Kyle Rittenhouse Legal Proceedings - Come for the trial, stay for….

[murdered meat bag]

If none of the videos are evidence, why are they showing them? Are they just going to tell the jurors, "none of this matters pretend you never seen it" ? lol

a foul for the defense. but i don't know if the videos do any damage or good to kyle's case. if you're watching them for the first time, what're you ultimately going to conclude from it?

 

[Art Kassul]

Rittenhouse Prosecutor Told Police Not to Execute Search Warrant Signed By Judge To View Grosskreutz's Cell Phone - Kenosha County Eye

Gaige Grosskreutz On August 25th, 2020, Kyle Rittenhouse shot three men in self-defense. The third man shot was Gaige Grosskreutz, a career criminal. He survived the shooting but district attorney Mike Gravely (D) ordered that Read more…

kenoshacountyeye.com

Rittenhouse Prosecutor Told Police Not to Execute Search Warrant Signed By Judge To View Grosskreutz’s Cell Phone​

The Wisconsin Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers said that “MARSY’S LAW CREATES UNFUNDED GOVERNMENT MANDATES THAT JEOPARDIZE CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS“

The Wisconsin Justice Initiative said “In reality the proposal, called “Marsy’s Law,” pushes the criminal justice system and the legal process so far to the prosecution’s side that violates the U.S. Constitution, interferes with law enforcement’s ability to provide information that members of the public need to better protect their safety, and be costly to local taxpayers to implement. Milwaukee County District Attorney John Chisholm called Marsy’s Law an “unfunded mandate.”

It is believed that Rittenhouse prosecutor T. Clair Binger did not want Gaiges activities from that night available to the defense. He is grossly and intentionally mis-applying Marsy’s law. Grosskreutz is a career Criminal and it’s a possiblity he came to Kenosha that night looking for trouble. He found it.

 

[AnOminous]

Rittenhouse Prosecutor Told Police Not to Execute Search Warrant Signed By Judge To View Grosskreutz's Cell Phone - Kenosha County Eye

Gaige Grosskreutz On August 25th, 2020, Kyle Rittenhouse shot three men in self-defense. The third man shot was Gaige Grosskreutz, a career criminal. He survived the shooting but district attorney Mike Gravely (D) ordered that Read more…

kenoshacountyeye.com

Rittenhouse Prosecutor Told Police Not to Execute Search Warrant Signed By Judge To View Grosskreutz’s Cell Phone​

Sounds like an indirect way of refusing to hand over Brady materials. Have access to them, but refuse actually to acquire them.

 

[Sheryl Nome]

he's not an expert witness and none of the videos are evidence.

The videos are evidence at you dumb?

 

[murdered meat bag]

The videos are evidence at you dumb?

they haven't been submitted yet as evidence. yeah, defense fucked up hard yesterday.

 

[Meat Target]

I'm glad to see more objections today.

 

[JohnDoe]

Sounds like an indirect way of refusing to hand over Brady materials. Have access to them, but refuse actually to acquire them.

I hope that Richards has been drafting a motion to dismiss this entire time, adding all these tidbits in as we go. I think there will be enough to ask for dismissal with prejudice due to all this obvious prosecutorial misconduct. This judge might just be the one that would grant it.

 

[murdered meat bag]

I hope that Richards has been drafting a motion to dismiss this entire time, adding all these tidbits in as we go. I think there will be enough to ask for dismissal with prejudice due to all this obvious prosecutorial misconduct. This judge might just be the one that would grant it.

is mtd like a mistrial?

 

[waffle]

Sounds like an indirect way of refusing to hand over Brady materials. Have access to them, but refuse actually to acquire them.

It's clearly an attempted to circumvent Brady by not getting all the info that was on his phone about the hood shit he was doing with skateboard man all night.

 

[murdered meat bag]

Detective is stumbling. Richard's found his groove.

 

[waffle]

I hope that Richards has been drafting a motion to dismiss this entire time, adding all these tidbits in as we go. I think there will be enough to ask for dismissal with prejudice due to all this obvious prosecutorial misconduct. This judge might just be the one that would grant it.

A jury panel has been sat, so the only options are mistrial and dismissal with prejudice.

The judge is pretty tired of the prosecutor already, if shit keeps pileing up this is the kind of judge that might actually dismiss a case due to state misconduct.

 

[AnOminous]

is mtd like a mistrial?

A mistrial results in dismissing the case, so yes. If he is, though, it's even more important to have objections on the record because if the appeals court has to look at this, their first question is going to be what the defense did to object. You can't just let the other side wander into a mistrial on purpose while doing nothing.

The judge is pretty tired of the prosecutor already, if shit keeps pileing up this is the kind of judge that might actually dismiss a case due to state misconduct.

To be charitable, with the judge actually objecting, the defense could claim they didn't object specifically because the judge had already admonished the defense for X, Y, Z, so it would have been redundant and futile. Just spitballing that, there could be legitimate strategic reasons for not objecting.

 

[reinigen]

is mtd like a mistrial?

Different. Mistrial is someone fucked up, but the prosecution gets another chance if they want. Motion to Dismiss is the judge basically going, "The prosecution shit the bed proving the case so hard, the defense doesn't even have to go. Not-guilty".

 

[Sheryl Nome]

they haven't been submitted yet as evidence. yeah, defense fucked up hard yesterday.

They 100% have, this material was absolutely all stipulated to

 

[Prj4MW8iPT3vmFM2rzDc]

awwwwwh shit, richie mcginnis, its showtime boys

 

[Sheryl Nome]

McGinnis, now this should be good

 

[Pizza Munch]

Defense did well finishing up that detective I think.. implying that the prosecution was helping him through his testimony

 

[murdered meat bag]

Defense did well finishing up that detective I think.. implying that the prosecution was helping him through his testimony

risky move. since i can rewind i can see that pross looked down and up read quick but it wasnt a nod.

maybe it played in court.

it definitely worked with black, but if he keeps it up hes going to be a loon.

 

[Meat Target]

So, McGinnis is a complaining witness? Is The Daily Caller stabbing Kyle in the back?

 

[mr.moon1488]

Sounds like an indirect way of refusing to hand over Brady materials. Have access to them, but refuse actually to acquire them.

I'm pretty sure there was a supreme court case that came later which said that that practice also constitutes a Brady violation.

Edit:
Can't find any cases that explicitly state this, but Kyles v. Whitley (1995) makes it sound like it would be a Brady violation because if there is a "reasonable probability" that evidence would be favorable to the defense, it has to be turned over. The case was similar in nature where the police never really bothered to investigate an informant further who was providing information on the defendant.