Chantal Sarault / Chantal Al-Refae / Foodie Beauty - Delusional drug fiend hamplanet mukbanger from Canada trying to be a glamorous online influencer. Pathological liar, huge bitch, narcissist, animal abuser

chantelerf.jpg

She has aged so much, and I can't get over what he did to her hairline. This looks like a mugshot of someone arrested for DUI.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Winner
Reactions: Bubbafat, Fattydingdong, itunes and 142 others
Beautiful Gunt said:
View attachment 2688728
Just a cute picture 😍
Click to expand...

Jesus tapdancing Christ!

* Doughy, zitty, blackhead-addled face complete with pubes coming along nicely on the Flemish Giant Dewlap
* Cat hairs? Gray hairs? Green dick hairs?
* Is that... dandruff?
* Maybe it's... cat litter
* Crusty, days old unscooped cat litter

TrainWreckSpotter said:
Being forced to shower and eat only whatever food was served to her.
Click to expand...

Eh, she'd "fortify" with zoo zoos and wham whams off commissary. Worse if Aramark has the iCare program in the jail since it does Aramark junk food.
 
  • Like
  • Winner
Reactions: TomboyGF, Rem Farms, Extra Dainty Gorl and 11 others
shameful existence said:
I really must go she announces as she's finishing her clown face
chat goes wild because she's very high
I'm not going anywhere you guise!
chat expresses doubts
I mean, I have a taxi app on my phone.
chat still not happy
I mean, I'll take a nap before going anywhere.
chat points out that's the fourth version of her plans
So call the cops, I don't give a shit. You're not hurting me, you're hurting people who pay taxes. :story:

View attachment 2689074
Click to expand...
Chantal shouldn't be so cocky. Her audience has proven to her time and time again that they absolutely will call the police, animal control, her leasing office, and whoever else they deem necessary (or lulzy). She's forgetting that - unlike before - Nader's actual address is now known and confirmed. She was (allegedly) fine with the police showing up over and over again, but will Nader be fine with it? Can he expect the same treatment from the police in his province? Can he expect the same treatment as a convicted felon on probation? Will the caller simply call the police and tell them that Chantal was driving high? Or will the caller tell them that it's a DV situation and that he possibly raped someone last week? Will he be mad if they show up, and will he take it out on her tits? Who knows, but provoking people to call the authorities is pretty stupid on her part.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Optimistic
Reactions: BestUserName, GrumbleBum2, WTF am I Watching and 55 others
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Feels
Reactions: TomboyGF, DopeAddictKittenV2, Dead Red and 30 others
shameful existence said:
I really must go she announces as she's finishing her clown face
chat goes wild because she's very high
I'm not going anywhere you guise!
chat expresses doubts
I mean, I have a taxi app on my phone.
chat still not happy
I mean, I'll take a nap before going anywhere.
chat points out that's the fourth version of her plans
So call the cops, I don't give a shit. You're not hurting me, you're hurting people who pay taxes. :story:
Click to expand...

A beautiful illustration of her eternal tone deafness. And this is why she is killing her livelihood softly:

Let's put ourselves in the shoes of the Beezers for a moment, shall we? We are VIBs, and we really like her. We consider her a wacky girl who is always fun to chill with, who is witty and self-effacing and generous and beautiful, We even, to some extent, consider her a "friend". Presumably, this is what the VIBs pay for, right?

So let's think about the ending of that stream for a moment. People saying, "please don't drive", "call an Uber", "it's not out of hate, just concern", "don't take a chance". Isn't this what a responsible real friend would say to a friend who was under the influence? Maybe we let the friend assure us he is ok, or maybe we succeed in convincing the friend. But saying such things is not meant as an admonishment or scolding; it is a logical response to mitigate risk in a situation with elevated dangers, and it puts the responsible friend in an uncomfortable spot sometimes. But it is a fairly normal friendly response.

If we believed that we had a special relationship with Chantal, and that she was a friend, and she really is the cool girl we believe her to be, then of course, we'd be concerned enough to make such comments.

So how does she respond? With anger and spite and insults, calling the concerned Beezers "worse than my parents", lying to their faces, using a sassy tone of voice, and making up bogus laws on the spot.

If you were a Beezer, wouldn't this really put a bad taste in your mouth? Wouldn't you feel somewhat offended that your natural impulse towards friendly concern is met with a demeaning response from your idol?

I dunno, maybe I am a softy, but it would me.


So how does this affect her channel?

Her overall new subscription rate is the most stagnant of her career; it is abysmal for a channel of her size with all the hype surrounding it.

