to get it back up to spec, replace the belts and the gummy buttons and whatnot. It won't yell and scream at you like a woman does when you try to yank out her nose rings, laser off her tats, and starve her down from obese to merely curvy.
 
Last edited:
didn't they use to have home economics degrees for women back in the day?

wonder where those all went.
They also used to teach it in high schools once upon a time, to both men and women. It taught basic life skills like cooking, how to do a budget, and other general household management. Getting rid of such things in school has proven to be a disaster for both genders. That type of stuff should be taught to fucking everyone.
 
They also used to teach it in high schools once upon a time, to both men and women. It taught basic life skills like cooking, how to do a budget, and other general household management. Getting rid of such things in school has proven to be a disaster for both genders. That type of stuff should be taught to fucking everyone.
What's funny is that I keep seeing this weird self-destructive mental loop in a looot of American Women/Girls.

>Decry cooking as sexist
>Want man that's a good cook
>Try to fight men that are good cooks with their shit cooking.
>Get butthurt over a lack of women in the professional culinary world
>Get absolutely butthurt when they hear men say women (and everyone) should know how to cook
>Cycle repeats itself ad infinitum, in hilarity. It's like a schizophrenic beehive.


Half the time they can't decide if it's a symbol of womanly pride or a sexist and patriarchal symbol of oppression.
 
Ghosting is not a crime
Let's be honest. The reason a man ghosts a woman are simple.
1. He can do better.
and/or
2. She gave it up too easily.
I can't even believe it needs to be said in current year, but a man who is 'non-exclusive' and isn't willing to wait to seal the deal is not relationship material.
That said, by age 25, most women have had enough latex inside them to reskin the Goodyear blimp... but that puts them squarely in both categories.
 
That's lottery ticket territory there mang.
It happens, but in the slim chances she fits all those categories she is almost ALWAYS mental or has a big issue with being defiant and annoying as shit. It really becomes a point in this day and age of choosing the lesser of the two evils I guess. Sucks really because dating standards have fallen this far.
 
I have to love how Tinder style dating has helped show a ton of women how the most valued men can get with women with ease and that they don't view most women as worth jack shit. Too many women get a huge ego because they figure if a high value guy sleeps with them that it means they themselves must be high value, when guys do not place that much value on who they have sex with.

Majority of women seem to want to treat relationships like some Disney ride they just hop on and enjoy the little story that plays out with everything being taken care of for them. Makes me feel like the gym bunnies working out to look good as trophy wives are the most cynical bunch, noticing that the main reason they have an easy life being the trophy wife is because of their looks and so they work on that shit. Have a relative that had been hard of hearing so would do conversations on their phone with speaker phone and got to hear some of these women just openly talk about this stuff, still wild to me how frank women can be about this stuff.
 
Back