To illustrate:

Nov. 4, 2021: 88,300 subs
Jan. 5, 2021: 83, 200 subs

She gained only 5,100 subs all year, with all the drama. And subbing is pretty usual for viewers of livestreamers because you want to get the notifications of lives. So this growth is really awful because going all-livestream should have resulted in tons of subs (which, of course is dependent on content, which is where she falls short, although her shenanigans offline have not helped her either), and it completely hasn't.

To put that into sharper relief, consider this: at her current rate of sub growth, it will take her 16 years to gain 88.3K subs, a task that only took her 4 years. That is not good.

Without significant growth in subscribers, there will never be significant growth in VIBs. The ones she has will naturally dwindle due to attrition, but the pool for replacement new ones has dried up into a puddle. So when she offends her VIBs or scares them away by putting Nader in her videos, she is doing herself serious harm that isn't felt immediately, but will become debilitating in a year or two (at the longest). She won't even understand why her check will get smaller and smaller, but unless she changes course it absolutely will. She needs those Beezers a lot more than she realizes. She needs them to stick around for years, because the pickings are getting slimmer and slimmer. Compounding this is the fact that pissed off Beezers get stingy with Superchats too.

But no, she'll just be a lying, dismissive, mean bitch to her "friends".

Yes, they are dumb and they take a lot of abuse. But math is not on Clotso's side in this, and there's always another more fun livestreamer that they can watch without all the excess baggage,



The longer the Nader era lasts, the more decisive will be the downfall of her livelihood and riches. At her age, once you get to be a drag there isn't much hope of a comeback. And while she will retain most of her freakshow-viewers, their growth rate has slowed too and most of them don't watch ads or buy Beezerships. She really needs to keep selling those Beezerships. Judging from the views on her uploaded static videos lately, she no longer gets enough viewers with uploads to keep her in the style to which she is accustomed. So it has to be livestreams and VIBs, and there needs to be growth.

So far she has pissed them off regarding drugs, Nader, the "rape", dui, the cats, Peetz, abuse, and lots more. She is really testing them, and one must never test one's good fortune because it makes it turn bad faster.

Haters have reason to be cheerful these days. VIBs really don't.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Winner
  • Informative
Reactions: lurking for the deets, BestUserName, Blah Blah Blah and 121 others
kookie said:
Surely with no ovaries/uterus she can't get 'all hormonal' ???
More like she's just fucking nuts and withdrawals/coming down from something.
Click to expand...
The endocrine system controls the production and secretion of hormones, not the uterus. And while the ovaries do produce hormones, they are just part of the endocrine system in women, not the whole thing. But you are still correct, she is def fucking nuts and on the come down damn near constantly.

Edited to clarify role of ovaries in the endocrine system bc I'm annoying af.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Informative
  • Agree
Reactions: GrumbleBum2, TomboyGF, paaassta and 48 others
Chunky Drunky Junky Monky said:
I seem to recall she also said Karate Joe was hot so I think we can safely discard her opinion in this matter.

"I don't eat THAT much" Chantal Sarault 2021. <- Still my fav quote to date.
Click to expand...
True, but I doubt she actually thought he was hot…Chantal just labels any male attention as being from a total hottie. The delivery boy was hot, the male nurse was hot, the man moving box mountain was hot.

If Chantal interacts with a man she is sure her followers will never actually see in person, she automatically calls them hot and claims they “want her.” It’s her dimwit way of showing off and claiming to be surrounded by attractive men. So I can see her thinking no one in chat would ever see KJoe’s hideous pedo face, thus she can safely label him hot and show the world that see??? Hot guys totally talk to her!! They all want her!
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: GrumbleBum2, TomboyGF, paaassta and 60 others
AbraCadaver said:
True, but I doubt she actually thought he was hot…Chantal just labels any male attention as being from a total hottie. The delivery boy was hot, the male nurse was hot, the man moving box mountain was hot.

If Chantal interacts with a man she is sure her followers will never actually see in person, she automatically calls them hot and claims they “want her.” It’s her dimwit way of showing off and claiming to be surrounded by attractive men. So I can see her thinking no one in chat would ever see KJoe’s hideous pedo face, thus she can safely label him hot and show the world that see??? Hot guys totally talk to her!! They all want her!
Click to expand...
This is why I will always be dying to see Nick's face.

I know some people even question the existence of Nick, but I 100% believe he was real. She was too giddy and losing her shit for the next three weeks after meeting him for it to be an act. (Also another reason to discredit her new story of meeting a FEW guys in her car right after Nick that we never heard about). And she can't remember any of these guys' names.....

P.s. She was 402 pounds at this point and literally couldn't turn her head to change lanes while driving. Many people were legitimately concerned. She wasn't bending down to suck anything. Her beachball stomach would have stopped that alone.

Long story short, I think Nick existed, had ok teeth (i.e. better than Stabby's), and looked like your average 39-year-old Walmart cashier.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Winner
Reactions: GrumbleBum2, Ebony Way, TomboyGF and 79 others
Darth Bino said:
Chantel's attempted re-write of past events makes no sense. She claims that her clinic had to call Nader to let him know that she had gonorrhea but she never got a call from his clinic therefore he may not have gonorrhea.
Click to expand...

For his clinic to call her, he would have to had offered up a list of his current and recent sexual partners. He probably flat out denied to do that, or denied having any, so they couldn’t contact anyone who would then go on to blame him for their STD.

Did Chantal tell her clinic about small wiener dude then? I presume he got a call about gonorrhea too? Or did she just name Nader?
 
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: TomboyGF, Muff Cabbage, irishlass and 25 others
See, here's the thing. All of her life Chantal expects that people HAVE to believe whatever she says, unless there is absolute stone-cold evidence that she is lying. She expects all her viewers to just sit there while she just lies non-stop and, unless you have proof otherwise, you are expected to swallow it. Pointing out that she has contradicted herself elsewhere, and all evidence is contradictory to what she is babbling about just gets, "Oh, I never said that. And if I did, I was either confused or exaggerating just a bit." "LYING?? Tell me what I lied about. When? Do you have proof?"

So, as her version of the truth unfolds, you must adapt to her world of ever-changing reality and wishful thinking.

With the venereal disease storyline, remember how she kept saying that she didn't have any "proof" that Nader had cheated on her? If she doesn't want to believe it, she won't. She doesn't want it to be true. So, because she doesn't have "proof" (as though there were some way to get the clap from "being dirty"), she insists that there WAS no cheating because Nader said so, and she doesn't have any proof otherwise. THEN she starts to manufacture "proof" that she is indeed the culprit with a blow job that she "forgot" to tell us about.

I would say she is insulting her fans' intelligence to the utmost, but then...

She can live in her fantasy world forever--as long as cold, hard reality doesn't interfere in the form of a diabetic coma, a rogue blood clot, a fiery car crash, or a steely knife from out favorite chef cook.

And I am getting tired of waiting.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Winner
Reactions: GrumbleBum2, TomboyGF, Painted Pig and 60 others
For those "mature" enough to remember, I present
"Ring around the collar, RING AROUND THE COLLAR

RingAroundTheCollar2.jpg




For you Whippersnappers, here is just one of the gloriously obnoxious filth-shaming commercials from back in the day:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZeakPcsccyY

I can't get over how revolting her skin is. Are those lumps ingrown hairs or is she sprouting facial warts like Shanny's?

Chinny.jpg
 
Last edited:
  • Horrifying
  • Like
  • Winner
Reactions: itunes, GrumbleBum2, Ebony Way and 77 others
Rasputin's Side Piece said:
I would say she is insulting her fans' intelligence to the utmost, but then...

She can live in her fantasy world forever--as long as cold, hard reality doesn't interfere in the form of a diabetic coma, a rogue blood clot, a fiery car crash, or a steely knife from out favorite chef cook.

And I am getting tired of waiting.
Click to expand...
I sometimes doubt whether she insults her audience’s intelligence on purpose. What she does IS insulting to anyone’s intelligence, but only as by-product of a different process.

It looks like a conflict of two worldviews. Ours, the prevailing one, is that “If it happened, it happened”. Hers, a rather unique one, is “If I don’t want it to have happened, it didn’t”. This “unhappening” of things is what she insists she has a right to do.

And she has every right to see and interpret the reality whichever way she prefers. Sure, we see that her approach is leading her straight into the hell of ill health and ruined relationships. Sooner or later, she’ll end up badly; she’s demonstrated clearly enough her inability to reverse this self-devised dynamics.

Sometimes it’s still funny to observe her spending so much energy trying to prove that what has been done can be either undone or “made to not have taken place at all”, at other times it’s annoying. Personally, I’m getting bored with the spectacle whose ending I know, I just don’t know the precise moment it’s going to end. I often sense that others are similarly tired – be it Kiwis, haydurs or VIBs.

Here comes the ending Chantal might not have envisaged yet. The ending that might be unbearable for a narcissist.

The audience’s INDIFFERENCE.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Winner
  • Agree
Reactions: GrumbleBum2, TomboyGF, Pantalaimon90 and 63 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back